Kelly Stecker Sussman Lab

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A basic overview of Proteomics Bioinformatics Unit Lab Meeting F.M. Mancuso 21/02/2012.
Advertisements

David Campbell 1,, Eric Deutsch 1, Henry Lam 1, Hamid Mirzaei 1, Paola Picotti 2, Jeff Ranish 1, Ning Zhang 1, and Ruedi Aebersold 1,2,3 1.Institute for.
Kelly Stecker Sussman Lab
Protein Quantitation II: Multiple Reaction Monitoring
Protein Quantitation II: Multiple Reaction Monitoring
Micromass Quattro Ultima triple quadrupole mass spectrometric detector HPLC system (LC) Electrospray ionisation source (-ve & +ve ion) Photodiode array.
* CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Bioanalysis of Exenatide: Intact Versus Signature Peptide Approach to Reach Optimal Sensitivity in Large Molecule Quantification.
Proteored Multicentric Experiment 8 (PME8) Quantitative Targeted Analysis in Proteomics. An Assesment Study (QTAPAS) ProteoRed WG1-WG2 Meeting Pamplona,
Quantification of low-abundance proteins in complexes and in total cell lysates by mass spectrometry Bastienne Jaccard and Manfredo Quadroni Université.
Proteomics The proteome is larger than the genome due to alternative splicing and protein modification. As we have said before we need to know All protein-protein.
HOW MASS SPECTROMETRY CAN IMPROVE YOUR RESEARCH
Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS Gygi et al (2003) PNAS 100(12), presented by Jessica.
Proteomics Informatics Workshop Part III: Protein Quantitation
Fa 05CSE182 CSE182-L9 Mass Spectrometry Quantitation and other applications.
Proteome.
Tryptic digestion Proteomics Workflow for Gel-based and LC-coupled Mass Spectrometry Protein or peptide pre-fractionation is a prerequisite for the reduction.
© 2010 SRI International - Company Confidential and Proprietary Information Quantitative Proteomics: Approaches and Current Capabilities Pathway Tools.
Outline Selection of candidate proteins for the multiplex analysis of DBS via targeted proteomics The currently employed strategies for the selection.
A Phospho-Peptide Spectrum Library for Improved Targeted Assays Barbara Frewen 1, Scott Peterman 1, John Sinclair 2, Claus Jorgensen 2, Amol Prakash 1,
Quantification of Membrane and Membrane- Bound Proteins in Normal and Malignant Breast Cancer Cells Isolated from the Same Patient with Primary Breast.
Multiple flavors of mass analyzers Single MS (peptide fingerprinting): Identifies m/z of peptide only Peptide id’d by comparison to database, of predicted.
Low lightHigh light High light response in Arabidopsis thaliana 4 days 1100 transcripts change Anthocyanin light response mutant.
Isotope Labeled Internal Standards in Skyline
Salamanca, March 16th 2010 Participants: Laboratori de Proteomica-HUVH Servicio de Proteómica-CNB-CSIC Participants: Laboratori de Proteomica-HUVH Servicio.
Oct 2011 SDMBT1 Lecture 11 Some quantitation methods with LC-MS a.ICAT b.iTRAQ c.Proteolytic 18 O labelling d.SILAC e.AQUA f.Label Free quantitation.
LC separation and MS of histone tryptic peptides allow for their post-translational modification quantitation -For most K residues our histone assay, we.
What is proteomics? Richard Mbasu and Ben Richards.
Protein quantitation I: Overview (Week 5). Fractionation Digestion LC-MS Lysis MS Sample i Protein j Peptide k Proteomic Bioinformatics – Quantitation.
Ho-Tak Lau, Hyong Won Suh, Martin Golkowski, and Shao-En Ong
Novel Proteomics Techniques
Target Analyses in Parallel Reaction Monitoring Mode (PRM)
이 장 우. 1. Introduction  HPLC-MS/MS methodology achieved its preferred status -Highly selective and effectively eliminated interference -Without.
Goals in Proteomics Identify and quantify proteins in complex mixtures/complexes Identify global protein-protein interactions Define protein localizations.
Mass Spectrometry makes it possible to measure protein/peptide masses (actually mass/charge ratio) with great accuracy Major uses Protein and peptide identification.
Tandem MS.
Sample Preparation Enzymatic Digestion (Trypsin) + Fractionation.
Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) Selected Reaction Monitoring (SRM)
The Syllabus. The Syllabus Safety First !!! Students will not be allowed into the lab without proper attire. Proper attire is designed for your protection.
Agenda Welcome from the Skyline team!
2 Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis
Pinpointing phosphorylation sites using Selected Reaction Monitoring and Skyline Christina Ludwig group of Ruedi Aebersold, ETH Zürich.
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Protein/Peptide Quantification
MCB test 2 Review M. Alex Miranda 11/5/16.
Proteomics Informatics David Fenyő
Volume 138, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Quantifying Ubiquitin Signaling
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Proteomic Approaches to Cancer Biomarkers
A perspective on proteomics in cell biology
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages (August 2008)
Separation of embryonic brain proteins and peptides by sequential preparative SDS-PAGE and SCX chromatography.A, 6 mg of embryonic day 16.5 murine brain.
Work flow for the LAXIC strategy to quantify the phosphorylation change in response to osmotic stress. Work flow for the LAXIC strategy to quantify the.
Schematic of MS1 filtering.
Representative example of LAXIC performance for complex plant phosphoproteome. Representative example of LAXIC performance for complex plant phosphoproteome.A.
2D-LC-MS/MS analysis of tryptic digest of HEK293-SUMO3 cells (2 μg inj
Mass Spectrometry THE MAIN USE OF MS IN ORG CHEM IS:
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Is Proteomics the New Genomics?
The principle of the immuno-SILAC method.
Shotgun Proteomics in Neuroscience
What Determines the Specificity and Outcomes of Ubiquitin Signaling?
The Coming Age of Complete, Accurate, and Ubiquitous Proteomes
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (March 2011)
Quantitative Proteomics II: Targeted Quantitation
Proteomics Informatics David Fenyő
Identification of Post Translational Modifications
Kuen-Pin Wu Institute of Information Science Academia Sinica
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (April 2016)
Presentation transcript:

Kelly Stecker Sussman Lab Targeted Proteomics Kelly Stecker Sussman Lab

Outline What is MRM/SRM/Targeted mass spec Quantification using peptide standards Selecting standard peptides and building methods Practical notes and suggestions.

MRM/SRM/Targeted proteomics MRM: Multiple Reaction Monitoring SRM: Selective/Selected Reaction Monitoring Specifically monitoring or ‘targeting’ one or more peptides Shotgun/untargeted proteomics: Coomassie stained gel Targeted proteomics: Western blot 1 2 3

MRM/SRM/Targeted proteomics MRM: Multiple Reaction Monitoring SRM: Selective/Selected Reaction Monitoring Specifically monitoring or ‘targeting’ one or more peptides Shotgun/untargeted proteomics: Coomassie stained gel Targeted proteomics: Western blot 1 2 3 -Indiscriminately identifies most abundant proteins -No prior knowledge required for protein detection -Information obtained for a large number of proteins -Selectively targets one protein -Requires prior knowledge of protein mass/sequence -Limited number of proteins can be assays at once (<150) -Improved sensitivity! -Higher throughput!

Peptides are targeted using a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (QQQ) Triple quads contain 3 quadrupoles in series that are programed to selectively stabilize your ion of interest. Quadrupoles act as a mass filter. Ion Source Detector The DC and RF voltages are tuned to stabilize particular m/z ranges www.waters.com

SRM analysis uses 2 stages of mass filtering Q1 q2 Q3 Ion Source Detector Fragmentation Q1: Peptide mass is selected (parent ion) q2: peptide is fragmented via collision induced dissociation Q3: Peptide fragment is selected (fragment ion) Parent ion to fragment ion mass change is called a “transition” Usually ≥ 3 transitions are monitored for each peptide of interest

SRM analysis uses 2 stages of mass filtering Q1 q2 Q3 At1g01690.1 SK NLTSSGDH MSDALSAIPAAVHRNLSDKLYEKRKNAALMLENIVKNLTSSGDHDKISKVIEMLIKEFAKSPQANHR SGDHDISK SGDHDISK AQYLEQ IVPPVINSFSDQDSRVRYYACEALY DHDISK NLTSSGDHDISK NL NLTSS DISK Three transitions (aka 3 pieces of data identifying this peptide) NLTSSGDHDISK SGDHDISK NLTSSGDHDISK DHDISK NLTSSGDHDISK NLTSS

Basic workflow for SRM analysis Extract proteins Digest into peptides Chromatographic separation of peptides (C18 column) ESI Electrospray Ionization MS analysis Parent ion selection Fragment ion selection Fragmen-tation Q1 q2 Q3 Ion Intensity Time

Peptides are quantified using stable isotope labeled peptide standards NLTSSGDHDISK Endogenous: Standard: NLTSSGDHDIS[K+08] Q1 mass 637.67 641.67 Q3 fragment y7 Q3 mass 779.38 771.38 Peptide A Peptide B Single transition Intensity m/z Endogenous Peptide Standard Endogenous Extracted ion chromatogram (XIC) Intensity Time Standard

Peptides are quantified using stable isotope labeled peptide standards NLTSSGDHDISK Endogenous: Standard: NLTSSGDHDIS[K+08] Q1 mass 637.67 641.67 Q3 fragment y7 Q3 mass 779.38 771.38 Peptide A Peptide B Single transition Intensity m/z Endogenous Peptide Standard Overlay: Std & Endog. Extracted ion chromatogram (XIC) Intensity Time

Peptides can be multiplexed in a single targeted MS run Standard peptides Standards peptides Endogenous peptides Endogenous peptides

Peptide standards are spiked in during sample processing Extract proteins Digest into peptides Chromatographic separation of peptides (C18 column) * * ESI Single transition Electrospray Ionization MS analysis Intensity m/z Endogenous Peptide Std. Parent ion selection Fragment ion selection Fragmen-tation Q1 q2 Q3 Intensity Time

Quantitation is achieved by measuring area under XIC curve signal intensity normalized to peptide standard Endog Area Std. Area =

Awesome freeware exists for analyzing SRM data MacCoss Lab https://skyline.gs.washington.edu/ Vendor specific software also exists: MultiQuant from ABSciex

How to select peptides for SRM analysis Considerations Feasibility of chemical synthesis -Peptide length (≤ 20 A.A., or ≤ 24 A.A.) -PTMs? Physiochemical properties -Hydrophobicity -Chemically modified residues (Met, Cys) Biological considerations -Is the peptide unique to 1 protein -Likelihood of trypsin misscleavage PRESENCE OF EMERPICAL MS DATA! -Has your protein been detected by MS? -Software for predicting proteotypic behavior” of peptides is “Not so good”-Dr. MacCoss Good performing Poor performing Number of peptides Hydrophobicity bins (SSR Calc) Picotti et. al. 2013 Nature Vol 494, pp 266-270

Examples of endogenous peptide detection success rate Sussman Lab data: -Lab mate working with rat blood proteins: In silico selection ~20% Empirical data ~80% -Targeting specific Arabidopsis protein: 11 tryptic peptides selected from in silico prediction, 2 endogenous peptides detected after SCX fractionation AND extended LC gradient. In silico selection ~18% -Arabidopsis phosphopeptides: 65 peptides selected from discovery shotgun proteomics data, 61 endogenous peptides detected. Empirical data ~93% NOTE: Isobaric tags may influence peptide behavior. Keep this in mind when viewing discovery data from iTRAQ or TMT experiments. In general, good quality MS1 spectra is a good indicator of SRM peptide performance. Success rate for peptide detection depending on selection source Huttenhain et al. Sci Transl Med 11 July 2012: Vol. 4, Issue 142, p. 142ra94

Commercial options for peptide synthesis Pros Cons Guaranteed 7-day turn around Length restriction (~20 amino acids) Cheap (around $60/peptide) Minimum order requirement (24) More PTMs available Expensive ($200-$300/peptide) No minimum order size Slow production (months) >95% pure Sigma-Aldrich PEPscreen Peptide libraries AQUA peptides Thermo Scientific PEPotec Pros Cons Cheap! (around $40/peptide) Minimum order requirement (4) Peptides arrive resuspended http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/life-science/custom-oligos/custom-peptides/product-highlights/pepscreen-peptides.html http://www.piercenet.com/info/pepotec-srm-custom-peptide-libraries Note: all prices are for heavy labeled peptides and are approximate

Developing SRM methods What you need to know -Peptide parent mass and charge state -Fragment peptide masses and charge states -Highly recommend building SRM methods by first starting with peptide standards Resources MacCoss Lab https://skyline.gs.washington.edu/ http://prospector.ucsf.edu/prospector/mshome.htm

Developing SRM methods Step 0: Successfully resolubilize lyophilized peptide standards. Recommend stepwise resuspension. Step 1: Determine strongest transitions for each peptide (start with 5/peptide; method can be trimmed down to 3/peptide later on). If your instrument has an ion trap, this process is easier. Step 2: Optimize collision energy (CE). This must be performed for every single transitions. Step 3: Determine retention time of peptide. Using scheduled SRM methods significantly improves multiplexing capability. Step 4: Look for endogenous peptides. Determine necessary pre-fractionation steps.

Why I like targeted MS: improved peptide detection Untargeted discovery data Detection overlap between samples Detection overlap between injection replicates Inj1 Inj2 Offline SCX fraction + 4 hour LC-MS runs 185 306 460 No SCX fraction, 90min LC-MS runs Comparison between MS methods PICC pS124 PEN3 pS40 Unfractionated SCX fraction Standard peptide Endogenous peptide Targeted SRM Quantitation Untargeted Quantitation Intensity Time Intensity, cps

Log2 (treated/control) 3 fold + 1.2 fold +/- 3 fold - Reliable peptide detection means proteins can be reproducibly analyzed across many different samples Cold FC JA Flg22 H2O2 ABA NaCl Mann. KCl AT5G56980 pS61 MSL9 pS124 EIF4A1 pT145 JAZ12 pS97 AHA1 pT948 AHA2 pT947 CPK5 pS552* ERD14 pS59 YAK1 pY284 AHA3 pT882 AHA3 pT948 CAX4 pS38 PIP3B pS274 AHA4 pT959 PIP2F pS283 AMT1 pS488 AT5G53420 pS204 NIA1 pS537 NPC4 pT158 DaySleeper pS155 TRP1 pS214 PP2C-g pS347 RPS6 pS240 WDL1 pS6 ZAC pS155 AREB3 pS43 ABF2 pS86* HSFB2B pS222 SnRK2.2 pS177 SnRK2.3 pS176 SnRK2.6.1 pS175 CPK9 pS78 PEN3 pS40 ADH1 pS229 CPK9 pT37 PEPC1 pS11 AHA2 pS899 Remorin pT58 SIP1 pS11 PICC pS124 Ox-reductase pS29 FAC1 pS203 PIP2F pS286 PLC2 pS280 GC5 pS793 V-ATPase pS241 SAY1 pS313 COP related pS24 MAP4Kα1 pS478 VCS pS692 bZIP30 pS176 MyoB1 pS825 PB1domain pS218 RAF18 pS671 TUA3 pT349* TUA4 pT349* SnRK2.4 pS158* Vac14 pS624 Heat map of 5 min phosphorylation response of 60 peptides under 9 treatment conditions ABA responsive block Osmotic-specific block Stecker et al. Plant Physiology 165.3 (2014): 1171-1187.

Log2 (treated/control) 3 fold + 1.2 fold +/- 3 fold - Reliable peptide detection means proteins can be reproducibly analyzed across many different samples Cold FC JA Flg22 H2O2 ABA NaCl Mann. KCl AT5G56980 pS61 MSL9 pS124 EIF4A1 pT145 JAZ12 pS97 AHA1 pT948 AHA2 pT947 CPK5 pS552* ERD14 pS59 YAK1 pY284 AHA3 pT882 AHA3 pT948 CAX4 pS38 PIP3B pS274 AHA4 pT959 PIP2F pS283 AMT1 pS488 AT5G53420 pS204 NIA1 pS537 NPC4 pT158 DaySleeper pS155 TRP1 pS214 PP2C-g pS347 RPS6 pS240 WDL1 pS6 ZAC pS155 AREB3 pS43 ABF2 pS86* HSFB2B pS222 SnRK2.2 pS177 SnRK2.3 pS176 SnRK2.6.1 pS175 CPK9 pS78 PEN3 pS40 ADH1 pS229 CPK9 pT37 PEPC1 pS11 AHA2 pS899 Remorin pT58 SIP1 pS11 PICC pS124 Ox-reductase pS29 FAC1 pS203 PIP2F pS286 PLC2 pS280 GC5 pS793 V-ATPase pS241 SAY1 pS313 COP related pS24 MAP4Kα1 pS478 VCS pS692 bZIP30 pS176 MyoB1 pS825 PB1domain pS218 RAF18 pS671 TUA3 pT349* TUA4 pT349* SnRK2.4 pS158* Vac14 pS624 20%CV ABA Cold C1 C2 C3 FC Flg H2O2 JA KCl Mann NaCl 8.5% 5.7% 12.9% 12.8% 6.8% 5.8% 6.9% 6.5% 7.6% 10% 6.4% 9.3% Median Standard Deviation Average CV=

Students T-Test: 3 control samples, 3 treated samples Log2 (treated/control) 3 fold + 1.2 fold +/- 3 fold - Reliable peptide detection means proteins can be reproducibly analyzed across many different samples Cold FC JA Flg22 H2O2 ABA NaCl Mann. KCl AT5G56980 pS61 MSL9 pS124 EIF4A1 pT145 JAZ12 pS97 AHA1 pT948 AHA2 pT947 CPK5 pS552* ERD14 pS59 YAK1 pY284 AHA3 pT882 AHA3 pT948 CAX4 pS38 PIP3B pS274 AHA4 pT959 PIP2F pS283 AMT1 pS488 AT5G53420 pS204 NIA1 pS537 NPC4 pT158 DaySleeper pS155 TRP1 pS214 PP2C-g pS347 RPS6 pS240 WDL1 pS6 ZAC pS155 AREB3 pS43 ABF2 pS86* HSFB2B pS222 SnRK2.2 pS177 SnRK2.3 pS176 SnRK2.6.1 pS175 CPK9 pS78 PEN3 pS40 ADH1 pS229 CPK9 pT37 PEPC1 pS11 AHA2 pS899 Remorin pT58 SIP1 pS11 PICC pS124 Ox-reductase pS29 FAC1 pS203 PIP2F pS286 PLC2 pS280 GC5 pS793 V-ATPase pS241 SAY1 pS313 COP related pS24 MAP4Kα1 pS478 VCS pS692 bZIP30 pS176 MyoB1 pS825 PB1domain pS218 RAF18 pS671 TUA3 pT349* TUA4 pT349* SnRK2.4 pS158* Vac14 pS624 P-value +/- 1.25 fold change +/- 1.5 fold change 0.05 Students T-Test: 3 control samples, 3 treated samples

Practical sample handling comments Targeted Proteomics Three biological replicates per treatment Process all samples and controls in the SAME batch! -Extract proteins on the same day -Spike standards on the same day from the same aliquot It is difficult to correct for differential sample handling before standard peptides are spiked in! Homogenization, protein extraction Spike in isotopically labeled peptide standards, trypsin digest, TiO2 phosphopeptide enrichment 90 min LC-MS analysis using Triple Quadrupole (QQQ) Parent ion selection Fragment ion selection Fragmentation Q1 Q2 Q3 Quantification of endogenous/standard extracted ion chromatograms Standard m/z Intensity Endogenous Time Intensity

Useful references “A complete mass-spectrometric map of the yeast proteome applied to quantitative trait analysis.” Paola Picotti, (lots of authors) Reudi Aebersold (2013) Nature “Selected reaction monitoring–based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions.” Paola Picotti & Ruedi Aebersold (2012) Nature Methods “Selected reaction monitoring for quantitative proteomics: a tutorial.” Vinzenz Lange, Paola Picotti, Bruno Domon and Ruedi Aebersold (2008) Molecular Systems Biology 4:222 Arabidopsis SRM data from our lab Stecker KE et al. "Phosphoproteomic Analyses Reveal Early Signaling Events in the Osmotic Stress Response." Plant Physiology 165.3 (2014): 1171-1187. Su SH et al. "Deletion of a tandem gene family in Arabidopsis: increased MEKK2 abundance triggers autoimmunity when the MEKK1-MKK1/2-MPK4 signaling cascade is disrupted." The Plant Cell Online 25.5 (2013): 1895-1910.