Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Egyptian Patients

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most frequent cancer in the world and the third most common cause of cancer mortality.
Advertisements

Mizutomo Azuma 1, Michael M. Shi 2, Christian J. Jacques 2, Carl Barrett 2, Kathleen D. Danenberg 3, Syma Iqbal 1, Anthony El-Khoueiry 1, Dongyun Yang.
 Matthew M. Yeh, MD, PhD, Anne M. Larson, MD,w Jean S. Campbell, PhD,  Nelson Fausto, MD, Stephen J. Rulyak, MD,w and Paul E. Swanson, MD.
Protein GP73 (GOLGI PROTEIN 73) A NEW NON-INVASIVE BIOMARKER FOR ASSESSING LIVER FIBROSIS AND RISK OF PROGRESSION TO HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA N.K. Gatselis,
 Primary liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer in the world and the third most common cause of cancer mortality  Hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs)
Eleni Galani Medical Oncologist
Genetic Alterations of TP53 Gene in Brain Astrocytic Tumours Methodology Θ Eighty-three brain tumor biopsies were collected and used in this study. Thirty.
Supplemental figure 1S Cell type composition analysis of the PBMCs according to the method of Houseman and colleagues (Houseman et al., 2012) revealed.
Clinical Division of Oncology Department of Medicine I Medical University of Vienna, Austria Tumormarkers.
وما أوتيتم من العلم إلا قليلاً. Prepared by: Abdo A Elfiky.
Tumor Markers.
HCV PCR By Henrietta Orji July 31 st, 2010 Hepatitis C Virus by Polymerase Chain Reaction.
吳 華 席 Hua-Hsi Wu, MD OB/GYN, VGH-TPE Aug 12, 2008
INCREASED EXPRESSION OF PROTEIN KINASE CK2  SUBUNIT IN HUMAN GASTRIC CARCINOMA Kai-Yuan Lin 1 and Yih-Huei Uen 1,2,3 1 Department of Medical Research,
The chemopreventive effect of Ginkgo biloba and Silybum marianum extracts on hepatocarcinogenesis in rats Hala O El Mesallamy, Nadia S Metwally2, Mahmoud.
Results 1 comparison for 5 systems containing the SNP at postion 1 to 5 of the up-stream probe  systems 2-5 work well, system 3 offers most stable & reliable.
Serum Levels of Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and Insulin Like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) as New Diagnostic Markers for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Ahmad S. Ibrahim*,
EXPRESSION OF HER-2 CORRELATED PROTEINS IN ILEAL CARCINOIDS Azzoni C., Giordano G., Bottarelli L., Tamburini E., D’Adda T., Pizzi S., Rindi G., Bordi C.
Dengue fever caused by dengue virus (DENV), a member of Flaviviridae leads to large global disease burden. Detection of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and nucleic.
GENISTEIN-MEDIATED PROTECTION AGAINST INTERLEUKIN-4-INDUCED INFLAMMATORY PATHWAYS IN HUMAN VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL CELLS Yong Woo Lee 1, Bernhard Hennig 2,
INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES Introduction: The carcinogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a multifactorial, multistep and complex process. Its prognosis.
The role of regulatory B cells on hepatocellular carcinoma progression Conclusion Results Fig2. (A and B) In vivo, Bregs in SCID mice increased the size.
第三章 Survivin siRNA nano particles are capable of inhibiting liver cancer cell growth both in vitro and in vivo Suoqin Tang,MD, Kuiyao Qu,MD, Yi Zhang,MD.
Golgi Protein-73 Shows Promise as a Sensitive Serum Marker for HCC Slideset on: Marrero J, Romano P, Nikolaeva O, et al. GP73, a resident golgi glycoprotein,
Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib as first-line therapy : A Korean multicenter.
Supplementary Methods
Patient & tumor characteristics (n=39)
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY AND TUMOR MARKERS
Dr. Mohammed Omar Khalifa
miRNA-targets cross-talks: key players in glioblastoma multiforme
Comparison between Pathologic Characteristics of Her2 Negative and Positive Breast Cancer in a Single Cancer Center in Jordan DR Majdi A. Al Soudi, MD,
Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis for Liver Cancers and Its Usefulness as a Liquid Biopsy  Atsushi Ono, Akihiro Fujimoto, Yujiro Yamamoto, Sakura Akamatsu,
MicroRNA-34a: a key regulator in the hallmarks of renal cell carcinoma
Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A Level Before and After Induction Therapy in Egyptian Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Sayed.A. Fadel1.
The Value of Measurement of Circulating Tumor Cells in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Nashwa Sheble, Gehan Hamdy, Moones A Obada, Gamal Y Abouria, Fatma Khalaf.
Farletuzumab in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer with low CA125
Contribution of Oxidized Low Density Lipoprotein and Nitric Oxide in the Pathogenesis of Early Onset Acute Myocardial Infarction in Egyptian population.
Synergistic Effect Of Combination Of Chemotherapeutic Drugs For The Treatment Of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Savita Mishra, Kumud Bala and Deepshikha Pande.
Ke Xu, Ph.D. Putuo Hospital and Cancer Institute,
Vrushali Patwardhan, Dinesh Kumar, Varun Goel, Sarman Singh
Volume 15, Pages (February 2017)
VEGF and VEGFR1 Gene expression levels predict tumor recurrence in adjuvant colon cancer Yan Ning1, Georg Lurje1, Kathleen Danenberg2, Janine Cooc2, Dongyun.
Products > HUH-7 Transfection Reagent (Liver Cancer Cells)
Presented By: Sally Saad Mandour Esawy
Pre-Clinical Validation of a Novel, Highly Sensitive Assay to Detect PML-RARα mRNA Using Real-Time Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction  James.
MRD in Myeloma: the Future is Here
In B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemias, 7q21 translocations lead to overexpression of the CDK6 gene by Sandrine Hayette, Isabelle Tigaud, Evelyne Callet-Bauchu,
Antiangiogenic antithrombin down-regulates the expression of the proangiogenic heparan sulfate proteoglycan, perlecan, in endothelial cells by Weiqing.
objectives Methods Results conclusion
Applied Biosystems™ Consumables on Bio-Rad CFX™
Kei Kuroda, Allen Sapadin, Toru Shoji, Raul Fleischmajer, Mark Lebwohl 
Cell Physiol Biochem 2016;39: DOI: /
Products > HepG2 Transfection Reagent (Hepatocellular Carcinoma)
Transcriptional Signature of Histone Deacetylases in Breast cancer
Zhuo Li, Dieter Metze, Dorothea Nashan, Carsten Müller-Tidow, Hubert L
Expression and Function of RIG-I in Oral Keratinocytes and Fibroblasts
Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Epidemiology and Molecular Carcinogenesis
Learning More from Microarrays: Insights from Modules and Networks
Volume 136, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (July 2015)
Analytical Validation of Androgen Receptor Splice Variant 7 Detection in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) Laboratory Setting  Parvez.
Yongli Bai, Chun Yang, Kathrin Hu, Chris Elly, Yun-Cai Liu 
PD-1 expression on HCC-infiltrating B cells and its clinical significance. PD-1 expression on HCC-infiltrating B cells and its clinical significance. A–H,
Heat Shock Transcription Factor 1 Is a Key Determinant of HCC Development by Regulating Hepatic Steatosis and Metabolic Syndrome  Xiongjie Jin, Demetrius.
Kellie J. White, Vincent J. Maffei, Marvin Newton-West, Robert A
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Post-Transcriptional Regulation of UV Induced TNF-α Expression
RealTime-PCR.
Loyola Marymount University
Detection of PSA-mRNA by single (first panel, 710 bp) and nested (second panel, 455 bp) RT-PCR. Detection of PSA-mRNA by single (first panel, 710 bp) and.
Presentation transcript:

Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Egyptian Patients Increased Endoglin and Transforming Growth Factor ß1mRNAs Expression and Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Egyptian Patients Salwa Teama1*, Amal Fawzy2 , Shirin Teama3, Eman Desouky4 Amany Helal5, Amira Diyaa Drwish5 , Tamer Elbaz6 1Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Research Center, Ain Shams University, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt *Presenting Author 2Department of Clinical Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt 3Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt 4Departement of Statistics, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt 5Departement of Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt 6Department of Endemic Hepatogastroenterology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt OPTIONAL LOGO HERE Background Endoglin regulation of TGF-β–dependent and –independent cell responses. Endoglin modulates TGF-β signaling by interacting with TβRI (ALK5 and ALK1) and TβRII through its extracellular and cytoplasmic domains. The endoglin cytoplasmic domain interacts with β-arrestin, Tctex2b, zyxin, and ZRP-1 proteins. Through these interactions, endoglin could mediate F-actin rearrangements, cell adhesion, and migration, as well as protein transport via endocytic vesicles. Result Transforming growth factor-β1 and its coreceptor Endoglin have been shown to contribute to Hepatocellular tumor development and malignant progression. Cirrhosis of any etiology is the major risk factor for HCC. Cirrhosis which is a progressive disease, developing slowly over many years, until eventually it can stop liver function (liver failure) or HCC. Established cirrhosis has a 10-year mortality of 34-66%, largely dependent on the cause of the cirrhosis (Altekruse et al., 2009). Hepatic TGF-β1 is over-expressed in HCC tissues and correlated with tumor formation, progression and prognosis of HCC (Flisiak et al., 2000]. This increased expression of TGF-β1 can be a useful marker to early detect HCC due to the higher sensitivity and specificity than alpha fetoprotein (AFP) in the diagnosis of small HCC lesions (Jakowlew 2006). Endoglin (ENG) is a TGF-β binding receptor. It is expressed at low levels in resting endothelial cells while its expression promptly increases in active vascular endothelial cells with tumor angiogenesis (Lebrin et al.,2005). In our study, ENG / TGF-β1 mRNAs relative expression ratio significantly increased in cirrhotic HCC and cirrhotic patients compared to healthy control group. Increased expression was observed in HCC only cases compared to healthy volunteer with no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). The highest relative expression ratio of ENG/ TGF-β1 mRNAs was 0.82 (0.1-3.2) 1.4 (0.19 -6.2), in cirrhotic HCC patients and 0.66 (0.15-5.3) 1.2 (0.22-4.3), in cirrhotic group higher than HCC only cases was 0.38 (0.007-2.8),1.0 (0.15-4.4). However, the increased expression of ENG / TGF-β1 mRNAs in cirrhotic HCC and cirrhotic patients than HCC only cases without cirrhosis and our limited sample size (38 cirrhotic HCC cases , 14 cirrhotic ,10 HCC only and 15 healthy controls) and heterogeneity in cancer with wide variability in level of expression may help to explain why no statistically significant difference were found but increased their expression in cirrhotic and cancer cases compared to healthy control and increased expression in cirrhotic than cancer only indicate that they may contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis and increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients. Graph Result The relative expression ratio of ENG mRNA was 0.82 (0.1 -3.2), 0.66 (0.15-5.3), 0.38(0.007-2.8) and 0.12 (0.00-0.22) and the relative expression ratio of TGF-β1mRNA was 1.4 (0.19 -6.2), 1.2 (0.22-4.3), 1.0 (0.15-4.4) and 0.6 (0.00-2.2) for cirrhotic HCC, cirrhotic, HCC only and healthy control groups respectively. Increased ENG and TGF-β1 mRNA gene expression was correlated with TNM clinical stages. The expression ratio in TNM stage III–IV 1.1 (0.07-3.2), 1.55 (0.15-6.2) was statistically significantly higher than that in stage I– II 0.47 (0.007-2.8), 1.0 (0.31-4.4) (P<0.05). Subjects and Methods Subjects Seventy seven subjects were included in our study and were categorized to three groups: Group I: It included 48 HCC patients 32 males and 16 females, Their ages were between 42-67 with a mean age value ±SD of (58.3±9.7); include; 38 cirrhotic patients with HCC (n=38), 10 patients with HCC only (n=10). Group II: It included 14 cirrhotic patients without HCC, 11 males and 3 females. Their ages were between 40-66 years with a mean value ±SD of (59.4±7.9). Group III: It included 15 apparently healthy volunteers, 9 males and 6 females, matched for age with a mean age value ±SD of (57.2±12.6). All Subjects included in the study were subjected to the following: Full history taking and complete clinical examination. Routine laboratory investigations including: complete blood count, liver biochemical profile, viral markers. Specific laboratory investigations including: Serum α-fetoprotein level by electro-chemiluminescence assay using cobase411 auto analyzer (Roche diagnostics). Relative expression ratio of ENG mRNA and TGFß1 mRNA was determined using Real-Time PCR System 7500. Radiological investigations include: Abdominal ultrasonography, triphasic CT abdomen and/or dynamic MRI abdomen with MRI diffusion. Methods All patients and control group were submitted to: Sampling and RNA Extraction: Peripheral blood samples (10 mL in EDTA), were collected. Nucleated cells were isolated by the osmotic red blood cell lysis method and the resulting cell pellets were stored at -80°C until RNA extraction. Extraction of total RNA from nuclear cells Total RNA of nuclear cells was extracted using RNA extraction kit QIAamp RNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, and USA) according to the manufacturer instruction. All RNA preparation and handling steps took place in a laminar flow hood, under RNAase free conditions. The RNA concentration was assessed by absorbance reading at 260 nm with (Nano-Drop ND-100). All the procedure followed the manufacture instruction. Reverse transcription and Real Time PCR assays: Reverse transcription reaction was carried out in 20 μL reaction mixture by using first strand cDNA synthesis kit (Promega; USA) according to manufacture instruction. For quantitative real-time PCR, cDNA was amplified in an Real-Time PCR System 7500 (Applied Biosystems) using SYBR Green Master Mix Reagent (Applied Biosystems). The forward (F) and reverse (R) primers used were: TGF-β1: F: CCCAGCATCTGCAAAGCTC; R: GTCAATGTACAGCTGCCGCA; Endoglin: F: CATCCTTGAAGTCCATGTCCTCTT, R: GCCAGGTGCCATTTTGCTT; GADPH: F: TGCACCACCAACTGCTTAGC; R: GGCATGGACTGTGGTCATGAG. Each primer was used at a concentration of 0.3 μM in each reaction. Cycling conditions were as follows: step 1, 10 min at 95 °C; step 2, 15 sec at 95 °C; step 3, 30 sec at 55 °C; step 4, 30 sec at 60 °C, repeating from step 2 to step 4 40 times. Data from the reaction were collected and analyzed by the complementary computer software (Sequence Detection Software, Applied Biosystems, and Version 1.3). Melting curves were run to confirm specificity of the signal. Tables Conclusion Our data suggested that increased ENG and TGF-β1 gene expression may participates in hepatocarcinogenesis and increased risk of HCC in cirrhotic group. Early screening for evidence of cirrhosis and consider ENG and TGF-β1 as ideal targets for therapy and treatment strategies. References Altekruse SF, Mcglynn KA, Reichman ME. (2009). Hepatocellular carcinoma incidence, mortality, and survival trends in the united states from 1975 to 2005. J clin. Oncol. 27: 1485 - 91. Flisiak R, Wiercińska-Drapało A, Tynecka E.( 2000). Transforming growth factor-beta in pathogenesis of liver diseases. Wiad lek.  53:530-7. Jakowlew SB. (2006). Transforming growth factor-beta in cancer and metastasis. Cancer metastasis rev 25:435-57. Lebrin F, Deckersm, Bertolino P, Ten Dijke P. (2005). TGF-h receptor functions in the endothelium. Cardiovasc res 65: 599 -608. Presenting author Salwa Hassan Teama Associate Consultant of Clinical Pathology, Medical Research Center, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt Salwateama2004@yahoo.com : Contact information Keywords Endoglin, TGFß1, quantitative PCR, mRNA hepatocellular carcinoma