GRI NW TRANSPARENCY PROJECT

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BEB Transport und Speicher Service GmbH, Hannover Capacity Development NW Region Capacity Development in the North-West.
Advertisements

RCC Meeting 13 December 2007 Interconnections: primary market IP Taisnières / Blaregnies / Quévy IP Taisnières / Blaregnies / Quévy IP Obergailbach / Medelsheim.
Vienna, 8 April th IG Meeting Meeting Guide.
Benoît Esnault (CRE) NW Region – governmental meeting 6 May 2010 Pilot framework guideline on capacity allocation mechanisms.
Heinz Hilbrecht Director "Security of Supply and Energy Markets" European Commission - DG TREN , GRI NW, Amsterdam Regional Cooperation Role of.
Update Transparency project RCC The Hague, 12 May 2011 Konrad Keyserlingk - Ofgem -
European Transparency Project Progress Olaf Islei European Strategy and Environment 04 September 2008.
Dipl. Ing. Dr. Stephan Ressl Vice Chairman EFET Europe Gas Chair EFET SSE Head of Business Development EconGas GRI SSE Vienna, European Federation.
Update on GSE Activities Klaus-Dieter Barbknecht GSE President GIE General Assembly Madrid 21 November 2007.
European Transparency Requirements – Draft Mod Transmission Workstream 4 th September 2008.
GRI NW TRANSPARENCY PROJECT Olaf Islei OFGEM RCC 13 May 2009.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Transparency – Proposal to amend chapter 3 of the Annex of Regulation 1775/2005 EUROPEAN COMMISSION H. Hick, DG TREN C 2 NW GRI 5th.
GRI NW Transparency Stockholm Stakeholder Group Conference 26 November 2009 Martin Crouch Partner: European Strategy.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Heinrich Hick, DG TREN C 2 3rd IEM Package and relevance of GRI GRI NW stakeholder Conference, London, 14 November 2008.
GRI Transparency Workshop London 19 September 2007 Centrica Storage Limited & Gas Storage Europe.
Jonas Törnquist EFET Gas Market Transparency Requirements ERGEG Enabler Group Meeting Dublin, April 2007 Törnquist.
XVI th Madrid Forum Madrid, 28 May 2009 Walter Boltz (Gas Working Group Chair) Transparency guidelines and GRI transparency work.
Gas Regional Initiative Region North-West Transparency Project Nicola Meheran, Ofgem.
Gas Regional Initiative North-West Gas Balancing Dublin Workshop 24 th April 2007 Steve Pownall.
Transparency GRI SSE -- 7th Stakeholder Group Meeting Vienna, 16 October 2009 Andrea Ćirlićová GTE+ Senior Adviser.
Bonn Workshops 8 and 9 Feb Balancing workstream.
Framework Guideline on gas balancing Martin Crouch, Ofgem 20th Madrid Forum September 2011.
Gas Regional Initiative North-West Transmission System Operators Page 1Transmission Transparency, Transmission Transparency Project Project.
Gas Regional Initiative North-West Transmission Transparency Second Mini Transparency Workshop Transmission Transparency Project GRI North-West Operators‘
Gas Regional Initiative North-West Transmission Transparency Transmission Transparency Project GRI North-West Operators‘ Group Stakeholder Group Meeting.
Benoît Esnault (CRE) 17 th Madrid Forum 14 January 2010 Pilot framework guideline on capacity allocation mechanisms.
Role of Storage Facilities GTE 2nd Annual Conference, 23./ – Copenhagen © VNG 2004 Barbknecht Speaker: Klaus-Dieter Barbknecht Director Gas Transport.
Transmission Transparency Workshop European Strategy and Environment 10 July 2008.
Pamela Taylor, Head of European Strategy, Ofgem Madrid Forum, March 2011 ERGEG’s draft framework guideline for gas balancing.
GRI NW TRANSPARENCY PROJECT Transparency Workshop 31 March 2009.
1 GTE Transparency Platform GIE Annual Conference Madrid, 22/23 November 2007 Paolo Mosa GTE Vice President.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Implementation progress – second stage Olaf Islei European Strategy and Environment.
Gas Regional Initiative North-West Transmission System Operators Page 1Transmission Transparency, Transmission Transparency Project GRI North-West.
Click to edit Master title style 1 Neta Meidav Manager, Ofgem GRI NW 9 th Stakeholder Group Meeting 25 November 2011, Rotterdam GRI NW Transparency Project.
Implementation progress – second stage Transmission Transparency Workshop London, 14 November 2008.
1 Dublin 23/24 April CONCLUSIONS Regulatory Co-ordination Responses to Deliverables 3 and 4 due by 8 th May Papers redrafted to take comments into account.
European Developments Transmission Workgroup 3 rd May 2012.
EFET PG Information Ofgem GRI transparency workshop March 2009 European Federation of Energy Traders 1 Brussels, March 2009 Cemil Altin Transparency: Minimum.
1 Capacity and Congestion Management Duties of TSOs - Availability of infrastructure and capacities for shippers to fulfil their supply obligations - Guarantee.
1 1 Brussels, 31 st March 2009 Presentation by Peter Hohaus Senior Manager Legal & Regulatory Affairs ERGEG North West Gas Regional Energy Market Transparency.
Gas Regional Initiative – North West Region Stakeholders Group meeting - London 14 November, 2008 Capacity Workshop Coordinated Open Seasons Marie-Claire.
European Transparency Requirements - update Transmission Workstream 1 st May 2008.
Gas Transmission Developments - the role of GTE
Gas Regional Initiative North-West
Transparency Project GRI NW Region
New transparency guidelines
GRI Transparency Workshop London 19 September 2007
ERGEG Gas Regional Initiative NW 5th Stakeholder Group Meeting
Demand forecast and network balancing
Update on GRI NW Transparency Project
Transmission Planning Code – Draft Document
Gas Transmission Europe
2009 TSO Transparency Gas Regional Initiative North-West
Logo(1.00”:3.33”) Font is Rotis Sans Serif however font may have to be embedded as it is important that this does not change on any presentations Size.
Work plan of GRI NW for 2011 Three out of four projects are started
Gas Regional Initiative
Transparency Platform
Update on European Network Codes
Transparency Project GRI NW Region.
European Transparency Requirements
Gas balancing – where next
Purpose Transparency is a critical element in ensuring an effective functioning internal European Gas market Gas Regulation No 715/2009, effective from.
NTS Entry Charging Review Update
EUROPEAN TRANSPARENCY UPDATE
Regulators’ views on Transparency
EURELECTRIC transparency requirements
Richard Fairholme E.ON UK
Information Provision for Transitional Exit Capacity
Work plan of GRI NW for 2011 Three out of four projects are started
Presentation transcript:

GRI NW TRANSPARENCY PROJECT 13th RCC Meeting The Hague 25 March 2009

PHASE ONE

IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW E.ON GT Fluxys Svenska Kraftnät RWE TNG National Grid Interconnector Gaslink WINGAS TRANSPORT Ontras GRTgaz Energinet.dk Gasunie DEP Swedegas GdFDT GTS BBL (C1) Max technical capacity in place   (C2) Interruption  in place  April (C3) Daily commercial firm and interruptible capacity (F1) Daily flow / aggregated Allocation  March May 2009 (F2) Daily prompt allocation information (F3) Daily aggregate day-ahead nominations  July March  Dec 2009 (F4) Historic gas flow information database Number of IPs 22 19 1 5 8 4 3 9 6 7 2 25 3 minus rule IPs 12 TSOs report published Specific date Less than three shippers Not published/no date Not applicable

PRESENT PROJECT CONCLUSIONS AT MADRID FORUM OUTSTANDING ACTIONS TSO ISSUE COMPLETION DATE BBL IT issues delayed expected release date (F1, F4, F3) May 2009 & Dec. 2009 DEP IT issues (F3) March 2009 Energinet.dk April 2009 GdF DT Resource constraints (F3) July 2010 (?) GRTgaz Shipper consultation (F3) July 2009 GUD Ontras New IT system, -3 shipper rule (C2, F1, F3, F4) WINGAS TRANSPORT Shipper concerns (F1, F3) ? PRESENT PROJECT CONCLUSIONS AT MADRID FORUM

GAS STORAGE TRANSPARENCY

HIGHLIGHTED IN LETTER TO GAS STORAGE EUROPE EXISTING PUBLICATION ISSUES Importance of coordinated European and regional approach RCC letter to GSE suggests areas for improvement: Frequency with which information is updated Zone of aggregation Number of participating storage facilities The types of information that SSOs publish HIGHLIGHTED IN LETTER TO GAS STORAGE EUROPE

Formal Gas Storage Europe response to RCC letter on 17 March 2009 PROGRESS TO DATE Formal Gas Storage Europe response to RCC letter on 17 March 2009 Next enhancement of GSE Aggregate Stock Inventory: Daily publication of stock levels Extension of platform coverage to new storage system operators Role for GRI NW to encourage all SSOs to publish daily stock information 20 APRIL JOINT RCC AND GSE MEETING ON IN BRUSSELS OBJECTIVE: GSE TO PROPOSE PROJECT MILESTONES

TRANSMISSION PHASE TWO

NETWORK USERS’ COMMON POSITION THE PRIORITIES Gas Quality Information Information on Capacity availability Gas Flow Information Balancing and Security of Supply Information Why these priorities? EFET Eurogas IFIEC GEODE eurelectric OGP “common position on minimum transparency requirements” Two proposed workstreams 1. Harmonisation of existing information 2. Incremental release of new information

POSSIBLE PHASE 2 PRIORITIES Harmonisation of phase one information The type of gas flow information that is published Maximum technical capacity The time period for which capacity information is published Incremental release of information Security of supply information Balancing information Gas quality information Gas flow information

NEXT STEPS

GTE+ TRANSPARENCY WORKSHOP BRUSSELS – HOTEL BLOOM! – 31 MARCH

GRI NW TRANSPARENCY WORKSHOP BRUSSELS – HOTEL BLOOM! – 31 MARCH DRAFT AGENDA 14:30 Opening and welcome Ofgem Review of Phase 1 14:40 Overview of TSO response to Network User requirements 15:10 Network User Presentation EFET 15:25 Eurogas 15:40 Coffee Break 16:00 TSOs on demand forecasts TBC 16:20 TSO presentation on balancing 16:40 Discussion on 2009 deliverables Panel 17:30 Workshop Ends

ANNEX 1

HARMONISATION 1: ACTUAL FLOWS Gas flow information Some TSOs publish the actual volume of gas flowing through a pipeline, others publish the final allocations Some TSOs publish real time information others publish information with a time lag Should all TSOs publish actual flow information? BENEFITS COSTS Address problem of contractual congestion Determine probability of interruption

FOR EXAMPLE Historical information on the capacity products that have been sold Maximum technical capacity Actual gas flows

HARMONISATION 2: MAXIMUM CAPACITY Maximum technical capacity Some TSOs frequently update maximum technical capacity, other TSOs have a more fixed definition Should all TSOs be required to explain how, why and when maximum technical capacity changes? BENEFITS COSTS Address problem of contractual congestion Help determine true value of interruptible products Increase capacity availability?

HARMONISATION 3: TIME PERIOD ON CAPACITY AVAILABILITY Contract length and period for which capacity availability is published Some TSOs publish available capacity (maximum capacity) for the same time period as the maximum available contract length, other TSOs publish capacity availability for a shorter period of time Should all TSOs publish the available capacity for the maximum capacity contract length BENEFITS COSTS Address problem of contractual congestion Highlight long term network investment requirements

20 Year Maximum Contract Length FOR EXAMPLE 20 Year Maximum Contract Length

INCREMENTAL 1: GAS DEMAND FORECASTS Network Users believe that TSOs should publish demand forecasts information TSOs in 5 out of 9 GRI NW countries reported that demand forecasts are published or will be published in the near future BENEFITS COSTS Enable shippers to ensure that they have sufficient gas to meet demand Reduce balancing costs Improve security of supply

FOR EXAMPLE FEBRUARY FORECASTS

INCREMENTAL 2: BALANCING INFORMATION TSO responses highlighted 3 areas where information provision fell short of Network User requirements: Real time information on imbalance charges Linepack information Details of TSO balancing actions (nature, timing, volume and cost information)

INCREMENTAL 3: RESTORATION OF GAS FLOWS Network Users specified that TSOs should publish information on the restoration of gas flows on a non-discriminatory basis It was not clear if all TSOs provided this information on a non-discriminatory basis

INCREMENTAL 4: GAS QUALITY INFORMATION TSOs should publish information on their systems’ gas quality parameters and the daily measured values of those parameters It was not clear if all TSOs publish information on the gas quality requirements of their respective systems TSOs in 7 out of 9 GRI NW countries reported that they published some daily information on measured values of key gas quality parameters

ANNEX 2

COMMERCIAL CONFIDENTIALITY The three dimensions of data granularity that determine the extent to which it is commercially sensitive: The period of aggregation The zone of aggregation The time lag of publication THE TSO SHOULD DEMONSTRATE WHY THE INFORMATION IS COMMERCIALLY SENSITIVE

DEMENSION 1: PERIOD OF AGGREGATETION The time period over which the information to be released has been aggregated

DIMENSION 2: ZONE OF AGGREGATION The ‘geographic’ or ‘market specific’ detail contained in the information to be released

DIMENSION 3: TIME LAG The time lag associated with the release of the information