Faith Ann Heinsch NTSG, School of Forestry The University of Montana

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Land Surface Evaporation 1. Key research issues 2. What we learnt from OASIS 3. Land surface evaporation using remote sensing 4. Data requirements Helen.
Advertisements

A Simple Production Efficiency Model 1/18 Willem de Kooning ( ) A Tree in Naples.
Gridded Biome-BGC Simulation with Explicit Fire-disturbance Sinkyu Kang, John Kimball, Steve W. Running Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group, School.
Main features of the Biome-BGC MuSo model Zoltán BARCZA, Dóra HIDY Training Workshop for Ecosystem Modelling studies Budapest, May 2014.
Detection of a direct carbon dioxide effect in continental river runoff records N. Gedney, P. M. Cox, R. A. Betts, O. Boucher, C. Huntingford & P. A. Stott.
Showcase of a Biome-BGC workflow presentation Zoltán BARCZA Training Workshop for Ecosystem Modelling studies Budapest, May 2014.
The C budget of Japan: Ecosystem Model (TsuBiMo) Y. YAMAGATA and G. ALEXANDROV Climate Change Research Project, National Institute for Environmental Studies,
Diagnostic canopy Prognostic canopy. Offline results: Combined influence of sun/shade and prognostic canopy scheme, compared to CLM3.0. CLM3-CN running.
Persistence of nitrogen limitation over terrestrial carbon uptake Galina Churkina, Mona Vetter and Kristina Trusilova Max-Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry.
Carbon – Nitrogen – Climate Coupling Peter Thornton NCAR, CGD/TSS June 2006.
Monitoring Effects of Interannual Variation in Climate and Fire Regime on Regional Net Ecosystem Production with Remote Sensing and Modeling D.P. Turner.
Development of a mechanistic model of Hg in the terrestrial biosphere Nicole Smith-Downey Harvard University GEOS-Chem Users Meting April 12, 2007.
03/06/2015 Modelling of regional CO2 balance Tiina Markkanen with Tuula Aalto, Tea Thum, Jouni Susiluoto and Niina Puttonen.
Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) Müncheberg, Germany Institute of Landscape Systems Analysis Funded by Martina Puhlmann, Hubert.
The Carbon Cycle 3 I.Introduction: Changes to Global C Cycle (Ch. 15) II.C-cycle overview: pools & fluxes (Ch. 6) III. Controls on GPP (Ch. 5) IV.Controls.
Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division.
ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology
Climatic variability, land-cover change, and forest hydrology in the Pacific Northwest David W. Peterson JISAO Climate Impacts Group Forest Hydrology.
Optimising ORCHIDEE simulations at tropical sites Hans Verbeeck LSM/FLUXNET meeting June 2008, Edinburgh LSCE, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de.
Plant Ecology - Chapter 14 Ecosystem Processes. Ecosystem Ecology Focus on what regulates pools (quantities stored) and fluxes (flows) of materials and.
BOREAS in 1997: Experiment overview, scientific results, and future directions Sellers, P.J., et al. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 102, No. D24,
Summary of Research on Climate Change Feedbacks in the Arctic Erica Betts April 01, 2008.
Ecosystem ecology studies the flow of energy and materials through organisms and the physical environment as an integrated system. a population reproduction.
1 Remote Sensing and Image Processing: 9 Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali.
A process-based, terrestrial biosphere model of ecosystem dynamics (Hybrid v. 3.0) A. D. Friend, A.K. Stevens, R.G. Knox, M.G.R. Cannell. Ecological Modelling.
BIOME-BGC estimates fluxes and storage of energy, water, carbon, and nitrogen for the vegetation and soil components of terrestrial ecosystems. Model algorithms.
Integrating Remote Sensing, Flux Measurements and Ecosystem Models Faith Ann Heinsch Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group (NTSG) University of Montana.
A detailed look at the MOD16 ET algorithm Natalie Schultz Heat budget group meeting 7/11/13.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
Overall flow diagram for the CENTURY model.. Optional input files for Century 4.5 nscale.dat - The optional multipliers on N inputs contained in this.
Water and Carbon Cycles in Heterogeneous Landscapes: An Ecosystem Perspective Chapter 4 How water and carbon cycles connect the organizational levels of.
Coupling of the Common Land Model (CLM) to RegCM in a Simulation over East Asia Allison Steiner, Bill Chameides, Bob Dickinson Georgia Institute of Technology.
Spatial and temporal patterns of CH 4 and N 2 O fluxes from North America as estimated by process-based ecosystem model Hanqin Tian, Xiaofeng Xu and other.
Remote Sensing of LAI Conghe Song Department of Geography University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC
Modeling Modes of Variability in Carbon Exchange Between High Latitude Ecosystems and the Atmosphere Dave McGuire (UAF), Joy Clein (UAF), and Qianlai.
Effects of Rising Nitrogen Deposition on Forest Carbon Sequestration and N losses in the Delaware River Basin Yude Pan, John Hom, Richard Birdsey, Kevin.
A FIRST LOOK AT THE MODIS 8-DAY PSN DATA FOR 2001 MODIS Science Team Mtg 19 December 2001 Steven W. Running NTSG, Univ. of Montana.
1 Remote Sensing and Image Processing: 9 Dr. Mathias (Mat) Disney UCL Geography Office: 301, 3rd Floor, Chandler House Tel: (x24290)
Satellite data, ecosystem models and site data: contributions of the IGBP flux network to carbon cycle science David Schimel, Galina Churkina, Eva Falge,
BioVeL MS11 Workshop - Ecosystem functioning & valuation web services and workflows Recent model developments in Hungary: Biome-BGC MuSo Zoltán Barcza,
Gridded Biome-BGC Simulation with Explicit Fire-disturbance Sinkyu Kang, John Kimball, Steve W. Running Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group, School.
Biome-BGC and Estimations of Tower Fluxes
Modelling Crop Development and Growth in CropSyst
CLM-CN update: Sensitivity to CO 2, temperature, and precipitation in C-only vs. C-N mode Peter Thornton, Jean-Francois Lamarque, Mariana Vertenstein,
Biases in land surface models Yingping Wang CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research.
Goal: to understand carbon dynamics in montane forest regions by developing new methods for estimating carbon exchange at local to regional scales. Activities:
MODIS Net Primary Productivity (NPP)
Using AmeriFlux Observations in the NACP Site-level Interim Synthesis Kevin Schaefer NACP Site Synthesis Team Flux Tower PIs Modeling Teams.
Results Time Study Site Measured data Alfalfa Numerical Analysis of Water and Heat Transport in Vegetated Soils Using HYDRUS-1D Masaru Sakai 1), Jirka.
Production.
1 UIUC ATMOS 397G Biogeochemical Cycles and Global Change Lecture 18: Nitrogen Cycle Don Wuebbles Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Illinois,
Arctic RIMS & WALE (Regional, Integrated Hydrological Monitoring System & Western Arctic Linkage Experiment) John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running.
Carbon Sequestration Akilah Martin Fall 2005.
Approach in developing PnET-BGC model inputs for Smoky Mountains
Comparison of GPP from Terra-MODIS and AmeriFlux Network Towers
Community Land Model (CLM)
CLM-CN update: Sensitivity to CO2, temperature, and precipitation in C-only vs. C-N mode Peter Thornton, Jean-Francois Lamarque, Mariana Vertenstein, Nan.
Introduction to Biome-BGC
Continental Modeling and Analysis of the North American Carbon Cycle
Global Carbon Budget. Global Carbon Budget of the carbon dioxide emitted from anthropogenic sources) -Natural sinks of carbon dioxide are the land.
3-PG The Use of Physiological Principles in Predicting Forest Growth
MODIS Validation and Real-Time Modeling
Dr. Faith Ann Heinsch September 8, 2008
Conghe Song Department of Geography University of North Carolina
Marcos Heil Costa Universidade Federal de Viçosa
Ecosystem Demography model version 2 (ED2)
CLM-CN update: Sensitivity to CO2, temperature, and precipitation in C-only vs. C-N mode Peter Thornton, Jean-Francois Lamarque, Mariana Vertenstein, Nan.
The NCAR Community Climate System Model (CCSM)
Corn Soybean Wheat Overview: Methods The challenge:
Watershed Management--7
Presentation transcript:

Use of Biome-BGC with the ChEAS flux tower network to address scaling issues Faith Ann Heinsch NTSG, School of Forestry The University of Montana ChEAS Meeting July 1, 2003

The BIOME-BGC Terrestrial Ecosystem Process Model BIOME-BGC estimates fluxes and storage of energy, water, carbon, and nitrogen for vegetation and soil on a daily basis. Model algorithms represent physical and biological processes that control fluxes of energy and mass: New leaf growth and old leaf litterfall Sunlight interception by leaves, and penetration to the ground Precipitation routing to leaves and soil Snow (SWE) accumulation and melting Drainage and runoff of soil water Evaporation of water from soil and wet leaves Transpiration of soil water through leaf stomata Photosynthetic fixation of carbon from CO2 in the air N uptake from the soil Distribution of C and N to growing plant parts Decomposition of fresh plant litter and old soil organic matter Plant mortality Plant phenology Fire/disturbance

BIOME-BGC Major Features: Daily time step (day/night partitioning based on daily information) Single, uniform soil layer hydrology (bucket model) 1 uniform snow layer of SWE (no canopy snow interception/losses) 1 canopy layer (sunlit/shaded leaf partitioning) Dynamic phenology and C/N allocation (e.g. LAI, biomass, soil and litter) Disturbance (fire) and mortality functions Variable litter and soil C decomposition rates (3 litter and 4 soil C pools) Major Features:

Meteorological Parameters Required by Biome-BGC Daily maximum temperature (°C) Daily minimum temperature (°C) Daylight average temperature (°C) Daily total precipitation (cm) Daylight average partial pressure of water vapor (Pa) Daylight average shortwave radiant flux density (W/m2) Daylength (s)

LAI Site Data Latitude Elevation Slope/Aspect Soil Depth Soil Texture   Site Data Latitude Elevation Slope/Aspect Soil Depth Soil Texture Atmospheric CO2 Plant Soil Organic Matter Atmospheric N Soil Mineral N Allocation to New growth N Uptake MR Litter PSN GR HR Meteorological Data Air Temperature Radiation Precipitation Humidity Evaporation/ Transpiration Photosynthesis Total Respiration Soil and Litter Respiration LAI Snow Soil Outflow Temperature C Annual Input N Deposition N Fixation Daily - Annual Evapotranspiration Respiration Absorbed PAR Daily - Annual Allocation  Carbon, Nitrogen -leaf (LAI) -stem -coarse root -fine root N Flux C Flux H2O Periodic Input  Disturbance -fire -harvest -grazing -agriculture

BIOME-BGC Eco-physiological Parameters Biome-BGC uses a list of 43 parameters to differentiate biomes. general eco-physiological characteristics must be specified prior to each model simulation can be measured in the field, obtained from the literature or derived from other measurements. Default Biome types with defined parameters Deciduous Broadleaf Forest (temperate) Deciduous Needleleaf forest (larch) Evergreen Broadleaf Forest (subtropical/tropical) Evergreen Needleleaf Forest Evergreen Shrubland C3 Grassland C4 Grassland

Integration Simulation Validation Model Estimates of: Hydrograph data Biome BGC Landcover database Other inputs: soils, elevation, N-deposition Surface weather Disturbance history Vegetation parameter Simulation Model Estimates of: Outflow Snow ET Rh NEE NPP Soil C fPAR Biomass LAI Hydrograph data SNOTEL Flux tower Ancillary measurements at flux sites Satellite data (MODIS, AVHRR) FIA, FHM, Ecodata (Inventory) FIA = Forest Inventory and Analysis Program (USDA FS) FHM = Forest Health Monitoring (EPA) Ecodata = European – forest industry products, energy, and transportation data Validation

BIOME-BGC Simulated Daily Carbon and Water Exchange (1Barrow Tussock / Wet Sedge Tundra Site, 2000) Daily 1Meteorology Daily C Budget good job of biomass, but showing much less C uptake than tower data – must all be going underground (can’t msr well) doubled precip to prevent dryout. 1 Daily meteorological data obtained from Barrow W Post Station, 71.28N 156.76W

BIOME-BGC Simulated Cumulative Net Carbon Exchange (1Barrow Tussock / Wet Sedge Tundra Site) C sink (+) run for a couple of years with re-init every yr resp dominate – source for much of yr may not be true if sat during winter really more like what Atqasuk where it is drier (BGC does not do Barrow well). C source (-) 1 Daily meteorological data obtained from Barrow W Post Station, 71.28N 156.76W

Biome-BGC runs for 4 areas in Alaska Site Name Latitude C source (+) C sink (+) Biome-BGC runs for 4 areas in Alaska Alaska Study Region C source (+) C sink (+) electra sites sap flow, etc. grew forest, compared with Seawinds data and now MODIS latit variation between sites for C02 exchange -> freeze-thaw variation Site Name Latitude Kenai AK 60.18N Bonanza Creek AK 64.70N Coldfoot AK 67.15N Atigun AK 68.02N

Biome-BGC Estimates of LAI Park Falls, WI

Biome-BGC Estimates of NEE and GPP

Suggested Improvements to Biome-BGC Simulations at ChEAS Flux Tower Sites

Wetland-BGC Presently being tested in Barrow, AK and the Niyak floodplain near Glacier Park, MT Dynamic groundwater component Previously 1 soil layer, now 2 (saturated/unsaturated) Designed to be require minimal additional data Methane??

Unique Site Disturbance History Natural Disturbances Timing Intensity Examples Fire Blowdown Managed Disturbances Timing Intensity Examples Fertilization Harvest Slash burn Plant

Ensembling of Simulations Temporal Necessary for historic disturbances 1 simulation for each year of the meteorological record Obscures effects of meteorology to allow recovery to be seen Spatial Non-interactive Age class Old growth forests Selective harvest and replant Vegetation Type ENF vs. DBF Hydrology Upland vs. wetland

Disturbance History Credit: P. Thornton, NCAR

Seasonal Cycle of GEP Credit: P. Thornton, NCAR

Annual LAI in Final Simulation Year Credit: P. Thornton, NCAR

Annual NEE in Final Simulation Year Credit: P. Thornton, NCAR

Annual ET in Final Simulation Year Credit: P. Thornton, NCAR

Suggested Improvements Difficult to attribute discrepancies to either the model or measurements Probably a combination of: Site-specific parameterization Low maximum stomatal conductance Incorrect treatment of respiration at low Tair Site-specific measurement biases Undermeasurement of warm season respiration Need to find a way to decompose NEE

Biome-BGC Default Eco-physiological Parameters: Evergreen Needleleaf Forest

Example Initialization File MET_INPUT (keyword) start of meteorology file control block BIOME-BGC Example Initialization File metdata/TDE.mtc41 meteorology input filename 4 (int) header lines in met file RESTART (keyword) start of restart control block 1 (flag) 1 = read r estart file 0 = don't read restart file 0 (flag) 1 = write restart file 0 = don't write restart file 0 (flag) 1 = use restart metyear 0 = reset metyear restart/TDE_n.endpoint input restart filename restart/TDE. endpoint output restart filename TIME_DEFINE (keyword - do not remove) 8 (int) number of meteorological data years 8 (int) number of simulation years 1993 (int) first simulation year (flag) 1 = spinup simulation 0 = normal simulation 6000 (int) maximum number of spinup years (if spinup simulation) CLIM_CHANGE (keyword - do not remove) 0.0 (deg C) offset for Tmax 0.0 (deg C) off set for Tmin 1.0 (DIM) multiplier for Prcp 1.0 (DIM) multiplier for VPD 1.0 (DIM) multiplier for shortwave radiation CO2_CONTROL (keyword - do not remove) 1 (flag) 0=constant 1=vary with fil e 2=constant, file for Ndep 356.0 (ppm) constant atmospheric CO2 concentration TDE_co2.txt (file) annual variable CO2 filename SITE (keyword) start of site physical constants block 0.765 (m) effective soil dept h (corrected for rock fraction) 28.0 (%) sand percentage by volume in rock - free soil 64.0 (%) silt percentage by volume in rock - free soil 8.0 (%) clay percentage by volume in rock - free soil 290.0 (m) site elevation 35.95 (degrees) site latitude ( - for S.Hem.) 0.2 (DIM) site shortwave albedo 0.0005 (kgN/m2/yr) wet+dry atmospheric deposition of N 0.0004 (kgN/m2/yr) symbiotic+asymbiotic fixation of N

Example Initialization File (cont.) RAMP _NDEP (keyword - do not remove) BIOME-BGC Example Initialization File (cont.) 0 (flag) do a ramped N - deposition run? 0=no, 1=yes 2099 (int) reference year for industrial N deposition 0.0001 (kgN/m2/yr) industrial N deposition value EPC_FILE (keyword - do no t remove) dbf.epc (file) TDE DBF ecophysiological constants W_STATE (keyword) start of water state variable initialization block 0.0 (kg/m2) water stored in snowpack 0.5 (DIM) initial soil water as a proportion of sa turation C_STATE (keyword) start of carbon state variable initialization block 0.001 (kgC/m2) first - year maximum leaf carbon 0.0 (kgC/m2) first - year maximum stem carbon 0.0 (kgC/m2) coarse woody debris carbon 0. 0 (kgC/m2) litter carbon, labile pool 0.0 (kgC/m2) litter carbon, unshielded cellulose pool 0.0 (kgC/m2) litter carbon, shielded cellulose pool 0.0 (kgC/m2) litter carbon, lignin pool 0.0 (kgC/m2) soil carbon, fast microbial recycling pool 0.0 (kgC/m2) soil carbon, medium microbial recycling pool 0.0 (kgC/m2) soil carbon, slow microbial recycling pool 0.0 (kgC/m2) soil carbon, recalcitrant SOM (slowest) N_STA TE (keyword) start of nitrogen state variable initialization block 0.0 (kgN/m2) litter nitrogen, labile pool 0.0 (kgN/m2) soil nitrogen, mineral pool OUTPUT_CONTROL (keyword - do not remove) outputs/TDE_out (text) pr efix for output files 1 (flag) 1 = write daily output 0 = no daily output 0 (flag) 1 = monthly avg of daily variables 0 = no monthly avg 0 (flag) 1 = annual avg of daily variables 0 = no annual avg 1 (flag) 1 = write annual output 0 = no annual output 1 (flag) for on - screen progress indicator DAILY_OUTPUT (keyword) 3 (int) number of daily variables to output 516 0 epv.vwc (%) 43 1 wf.soilw_trans (kg m^ - 2) 38 2 wf.canopyw_evap (kg m^ - 2) ANNUAL_OUTPUT (keyword) 2 (int) number of annual output variables 545 0 annual maximum projected LAI 636 1 vegetation C END_INIT (keyword) indicates the end of the initialization file

What if Some Met Data is Missing? Use a nearby weather station Use MT-CLIM to estimate radiation and humidity measurements from Tmax, Tmin designed to handle complex terrain uses a base station to calculate “site” data Use DAYMET (conterminous U.S. only) uses several met stations surrounding site data available from 1980-1997 takes into account complex terrain

Soil Water Potential Curves BIOME-BGC 1Soil Water – Soil Water Potential Curves (%) (MPa) Soil Class Silt loam Silt Loam β-value -4.625 -3.84 -5.275 VWC_sat 0.48 0.48 0.41 PSI_sat -0.0073 -0.0078 -0.0013 1after Cosby et al., 1984

BIOME-BGC Environmental Controls on Canopy Conductance (Walker Branch Site) M_total,sun,shade = (MPPFD,sun,shade * MTmin * MVPD * MPSI) where multipliers range from 0 (full Gs reduction) to 1 (no effect) Gs, sun,shade = Gs,max * M_total, sun,shade

MODIS vs. Biome-BGC LAI MODIS sees higher lai – modeling for deciduous stand, but pixel sees mixed forest

GPP Estimates of 5X5 km Grid This is the GPP of the 5X5 km grid surrounding each tower site.

Park Falls/WLEF, WI

Park Falls/WLEF, WI: Tower vs. DAO

GPP from MOD17A2 Algorithm Default (DAO) Data As Input Meteorology

GPP from MOD17A2 Algorithm Tower Data As Input Meteorology