Lake Tarawera Sewerage Steering Committee

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRP Chapter Chapter 6.8 Site selection for hazardous waste treatment facilities.
Advertisements

Masterton District Council Homebush Wastewater Treatment Plant Neighbours Meeting 29 September 2014.
Why Does the Lake Community Need a Sewer Septic tanks are failing. The life expectancy of a septic tank in “ideal” conditions is 20 years. In many cases.
THE EXPANDING ROLE of RECYCLED WATER The Need, Benefits and Cost Effectiveness Make Recycled Water an Increasingly Valued Resource Harry Ehrlich, SDA Principal.
Te Herenga Hui Tapu Te Ranga Marae 24 June 2014 Dealing with Marine Consents Richard Johnson Applications Manager, EEZ.
Wastewater Collection Options for Lakota Beach Area Sub-Basin Special Meeting June 27, 2001 John Bowman Lakehaven Utility District (253)
Town of Plattsburgh Cumberland Head Sewer District Welcome To CUMBERLAND HEAD SEWER DISTRICT INFORMATIONAL MEETING JULY 2009.
California’s New Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Policy Richard Sanchez, REHS, MPH President California Conference of Directors of Environmental Health.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Rule Change Update MPCA 1/13/ Mid-Sized ISTS (MSTS)
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SETTLEMENTS- SANITATION INPUTS ON NATIONAL WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 29 MAY 2012 By Mandisa Mangqalaza.
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.
Smart Growth / Smart Energy Toolkit Wastewater and Higher Densities Achieving Higher Density Development In Areas Without Sewer/Water Service Smart Growth.
WETLANDS and ODOT Environmental Services Oregon Department of Transportation.
TRP Chapter Chapter 4.2 Waste minimisation.
Massachusetts Public Health Inspector Training Wastewater Certificate Program (MA PHIT WW) Session 5: Design and Plan Review— Non-Conventional Systems.
Federated Farmers submission to PC22 to the Horowhenua District Plan 15 November 2011 Presented by Rhea Dasent, Federated Farmers Regional Policy Advisor.
This project is funded by the European Union ENVIRONMENTAL COLLABORATION FOR THE BLACK SEA GEORGIA, MOLDOVA, RUSSIA and UKRAINE Euroconsult This project.
WSNTG Annual Conference September 2006 Water Services National Training Group 10 th Annual Conference 7 th September 2006.
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32, Article V, Solid Waste Management, and to Chapter 38, Zoning Orange County Code Presented by the Orange County Environmental.
Thames Valley/Matatoki Water Supplies October 2012.
Pelican Group of Lakes Improvement District Public Hearing on Facilities Plan Agenda Introduction of PGOLID Board of DirectorsDale Haakenstad Introduction.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
Integrated Constructed Wetlands Regulatory Aspects - the EPA’s role Aoife Loughnane Inspector, Environmental Licensing Programme Environmental Protection.
LIFE AFTER LANDFILL – THE TRANSITION FROM LANDFILLS TO RESOURCE RECOVERY AND TRANSFER STATION 27 September 2007 "Planning – Guidance on Planning Issues.
Orange County Board of County Commissioners Update on USEPA Rulemaking for Numeric Nutrient Criteria Utilities Department January 26, 2010 Utilities Department.
© 2009 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP which may not be reproduced,
Annual Conference October 2011 Water Services Training Group 15 th Annual Conference Water Services in Ireland – Organisational modernisation and new challenges.
3 Councillors Greater Taree 3 Councillors Great Lakes MidCoast Water General Manager Design And Construction Strategic Planning OperationsCorporate.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Presenter Name School of Drafting Regulations for Borehole Disposal of DSRS 2016 Vienna, Austria Siting Strategies.
Village of Naples and Hazlitt 1852 Vineyards Sewer Feasibility Study.
1 Staff Public Workshops Fall 2011 Policy for Siting, Design, Operation and Management of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems San Luis Obispo: October.
Council Improvement Plan Council Meeting 1 June
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
CONNECTIONAL MINISTRIES REACHING FURTHER WITH THE GOSPEL BY SHARING THE LOAD.
WASTEWATER TREATMENT IN BULGARIA STATUS AND CHALANGES ORLIN DIKOV – INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANT.
PARK STREET/CAMPANELLI PARK SEWER EXPANSION PROJECT Public Meeting Wednesday, June 22, 2016.
Proven Management – Proven Gold Districts – Safe Jurisdictions Symbol:PG Exchange:TSX Hardrock Project Environmental.
James Palmer, HBRC The Future of Our Water; Community Symposium
Septic System Overview
Environmental Services Training Group
Kennett Township land Stewardship Initiative
Policy workstreams Craig Mallett Miriam Eagle.
Equality and Human Rights Exchange Network
Delivering Water Reuse Solutions
PowerButte: Solar Overlay Replacement with PowerButte Guide
Mangawhai Wastewater Strategy and Options 7 August 2017.
THE LOWESWATER CARE PROJECT
Civil society demands for key changes in GEF 5 Faizal Parish GEC, Central Focal Point GEF NGO Network GEF-NGO Consultation Washington DC 9 November.
Homeowner Responsibility
Our Mission We work with landowners, communities, and organizations to protect lakes and rivers through developing effective, transferable, long-term solutions.
Waimea Water Augmentation Project
Canadian Navigable Waters Act
An example of Finland's approach to wastewater treatment for households in rural areas Kimmo Tiilikainen Minister of the Environment Finland
What can the urban audit contribute?
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems
Council’s Biosecurity objectives and aspirations
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Assessing Vulnerability & Climate Change Impacts
KIRIBATI IW R2R PROJECT OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION: PROGRESS
Lake Tarawera Needs Help!
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Homeowner Responsibility
Technical Advisory Committee
2012 Annual Call Steps of the evaluation of proposals, role of the experts TEN-T Experts Briefing, March 2013.
Stormwater PNRP Implementation
Lake Tarawera Needs Help!
Freshwater update Te Maru o Kaituna River Authority
Tauranga Moana Marae On-site Wastewater Pilot Project
Post Point Treatment Plant Resource Recovery Project Update
Presentation transcript:

Lake Tarawera Sewerage Steering Committee Community update 14th January 2018 Glenn Snelgrove Independent Chair Lake Tarawera Sewerage Steering Committee

Lake Tarawera Sewerage Steering Committee cont. Lake Tarawera Ratepayers’ Association   Libby Fletcher Terry Beckett Lake Tarawera Community Anaru Rangiheuea (also Tuhourangi) Richard Noke Lakes Water Quality Society Neil Callaghan Tarawera Lakes Restoration Committee John Ford Barnett Vercoe - Onuku Maori Land Trust Chris Sutton Rotorua Lakes Community Board Jim Stanton Tarawera Lakes Protection Society Fred Stevens Tuhourangi Tribal Authority Alan Skipwith Te Mana O Ngāti Rangitihi Trust Ken Raureti Chris Clarke Te Arawa Lakes Trust Karen Vercoe Nicki Douglas Rotorua/Taupo Federated Farmers Gifford McFadden Rotorua Lakes Council Cr Tania Tapsell Cr Mark Gould Monty Morrison Bay of Plenty Regional Council Kevin Winters Ministry of Health Annaka Davis Technical Advisory Group Taupiri McLeod Ngāti Te Rangiunuora Peri Marks Wally Lee

Lake Tarawera Sewerage Purpose of Tarawera Sewerage Steering Committee The Tarawera Sewerage Steering Committee (TSSC) is established to reach consensus on a preferred sewage disposal option for Tarawera To recommend a solution to the Rotorua Lakes Council To work with appropriate funding agencies to obtain an approved level of funding and subsidy to enable the construction of a suitable sewage disposal scheme at a cost acceptable to the community.

Lake Tarawera Sewerage Goals The Committee is to select amongst options for the scheme, which is overall the best practicable option, and which: Contributes best to improving the water quality in Lake Tarawera by reducing such nutrient and contaminant flows from homes and properties as enter into the lakes. Recommends “the best practical option” in terms of the Resource Management Act (RMA)

Lake Tarawera Sewerage Goals Continued Best meets the needs of the community and the cultural needs of tangata whenua. Achieves environmental outcomes. Best safeguards public health. Complies with regulatory requirements, national and regional. Attracts appropriate subsidy funding. Is the most cost effective option for local rate payers as well as Rotorua Lakes Council. Has community support.

Lake Tarawera Sewerage Responsibility and reporting of TSSC The TSSC is a meeting of equals among stakeholders: community groups (especially iwi), authorities (especially Rotorua Lakes Council), and such other stakeholders as may have an interest. The TSSC is not a Statutory Committee and is not subject to direction by Rotorua Lakes Council, nor is there any delegation of Council decision making authority to the TSSC.

Lake Tarawera Sewerage Responsibility and reporting of TSSC The TSSC is to report to the community and to Rotorua Lakes Council. The TSSC is to recommend to Rotorua Lakes Council its preferred option for a sewerage scheme and make such representation to both the RLC and BoPRC annual and long term plans and policies in support of its recommendations. This does not preclude any member of the committee making a submission in their own right.

Lake Tarawera Sewerage TSSC engagement and reporting functions The TSSC may occasionally seek broader stakeholder input by convening workshops, stakeholder forums or by other appropriate means. This engagement shall be done in conjunction with Rotorua Lakes Council. The TSSC shall report regularly to Rotorua Lakes Council. The frequency and form of this reporting shall relate to the timeline of the proposed scheme. The TSSC after agreement by Rotorua Lakes Council, shall report to the public at appropriate times.

Lake Tarawera Sewerage Lake Tarawera Restoration Plan Developed with the community. Plan approved by both Councils. Te Arawa Lakes Trust and community. Community Plan Committee is Chaired by Libby Fletcher Has a number of actions to improve the environment. Number one priority is to reticulate wastewater.

Lake Tarawera Sewerage Cultural Impact Assessment Acknowledgment TLT Abridged version of presentation

Key Recommendations CIA From the report the committee received the four guiding principles of; 1 The best option that halts the decline in Lake water quality. Te Mauri o te Wai 2 Enables the return of Iwi and best use of Maori land 3 The option that has least impact on the sites of significance 4 The management of waste and the respect for one another Tekanga

Lake Tarawera Sewerage Cultural Impact assessment stage two Currently being scoped Stage two will focus on the committees preferred options Engage the four principles Consult with Iwi and Hapu Consult with Maori Land Trusts Recommend findings and preferred option Identify mitigation if needed

On-site Wastewater Capability Project Undertaken by Bay of Plenty Regional Council Acknowledgements Trisha Simonson – Louise Feathers Planning Ltd.

Current Situation Water quality in Lake Tarawera is declining. BoPRC classified Tarawera as a Maintenance Zone and Future Reticulation Zone. From 1 December 2017 all septic tanks will be a discretionary activity, requiring resource consent. All aerated wastewater treatment plants (AWTS) must meet a nitrogen standard or require resource consent. Reticulation options are being investigated. Should reticulation not be the preferred option, then continued use of on-site systems is required. Can sustainable, lawful on-site wastewater management occur for the Lake Tarawera community?

OSET Capability Project A range of environmental constraints were identified by BoPRC which limit effective and sustainable OSET management at Tarawera. The project sought to confirm whether or not these constraints exist, and to what extent. Used GIS and BoPRC data to identify areas to visit. Field investigation including soil testing and site inspections. Colour grading of properties, green to red. Identified what is required for properties to be compliant with BoPRC rules. Overall conclusions made. Full report available at Steering Committee meeting.

Identified Constraints A range of environmental constraints have been identified by BoPRC which limit effective and sustainable on-site wastewater management at Tarawera: Existing Systems Soil Type Property Size Proximity to Groundwater Land Slope

Data Gathering GIS Data from BoPRC used as follows: Maps generated showing areas greater than 15 degrees in slope. Used with aerial photos to identify sites with less than 250m2 disposal area. Soil maps used to identify areas with Rotomahana soil types. Property size from Prover. Groundwater level from BoPRC topography. Data used to select five areas to undertake site inspections and the locations for soil investigations.

Desk-Top Results Existing Systems 391 OSET systems, 11 Resource Consents. 9 AWTS systems, 382 Septic Tanks (97%). 177 Soak Hole systems (45%), 75 Trench systems (19%). Where septic tank size known, 276 were less than the recommended minimum size of 3,000 litres (80%). Soil Type – Rotomahana Mud description from literature Property Size – urban scale, 70% less than 1500m2.

Field Investigation Results Soil Investigation 11 boreholes drilled. Rotomahana Mud identified in 9 holes. Groundwater intercepted in two holes at 800mm and 1000mm depth Percolation tests in four boreholes. Average permeability measured at 0.1m/day, worst case 0.05m/day. Given permeability, soil texture and lack of topsoil, the soil is classified as category 6 (AS/NZS 1547:2010). On the basis of the soil tests, the area required for wastewater disposal per lot was revised to 600m2, based on a loading rate of 2 mm/day and a 4-bedroom dwelling.

Field Investigation Results Site inspections: 107 properties or 27% were inspected. Confirmed that 40%+ sites inspected had steep slopes and limited level areas generally occupied by buildings. 17% of properties had an issue with existing systems e.g. odour, breakout, too close to watercourse, broken tank lids, systems under driveways or decks. 64% of dwellings sourced water from Lake Tarawera. Some sites had multiple dwellings and outbuildings limiting available area. On 27% of sites, it was difficult to establish the location or type of disposal system. Where owners were present, most indicated their systems had been serviced within 12 months.

Collapsing Tank Broken Tank Lid Tank under Driveway Typical Site Area

OSET Colour Grading The constraints identified by BoPRC and confirmed by the field investigation were assessed for all properties. Where sites were not visited desk-top data used to determine colour grading. Results: Green: Permitted Nitrogen Removing Systems (2 properties) = Acceptable Yellow: AWTS and Consent Septic Tanks Systems (16 properties) = Short Term Acceptable. Orange: Upgrade Work Required (204 properties) = Need Significant Upgrades Red: Unable to Meet the Standard Required (169 Properties) = No Solution Available

Colour Grading Pie Chart

OSET Plan Compliance If a reticulation scheme is not pursued, the Tarawera OSET systems must be compliant under the OSET Plan by either: Installing a Nitrogen Reducing AWTS System, or Gaining Resource Consent for a septic tank system (that meets modern standards) as a discretionary activity. For the 220 Orange or Yellow Properties, this means around $16,000 for a new AWTS, or a consent (which may be declined as septic tanks do not meet the required N reduction). For the 169 Red Properties current, solutions have not been determined. Further investigation may find specific solutions. Some properties are very severely limited and pump-out of wastewater may be the only option.

Summary and Conclusions Effective and sustainable on-site wastewater management at Lake Tarawera is severely constrained. On-site disposal is contributing to the nutrient and pathogen loads discharging into Lake Tarawera. The majority of Tarawera properties (95%) do not meet current standards. On-site systems are not likely a valid option for 43% of the community and a further 56% face significant upgrades. Given the evidence of the impacts of OSET discharges and the upgrades required, it is considered important that the settlement is reticulated.

OSET Plan Compliance The OSET Plan requirements for Lake Tarawera are: Existing septic tanks are permitted subject to having an outlet filter and having sludge removed. Existing AWTS within 200 metres of the lake edge are permitted. A new AWTS+NR system is a permitted activity. Other new systems require a resource consent.

OSET Plan Compliance The OSET Plan requirements for Lake Tarawera are: Houses which are expanded, altered or reconstructed can install an AWTS+NR as a permitted activity. For those who do not wish to install an AWTS+NR, a resource consent is required for some other type of system.

OSET Plan Compliance The OSET Plan requirements for Lake Tarawera are: There are a number of existing property owners who are not complying with Maintenance Zone requirements, or have not complied with resource consent requirements. There are also failing on-site effluent treatment systems. The wastewater systems on these properties are contributing to adverse effects on Lake Tarawera. Council does not wish to authorise inadequate new systems which will make the existing situation worse.

OSET Plan Compliance The OSET Plan requirements for Lake Tarawera are: BOPRC Recommendation is that property owners engage an approved wastewater system designer to develop a proposal which will comply with the current requirements of the operative OSET Plan. Resource consents may be granted for systems that; comply with the relevant New Zealand Standard(s), appropriate to site restrictions, and do not exacerbate the problems associated with nutrients discharged into the Lake.

Sewerage Options for Tarawera Acknowledgement Greg Manzano _______________________________________________________________________

PROPOSED SERVICE AREA Number of properties: Current - 423 Ultimate - 546

INDICATIVE CAPITAL COST (MAY 2017) POTENTIAL SERVICING OPTIONS   INDICATIVE CAPITAL COST (MAY 2017) Option Description Collection, Reticulation and Transfer ($M) Treatment and Disposal Total Capital Cost Estimate 1A LPGP system connected to Okareka scheme via Tarawera Road $14.7 $2.7 $17.4 1B LPGP system connected to Okareka scheme via Playnes farm $12.5 $15.2 1C OPGP system connected to a local WWTP and LDS $6.4 $18.9 2A STEP system connected to Okareka scheme via Tarawera Road $16.9 $19.6 2B STEP system connected to Okareka scheme via Playnes farm 2C STEP system connected to local WWTP and LDS $21.1 NOTE: STEP system options about $2M more expensive than LPGP systems

LOW PRESSURE GRINDER PUMP SYSTEM Houses at Tarawera connected by low pressure grinder pumps About 1500 installed within the district over the last 9 years

STEP SYSTEM Underground septic tank (about 3800 litres) provides primary treatment (solids settling) so only liquids go to treatment plant. The solids remain in tank for years and decompose through anaerobic process. Remaining solids pumped every seven years (approximately.) Solids filtered out. 25mm line connects property to main sewer in street.

PROPOSED WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT AND LAND DISPOSAL SYSTEM CONCEPT Wastewater Treatment – Membrane BioReactor Plant (600m³/day approx.) Land Disposal System – Trench based Rapid Infiltration. Approximate area requirement - 5-6 hectares (depending on soil characteristics and buffer requirements.) Solids management – Stored on site and transported offsite. Odour management – Enclose all odour generating processes with foul air extraction and treatment. Noise management – Blowers house inside blower room with acoustic silencers. Indicative cost - $6.0M to $6.50M.

PROPOSED WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT AND LAND DISPOSAL SYSTEM EMERGENCY STORAGE TANK SOLIDS MANAGEMENT BUILDING PROCESS TANKS PERMEATE TANK CONTROL/BLOWER BUILDING Indicative perspective view of Tarawera Wastewater Treatment Plant

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA APPLIED Proximity to receptors - Neighbouring dwellings / urban areas - Cultural/historically significant sites - Groundwater users - Rivers and streams - High use stream management areas - Ecologically significant sites Distance from proposed reticulation Nearer site means lower capital and operations cost Site topography Flatter slopes are ideal Designations ONFL – Outstanding natural features and landscape Geology Higher permeability is better suited for RI disposal

Committees Recommendations That the best practical option for local collection of wastewater is LPGP Grinder Pumps with STEP as a back up option. Reasons Topography of the land very sloping. Capacity of the system LPGP can take higher loadings. Cost effective - is the cheapest cost. Geology Rotomahana Mud. Note Subject to CIA report.

Committees Recommendations The best practical option That the effluent be pumped to one of two connections at Lake Okareka - Playnes farm connection or Connect to Lake Tikitapu (Blue Lake). Reasons Lake Okareka made allowance for Tarawera. Get all nutrients out of the catchment . No Resource Consents required. Easiest to construct. Cheapest of disposal options. Note Subject to CIA report.

Committees Recommendations That a detailed CIA (Cultural Impact Assessment) be undertaken by TLT (Te Arawa Lakes Trust) providing advise on (in no particular order) The aspiration of Maori and Maori land owners. The removal of nutrients and contaminates from the lake catchment. Enhancing the Mana of the Lake and its significance. Any Cultural issues with the alignment of both reticulation and trunk mains. Playnes Farm or Lake Tikitapu and The onsite treatment of effluent if required.

Committees Recommendations That funding applications be made to both the Bay of Plenty Regional Council and the Rotorua Lakes Council for Additional Funding. Currently $6.5m from MfE and $.75m from RLC. That the Committee look at ways of bringing the project forward Including Lump Sum payments and early rating. That there be a community update following the receipt of the CIA. That towards the end of the year, an expression of community support be assessed.

Committees Recommendations That the Reticulation Zone for Lake Tarawera be increased include Te Mu Road, The Landing, The Buried Village and the new Tarawera Walkway carpark. Recommendation 6 That Council in consultation with community and Maori land owners evaluate the max number of connections to the scheme.

Budgets - Estimated Project Budget FRESHWATER IMPROVEMENT FUND Year 1 Year 2 (if applicable) Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 TOTAL Amount requested from the fund for each hear of the project (excl. of G.S.T.)   $325,000.00 $550,000.00 $3,825,000.00 $8,525,000.00 OTHER CASH INCOME (excl. in-kind contributions) Rotorua Lakes Council - to be recovered from Tarawera ratepayers who are scheme beneficiaries Rotorua Lakes Council – contribution from general rates $300,000.00 $450,000.00 $0.00 $750,000.00 Total cash income from other sources for each project year (excl. G.S.T.) $775,000.00 $9,275,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT INCOME $1,100,000.00 $7,650,000.00 $17,800,000.00

Costs Based on a capital cost of $17.8M Subsidies Received and other income $ 8.525M Community Cost $ 9.275M At this stage, subject to change no's of connections 550 Very draft cost per property would be $16,863 Add GST $19,393 Please note: Subject to final costs, variation in property numbers. Contracts are at + or – 30%

Timelines

Questions