Launch Readiness Review

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Team Space Jam Launch Readiness Review Paul Guerrie, Ben Azlein, Megan Scheele, Bridget Chase, Shane Meikle, Taylor King, & Jamie Usherwood November 2,
Advertisements

Matt Breihan, Jay Davis, Jack Gregory, Ashton Schrage, Sara Schuette, and Lydia Whitney October 14, 2008.
Space Debris Conceptual Design Review Cole Bostrom Corey Godwin Jonathan Kirchmaier Emily Logan Sean Murphy Seanna Renworth
Clean Air Project: Team Big Green SpaceGasm Launch Readiness Review Hillary Beltran, Edward Crawford, Nicole Harris, Edward Lowe, Emily Proano, and Kevin.
Team Space Jam Launch Readiness Review Paul Guerrie, Ben Azlein, Megan Scheele, Bridget Chase, Shane Meikle, Taylor King, & Jamie Usherwood November 2,
Team Lightning Rod Launch Readiness Review Fall 2010 Rev C 11/2/2010 Trevor Luke Chris Bennett Matt Holmes Sushia Rahimizadeh Alex Shelanski Matthew Dickinson.
Dynamo Team Careful Harry Glenda Alvarenga J.J. Busse Emily Eggers Adam Kemp Gabrielle Massone Dalton Smith Corey Wilson Launch Readiness Review.
Team 7, Final Presentation December 1, Mission Overview Send up petri dishes containing bacteria Analyze the effects of temperature, pressure, and.
Adam Archuleta Katie Cartee Logan Farley Patrick Klein Kamron Medina Catherine Villa TEAM INFINITY AND BEYOND LAUNCH READINESS REVIEW Fall 2011 Rev C
Brynn Larson Trey Karsten Terek Campbell Marcus Flores Marcell Smalley Shunsuke Miyazaki 2015/6/10 Team Ochocinco.
Team BIOHAZARD Presents: Project CRUENTO. CRUENTO: Latin – to make bloody; stain with blood.
Flight Club Critical Design Review Evan Akselrad, Chris Anaya, Natalie Bixler, Melanie Dubin, Logan Finch, Ted Maritz, and Scott Williams October 14, 2008.
BalloonSat “Optimism Prime” Team “Thumbs Up” Conceptual Design Review Nick Lenk, Greg Nelson, Eddie Cyrus, Jake Varey, Chase Pritchett, Brian Inglis 9/23/08.
Team D.S.R.O Taylor Boe Andrew Buckner Andrew Gilbert Gracie Harsha Emily Howard Bobby Stillwell September 23, 2008.
Team Cutthroat Critical Design Review Chris Alley Annie Frederick Josh Marshman Julie Price Lance Tokmakian Kent Welborn October 17, 2006.
Team S.H.I.E.L.D Launch Readiness Review Team Members Evan Coffey Aaron Holt Travis Pollok Matthew Ross Jared Turner Addison Woodward-Parrish 11/11/08.
Teamo Supremo Critical Design Review Ahna Issak Wes Roos Kristen Brenner Kimberley Fornall Barton Tofany Nick Martinez Ahna Issak Wes Roos Kristen Brenner.
Team Cutthroat Critical Design Review Chris Alley Annie Frederick Josh Marshman Julie Price Lance Tokmakian Kent Welborn December 7, 2006.
Team BIOHAZARD Presents: Project CRUENTO. CRUENTO: Latin – to make bloody; stain with blood.
Space Debris Critical Design Review Cole Bostrom Corey Godwin Jonathon Kirchmaier Emily Logan Sean Murphy Seanna Renworth October 14, 2008 Fall 2008 Rev.
Final Presentation Nick Hoffmann Miranda Rohlfing Geoff Morgan Miles Buckman Lauren Wenner Rahul Devnani December 5, 2006.
Carnivorous Ninja Warriors Launch Readiness Review Katie Brissenden, Hannah Williams, Aram Podolski, Kat Bryant, Arley Hendrick, Cam Comeau November 5,
GONS Final Presentation Steven Benedict Jake Danser Josh Hecht Brock Kowalchuk Erik Shuttlesworth Matthew Zemel December 4, 2007 Steven Benedict Jake Danser.
GloboGym Fighting Cobras Conceptual Design Review Riley Pack, Sebastian Seeds, Greg Stahl, Paul Loeb, Nic Zinner, Pierce Edwards September 21, 2006 Project.
Critical Design Review Nick Hoffmann Miranda Rohlfing Geoff Morgan Miles Buckman Lauren Wenner Rahul Devnani October 17, 2006.
Team DSRO Critical Design Review Taylor Boe Andrew Buckner Andrew Gilbert Emily Howard Grace Harsha Bobby Stillwell October 14, 2008.
Oddballs Critical Design Review Team 8: Grant Fritz, Jessica Brown, Stephanie Jalovec, Jennifer McGraw, Brian Roth, Evan Townsend 10/18/07.
Team Hubble Jr. Final Presentation Rachel Small, Holly Zaepfel, Ryan Del Gizzi, Kyle Norman, and Evan Levy December 5, 2006.
Launch Readiness Review 11 Nov Brady Phillips, Elliot Guber, Brandon Campbell, Dushyant Dhundra, Joel Mendez, Cameron Trussell.
Conceptual Design Review Nick Hoffmann Miranda Rohlfing Geoff Morgan Miles Buckman Lauren Wenner Rahul Devnani September 21, 2006.
Critical Design Review Riley Pack, Sebastian Seeds, Greg Stahl, Paul Loeb, Nic Zinner, Pierce Edwards October 17, 2006 Project Frankenfine: A Near Space.
Space Debris Launch Readiness Review Seanna Renworth, Emily Logan, Corey Godwin, Sean Murphy, Cole Bostrom, Jonathan Kirchmaier November 11 th, 2008.
Conceptual Design Overview
Thomas Jeffries, Anthony Anglin, Dylan Cooper, Dustin Fishelman, Colin Harkins, Joao Mansur, Starteya Pais, Andrew Trujillo 10/2/2012.
SPIRIT of the Koala Project VOLT Critical Design Review Anthony Anglin, Colin Harkins, Dylan Cooper, Thomas Jefferies, Starteya Pais, Joao Mansur, Andrew.
Lucas Ibarra Alexis Sutker Evan Long Jack Oblack Jaevyn Faulk Dylan Anderson Devon Connor Eric Hardwick October 18, 2012.
Quinn Kostelecky, Vincent Staverosky, Gloria Chen, Roshan Misra, Jacqueline Godina, Raymond Auyeung Fall 2011 Rev A
Hang Seven Launch Readiness Review Lucas Migliorini, Becca Lidvall, Paul Smith Chase Goodman, Ethan Hollenbach, Nikhil Desai, Abby Caballero, Sierra Williams.
Team Lightning Rod Critical Design Review Fall 2010 Rev A Trevor Luke Chris Bennett Matt Holmes Sushia Rahimizadeh Alex Shelanski Matthew Dickinson.
Team Hang 7 Final Presentation Lucas Migliorini, Sierra Williams, Chase Goodman, Ethan Hollenbach, Becca Lidvall, Abby Caballero, Paul Smith, Nikhil Desai.
Hang Seven Critical Design Review Sierra Williams, Lucas Migliorini, Abby Caballero, Chase Goodman, Paul Smith, Becca Lidvall, Ethan Hollenbach, Nikhil.
Zachary Cuseo, Andrew Fruge’, Tyler Knappe, Christopher Nie, Sydni Smith, and Shweta Maurya 5 November, 2009.
Space Monkeys Launch Readiness Review Project Curious George November 11, 2008 Project Curious George November 11, 2008.
Team Honey Badger R.A.H.D. Final Presentation Team Members: Kyle Daniels, Logan Harrop, Annie Kelly, Gabe Frank Jason Leng, Karyn Perdue, Josh Whipkey,
Evan Akselrad, Chris Anaya, Natalie Bixler, Melanie Dubin, Logan Finch, Ted Maritz, and Scott Williams September 23, 2008 Fall 2008 Rev A
Zachary Cuseo, Sydni Smith, Andrew Fruge’, Tyler Knappe, Christopher Nie, and Shweta Maurya 8 October 2009.
Team SSCSC Critical Design Review Nick Brennan, Kier Fortier, Tom Johnson, Shannon Martin, Dylan Stewart, and Adam Wright October 05, 2010 Fall 2010 Rev.
Napoleon Connor Strait | Chris Gray | Chad Alvarez Akeem Huggins | Ashley Zimmerer Tucker Emmett | Ginny Christiansen |Caleb Lipscomb Conceptual Design.
Victor Taberski, Ryan Walker, Allen Marshall, Matt Kerwin, Andrew Winthrop, Steven Ramm October 14, 2008 UANIOOU – (Upper Atmosphere Near-Infrared Optical.
Team Honey Badger R.A.H.D. Critical Design Review October 18, 2012 Josh Power Karyn Science Kyle Team Leader C+DH Annie C+DH Zach Budget + Science C&DH.
Quinn Kostelecky, Vincent Staverosky, Gloria Chen, Roshan Misra, Jacqueline Godina, Raymond Auyeung Fall 2011 Rev C
Team Hubble Jr. Critical Design Review Ryan Del Gizzi, Evan Levy, Kyle Norman, Chris Everhart, Holly Zaepfel, Rachel Small October 17, 2006.
PROJECT SCREAM PROPOSAL Josh Yeaton Kevin Dinkel Chris Kopacz Conrad Schmidt Chris Warren Dillon Thorse
S.H.I.E.L.D. CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW Addison, Travis, Jared, Evan, Aaron, Matt 10/14/08.
Junk in a Box Critical Design Review
O2n Cloud Nine Critical Design Review
Balloon Payload Launch
Mission Statement... The Space Wolverines will;
Brandi Casey Lee Wilson
Team S.H.I.E.L.D. Final Presentation
Skillz That Killz Team 3 Final Presentation
Team Go Go Gadgets Launch Readiness Review
S^3 Launch Readiness Review
Space Debris Critical Design Review
Team Super 8: Sat Morpheus Launch Readiness Review
Team Super 8: Sat Morpheus Final Presentation
Team Honey Badger Conceptual Design Review
Team Up, Up, and Away Launch Readiness Review
Team TWSS Launch Readiness Review
Team SCREAM Launch Readiness Review
Presentation transcript:

Launch Readiness Review Team Napoleon Launch Readiness Review Connor Strait, Chris Gray, Chad Alvarez, Akeem Huggins, Ashley Zimmer, Tucker Emmett, Ginny Christiansen , Caleb Lipscomb Tuesday, November 26, 2012

Mission Overview Our Mission is to prove that 3D imaging is possible for small objects close to the camera in space, and that 3D imaging is not viable for large, distant objects in space.

Design Overview Our satellite consists of a structure made of foam core, with four plastic viewing ports on the front and top of the structure, and a heater. Our satellite contains two Arduinos The 1st Arduino has our External Temperature sensor, internal temperature sensor, humidity sensor, pressure sensor, and accelerometer The 2nd Arduino has a gyroscope and controls our camera rig motor Our satellite also contains two identical Canon Cameras used for 3D imaging and a GoPro for HD film

Structure

Heater Warm

1st Arduino Environmental Sensors

2nd Arduino Gyroscope and Motor

Canon Cameras and Rig Not a Pepsi Advertisement

GoPro Camera

3D image testing We took images with the Canon cameras of known objects close to the cameras over an hour long period. We then attempted to create 3D images from these images Cameras were successfully synced, and took pictures at the same time We successfully created 3D images We were also able to make a 3D video

2D image

3D image Looks cooler with 3D glasses

Functional Testing We ran all of our sensors in 3 different controlled environments in order to calibrate our environmental sensors. We subtracted the average value our sensors read during the test from the actual environmental value of the room. Our final test was in a room of 18 degrees C, a humidity of 35%, and a pressure of 14.673 psi The accelerometer was placed on a flat surface with the z-axis pointing up

Accelerometer Results: Our accelerometer is still a small percentage off actual readings X-axis reads about .2 g high Y-axis reads about .16g high Z-axis reads about .06 g high The results of this final test will be used to calibrate the accelerometer sensors one more time, and they will be tested again before the flight.

Accelerometer (g)

Accelerometer (g)

Accelerometer (g)

Pressure sensor Our pressure sensor is fairly accurate, reading about .2 psi low during the test. We will use this data to make a final calibration to our sensor. The change in the values of the pressure sensor in a room of constant pressure showed that our sensor is accurate to about +-.04 psi.

Pressure (psi)

Temp Sensors Our internal temperature sensor was very accurate during the test, reading between 17.5 C and 18.5 for the duration of the test Our external temperature sensor read about 1.7 degrees C high for the test, and will be calibrated to solve this error.

Internal Temperature Sensor

External Temperature Sensor

Humidity Sensor Our humidity sensor performed well during the test, reading at about 35% for the duration of the test

Humidity

Gyroscope To test our Gyroscope, we rotated the gyro about each axis individually 180 degrees in one second. We also recorded the reading of our gyroscope on a flat surface while not moving We used the results of this test to calibrate our gyroscope We are not yet able to write our gyroscope’s data to an SD card.

Cold Test We placed our satellite in a cooler filled with dry ice for an hour and a half and ran all of our sensors. Our satellite remained above -10 degrees C the entire test, reaching a max temperature of 35 degrees C

Cold Test

Structure Test Drop Test: Stair Test: Results: Thrown off bridge between DLC and ITLL Stair Test: Thrown a flight of stairs at down Stairs at DLC Results: Sides of Structure held up well. One corner did break open, not enough hot glue was used. Problem solved by applying hot glue to outside of corners as well as inside

Whip Test Box whipped around Tucker’s head at a high velocity for 3 minutes Results: Main Structure survived Flight tube became loose during test Problem solved by applying more hot glue secure the flight tube and by correct placement of paper clips in tube

Whip Test

Predicted Flight Results We expect to successfully take 3D images of close up objects (other satellites, the balloon) but not of distant objects (the earth, mountains on the earth, the sun, ect.) We expect all of our sensors to successfully collect and record data to the SD cards. We expect our satellite’s internal temperature to remain about -10 degrees C for the entire flight.

Worries/Concerns Cameras remaining in sync for the entire flight Camera rig not rotating correctly

Mission Objectives, Level 0 Requirements. # Mission Objectives, Level 0 Requirements. Origin Test ability to produce 3D images in a near space environment. Mission Statement 1 Determine attitude and rotation of our satellite during the entire flight. 2 Our Satellite shall reach an altitude of 30 km. RFP 3 Keep total weight under 1125g and total money spent $250. 4 Keep internal temperature of Satellite above -10 C. 5 Record environmental variables. 6 Ensure the safety of all members of the team. 7 Balloon Sat must be able to fly again. Level 0 Requirements

Shaniqua shall fly a GoPro to capture standard 2D video. Requirements # Objective 0, Level 1 Reference # 0.1 Satellite Shaniqua shall fly two Cannon SD 780 cameras side by side to capture “3D” images. 0.2 Shaniqua shall fly a GoPro to capture standard 2D video. 0.3 The two cameras and GoPro shall be connected by a miniB USB cable that will sync the timers on the camera hardware and software before the fight to take pictures automatically during the duration of the flight. 0.4 The Cannon Cameras and GoPro shall be attached to a mechanism that shall rotate the cameras 90 degrees 25 minutes prior to balloon burst. Level 1 Requirements

Shaniqua shall use washers and clips to keep it stable on the rope. Requirements # Objective 1, Level 1 Reference # 1.1 Satellite Shaniqua shall fly a Gyroscope that will collect data continuously for the entire duration of the flight. 1 1.2 The data collected by the gyroscope shall be recorded and used to determine our satellite’s attitude and spin rate. # Objective 2, Level 1 Reference # 2.1 Our satellite Shaniqua shall be attached to a hydrogen balloon that shall carry our satellite to an altitude of 30km. 2 2.2 Shaniqua shall be attached to a rope that is connected to the Balloon via a tube running through the center of our satellite. 2.3 Shaniqua shall use washers and clips to keep it stable on the rope.

Requirements # Objective 3, Level 1 Reference # 3.1 A weight budget shall be kept and updated weekly to ensure our satellite shall weight less than 1125g. 3 3.2 A cost budget shall be kept and updated weekly to ensure our satellite cost does not exceed $250. # Objective 4, Level 1 Reference # 4.1 Our Satellite shall have an internal heater powered by 9V batteries that shall heat the satellite for the duration of the flight. 4 4.2 Our satellite shall have ½ inch foam insulation on the interior of the structure.

Requirements # Objective 5, Level 1 Reference # 5.1 Our Satellite shall have an external and internal temperature sensor that shall continuously collect data for the duration of the flight. 5 5.2 Our satellite shall have a pressure sensor that shall continuously collect external pressure data for the duration of the flight. 5.3 Our satellite shall have an internal humidity sensor that shall collect data continuously for the duration of the flight 5.4 Our satellite shall have a 3 axis accelerometer that shall collect data continuously for the duration of the flight. 5.5 All data collected from the temperature sensors, pressure sensor, humidity sensors, and accelerometer shall be stored on a 2 GB SD card. 5.6 Data collected form the temperature sensor, pressure sensor, and accelerometer shall be used to determine the altitude of our satellite as a function of time.

Requirements # Objective 7, Level 1 Reference # 7.1 The structure of our satellite shall be made of foam core and shall be held together using aluminum tape and hot glue. 7 7.2 Our satellite’s structure shall remain intact during the entire flight, including the ascent, the balloon burst, the descent and 7.3 All of our satellite’s sensors, cameras, and Arduino boards shall be functioning during the duration of the flight and after landing. # Objective 6, Level 1 Reference # 6.1 Construction and Soldering equipment shall be used only in the proper manner and for the direct purpose of constructing our satellite. 6 6.2 All construction equipment and soldering tools shall be properly stored.

End