INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE Design Of Multiloop P and PI controllers based on quadratic optimal approach.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
System Function For A Closed-Loop System
Advertisements

Chapter 4 Continuous Time Signals Time Response Continuous Time Signals Time Response.
Design with Root Locus Lecture 9.
Modern Control Theory Lecture 5 By Kirsten Mølgaard Nielsen
Multivariable Control
Qube-Servo Curriculum Presentation This presentation is intended to provide general content for any relevant presentations The general real-world applications.
Design of LFC using Optimal Control Theory The optimal controller is designed to minimize the quadratic performance index of the following form For linear.
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
Maribor, December 10, Stability of relative equilibria in spinning tops 9th Christmas Symposium dedicated to Prof. Siegfried Großmann CAMTP, University.
Lecture #1 Hybrid systems are everywhere: Examples João P. Hespanha University of California at Santa Barbara Hybrid Control and Switched Systems.
A Typical Feedback System
Analysis of a Pendulum Problem after Jan Jantzen
PD Controller 1.Find the steady-state output due to unit-step r d. 2.Find the steady-state output due to unit-step input (with r d =0)
Control System Design Based on Frequency Response Analysis
Modeling, Simulation, and Control of a Real System Robert Throne Electrical and Computer Engineering Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology.
Digital Control Systems STATE OBSERVERS. State Observers.
PID Control and Root Locus Method
Lesson 2.5 The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra. For f(x) where n > 0, there is at least one zero in the complex number system Complex → real and imaginary.
The Concept of a Root Locus
1. 2 Outline 1.Introduction 2.Modeling 3.Simulation 4.Implementation 5.Demo 6.Conclusion.
It is the time response of a system to an input that sets the criteria for our control systems. Many quantitative criteria have been defined to characterise.
Review SYNTHETIC DIVISION to find roots of third degree characteristic polynomial Pamela Leutwyler.
6.6 The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
Chapter 7 Stability and Steady-State Error Analysis
Progress in identification of damping: Energy-based method with incomplete and noisy data Marco Prandina University of Liverpool.
Intelligent vs Classical Control Bax Smith EN9940.
Chapter 5 Transient and Steady State Response “I will study and get ready and someday my chance will come” Abraham Lincoln.
INC341 Design Using Graphical Tool (continue)
Introductory Control Theory. Control Theory The use of feedback to regulate a signal Controller Plant Desired signal x d Signal x Control input u Error.
Introduction to Biped Walking
Modern Control System EKT 308 Steady-State and Stability.
Matlab Tutorial for State Space Analysis and System Identification
Notes Over 5.6 Quadratic Formula
Lecture 14: Pole placement (Regulator Problem) 1.
SKEE 3143 Control Systems Design Chapter 2 – PID Controllers Design
Exercise 1 Suppose we have a simple mass, spring, and damper problem. Find The modeling equation of this system (F input, x output). The transfer function.
1 Project seminar on - By:- Tejaswinee Darure. Contents: 1] Aircraft (Boing-737) modeling a] Longitudinal Dynamics b] State space representation of system.
Automatic Control Theory CSE 322
Realization of Dynamic Walking of Biped Humanoid Robot
Chapter 7 The Root Locus Method The root-locus method is a powerful tool for designing and analyzing feedback control systems The Root Locus Concept The.
Transient & Steady State Response Analysis
Chapter 10 Optimal Control Homework 10 Consider again the control system as given before, described by Assuming the linear control law Determine the constants.
ME375 Handouts - Spring 2002 MESB374 System Modeling and Analysis System Stability and Steady State Response.
Design via Root Locus (Textbook Ch.9).
University of Bridgeport
Lesson 2.5 The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
Basic Design of PID Controller
Chapter 9 Design via Root Locus <<<4.1>>>
Autonomous Cyber-Physical Systems: Dynamical Systems
Chapter 9 Design via Root Locus <<<4.1>>>
Servo Tuning for Path Applications
Eigenvalues: p1=-4.526, p2,3= ±2.7883i, p4=
Digital Control Systems (DCS)
Quanser Rotary Family Experiments
Root Loci Analysis (3): Root Locus Approach to Control System Design
Vehicle Dynamics Modeling and Control
UNIT-II TIME RESPONSE ANALYSIS
Compensators.
HW-03 Problem Kuo-95 (p. 377) Find the steady-state errors for step, ramp and parabolic inputs. Determine the type of the system. ) s ( R Problem.
Frequency Response Techniques
Digital and Non-Linear Control
Homework 9 Refer to the last example.
Aim: How do we explain rotational kinematics?
Chapter 4. Time Response I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be. Pusan National University Intelligent.
Hafez Sarkawi (D1) Control System Theory Lab
Eigenvalues: p1=-4.526, p2,3= ±2.7883i, p4=
State Feedback.
HOMEWORK-03 Problem Kuo-95 (p. 377)
Frequency Response Techniques
Time Response, Stability, and
Presentation transcript:

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE Design Of Multiloop P and PI controllers based on quadratic optimal approach

2 Project Division LQR Study of LQR and its benefits over pole placement Design of of LQR controller On inverted pendulum which is Single input multi output fourth order system Design of LQR for multiloop P and PI controller using LQR Implementation on real life problem Future Scope

3 LQR v/s Pole placement LQR(Linear Quadratic Regulator) Balances between the acceptable response and the amount of control energy required. Q and R determine the relative importance of the error and the expenditure of this energy. A* P + PA - PBR-1 B* P + Q = 0 Riccati Equation. Pole Placement U=KX : control signal determined by instantaneous state. Necessary condition: Completely State controllable system Objective is to have zero input response and zero output response Also called Regulator (constant input response)

4 Inverted Pendulum 4th order system. objective is to stabilize the pendulum in upright direction. LQR controller is implemented for stabilization. PD controller is used for “swing up”. Controller switched at upright position of pendulum. Euler-lagrangian energy equation are used.

5 Inverted Pendulum

6 1) PD Controller Aims to swing up controller from rest(alpha=180 degree) Kp: proportional to cart position error. Kv: proportional to cart velocity. Assumed desired performance as : damping ratio=0.59 and damping velocity =26 rad/s.

7 Inverted Pendulum 2) LQR Controller Minimize cost function. Q and R matrix are selected by hit and trial method. Determine matrix K such that U=-KX. Activate when angle of pendulum becomes zero.

8 Final results from the taken example Position of cart Velocity of cart

9 Final results from the taken example Angle (alpha) Angular velocity

10 Multiloop P Controller Using LQR Used iterative approach to obtain optimal value of Q and R. For MIMO system Necessary condition : system should be full state controllable. Kp should not have complex eigenvalue. Hamiltonian matrix does not have eigenvalues on imaginary axis.

11 Thank you