Local gravity gradient noise

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Advertisements

Some ideas on ET1 site Adalberto Giazotto INFN Pisa- EGO.
Can we do Earthquake Early Warning with high- precision gravity strain meters? Pablo Ampuero (Caltech Seismolab) Collaborators: J. Harms (INFN, Italy),
Dennis Ugolini, Trinity University Bite of Science Session, TEP 2014 February 13, 2014 Catching the Gravitational Waves.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
Design study for 3rd generation interferometers Work Package 1 Site Identification Jo van den Brand
LIGO-G W Is there a future for LIGO underground? Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Atmospheric phase correction for ALMA Alison Stirling John Richer Richard Hills University of Cambridge Mark Holdaway NRAO Tucson.
1st ET General meeting, Pisa, November 2008 The ET sensitivity curve with ‘conventional‘ techniques Stefan Hild and Andreas Freise University of Birmingham.
Extending the North Atlantic Hurricane Record Using Seismic Noise Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Northwestern University American Geophysical.
Gravity Wave Detectors Riccardo DeSalvo - LIGO Gravity waves GW detectors Strain measurement, sensitivity Newtonian Noise How do we throw away your signal.
Gravitational Wave Detectors: new eyes for physics and astronomy Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University.
LISA STUDIES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO Michael J. Nickerson, Ellery B. Ames, John L. Hall, and Peter L. Bender JILA, University of Colorado and NIST,
FE model implementation of seismically driven GG noise in subterranean gravitational wave detectors David Rabeling, Eric Hennes, and Jo van den Brand
1 Kazuhiro Yamamoto Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Sezione di Padova Substrate thermoelastic noise and thermo-optic noise at low temperature in.
LIGO-G Z Gravity gradient studies Firenze, Pisa, Roma and Urbino Francesco Fidecaro, Pisa.
Z B Zhou, Y Z Bai, L Liu, D Y Tan, H Yin Center for Gravitational Experiments, School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science.
1 DUSEL and Gravitational Waves Vuk Mandic University of Minnesota 03/17/08.
New Low-Frequency GW Detector with Superconducting Instrumentation
L 21 – Vibration and Waves [ 2 ]
Bridging the Gap between Terrestrial Detectors and LISA Elba 2002 May 24, 2002 Seiji Kawamura National Astronomical Observatory of Japan.
Infrasounds and Background Free Oscillations Naoki Kobayashi [1] T. Kusumi and N. Suda [2] [1] Tokyo Tech [2] Hiroshima Univ.
State College May 2004 LIGO- Mining for IMBH Gravitational Waves Fabrizio Barone Enrico Campagna Yanbei Chen Giancarlo Cella Riccardo DeSalvo Seiji Kawamura.
DECIGO – Japanese Space Gravitational Wave Detector International Workshop on GPS Meteorology January 17, Tsukuba Center for Institutes Seiji Kawamura*
COMPARISON OF PARAMETER ESTIMATION BETWEEN ET-B AND ET-C SENSITIVITIES Tjonnie Li (Nikhef) 2 September ET F2F, Nice.
GWADW - La Biodola 20061/20 Underground reduction of Gravity Gradient Noise. Giancarlo Cella INFN sez. Pisa/Virgo GWADW – La Biodola 2006.
Gravitational Wave Observatories By: Matthew Fournier.
LIGO-G D Upper Limits on the Stochastic Background of Gravitational Waves from LIGO Vuk Mandic Einstein2005 Conference Paris, July
Newtonian Noise Mitigation with Tensor Gravitational Wave Detector
Motions of Self-Gravitating bodies to the Second Post- Newtonian Order of General Relativity.
1 Kazuhiro Yamamoto Institute for Cosmic Ray Research (ICRR) the University of Tokyo KAGRA face to face meeting University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan 3 August.
Deci-hertz Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (DECIGO) 7th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis Workshop December 17, International Institute.
Torsion Pendulum Dual Oscillator (TorPeDO) David McManus, Min Jet Yap, Robert Ward, Bram Slagmolen, Daniel Shaddock, David McClelland.
Space Gravitational Wave Antenna DECIGO Project 3rd TAMA Symposium February 7, Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, Japan Seiji Kawamura National.
GSFC  JPL Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) Time-Delay Interferometry with Moving Spacecraft Arrays Massimo Tinto Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California.
LOGO Gravitational Waves I.S.Jang Introduction Contents ii. Waves in general relativity iii. Gravitational wave detectors.
G. Cella I.N.F.N. Sezione di Pisa.  The mass density fluctuates..... ..... and the gravitational field will do the same Direct gravitational coupling.
SCM x330 Ocean Discovery through Technology Area F GE.
NOTA: Per modificare l'immagine su questa diapositiva, selezionarla ed eliminarla. Fare quindi clic sull'icona delle Immagini nel segnaposto per inserire.
GWADW Elba Setting the stage GWADW2011, La Biodola Francesco Fidecaro Pisa.
Michele Punturo INFN Perugia and EGO 1MGR13- ET.
Searches for Gravitational Waves Barry Barish Caltech IPA London – Aug 2014 “Merging Neutron Stars“ (Price & Rosswog)
Lessons to be learned from the ET design study Michele Punturo INFN Perugia ET-0005A-16 Dawn Meeting
Ho Jung Paik University of Maryland GW Astronomy, Korea August, 2016
Terrestrial Planet Finder - Coronagraph
Activities in the Homestake mine
Critical Technology Giant leaps Near-term steps Non-IFO methods
Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
GW Policy: The Future: G3 Detectors
The Search for Gravitational Waves with Advanced LIGO
Gravitational Waves: On the Brink of a New Astronomy
Gravity Wave Detectors Riccardo DeSalvo - LIGO
8th January 2008 Taitung workshop Sachie Shiomi
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
Speculations about Newtonian-Noise Filtering
(Superconducting Omni-directional Gravitational Radiation Observatory)
GW150914: The first direct detection of gravitational waves
Spokesperson, LIGO Scientific Collaboration
Quantum noise reduction techniques for the Einstein telescope
12th Marcel Grossman Meeting,
Ho Jung Paik University of Maryland GW Astronomy, Korea August, 2016
Polarization Effects on Column CO2 Retrievals from Non-Nadir Satellite Measurements in the Short-Wave Infrared Vijay Natraj1, Hartmut Bösch2, Robert J.D.
Advanced LIGO Quantum noise everywhere
Gravity gradient studies
Newtonian Noise Mitigation by Using Superconducting Gravity Gradiometers Ho Jung Paik Department of Physics University of Maryland ICGAC-XIII, Seoul.
Polarization Effects on Column CO2 Retrievals from Non-Nadir Satellite Measurements in the Short-Wave Infrared Vijay Natraj1, Hartmut Bösch2, Robert J.D.
Ho Jung Paik University of Maryland E-GRAAL January 10, 2018
WG2 Machine learning for low frequency seismology
The ET sensitivity curve with ‘conventional‘ techniques
Frequencies-Sensitivities Low vs High
Presentation transcript:

Local gravity gradient noise (Newtonian Noise) Donatella Fioruccia, Jan Harmsb, Matteo Barsugliaa aAstroparticule et Cosmologie (APC) b Gran Sasso Science Institute (GSSI) EGRAAL Meeting 10/01/2018

Einstein Telescope (ET) Newtonian Noise frequency range in different detectors Frequency range ≈ 10Hz – 20Hz aLIGO, AdVirgo, KAGRA Einstein Telescope (ET) Cosmic Explorer (CE) Frequency range ≈ 1Hz – 20Hz Torsion bar antennas (TOBA, TORPEDO) and other low frequency detectors (atom interferometers, surconducting gradiometers) Frequency range ≈ 10 mHz-1Hz EGRAAL Meeting 10/01/2018

Temperature fluctuations 2, 3 Newtonian Noise (NN) δT Infrasound waves 1, 2, 3 v(t) r(t) Temperature fluctuations 2, 3 m Seismic waves 1, 2 1 Saulson Phys. Rev. D 30, 732, 2 J. Harms Terrestrial Gravity Fluctuations, 3 Creigthon CQG. 25 (2008) 125011, C.Cafaro, S. A. Ali arXiv:0906.4844 [gr-qc]

Infrasound vs seismic NN * Seismic NN does not limit the target sensitivity of the next-generation gradiometers * EGRAAL Meeting 10/01/2018 Harms et al. Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013)

Atmospheric NN Infrasound NN NN due to temperature fluctuations - Model - Measurement of pressure fluctuations at the Advanced Virgo (AdV) site - AdV infrasound NN - ET infrasound NN - Torsion bar antenna infrasound NN NN due to temperature fluctuations - Laser interferometers (ET case) - Torsion bar antenna EGRAAL Meeting 10/01/2018

Infrasound NN modeling Equation 1 Relation between pressure and density perturbations Equation 2 Gravity potential perturbation * Measurement of pressure fluctuations at infrasound frequencies Eq. 2 is used to derive the infrasound NN both for laser interferometers and for TOBA. * Harms, Living Rev. Relativ. (2015) EGRAAL Meeting 10/01/2018

Infrasound NN modeling Laser interferometer Test mass building modeling for laser interferometers on Earth Test mass cavity modeling for underground laser interferometers The exterior and interior pressure fluctuations are assumed to be incoherent. EGRAAL Meeting 10/01/2018

Infrasound NN modeling TOBA TOBA on Earth, z0 = 0 TOBA underground, z0 < 0 Building effect neglected: the cavity or building hosting the detector is much smaller than the length of infrasound waves. EGRAAL Meeting 10/01/2018

Measurements of pressure spectra at the AdV site * Simplified scheme of AdV. Solid lines: sound spectra measured at the AdV site. Dashed yellow line: pressure fluctuation median noise model presented in Geophys. Res. Lett.32, L09803. *I. Fiori, D.Fiorucci, J.Harms, F.Paoletti EGRAAL Meeting 10/01/2018

AdV infrasound NN Estimate of the AdV infrasound NN, by using sound spectra recorded at the AdV site. EGRAAL Meeting 10/01/2018

Infrasound NN for an ET-like detector Infrasound NN for an ET like laser interferometer using the pressure fluctuation median noise model presented in Geophys. Res. Lett.32, L09803. EGRAAL Meeting 10/01/2018

TOBA infrasound NN TOBA infrasound NN for different detector depth using the pressure fluctuation median noise model presented in Geophys. Res. Lett.32, L09803. EGRAAL Meeting 10/01/2018

TOBA infrasound NN - Cavity/building effect Contributions to the infrasound NN of a TOBA detector located 300 m beneath the earth surface. Blue line: contribution due to the space inside the underground cavity housing the detector. Green line: contribution of the space above the earth surface. EGRAAL Meeting 10/01/2018

Atmospheric NN Infrasound NN NN due to temperature fluctuations - Model - Measurement of pressure fluctuations at the Advanced Virgo (AdV) site - AdV infrasound NN - ET infrasound NN - Torsion bar antenna infrasound NN NN due to temperature fluctuations - Laser interferometer (ET case) - Torsion bar antennas EGRAAL Meeting 10/01/2018

Temperature fluctuation NN-ET * Uniform airflow 20 m/s  credit: Jan Harms * Harms, Living Rev. Relativ. (2015) EGRAAL Meeting 10/01/2018

Temperature fluctuation NN-TOBA TOBA orientation y Wind speed, v=10m/s, along the x axis x Turbulent mixing theory breaks down at f ≤ few tens of mHz 1 Gravimeter data show that this noise is overestimated by few orders of magnitude at 10mHz 2 Validity of the model for 10 mHz < f < hundreds of mHz must be checked Model should be ok (but simplified) for f ≥ 1 Hz. Preliminary! Probably overestimated Warning! 1 Kukharets, V.P. and Nalbandyan, H.G. Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys., 42, (2006) 2 Hinderer, Crossley, Warburton, Gravimetric Methods, 2007 Elsevier B.V.

Conclusion and Perspectives Infrasound NN Pressure fluctuations variate significantly with location, time and season. It is important to characterize the detector sites in terms of pressure fluctuations. Characterization of the AdV site in terms of pressure fluctuations and infrasound NN level. For an ET-like detector the Infrasound NN is strongly suppressed, when going underground. However the attenuation can be significantly spoiled by the internal contribution of the test mass cavity. TOBA infrasound NN is below the next stage sensitivity and a few orders of magnitude above the sensitivity required for gravitational-wave detection. This allows the exploitation for geophysical applications. TOBA NN from Temperature fluctuations Check and improve the model. Strongly attenuated when going underground. EGRAAL Meeting 10/01/2018