2017 Merit Guidance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UTSA Classified Staff Promotion Tool HR-Compensation.
Advertisements

Preparing for the Biennium Click on icon for presentation audio >>
FY2015 Classified Merit Process Rev January 2015.
Employee Certification Sam Del Toro HOAG, California.
2013 APS Remuneration Survey. Your presenter Christopher Giuliano – APS Remuneration Survey data collection, compilation, tabulation – APSED.
1 FY 2014 Merit Presentation July 2, AGENDA – MERIT PROCESS  Merit Policy Overview and Timeline  Templates and Instructions, Forms Signature.
1  Introductions  Budget Website  Budget Allocations  Salary Planner  Merit Guidelines  Faculty, Staff, Pool Extracts  Spring Budget Downloads 
Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Meeting
PAYING THEM RIGHT: TOOLS FOR SALARY ADMINISTRATION HR Liaison Network Spring Meeting Texas A&M University, Human Resources DIVISION OF FINANCE February.
1 Personnel Policies and Practices, University of Wisconsin System Legislative Audit Bureau November 2006.
Budget Process March 27, Purpose of Budget Process 1. Setup new year employee salary information and establish new year salary budgets 
Efficiencies West Hills Community College District November, 2004.
PUSD Compensation Committee Process Overview Governing Board Study Session January 7, 2013.
No 1 REVIEW OF ACADEMIC STRUCTURE PROPOSED GENERAL STAFF STRUCTURE 3 June 2008.
Classified Compensation Plan FY Summary Occupational Group changes Across the Board increases (ATB) Merit Increases Total Compensation Q & A.
Town Hall Budget Forum August 14, 2009 Henry Yang Chancellor Joel Michaelsen Chair Academic Senate Gene Lucas Executive Vice Chancellor Todd Lee Assistant.
Update to FSUN HRMS April 23, ent/d/1k4FQ6xvh-MnE- erL1NEswbLLBjdq8A91zvozl14yieo/edit.
Policies and Procedures for Summer Supplements on Federal Awards April
The University of Texas at San Antonio June 19, 2013 Merit Policy.
P HASE 2.5: B UDGETARY F UNDING, BUD, AND SUD 12/17/2009.
1 MERIT PROCESS Area Lead Presentation September 23, 2011.
Merit Program  Overview – General Information  Employee Eligibility  Merit Allocation Pools & Funding  Merit Awards, Process, Rules  Draft.
BPC – 1/15/2016 Staff Compensation Update 1. FY16 Compensation Updates  Annual Reappointment Increases– 2%  $2,858,234  Equity Increases – 1%  $1,134,993.
Human Resources Department Bridget Paris, Compensation Specialist Work Session July 7, 2011.
1 MERIT PROCESS Area Lead Presentation June 21, 2012.
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Proposed Changes CALS May 24, 2016 Kelly Delforge, SPHR, SHRM-SCP Director, HR Solutions and Consulting Division of Human.
Strategic Resource Planning Council June 26, 2013 Merit Policy.
Changes to the FLSA Exemptions Overtime Pay Requirements Office of Human Resources and Workforce Diversity.
FLSA TRANSITION October 2016.
2016 SPaRC Retreat Afternoon Concurrent Session #2 Ask HR!
Non-Educator Merit Pay Plan
Agenda Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
Employee Informational Session Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT (FLSA)
Changes to the FLSA Overtime Rule
FLSA – OVERTIME RULE CHANGES
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
Payroll Cycles are Changing What is changing
Fair Labor Standards Act Update October 4, 2016
S , F.S., Requirements for Employee Compensation and Salary Schedules Florida Department of Education May 23,
PAc-17 Sabbatical Leave of Absence
FLSA Update to Overtime Regulations
FLSA Training for Managers
Merit Process Budget Planning and Development FAR Meeting
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) New Overtime Regulations Overview
Financial Area Representatives
Associate Changes Policy: Manager Training
Troy Anderson ERCOT Program Management Office November 6, 2008
9 6 Total Rewards C H A P T E R Training Employees
Merit Increase Pay Guidelines
Overview Background UPS Operational Policy TC 4
Salary Increases FY18 and
Health Sciences UC/VA Split Faculty Salaries & Effort Reporting
Added flexibility for districts
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi
Area Lead Presentation
Higher Ed Class & Comp Update
Staff Compensation Update
Pay Plan Meeting with HR Directors and Budget Officers
2017 Summer Salary Additional Compensation
2018 UCPEA One-time Performance Awards
12 (total number of admin. positions)
Funding Pension Benefits for Georgia’s Educators
Workforce Development Goal
Substantive Change Full Category I Proposal Workflow
Office of Human Resources HR Forum
Added flexibility for districts
Graduate Assistant Hiring
Finalizing the Compensation Study
Presentation transcript:

2017 Merit Guidance

Merit Pools & Dates T&R Faculty, 3% salary pool and 0.75% bonus pool or as articulated in a school plan and approved in advance by the Provost, 12-month effective 7/25/17; 9, 10, & 11-month effective 8/25/17 University Staff, 3% pool, effective 7/10/17 PRS and A&P Faculty, 3% pool, effective 7/25/17 Classified Staff,  receive 3% across the board increase effective 7/10/17. Employees must have a performance rating of “2” or higher.  Classified increases will be processed centrally. Classified Staff in High Turnover jobs (as defined by State legislation), 2% increase effective 9/4/17. This increase will be processed centrally.

Recommended Matrix for Ustaff & A & P Faculty Schools/units have flexibility in adjusting approach to meet their business needs.  For those who may need to adjust these increase amounts based on budget considerations or the distribution of performance ratings, a range of increase options for each rating is also provided.  An optional recommended approach is to focus on both merit as well as market pay range penetration.  Based on the Cabinet’s guidance, the primary consideration in determining your school/unit’s approach to merit pay should be 1) ensuring it is based on merit, and 2) ensuring managers can explain the increases provided to their staff The Lead@ planning worksheet’s Recommended Salary increase is based on 3% Merit Pool and Performance Rating as shown below: Performance Rating Recommended Salary Increase Recommended Range of Increase Effective 2.25% 1-3% Highly Effective 3.25% 2.25%-4.25% Exceptional 4.25% 3.25%-5.25%

Merit Processing for Ustaff and A&P Employees must have been onboard by December 31, 2016, in order to be eligible for an increase. In order to receive an increase, a performance evaluation must be on file.  Compensation administrators will certify that current performance documentation is available for all staff receiving a merit increase. UHR will perform a post-implementation quality assurance review to ensure the presence of performance documentation. We recommend that employees at 100% or higher market penetration be paid a bonus (one-time payment) rather than a base pay increase; no suggested amount for this bonus is provided.   A second level executive reviewer (i.e. Provost for Deans, EVP for most VPs), is required for total increases which exceed 3% of salary budgets or individual employee merit increases of 0% for effective or higher or >10%.  Medical Center transfers are eligible for merit increases irrespective of their hire date; Increases for employees rated as a 2 (Inconsistent) require comment; Salary increase may be shared with impacted staff and A&P faculty on or after July 14 Increases other than Merit can be included In person open houses in UHR to assist as you key will be held during the two week keying window June 26-July 9

New for 2017 Since the T&R Faculty plan does allow for a potential bonus, three columns have been added into the faculty workbooks to capture these recommendations. Any faculty on Leave With Partial Pay that have hours less than 40 hours now have a new Oracle field to track their actual effort. This effort will be listed in the faculty worksheet instead of the standard hours. Corrections will be made in the field up until the Compensation Administrator responsibilities is turned off. See guidance document for instructions on correcting locked entries. Given the unfunded mandate required by the FLSA minimum in 2016, we understand that salary levels may need to be adjusted differently for individuals who did receive an increase due to the planned FLSA minimum in contrast to those who did not. We suggest that schools/units look at this closely. If the school/unit decides not to award an increase to an individual who received an increase due to the planned FLSA minimum, they should indicate this by putting “received FLSA increase” in the comment field.