TTC High Q0 Working Group Summary of developments since last TTC meeting C. Reece.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Continuing Role of SRF for AARD: Issues, Challenges and Benefits SRF performance has been rising every decade SRF installations for HEP (and other.
Advertisements

Thin Films for Superconducting Cavities HZB. Outline Introduction to Superconducting Cavities The Quadrupole Resonator Commissioning Outlook 2.
ILC PM Meeting S0 Webex Global Design Effort 1 S0/S1 Next Steps Lutz Lilje GDE.
Superconducting RF Materials University Collaboration STATUS Lance Cooley June 07, 2010.
Rong-Li Geng Jefferson Lab High Efficiency High Gradient Cavities - Toward Cutting Down ILC Dynamic Heat Load by Factor of Four R.L. Geng, ALCW2015,
Structure of the task 12.2 Claire Antoine Eucard2 WP12 DESY
High Q R&D at JLab G. Ciovati, P. Dhakal, R. Geng, P. Kneisel, G. Myneni TTC Topical Meeting on CW SRF Cornell Univ., June 12 th -14 th, 2013.
RF breakdown in multilayer coatings: a possibility to break the Nb monopoly Alex Gurevich National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University.
R.L. Geng, 5/27-31,2013 ECFA LC2013, DESY 1 Update on Raising Q0 at Ultra-High Gradient via Large-Grain Niobium Material Rongli Geng Jefferson Lab ECFA.
Rongli Geng March 4, th LCC ILC Cavity Group Meeting
Update on S0 Work in the Americas Region Mark Champion 17 June 2008.
Advances in Development of Diffused Nb3Sn Cavities at Cornell
CEPC 1.3GHz & 650MHz SC cavity high Q R&D Z.C. LIU #, P. Sha, H.J. Zheng, J.Y. Zhai, M.Y. Wang, G.W. Wang, Y. Sun, J. Gao
JLab Update Rongli Geng April 30, th LCC ILC Cavity Group Meeting.
High Temperature Heat Treatment to Raise the Quality Factor of Large Grain Niobium Cavities Pashupati Dhakal Gianluigi Ciovati Ganapati Rao Myneni July.
High Q 0 preservation Andy Hocker Fermilab TTC CW Workshop, 13-JUN-2013.
Niobium RRR and Ta specifications for SRF cavities: a critical review G. Ciovati, P. Kneisel and G. Myneni 7 th SRF Materials Workshop, July 16 th 2012.
Plasma cleaning Laser re-melting technique at FANL M. Ge, G. Wu, J. Ruan, J. Ozelis, T. Nicol, D. Sergatskov, D. Hicks, L. Cooley Fermi National Accelerator.
Laser heating and laser scanning microscopy of SRF cavities
Surface Resistance of a bulk-like Nb Film Sarah Aull, Anne-Marie Valente-Feliciano, Tobias Junginger and Jens Knobloch.
LCLS-II Technical Requirements
Juliette Plouin, Enrico Cenni, Olivier Napoly (CEA)
LCLS-II Cavity Production and Vertical Testing
Electropolishing of Dressed ILC 9-cell Cavity
Energy (ILC) and Intensity (Project X) SRF Cavity Needs
CEPC Nitrogen Doping Study
Ari D. Palczewski, SRF Scientist
Results on second sound method
New Cavity Techniques and Future Prospects
Vertical Electropolishing at Marui & KEK
JLab infusion and LG flux expulsion update
Odu/slac rf-dipole prototype
State of the Art and Future Potential of Nb/Cu Coatings
for the FNAL/ANL, JLab, and Cornell cavity teams
Peng Sha Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS
CEPC 1.3GHz and 650MHz high Q Nitrogen doping R&D progress
High Q via N infusion R&D at Jefferson Lab
High Q R&D at Fermilab Anna Grassellino TTC Topical Meeting on CW SCRF
A COMMON R&D ON THE HIGH GRADIENT Nb CAVITIES
R&D Activity for Field Emission and Vertical EP
9-cell Vender Qualification test for LCLS-II
Recent SCRF Activities in IHEP
Materials, Advanced Accelerator Science & Cryogenics Division
High Q Cavity Operation in the Cornell Horizontal Test Cryomodule
LCLS-II CM Ambient Magnetic Field Management
LCLS-II 9 cell production update and change of recipe update
TTC topical-meeting on CW SRF 2013
Future Thin Film Deposition Efforts at FNAL
HZB High-Q0 Optimization by thermal cycling
N-infusion, Vertical-EP, and ILC cost reduction efforts at Cornell
LCLS-II High Q0 Cavities: Lessons Learned
Cavity Treatment for High Q0 in Realistic Magnetic Fields
SRF Surface Studies and the High Field Q-slope Mystery
Red – ASTM 5 Black - ASTM 6 Blue - ASTM 7 * Not 900°C
Vertical Test Results of 9-Cell Cavities for LCLS-II
Surface resistance studies as a function of the mean free path
FNAL update Martina Martinello.
LCLS-II HE R&D ongoing results
Peng SHA, On behalf of CEPC SRF group
Nb films Sergio Calatroni for the new CERN SRF & films team 5/21/2019
JLab Doping Protocol Exploration
8-T Solenoid Package and Local Magnetic Shielding in FRIB Cryomodules
Quench Studies in Single and Multicell N-Doped Cavities
FLUX TRAPPING STUDIES ON LOW BETA CAVITIES
SRF Science and Technology
Magnetic Field Sensors and Measurements in Cryomodules
JLab Work on Low Temperature Near-Surface Diffusion aka “Infusion”
The LCLS-II HE High Q0 and Gradient R&D Program
Cool Down Studies of LCLS-II Cryomodules
Introduction WG2 Martina Martinello, Oliver Kugeler TTC Meeting 2019.
Presentation transcript:

TTC High Q0 Working Group Summary of developments since last TTC meeting C. Reece

TTC High Q working group Informal working group from TTC-member institutions pursuing routes to minimized rf surface resistance in SRF applications. Periodic web-based meetings (1-2 months) Information exchange Solicitation of technical feedback Learning from each other Not project-specific Prepared short presentations Posted on Indico For informational and learning purposes within TTC Not for technical reference All material considered “preliminary”

Since the DESY TTC Meeting three web-based virtual meetings were held May 15, July 31, and October 16. Indico sites: http://www.jlab.org/indico/event/TTC_High_Q_WG_3 http://www.jlab.org/indico/event/TTC_High_Q_WG_4 http://www.jlab.org/indico/event/TTC_High_Q_WG_5 Although most of the presentations were from US participants due to aggressive LCLS-II investments, there was broad and growing participation from all regions and good stimulating discussion, especially regarding the puzzling Q0 sensitivity to cooldown conditions.

A variety of topics are being discussed (and continue in WG 3 this week) Q0 variability with cooldown conditions Pressure to better quantify external magnetic fields and amount of flux trapped Pressure to scrutinize temperature profile and change rate through Tc How to exploit the phenomenon for best performance? Analysis of Q0 dependence with rf Bpk as a function of various treatments HT-N = 800C + N doping – protocol studies EP BCP 1400°C clean bake without subsequent chemistry Comparison of bulk and film Nb surfaces

What Has Been Learned toward High Q0? Subtle material details within L matter a lot High temperature diffusion doping can lower Rresidual and R“BCS” The best surfaces show decreasing Rs to ~5 nohms @80 mT, 2 K, 1.3 GHz Magnetic flux must be carefully managed Cavity Q performance is easily limited by extrinsic effects that yield frozen-in flux that “Magnetic hygiene” standards must improve Fixturing hardware, instrumentation connectors, etc. non-magnetic, low permeability Temperature gradient across cavity during Tc transition is very helpful for expelling residual flux. (“Fast” is but a means of creating gradient.) Asymmetric temperature gradient across cavity assembly with dissimilar metals during Tc transition may generate currents, large B-field, and frozen flux. Cavity quench presents opportunity for flux entry – and Q degradation N-doped material appears to trap available flux more readily than non-doped material. Higher doping appears correlated with lower cavity quench fields.

R&D for Optimum Q0 from Bulk Nb Quick Review Unexpected discovery that surface diffusion of some foreign atomic species into Nb at high temperature seems to inhibit RF loss mechanisms that have “normally” been present. 800°C vacuum for 3 hours is used to degas dissolved H from the niobium bulk - routine. ~20 mTorr nitrogen gas @ 800°C for a few minutes - new. Lossy nitrides on the surface are removed by light > 2 µm electropolish. Resulting rf surface resistance decreases with field to unprecedented low levels (< 10 nOhm @ 2.0K, 1.3 – 1.5 GHz)= high Q0 FNAL

What Has Been Learned toward High Q0? Subtle material details within L matter a lot High temperature doping can lower Rresidual and R“BCS” The best surfaces show decreasing Rs to ~5 nohms @80 mT, 2 K, 1.3 GHz With a big push from the LCLS-II project, nitrogen doping for high Q0 has been clearly demonstrated by multiple labs and in a production environment on both single and 9-cell cavities. { >150 tests } FNAL Cornell JLab Many open questions remain regarding detailed mechanism Immunization against hydrogen? Low mfp scattering benefit from N? Why do the best cavities’ R“BCS” match Xiao extension of M-B theory? Enhanced quench vulnerability from suppressed Hc? N-doping not yet fully optimized, but clearly ready for use

Cornell Nine Cell 2.0K Results, doping recipe 2 100 um bulk VEP, 20min N2 @800C, 30 min anneal, final VEP Q0 > 3E10 at 2K, at 16MV/m (or max field reached) for all nine cells Quench fields of 14 to 22 MV/m LCLS-II spec Similar results from FNAL and JLab M. Liepe

What Has Been Learned toward High Q0? Temperature gradient across cavity during Tc transition is very helpful for expelling residual flux. (“Fast” is a means) FNAL VTS tests N-doped bare 9-cell Slow cooling leads to strong deterioration of Q0 Efficient flux expulsion Meissner effect flux expulsion is sensitive to the cooling conditions through Tc Trapped flux adds Rs Detailed characterization is underway Poor flux expulsion Oct, 2013 A. Romanenko et al. J. Appl. Phys. 115, 184903 (2014)

Turning the two knobs: magnetic field and cooling- measurements at Fermilab N doped single cell Helmholtz coils to create close to uniform magnetic field around the cavity Three fluxgate probes around the cavity equator for precision magnetic field measurements at the important region Similar work @ Cornell Alex Romanenko & Anna Grassellino

Possible mechanism: thermal force overcoming the pinning force Thermal gradient at the superconducting/normal conducting boundary is aiding the flux expulsion => the higher dT/dx the better. See J. Appl. Phys. 115, 184903 (2014) A. Gurevich and G. Ciovati, Phys Rev B 87, 054502 (2013) Example of thermal difference across the 1-cell cavity: fast from 300K leads to full flux expulsion Slow leads to full flux trapping Fast from 20K leads to good flux expulsion, but not full Grassellino For efficient flux expulsion ~ 13K along the nine cell

Image Courtesy of Dan Gonnella Residual Resistance from Trapped Magnetic Flux in “fast” Cool-down - magnetic field sensitivity studies Rres [nOhm] FNAL B [mGauss] Image Courtesy of Dan Gonnella Cornell University Turbulent mixing of supplied cold He yields low delta-T across cavity and lower Q0 Palczewski

Optimal cooling conditions can produce extra low residual resistance despite large ambient fields ! Reported VT @ FNAL 5 nOhm in 200mG!! Anna Grassellino

Importance of Cryomodule Cooldown Conditions

What Has Been Learned toward High Q0? Asymmetric temperature gradient across cavity assembly with dissimilar metals during Tc transition may generate currents, large B-field, and frozen flux. Cornell HTC tests 9-cell cavity in HV Multiple cooldowns with controlled magnetic field and supplied heat Dan Gonnella

Nb film Rs Dependence on Cooling Conditions Film Type Plasma

The door has opened to new opportunities. New performance domain The door has opened to new opportunities. New interesting challenges have appeared for exploiting these opportunities with high Q0.