What Does Research Tell Us About the Teaching and Learning of Writing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PACT Feedback Rubric Pilot Results with UC Davis English Cohort.
Advertisements

Evidence & Preference: Bias in Scoring TEDS-M Scoring Training Seminar Miami Beach, Florida.
Dr. Dana Ferris University of California, Davis PREPARING TEACHERS TO TREAT ERRORS IN THE K-12 CLASSROOM.
From Elaboration to Collaboration: Understanding and Supporting Second Language Writers Alfredo Urzúa, Languages and Linguistics Kate Mangelsdorf, English.
EVALUATING WRITING What, Why, and How? Workshopping explanation and guidelines Rubrics: for students and instructors Students Responding to Instructor.
Human Resources ‘Designing out’ ‘designing in’ in the Open University: strategies for dealing with student plagiarism Jude Carroll 19 January 2005.
Writing in a Foreign Language Foreign Language Pedagogy EA 125/225.
WRITING NEXT: A Report to Carnegie Corporation of New York
The purpose of this workshop is to introduce faculty members to some of the foundation issues associated with designing assignments for writing intensive.
OCTOBER ED DIRECTOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 10/1/14 POWERFUL & PURPOSEFUL FEEDBACK.
What Does Research Tell Us About the Teaching and Learning of Writing? Writing Resources Center UNC Charlotte 1.
Interdisciplinary Writing Unit Narrative & Informational Writing 4 th Grade By: Sheri Bashlor.
Unit 12 Teaching Writing. Teaching objectives  know how to motive students to write  design writing tasks  A communicative approach and a process approach.
University Writing Center Colbourn
10/20/2015Dr. Hanaa El-Baz 1 Methodology L7 Lecture Error Correction and feedback.
A review of peer assessment tools. The benefits of peer assessment Peer assessment is a powerful teaching technique that provides benefits to learners,
Focus on the Unskilled Writer. 60% of students nationwide enter college underprepared for college level writing. Students who successfully complete a.
Integrating Outcomes Teaching Writing Intensive LSICs.
Teaching Writing.
STATE OF TEXAS ASSESSMENTS OF ACADEMIC READINESS (STAAR TM ) Grades 3−8 Reading Grades 4 and 7 Writing English I, II, and III Victoria Young Director of.
Peer Editing/Revision EDG 4410 Teaching Strategies and Classroom Management University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL Dr. Verkler Fall 2014.
Standards That Count: Reading, Discussion, Writing, and Presentation.
Teaching Grammar Understanding and Implementing Classroom Teaching Strategies Diana Calhoun Bell Tutor Training Friday, January 7, 2011 University of Alabama.
Objectives of session By the end of today’s session you should be able to: Define and explain pragmatics and prosody Draw links between teaching strategies.
“The purpose of a writing course is not to teach information about writing but to help students become better writers.” Cheryl Smith and Angus Dunstan,
Communication Arts The Writing Process. Communication Arts GUIDING CONCEPT As writers, we understand and demonstrate the ability and flexibility to use.
How to teach writing Why teach writing?
Pamela R. Fletcher St. Kate’s Director of Writing
THE EARLY FRENCH IMMERSION PROGRAM
Anthony Williams, Maria Northcote, Jason Morton and John Seddon
Don’t Throw the Book at Them
Using Weblogs in the Classroom
What is reflective writing?
Teaching Writing to Science Undergraduates
Inquiry-based learning and the discipline-based inquiry
Innovating Rubrics: Inviting Dialogue With and About Student Writing
AP Language and Composition
Writing Tasks and Prompts
U n i v e r s i t y o f W a s h i n g t o n
What is reflective writing?
ENG 101: Freshman Composition
Purposeful Literacy Leadership for Administrators: Start a Movement
Visible Learning for Literacy
CLUE WRITING CENTER BASICS
Introduction to the NSU Write from the Start QEP
Understanding the rhetorical situation
By Jennifer Forsthoefel Courtesy of The Writing Studio
PURPOSE/FOCUS/ORGANIZATION
PURPOSE/FOCUS/ORGANIZATION
PURPOSE/FOCUS/ORGANIZATION
Teaching Writing LLT 307.
The Five Stages of Writing
Peer Review ENGL 106: FYC Beth Towle.
PURPOSE/FOCUS/ORGANIZATION
Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member
Section VI: Comprehension
Writing Learning Outcomes
Competence and performance
“Language is the most complicated human behaviour” ”
Tutors: providing feedback Students: using tutor feedback
Florida Standards Assessment:
The Writing Process.
DEVELOPING ACADEMIC LANGUAGE AND TEACHING LEARNING STRATEGIES
Approaches to Learning (ATL)
Advice from Admissions Representatives
Analytical and Rhetorical Writing Matt Barton
Leveraging Technology to Increase Learning Through Student-Feedback Tools       Leveraging Technology to Increase Learning Through Student-Feedback.
Getting to Know the Writing Resources Center
Writing-to-Learn vs. Writing-to-Demonstrate Learning
Presentation transcript:

What Does Research Tell Us About the Teaching and Learning of Writing What Does Research Tell Us About the Teaching and Learning of Writing? Writing Resources Center UNC Charlotte PowerPoint originally created by Dr. Mark Hall, former Director of the UNCC WRC

Writing Resources Center (WRC) Locations: 125 Cameron G31 Atkins Library (by Peet’s) Center for Graduate Life, Cone 268   Phone: 704-687-1899 E-mail: wrchelp@uncc.edu Website: wrc.uncc.edu Appointments: writing.uncc.edu/writing- resources-center/schedule- appointment

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? There is no single, “good” writing. Writing practices, including rules and conventions, vary from one discipline to another. Literacy practices are situated. Transference from one discipline to another is largely a myth [1].

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? Genres are historically constructed and evolving as parts of changing social expectations. Teachers have tacit knowledge about writing in their disciplines. Students benefit from explicit instruction from those experienced in a particular academic genre, which may be unfamiliar to a novice [1].

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? When college students fail writing, it is not primarily because they lack linguistic or rhetorical skills, but because they lack understanding of the context in which their writing is to function [1].

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? Process comes before product. Writing practices are more important than individual papers. In a pedagogical setting, attention to and guidance in writing processes leads to improved products [1].

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? Students do not learn the basics of grammar before they can write in a particular context. Students learn the rules and conventions of your discipline by practicing meaningful writing—for a real purpose to a real audience in a real form—repeatedly over time. Conventions are not static or universal [1].

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? In a pedagogical setting, writing is meaningful when it is like the writing professionals do outside of school. Meaningful writing accomplishes some goal or objective important to the writer. When writing is meaningful, students find it engaging. When writing is engaging, students learn [1].

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? Novice writers in any field cannot produce writing “like a professional” [1]. Learning to write requires room to make mistakes. As students learn unfamiliar genres and composing practices, mistakes are frequently evidence of learning, not ignorance, laziness, or failure [1].

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? Form follows function. Writing is concerned, first and foremost, not with sentence-level correctness, but with communicating meaning to a real audience. Over-concern with error too early in the writing process actually hinders development [1].

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? Real writers revise multiple times. If you want students to improve, then include revision as a requirement of the assignment. Even if you don’t intervene in the process, students who revise tend to improve [1].

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? Students benefit most from three types of feedback: Comments that respond to the development of ideas. Comments that suggest specific ways to make improvements in revision. Comments that explain why something is good or bad in their writing [2].

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? Rubrics that include only general criteria are ineffective. Rather than importing generic criteria that may have little relevance to a unique writing situation, teachers should design criteria with specific assignment contexts in mind [2].

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? Peer responses may help students improve writing if students are trained to respond effectively through repeated modeling and explicit instructions. Students need training in strategies for providing specific, descriptive feedback and in working cooperatively with peers [3].

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? Correcting errors for students prompts little or no improvement. Students improve by having a small number of repeated errors—patterns—pointed out at one time, then self-correcting and collaborating with peers to revise [3].

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? Minimal marking (merely pointing out) is effective, while excessive marking is overwhelming, and even confusing [3].

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? Marking errors on one paper may not lead to improvement on the next. Students learn by revising one paper before going on to the next [3].

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? Writing correcly is very importent. Error has serious concsequences in the “real world.” The question is not if sentence-level errors matter, but when in the writing process to attend to proofreading & editing: In the final stage. When certain kinds of feedback are provided matters less than students understanding why [3].

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? All errors are not created equal. Those that interfere with clear meaning are more important than, say, a misspelled word, or affect when the writer means effect. Effective feedback prioritizes revision suggestions from most important to least [3].

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? Effective writing assessment distinguishes among the following: “mistakes” (the result of carelessness), “error” (the result of misunderstanding), “stylistic” preferences (viscous instead of thick, for example) [3].

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? Errors are social and local, not universal. Errors are what experts in a field agree are errors. Error in one situation may be a preferred convention in another. We mark what we expect to find [3].

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? Non-native English speakers may always write with an accent. Penalizing them for their status as language learners is unjust [2].

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? Students must write frequently in order to develop. Students improve as writers only when they revise repeatedly over time [3].

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? “Learning” is a process of gradual internalization of routines and procedures available to the learner from the social and cultural context in which the learning takes place [1].

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? If students don’t know, we must teach them. Telling students that they should have learned “X” in high school or first-year composition does not help them develop [1].  

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? Assigning writing then marking and grading it is not teaching writing. Teaching requires explicit instruction, repeated modeling, frequent feedback during the writing process, multiple opportunities for writing in a variety of genres, both formal and informal, and practice over an extended period of time [1].

What Does Writing Research Tell Us? Not all evidence of learning shows up in a single semester. Writing development occurs slowly over extended time [1].

Writing Resources Center (WRC) Locations: 125 Cameron G31 Atkins Library (by Peet’s) Center for Graduate Life, Cone 268   Phone: 704-687-1899 E-mail: wrchelp@uncc.edu Website: wrc.uncc.edu Appointments: writing.uncc.edu/writing- resources-center/schedule- appointment

Works Cited [1] M. Carter, C. R. Miller, and A. M. Penrose, (1998, Apr.). Effective composition instruction: What does the research show?. Center for Communication in Science, Technology, and Management [Online]. (3), pp. 1-16. Available: https://writing.uncc.edu/sites/writing.uncc.edu/files/media/docs/Effective_Writing_In struction_What_Research_Shows.pdf. [2] D. Martins, (2008, Dec.). Scoring rubrics and the material conditions of our relations with students. Teaching English in the Two-Year College [Online]. 36(2), pp. 123-137. Available: https://writing.uncc.edu/sites/writing.uncc.edu/files/media/docs/Martins_Designing_R ubrics.pdf. [3] R. Barron, (1991, Sept.). What I wish I had known about peer-response groups but didn’t. The English Journal [Online]. 80(5), pp. 24-34. Available: https://writing.uncc.edu/sites/writing.uncc.edu/files/media/docs/Barron_Using_Peer_ Response_Groups.pdf.