From: Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Working Group 2 Report Introduction Definition of terms Water Use Efficiency related to Water Productivity WUE as a ratio; WP related to production or.
Advertisements

Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Simulating Cropping Systems in the Guinea Savanna Zone of Northern Ghana with DSSAT-CENTURY J. B. Naab 1, Jawoo Koo 2, J.W. Jones 2, and K. J. Boote 2,
Application to the rice production in Southeast Asia Rice Production Research Program Agro-meteorology Division National Institute for Agro-Environmental.
CALIFORNIA’S WATER WAR: PART II Balancing Agricultural and Domestic Water Demands Sharon Liu Urban Planning M206A – Intro to GIS March 19, 2012.
Transpiration. the release of water vapor by plants to the atmosphere “is not an essential or an active physiological function of plants” a largely passive.
Gelfand, I. and G. P. Robertson Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in agricultural ecosystems. Pages in S. K. Hamilton, J. E. Doll,
Godoy & Godoy technique of cervical stimulation in the reduction of edema of the face after cancer treatment by José Maria Pereira de Godoy, Maria de Fátima.
Figure 3. Concentration of NO3 N in soil water at 1.5 m depth. Evaluation of Best Management Practices on N Dynamics for a North China Plain C. Hu 1, J.A.
Dr. Joe T. Ritchie Symposium : Evaluation of Rice Model in Taiwan Authors : Tien-Yin Chou Hui-Yen Chen Institution : GIS Research Center, Feng Chia University,
Cancer cachexia by J.N. Gordon, S.R. Green, and P.M. Goggin QJM Volume 98(11): October 17, 2005 © The Author Published by Oxford University.
NFOA for Wheat and Corn. Yield Potential Definitions INSEYIn Season Estimated Yield = NDVI (Feekes 4 to 6)/days from planting to sensing (days.
Mobilization of Stem Reserves in Diploid, Tetraploid, and Hexaploid Wheat B. Ehdaie, G.A. Alloush and J.G. Waines Department of Botany and Plant Sciences,
Figure 1: seasonal courses of (a) PAR (daily sums, solid line; daily maxima, broken line), (b) wind speed (daily means, solid line; daily maxima, broken.
Figure 4. The distribution of biology teacher main assignments
CERES-Wheat a dynamic model to simulate the effects of cultivar, planting density, weather, soil water and nitrogen on crop growth, development and yield.
Fig.3. Photoperiod trend during growing season
From: The Geographic Imagination of Civil War-Era American Fiction
Figure 1. Competition for establishing neural connections
Figure 1. Study population and PCR results
Fig. 1. Water potential (ψ) gradients between leaf xylem (higher ψ) and peripheral elongating cells (lower ψ) are required to sustain cell elongation.
Fig. 7. Path analysis of selected traits
From: Discovery of carbon-rich Miras in the Galactic bulge
Fig. 1. Architectural limitations (dark grey area) and functional limitation (light grey filled with forward diagonal lines) of canopy photosynthesis rate.
J Exp Bot. 2017;68(17): doi: /jxb/erx352
FIG. 1. The Poptree window that appears right after starting POPTREE2 and the dialog box for specifying an input data file. When users start POPTREE2,
Fig. 3. ACE outperforms plmDCA in recovering the single variable frequencies for models describing (a) ER005, (b) LP SB, (c) PF00014, (d) HIV.
Figure 1. Root dry matter concentrations (0, 25, 50, 100, 300, 800 and 1600 mg kg−1) of KP root tissue in control soil plotted against pg DNA.
Figure 3. Average response time by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), group, and condition. Error bars represent standard error. Response time was measured as.
From: Soil temperature modifies effects of soil biota on plant growth
Fig. 7. Estimated damage ratio (eqn 3) of Abies mariesii along an altitude. The lines indicate 5, 10, 20 and 40 cm of DBH, as shown. Regression lines are.
Figure 3. Conceptual framework.
Fig. 1 Overview of model components to identify if hormonal pleiotropy constrains or facilitates phenotypic responses to selection. The environment imposes.
Figure 2 Nonparametric thin-plate spline visualizations of the response surface for each pair of traits. The unbroken line gives the WHR that intersects.
Fig. 1 Flow of ascertainment of cases with incident childhood IgA vasculitis reported by four sources From: Incidence of IgA vasculitis in children estimated.
Fig. 2. Leaf area (A), dry (B) and fresh mass (C) in relation to leaf volume in all studied species. The inset in (B) demonstrates the correlation between.
Fig. 1. Conceptual model of seed bank input as a function of humidity-regulated dormancy onset under variable weather conditions. We hypothesize that there.
Figure 1. Recent estimates of Neoaves phylogeny. a) The Jarvis et al
Figure 1. Single-Tree Model and BART Fits to Simulated Data.
Fig. 1. Assessment of drought tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana C24
Fig. 2. Histograms of estimated lateral root growth rate (cm d−1): (A) Control, no leaves removed; (B) CML, removal of cotyledons and mature.
Fig. 1. The required sample sizes nPPV and nNPV versus the sample allocation fraction P for the case study. From: Sample size for.
From: Estimating the Location of World Wheat Price Discovery
Fig 1: Nitrogen fertilizer application at V7.
Fig. 1. Average leaf water potential ( A ), shoot dry weight ( B ), and root dry weight ( C ) of maize plants infested with western corn rootworm neonate.
Using FAO-56 model to estimate soil and crop water status: Application to a citrus orchard under Regulated Deficit Irrigation Giuseppe Provenzano1, Pablo.
Fig. 1. Comparative protein electrophoretic profiles and immunodetection analysis of extracellular washing fluid (EWF) and seed extract (SE) fractions.
From: The Effect of Vapor of Propylene Glycol on Rats
Fig. 1. Accumulation of Chi1b, CH3, GLUC, PAL, and STS transcripts in bunchstems and flowers/berries of control and UV-C-treated inflorescences/clusters.
Fig. 1 Map of Europe presenting the three ringing stations (black circles, Hel: Heligoland; Chr: Christiansø; and Jur: Jurmo) and locations of the eight.
Nicolas Tremblay, M.Y. Bouroubi
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Fig. 1. (A) Acclimated specific growth rates of Picochlorum species in media with varying salinity (10 mM–1.2 M). (B) Growth rates of P. oklahomensis and.
Using Soil Moisture and Matric Potential Observations to Identify Subsurface Convergent Flow Pathways Qing Zhu, Henry Lin, and Xiaobo Zhou Dept . Crop.
Fig. 5. Number and density of species within 0. 5 s. d
Evangelos Gonias, Derrick Oosterhuis, Androniki Bibi and Bruce Roberts
Figure 1 (a) Predicted dispersal success of hatchling turtles as a function of the interaction between hatchling body ... Figure 1 (a) Predicted dispersal.
Figure 1 Relationships between probability of prey discard and each parameter explored. To show the most robust ... Figure 1 Relationships between probability.
Figure 1 Mean ± standard error proportions of (a) courtship and (b) copulation by female-male type pairing. Error bars ... Figure 1 Mean ± standard error.
x-axis, post-partum days. Closed ...
Fig. 1 Flow chart for selection of study subjects
Figure 1 Relationships between pair indices of dance performance (joint entropy or mutual information) and the past ... Figure 1 Relationships between.
Robust Driving Forces for Transmembrane Helix Packing
Fig. 2. Effect of substrate orientation on growth rate of midwater tadpoles with different oral configurations. Effect of substrate orientation on growth.
Fig. 3. Effect of substrate orientation on growth rate for bottom-dwelling tadpoles with similar oral configuration. Effect of substrate orientation on.
The figure shows the fraction of ...
Fig. 5 Conceptual diagram of the impact of acid deposition on calcium cycling and subsequent plant water use. Conceptual diagram of the impact of acid.
Top: probability distribution of the mass-to-light ratios observed when nebular emission is included in the fitting, stacked across all of the MC samples.
Intensified vegetation water use under acid deposition
Fig. 3 Load dependence of friction force and corresponding COF.
Presentation transcript:

From: Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use Fig. 1. Generalized relationships between applied irrigation water, ET, and crop grain yield. I<sub>W</sub> indicates the point beyond which the productivity of irrigation water starts to decrease, and I<sub>M</sub> indicates the point beyond which yield does not increase any further with additional water application. From: Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use J Exp Bot. 2006;58(2):147-159. doi:10.1093/jxb/erl165 J Exp Bot | © The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

From: Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use Fig. 2. Distribution of irrigation depth, X, as a function of fractional irrigated area. Hypothesized relationships, resulting from the spatial distribution of irrigation water over a field, between the depth of water applied (X, normalized with respect to the required depth to refill the soil water deficit) as a function of the fraction of the area irrigated for full and deficit irrigation. Note that under full irrigation, 50% of the area receives water in excess of the required depth, X<sub>R</sub>, needed to refill the root zone. From: Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use J Exp Bot. 2006;58(2):147-159. doi:10.1093/jxb/erl165 J Exp Bot | © The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

From: Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use Fig. 3. Average monthly consumptive use (ET) requirements for producing 1 metric ton of alfalfa at Cordoba, Spain. Biomass was calculated with a simple model that used transpiration efficiency values, obtained by Asseng and Hsiao (2000) in Davis, CA, USA, the long-term average consumptive use of alfalfa at Cordoba, Spain, and a correction for root dry matter estimated from Rapoport and Travis (1984). From: Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use J Exp Bot. 2006;58(2):147-159. doi:10.1093/jxb/erl165 J Exp Bot | © The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

From: Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use Fig. 4. Relationship between harvest index (HI<sub>R</sub>) as a function of biomass production (B<sub>R</sub>) in response to water deficits. Both are expressed relative to the values observed under full irrigation and all were obtained in experiments conducted under sustained DI. The maize data are from Farré and Faci (2006), the sunflower data from Soriano et al. (2002), and the wheat data from two 4-year experiments reported by Ilbeyi et al. (2006). From: Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use J Exp Bot. 2006;58(2):147-159. doi:10.1093/jxb/erl165 J Exp Bot | © The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

From: Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use Fig. 5. Relationship between harvest index (HI<sub>R</sub>) as a function of biomass production (B<sub>R</sub>) in response to water deficits for sorghum (closed circles) and cotton (open and crossed squares) under SDI regimes. The sorghum data are from Farré and Faci (2006) and Faci and Fereres (1980). The open squares are for the cotton cv. Coker-310, and the crossed squares for cv. Jaen. The cotton data were originally reported by Orgaz et al. (1992). From: Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use J Exp Bot. 2006;58(2):147-159. doi:10.1093/jxb/erl165 J Exp Bot | © The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

From: Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use Fig. 6. Relationship between the harvest index (HI<sub>R</sub>) as a function of biomass production (B<sub>R</sub>) in response to pre- and post-anthesis water deficits for maize (circles) and sunflower (triangles). The maize data are from Farré (1998) and from NeSmith and Ritchie (1992a, b), and the sunflower data are from Soriano et al. (2002). The dashed line is the same as that depicted in Fig. 4 for SDI regimes. (DPre, DPost, DFl: water deficits during pre- and post-anthesis and at flowering, respectively.) From: Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use J Exp Bot. 2006;58(2):147-159. doi:10.1093/jxb/erl165 J Exp Bot | © The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

From: Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use Fig. 7. Harvest index (HI<sub>PV</sub>) as a function of post-anthesis transpiration fraction (fT<sub>VPD</sub>) for sunflower, standardized with respect to the production value (PV=amount of biomass produced per unit of hexose substrate; Penning de Vries et al., 1974) of biomass and to the vapour pressure deficit (VPD), respectively. The dashed line represents Sadras and Connor (1991) model: HI<sub>PV</sub>=fT<sub>VPD</sub>/[1–(a–b fT<sub>VPD</sub>)]; (a=0.91; b=1.63); a and b were obtained following the derivation of Sadras and Connor (1991) but using original data obtained in Cordoba in two sunflower experiments under an SDI regime. The data used were: closed circles and triangles, from an SDI regime measured in a summer experiment reported by Soriano (2001). Squares are from an SDI regime under high N, measured in a spring experiment in 1985 (Álvarez, 1987). The continuous line represents the best fit to all the Cordoba experimental data (HI<sub>PV</sub>=0.116 ln(fT<sub>VPD</sub>)+0.608; r<sup>2</sup>=0.89). From: Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use J Exp Bot. 2006;58(2):147-159. doi:10.1093/jxb/erl165 J Exp Bot | © The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

From: Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use Fig. 8. Harvest index (HI<sub>PV</sub>) as a function of post-anthesis transpiration fraction (fT<sub>VPD</sub>). Closed triangles are from a DI regime that had pre-anthesis deficits while open triangles are from another DI regime in the same experiment under post-anthesis deficits, as reported by Soriano (2001). Squares are from an SDI regime under N limitation (no N fertilizer applied) measured in the 1985 experiment of Álvarez (1987). The two lines are the same as those depicted in Fig. 7. From: Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use J Exp Bot. 2006;58(2):147-159. doi:10.1093/jxb/erl165 J Exp Bot | © The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

From: Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use Fig. 9. Response of almond yield to three deficit irrigation regimes. Average results of a 4-year experiment conducted in California where three different DI regimes were applied. Drawn from data of Goldhamer et al. (2006). From: Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use J Exp Bot. 2006;58(2):147-159. doi:10.1093/jxb/erl165 J Exp Bot | © The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

From: Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use Fig. 10. Seasonal patterns of stem water potential (SWP, MPa) of peach trees in response to the irrigation treatments (RDI, SDI, and full irrigation) during the fourth experimental year (2005); fruit growth stages (I, II, and III) are shown and the arrow H indicates harvest date. Error bars indicate ±standard error. From: Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use J Exp Bot. 2006;58(2):147-159. doi:10.1093/jxb/erl165 J Exp Bot | © The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org