First look at data/MC comparison for period 8 reference runs

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Status of CTB04 electron data vs MC analysis Stathes Paganis (Sheffield) Martin Aleksa (CERN) Isabelle Wingerter (LAPP) LAr Week, Cargnano, Italy 13-Sep-05.

Advertisements

Beam-plug under M2 and HCAL shielding studies Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt October 9,

April 19th, 2010Philippe Doublet (LAL) Hadronic showers in the SiW ECAL (with 2008 FNAL data) Philippe Doublet.

LAr Response to pions: Data vs MC (work in progress) S.Paganis (Wisconsin) withIsabelle,Martin LAr+Tile H8 pion CTB Meeting, CERN, 19-April-2005.

1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.

Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.

Ricardo GoncaloZEUS Week - London June Neutral Current 99/00 e + p Analysis Status Ken Long Matthias Moritz Henning Scnurbusch Ricardo Gonçalo Thanks.

1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.

CSC Note Jet 8 Meeting – April 11 '07 Status and plan for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.

1 First look at new MC files First look at reconstruction output from the newly- generated “mock-data” MC files. –These contain the following improvements:

1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.

Analysis Meeting – April 17 '07 Status and plan update for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson.

TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia & M. Vos. Introduction SCT Week – March 03 Jose E. Garcia TB & Simulation results Simulation results Inner detector.

1 Calice Analysis Meeting 13/02/07David Ward Just a collection of thoughts to guide us in planning electron analysis In order to end up with a coherent.

1 N. Davidson Calibration with low energy single pions Tau Working Group Meeting 23 rd July 2007.

Energy Flow and Jet Calibration Mark Hodgkinson Artemis Meeting 27 September 2007 Contains work by R.Duxfield,P.Hodgson, M.Hodgkinson,D.Tovey.

Preliminary comparison of ATLAS Combined test-beam data with G4: pions in calorimetric system Andrea Dotti, Per Johansson Physics Validation of LHC Simulation.

Energy Flow Technique and *where I am Lily Have been looking at the technique developed by Mark Hodgkinson, Rob Duxfield of Sheffield. Here is a summary.

LAr Response to pions: Data vs MC S.Paganis (Wisconsin) with Isabelle Winterger,Martin Aleksa LAr Week CTB Meeting, CERN, 10-May-2005.

1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.

Isabelle Wingerter-Seez (LAPP) ATLAS Overview Week - Stockholm 1 LARG H8 combined run: Analysis status Data/MC comparison Energy Reconstruction.

Marco Delmastro 23/02/2006 Status of LAr EM performance andmeasurements fro CTB1 Status of LAr EM performance and measurements for CTB Overview Data -

1 Calice UK Meeting 27/03/07David Ward Plans; timescales for having analysis results for LCWS Status of current MC/data reconstruction Reconstruction status;

20 Jan 2009SiD Benchmark Meeting1 Chargino / Neutralino Analysis Update Yiming Li University of Oxford.

Update on Material Studies - Progress on Linearity using calib-hits (very brief) - Revisiting the material problem: - a number of alternative scenarios.

CTB04: electron Data vs MC Stathes Paganis University of Sheffield LAr CTB04 WG 25-Aug-05.

© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Tracking & Ecal Positional/Angular Resolution Hakan Yilmaz.

G4 Validation meeting (5/11/2003) S.VIRET LPSC Grenoble Photon testbeam Data/G4 comparison  Motivation  Testbeam setup & simulation  Analysis & results.

First look at non-Gaussian tails with the new Reconstruction Stathes Paganis Univ. of Sheffield LAr-H8 Working Group, 18-Oct-05.

N. Saoulidou, Fermilab, MINOS Collaboration Meeting N. Saoulidou, Fermilab, ND/CC Parallel Session, MINOS Collaboration Meeting R1.18.

Cedar and pre-Daikon Validation ● CC PID parameter based CC sample selections with Birch, Cedar, Carrot and pre-Daikon. ● Cedar validation for use with.

1 D.Chakraborty – VLCW'06 – 2006/07/21 PFA reconstruction with directed tree clustering Dhiman Chakraborty for the NICADD/NIU software group Vancouver.

Status of Reconstruction in sidloi3 Ron Cassell 5/20/10.

Measurement of the Charge Ratio of Cosmic Muons using CMS Data M. Aldaya, P. García-Abia (CIEMAT-Madrid) On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Sector 10 Sector.

1 DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data Plots for approval CMS- Run meeting, 26/6/09 U.Gasparini, INFN & Univ.Padova on behalf of DT community [ n.b.:

Jet/MET Trigger On-Call Report Ricardo Gonçalo – LIP Jet Trigger Meeting – 31/3/2015.

The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.

22 January 2009 David1 Look at dead material and fake MET in Jx samples mc08 10 TeV simulations, release J0 to J6 are tag s479_r586, ‘ideal geometry’

Electron Calibration and Performance ( ) N. Benekos (MPI), R. Nikolaidou (Saclay), S. Paganis (Sheffield) Contributions from: A. Farbin (CERN) +

A search for the ZZ signal in the 3 lepton channel Azeddine Kasmi Robert Kehoe Southern Methodist University Thanks to: H. Ma, M. Aharrouche.

Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.

P. Ochoa, September Using Muon Removed files to assess the purity of the nubar-PID selection Pedro Ochoa MINOS Collaboration Meeting September 2006.

ST Occupancies (revisited) M. Needham EPFL. Introduction Occupancies matter Date rates/sizes In particular was data size on links from Tell1 to farm estimated.

Discussion on Combined (ID+LAr) Material Studies action plan  Latest LAr linearity plot from period 5  Discussion on test MC run production.

Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.

L1Calo EM Efficiency Maps Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham L1Calo Weekly Meeting 07/03/2011.

Electrons in CTB: status of data/MC comparisons LAr & Inner Detector H8 CTB groups Physics Week, CERN, 30-May-2006.

Photon purity measurement on JF17 Di jet sample using Direct photon working Group ntuple Z.Liang (Academia Sinica,TaiWan) 6/24/20161.

Reconstruction of converted photons E. Tournefier LAPP meeting Feb. 2,2012 Algorithm for the reconstruction of converted photons Performances studies:

1 Calice Analysis 21/7/08David Ward Quick look at 2008 e - data; low energy hits in 2006  2008 e - data from Fermilab; July’08  Looked at several runs.

16/10/2010ECFA CERN1 Manqi RUAN Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet (LLR) Ecole Polytechnique 91128, Palaiseau SDHCAL PFA Study: Single Particle Event.

Michele Faucci Giannelli

Emmanuel Monnier, Elodie Tiouchichine, Elisabeth Petit LAr Week

Some introduction Cosmics events can produce energetic jets and missing energy. They need to be discriminated from collision events with true MET and jets.

on behalf of ATLAS LAr Endcap Group

Effect of t42 algorithm on jets

Converted photons efficiency

Jet Studies 1. Changes in seed finding for cone jets reconstruction

Converted photons efficiency

Checks of TOF Fiducial Cuts

Nick Markov, UCONN Valery Kubarovsky, JLAB

SAC/IRC data analysis Venelin Kozhuharov for the photon veto working group NA62 photon veto meeting

Introduction The aim of this talk is to try to get a feeling on the expected degradation of performance of a calibration once we move from MonteCarlo.

EM Linearity using calibration constants from Geant4

TOF Fiducial Cut on 325 +/- 25 MeV/c (++ Field)

Mokka vs. LCDG4 Comparison

Data/ Monte Carlo comparisons for the EMC

Song LIANG ihep.ac.cn CMS-IHEP, China

Comparing Data and MC CITADL Variables on Ks and KK

Steve Magill Steve Kuhlmann ANL/SLAC Motivation

Presentation transcript:

First look at data/MC comparison for period 8 reference runs LAr H8 Analysis meeting 11/04/06 Per Johansson and Stathes Paganis Sheffield University

Introduction Want to study the effects of upstream material with combined ID+LAr info. Using data and MC at different configurations, as energies and ID magnetic fields Using the latest version, 11.4.0, both for MC and data, which is interesting in itself since it includes the new LAr geometry (more correct description of the changes of thicknesses at cold). First look is for 20 GeV electrons, with and without magnetic field. However, I have had a lot of problems with both the reconstruction and CASTOR the latest week, so have small statistics. So started to use 11.0.2 data at first…

This is, as we will see later, not seen in 11.4.0. Run 2102413, 20 GeV, eta=0.45 data, B=1.4T, 11.0.2 E in cells 0.1 in eta around 0.45 E in all cells Empty evts in the calo’s Applied Cher2 and TileCal cuts to remove pions E [Gev] E [Gev] Strange peak at 12 GeV?!? This is, as we will see later, not seen in 11.4.0. So have I missed something?! I thought this version was actually ok…

Data and MC info for the runs used henceforth Using 11.4.0, but no ID or Track info (had to run interactively and took to long time…so low statistics…) Data runs: 2102397 B=0T, 20 GeV, eta=0.45, 10k evts 2102413 B=1,4T, 20 GeV, eta=0.45, 10k evts MC runs: “2102397”, no extra material, 5k evts “2102413”, far upstream material = 0.15X0, 5k evts Using topocluster to have a first look at the data

Energy comparison E cluster 1 when nc=1 E cluster 1 E cluster 1+2 Red B=0 Full line data Dashed MC Black B=1.4T Full line data Dashed MC Energy comparison E cluster 1 when nc=1 Black better tail agreement than for Red Obs Black MC has extra material! # of clusters E [Gev] E cluster 1 when nc=2 E cluster 1+2 when nc=2 Need more statistics and various MC material configurations! E [Gev] E [Gev]

Energy versus Phi Left: E clust 1 ver phi1 Nc=1 Right: TOP: DATA B=1.4T phi phi E E Bottom: MC B=1.4T phi phi

Energy versus phi cont’ Left: E clust 1+2 ver <phi of 1and 2> Right: phi1 versus phi2 Energy versus phi cont’ TOP: DATA B=1.4T Bottom: MC B=1.4T

Summary Version 11.0.2 seems to have some reco problem, or I at least have some problems with it… Comparison of Data and MC for 11.4.0, for 20 GeV electrons, eta=0.45, B=0 or 1.4 T, seems reasonable with the low statistics I have. However, the MC with extra upstream material seems to reproduce the tail better for the B=1.4T run, than the MC without extra material manage to reproduce the tail for the B=0T run. The number of clusters for the B=1.4T run is different, more events with 2 clusters in the MC. The energy and phi distributions also seems okay, although in the data there is a gap at phi=0 that is not reproduced in the MC.

Conclusion and outlook Need more data statistics, we have I believe 70 and 100k evts for the data at 20 GeV, and also have a look at other energies. More MC statistics with different configurations. Also reconstruct with ID and track info! More closer look at the data, for example the energy distributions in the different layers with and without material (new LAr geometry), use the ID info to compare MC/Data as E/p. This will hopefully tell us about the amount of material upstreams.