Calibrations What’s new in Kurt Woschnagg, UCB

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PMT Calibration Results and the MC simulation Shigeru Yoshida, Chiba University
Advertisements

TeVPA, July , SLAC 1 Cosmic rays at the knee and above with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav for The IceCube Collaboration South Pole 4 Feb 2009.
EHE Neutrino Search with the IceCube Aya Ishihara The University of Wisconsin - Madison for the EHE Verification working group.
M. Kowalski Search for Neutrino-Induced Cascades in AMANDA II Marek Kowalski DESY-Zeuthen Workshop on Ultra High Energy Neutrino Telescopes Chiba,
Calibration of the 10inch PMT for IceCube Experiment 03UM1106 Kazuhiro Fujimoto A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree.
SUSY06, June 14th, The IceCube Neutrino Telescope and its capability to search for EHE neutrinos Shigeru Yoshida The Chiba University (for the IceCube.
2015/6/281 IceCube EHE analysis Present Status and Future Plan Shigeru Yoshida For the EHE working group.
PD Kobe Univ. 06/29/2007 General performance of the IceCube detector and the calibration results I am Mina Inaba from Chiba university. I will.
Coincidence analysis in ANTARES: Potassium-40 and muons  Brief overview of ANTARES experiment  Potassium-40 calibration technique  Adjacent floor coincidences.
IceTop Tank Calibration Abstract This report outlines the preliminary method developed to calibrate IceTop tanks using through going single muon signals.
EHE Search for EHE neutrinos with the IceCube detector Aya Ishihara for the IceCube collaboration Chiba University.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
IceCube: String 21 reconstruction Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL Presented by Spencer Klein LLH reconstruction algorithm Reconstruction of digital waveforms Muon.
Greg Sullivan University of Maryland Data Filtering and Software IceCube Collaboration Meeting Monday, March 21, 2005.
1 N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Operation and performance of the NESTOR test detector.
Photon propagation and ice properties Bootcamp UW Madison Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison r air bubble photon.
Ronald Bruijn – 10 th APP Symposium Antares results and status Ronald Bruijn.
Response of AMANDA-II to Cosmic Ray Muons and study of Systematics Newt,Paolo and Teresa.
Point Source Search with 2007 & 2008 data Claudio Bogazzi AWG videconference 03 / 09 / 2010.
March 02, Shahid Hussain for the ICECUBE collaboration University of Delaware, USA.
Cascade and Flasher Workshop Welcome! n Logistics n Agenda n Goals Spencer Klein, LBNL.
J. Vandenbroucke N. Bramall, M.D’Agostino, A. Morey, P. Sandstrom, M.Solarz, I.Taboada Calibration of the Standard Candle: How Standard Is It? IceCube.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
Standard Candle, Flasher, and Cascade Simulations in IceCube Michelangelo D’Agostino UC Berkeley PSU Analysis Meeting June 21-24, 2006.
Calibrating the first four IceCube strings Kurt Woschnagg, UCB L3 Detector Characterization IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Bartol, March 2004.
IC59 Cascade Filter Comparison between the recos for (HLC+SLC) and (HLC only) pulses Part I Mariola Lesiak-Bzdak LBNL 1 Cascade Phone Call, Nov. 8, 2010.
Progress on the beam tracking instrumentation Position measurement device Tests performed and their resolution Decision on electronics Summary.
Calibrations Accomplishments in PY03 Plans for PY04 Kurt Woschnagg, UCB L3 lead – Detector Characterization.
IceCube Calibration Overview Kurt Woschnagg University of California, Berkeley MANTS 2009 Berlin, 25 September identical sensors in ultraclean,
Feature Extractor Dima Chirkin, LBNL The future is here.
Measurement of the Charge Ratio of Cosmic Muons using CMS Data M. Aldaya, P. García-Abia (CIEMAT-Madrid) On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Sector 10 Sector.
IceCube Dust Loggers Kurt Woschnagg, Ryan Bay Physics Department, UC Berkeley Instrumentation Session IceCube Collaboration Meeting Bartol, March 2004.
South Pole Glaciology with the IceCube telescope Kurt Woschnagg University of California, Berkeley for the IceCube Collaboration Open Science Conference,
PMT measurements in Antares Oleg Kalekin on behalf of Antares collaboration VLVnT 2011 Erlangen
Review of Ice Models What is an “ice model”? PTD vs. photonics What models are out there? Which one(s) should/n’t we use? Kurt Woschnagg, UCB AMANDA Collaboration.
A. Tsirigotis Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Reconstruction, Background Rejection Tools.
IceTop Design: 1 David Seckel – 3/11/2002 Berkeley, CA IceTop Overview David Seckel IceTop Group University of Delaware.
Status of Detector Characterization a.k.a. Calibration & Monitoring Project Year 2 objectives ( → Mar ‘04) 1. Calibration plan (first draft in March.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
OD Tuning: SK-IV Roger Wendell TMC Meeting
INFN-Pisa Collaboration Meeting, Roma – 12/10/2013 *
Light Propagation in the South Pole Ice
Status of the Baikal-GVD experiment
Doug Cowen/High-Level Analysis Preparation/SAC Meeting
Sebastian Kuch University Erlangen-Nürnberg
South Pole Ice model Dmitry Chirkin, UW, Madison.
IceCube Collaboration Meeting Ghent, October 9, 2007
Direct Measurement of the Atmospheric Muon Spectrum with IceCube
An expected performance of Dubna neutrino telescope
Measurement of water optical properties in ANTARES
Systematic uncertainties in MonteCarlo simulations of the atmospheric muon flux in the 5-lines ANTARES detector VLVnT08 - Toulon April 2008 Annarita.
Performance of the AMANDA-II Detector
Ioannis Manthos Laboratory of Nuclear & Particle Physics
IC40 Physics Run Preparations
(2001) Data Filtering: UPDATE
South Pole Ice (SPICE) model
Response of AMANDA-II to Cosmic Ray Muons and study of Systematics
String 21 Flashers and AMANDA
Freeze-In and Hole Ice Studies with Flashers
Light Sources for AMANDA/IceCube Cross-Calibration
on behalf of the NEMO Collaboration
String-21 Flasher Analysis
Preliminary Comparison of Monte Carlo and 9-string IceCube Data
Geometry and Timing Verification with Flashers
Monte Carlo simulation of the DIRC prototype
Atmospheric muons in ANTARES
Summary of yet another Photonics Workshop AMANDA/IceCube Collaboration Meeting Berkeley, March 19, 2005.
Reconstruction of the SC with rime
西村美紀(東大) 他 MEGIIコラボレーション 日本物理学会 第73回年次大会(2018年) 東京理科大学(野田キャンパス)
Hellenic Open University
Presentation transcript:

Calibrations What’s new in Kurt Woschnagg, UCB IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Ghent, October 10, 2007

Selected Calibration Topics Waveform Calibration DOMcalibrator [C. Roucelle] Linearity/Saturation [S. Seunarine] Relative DOM efficiency [H. Johannson] Golden DOMs [M. Inaba] Ice Properties Dust logger update: deep ash layer found [R. Bay] Standard Candle Waveform analysis [M. Inaba] Azimuthal asymmetry [J. Kiryluk] New data (IC22+TWR) Ice Shear Interstring flasher data [KW] Muon tomography [M. Olivo] Inclinometers [R. Bay]

DOMcalibrator [Cécile Roucelle] : icecube/200709001

Dual t droop correction

General case

PMT linearity/saturation [Suruj Seunarine] Sketch of the method Measured V Expected V

PMT linearity/saturation DOMs have different saturation levels Will be parameterized → DB → DOMcalibrator In-situ flasher data

Relative DOM efficiency [Henrik Johansson] Calculate average nphotons seen by a DOM from a track at distance r (use well-reconstructed tracks) Fit curve according to theory: exp(a-b·r) Use <nphotons(r=0)> as measure of DOM efficiency Relate individual efficiencies to mean efficiency

Relative DOM efficiency Two ways to estimate <nphotons> exp(a-b·r) nHits from FE Use track detection probability

Relative DOM efficiency Attempt to decouple ice effects Use average b, refit a Grouping by b, abs, z

Relative DOM efficiency ongoing…

Calibration of ROMEO with GDOM Outline [Kotoyo for Mina Inaba] Comparison DOMINANT + ROMEO Simulation PMT Calib. Data Glass+Gel Calib.Data DOM Calib.data Challenging : Large PhotoCathode area … Difficult to do overall ABSOLUTE calibration - Combine RELATIVE 2D measurement + small-area ABSOLUTE efficiency measurement ( )

Glass + Gel : Acceptance simulation New transmittance and DOMINANT Outline Transmittance of glass/gel is updated Gel : available for all DOMS ! :) Glass : still small sample(less than 10), need continuous monitoring New Acceptance Photon Acceptance Old DOMINANT Simulation Injection angle : 0deg (off-axis) Beam size : 8mm Beam location : center of PMT Parallel beam Updated DOMINANT(Geant4) New glass/gel transmit. Harness, MB, FB, HV installed Fresnel reflection ON Wavelength [nm]

Outline Golden DOM calibration Summary We averaged available PMT calibration data New Glass/Gel transmittance table is applied to DOMINANT simulation The averaged absolute calibration of GDOM and Romeo + DOMINANT simulation with averaged calib data shows GOOD agreement over all wavelength range New Romeo + DOMINANT simulation represents Stoyan’s In Water Angle Acceptance measurement This plots shows the comparison between DOM measurements and the PMT measurement+glass-gel simulation. The histogram is the expected efficiency which is provided by the simulation explained in the previous slide. The red points are the value of DOM measurements. The difference between simulation and data was 12% at 337nm at first, and then We found that a shift of -3 nm of the penetration curve of a glass and a gel make the difference 0.5%. You can see that data and simulation agrees well over the wavelengths.

Dust logger update [Ryan Bay] First ash layer identified in instrumented volume: Corresponds to known 92,000 year old ash layer in Dome C core

Dust logging in the coming season

Standard Candle Basics Standard Candle I Standard Candle Basics ~4ns @337nm Full intensity: (4.0±0.4)×1012 /pulse 40” N2 laser 8”

Standard Candle I: waveform analysis [Aya for Mina Inaba] ATWD based total estimated Npe 100% ? First guess center of brightness COBy [m] COBx [m]

Standard Candle I: ATWD waveforms on str39 ATWD waveform of str39 DOM10 DOM11 DOM13 DOM15 DOM16 DOM18 DOM19 DOM20 DOM21 DOM25 DOM28 DOM30 MC Real

Standard Candle I: ATWD waveforms on str40 ATWD waveform of str40 DOM10 DOM11 DOM13 DOM15 DOM16 DOM17 DOM18 DOM25 DOM26 DOM28 DOM29 DOM30 MC Real

Standard Candle I: waveform analysis [Aya for Mina Inaba] Charge Ratio MC/Real 1690m 1910m 1680m 1920m SC

Standard Candle I: azimuthal asymmetry [Joanna Kiryluk] Standard Candle data 1.30 [rad] 4.34 [rad] 2.35 [rad] 3.45 [rad] SC DOM Number

Standard Candle I: 22-string data [Taboada/Filimonov] Data taken on September 18, 2007 pDAQ IC22+TWR default configuration PnF running 7 filter wheel settings: 0.5%-100% SC @ 1Hz, 2000 pulses/setting 80 GBytes of raw data → SC filtering needed Filtered data now in Data Warehouse: /data/exp/IceCube/2007/internal-system/ DebugData/1004/DebugData_SCData_Oct03.tar.gz First pDAQ calibration data taken without detector downtime (as envisioned in the PDD) Milestone

Standard Candle I: 22-string data run 109337 run 109338 100% 50% 30% 10% 5%

Standard Candle I: 22-string data 5% setting, ~120 DOMs 100% setting, ~250 DOMs [AMANDA hits not shown]

How to take future Standard Candle data [I. Taboada] Write a Standard Candle trigger Base trigger on multiplicity, topology, timing Create a pDAQ configuration that enables this trigger Otherwise configuration identical to default Add a PnF filter that runs all the time to select events with a SC trigger No downtime and automatic filtering of SC data

Standard Candle II To be deployed on string 55 (3rd of the season) Between DOMs 42 and 43 λprop (2150 m) ~38 m (SC-II) λprop (1813 m) ~22 m (SC-I) Pointing down (SC-I points up) About 10 times brighter than SC-I Filter wheel dynamic range: SC-II: 1500 SC-I: 120

Standard Candles Standard Candle II deploy next season 57 Standard Candle II deploy next season pointing downward 63 64 55

Three experimental approaches: 1. Using the three deep AMANDA strings Ice Flow and Shear flow model Three experimental approaches: 1. Using the three deep AMANDA strings 2. Muon tomography 3. Inclinometers http://wiki.icecube.wisc.edu/index.php/Ice_shear_measurement

Using the deep AMANDA strings ● 48/57/58: recently deployed = ~vertical ● 11/12/13: in the ice for >9 years

Pilot Runs 9/17 Dawn Williams Andreas Gross ~1700 m ~2000 m ~2300 m

What resolution can we achieve? Zoom in: 1 bin = 5 ns ≈ 1 m ~2300 m

muon tomography [Martino Olivo] Reconstruct tracks (include the DOM) Move DOM around (virtually), keep tracks stationary See how reco likelihood changes → Pandel function

muon tomography

muon tomography Under development…

Pressure vessel <2” I.D. Biaxial tiltmeter for constraining shear @ ~2430 m (on 3-4 strings 2007/08) [Ryan Bay] Special Devices breakout y x ~0.5°/year 3 strings meters per year Angular resolution: 0.01° Angular range: +/- 25° Operating temp: -40 to 85 °C Pressure vessel <2” I.D. (TBD)