IHTSDO Observable and Investigation Model Project Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Units of Measurement. quantities and units UCUM Units in RTM IHTSDO - Observable and Investigation Model Project ISO/IEC / telebiometrics.
Advertisements

Functional and Cognitive Status and Pressure Ulcer Templates Consolidation Updates April 2012.
Copyright © 2001 College of American Pathologists Pseudophakic corneal edema Sample Hierarchy for Corneal Edema Idiopathic corneal edema Phakic corneal.
Ontological analysis of the semantic types Anand Kumar MBBS, PhD IFOMIS, University of Saarland, Germany. BIOMEDICALONTOLOGYBIOMEDICALONTOLOGY.
Concept Model for observables, investigations, and observation results For the IHTSDO Observables Project Group and LOINC Coordination Project Revision.
Concept Model for observables, investigations, and observation results For the IHTSDO Observables Project Group and LOINC Coordination Project Revision.
A proposal for interoperable health information exchange with two Esperantos: ICF and LOINC® originally presented at: Daniel J. Vreeman, PT, DPT, MSc Assistant.
Copyright © 2001 College of American Pathologists Sample Hierarchy for Fine Needle Biopsy of Abdominal Wall Mass Tru cut biopsy of lesion of abdominal.
1. DATA ATTRIBUTES ; SUMMARY 1.1Introduction to biostatistics 1.2 The Mean 1.3Measures of Variability 1.4The Normal Distribution 1.5 Distribution; Data.
MEASUREMENT the process of determining the value or level of a particular CONSTRUCT for every unit of analysis or subject involves OPERATIONALIZATION –translating.
SNOMED and “phenotypes” Signs, symptoms, findings, etc Signs, Symptoms and Findings: Steps Toward an Ontology of Clinical Phenotypes Sept 3-4, 2008 Dallas.
QUALITY CONTROL OF PHYSICO-Chemical METHODS Introduction :Validation توثيق المصدوقية.
RUP Implementation and Testing
Human Factor Evaluation for Marine Education by using Neuroscience Tools N. Νikitakos D. Papachristos Professor Ph.d. candidate Dept. Shipping, Trade and.
Concept Model for observables, investigations, and observation results For the IHTSDO Observables Project Group and LOINC Coordination Project Revision.
EVIDENCE ABOUT DIAGNOSTIC TESTS Min H. Huang, PT, PhD, NCS.
Chapter 9.  Estimate size of injury and determine associated injuries  Discuss the principles of initial assessment and treatment  Identify special.
EPA’s Bioassessment Performance and Comparability “Guidance”
VVSG: Usability, Accessibility, Privacy 1 VVSG, Part 1, Chapter 3 Usability, Accessibility, and Privacy December 6, 2007 Dr. Sharon Laskowski
Perioperative Use Case Best Care through Continuously Delivering Next Best Practices.
How To Design a Clinical Trial
USE OF UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT IN TESTING ROHAN PERERA MSc ( UK ), ISO/IEC Technical Assessor, Metrology Consultant.
Sampling Design & Measurement Scaling
If property-type = susceptibility, then inheres-in = organism (also if method = MLC, then inheres-in = organism)
Lesson 3 Measurement and Scaling. Case: “What is performance?” brandesign.co.za.
LOINC – SNOMED Cooperation on Content Overview for Mapping SIG October 2014 Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Exploration of Possible Concept Models for Observables, Investigations, and Observation Results For the IHTSDO Observables Project Group Revision Date:
EQUIPMENT and METHOD VALIDATION
INTRODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT OF AEROBIC FUNCTION Gilbert O. Madriaga, PTRP Department of Physical Therapy College of Allied Medical Professions University.
Draft Observables Concept Model for Deployment of Anatomic/Molecular Pathology.
Research Design
LOINC – SNOMED CT Cooperation on Content IHTSDO Business Meetings: IPaLM SIG & Observable and Investigation model project April 2016 London, England.
Table core Part file Answer file Group file
Assessing SNOMED CT for Large Scale eHealth Deployments in the EU Workpackage 2- Building new Evidence Daniel Karlsson, Linköping University Stefan Schulz,
SNOMED CT and Surgical Pathology
LOINC – SNOMED Cooperation on Content
Indexes vs. “true” qualities
Nursing Special Interest Subgroup – Observables Modelling
How To Design a Clinical Trial
LOINC – SNOMED CT Cooperation on Content
Non-lab observables The Observables project is supposed to develop a/the model for non-lab observables during 2012 Non-lab → unlimited scope Need for.
Use cases for molecular pathology/genetics
METHODS SECTION OF A RESEARCH PROPOSAL
W. Scott Campbell, MBA, PhD James R. Campbell, MD
Cancer Synoptic Worksheet Encoding Project
The ”level” property type
SNOMED CT Logic Profile Enhancement Yongsheng Gao, 2017/07/11
Draft Observables Ontology model for laboratory and related domains
Scope The scope of this test is to make a preliminary assessment of the fitness of the Draft Observables and Investigation Model (Observables model)
Nursing Special Interest Subgroup – Observables Mapping
SNOMED CT and Surgical Pathology
For the IHTSDO Content Team and Project Groups
LOINC – SNOMED CT Cooperation Project Update
Assessment Theory and Models Part I
Body temperature Core vs. non-core body temperature
INR PropertyType Relative time Characterizes
LOINC – SNOMED CT Cooperation Project Issue Review
CDISC Use of LOINC Codes
IHTSDO Observables Project Group July 23, 2008
IHTSDO Observables Project Group April 21, 2008 Evanston, Illinois
Clinical Assessment Instruments and the LOINC/SNOMED CT Relationship
Naming and modelling of genetic tests
Device complications.
Ontological analysis of the semantic types
“Managing Modern National Statistical Systems in Democratic Societies”
USE OF CLINICAL LABORATORY
Model ID: Model to represent entire statement including context
What Do You Know About “Doctoring”?
USE OF CLINICAL LABORATORY
Experiment for Week 4 Determining the Identity of Several Unknown Substances using Physical Properties CHE116.
Presentation transcript:

IHTSDO Observable and Investigation Model Project Update 2012-10-27

Observables... project Started ca. 2008 Lab test in 2009 Still on-going Planned new lab test 2012

Laboratory test 2012 Larger set of test cases Quality criteria specified Completeness, Understandability, Reproducibility Qualitative aspects in addition to metrics

Example: Core body temperature observable entity = what is intended to be observed + how that is observed

Example: Core body temperature observable entity = what is intended to be observed + how that is observed

Observables model Quality, which is the object of observation Observation procedure, how the quality is observed

Observables model PROPERTY TYPE INHERES IN INHERENT LOCATION INHERENT INGREDIENT CHARACTERIZES PROCESS AGENT PROCESS DURATION PROCESS OUTPUT TOWARDS RELATIVE TO REL-TO PART-OF PRECONDITION Observable = SCALE UNITS TECHNIQUE DIRECT SITE

Observables model WARNING! For educational purpose. Not 100 % true to the model.

Clinically intended target of observation Challenge Body state Environment

PROPERTY TYPE INHERES IN (QUALITY OF) INHERENT LOCATION INHERENT INGREDIENT (INHERENT) OUTPUT OF PROCESS PROCESS AGENT PROCESS DURATION TOWARDS RELATIVE TO RELATIVE TO PART OF Clinically intended target of observation Challenge PRECONDITION Body state Environment

Example: Core body temperature Observation device Observation proxy location Observation technique

Example: Core body temperature Observation device USING DEVICE Observation proxy location DIRECT SITE Observation technique TECHNIQUE

Example: Core body temperature SCALE UNIT

Example |Observable entity|: |Property type| = |Temperature|, |Inheres in| = |Body internal region|, |Using device|=|Tympanic thermometer|, |Units| = |degrees C|, |Direct site| = |Tympanic membrane structure|

Example |Observable entity|: |Property type| = |Temperature|, |Inheres in| = |Body internal region|, |Using device|=|Oral thermometer|, |Units| = |degrees C|, |Direct site| = |Mouth|

Example: Serum sodium concentration relational quality Clinically intended target of observation |PROPERTY TYPE|=|Mass conc.|, |QUALITY OF|=|Plasma|, |TOWARDS|=|Sodium electrolyte| Observation proxy location |DIRECT SITE|=|Serum sample|

|PROPERTY TYPE|=|Mass concentration|, |QUALITY OF|=|Plasma|, Example: Serum sodium concentration |Observable entity|: |PROPERTY TYPE|=|Mass concentration|, |QUALITY OF|=|Plasma|, |TOWARDS|=|Sodium electrolyte|, |DIRECT SITE|=|Serum sample|

TOWARDS QUALITY OF RELATIVE TO RELATIVE TO PART OF Ig G Csf LOINC code 42207-1 Component IgG.CSF Quotients IgG.CSF/IgG.serum Divisors IgG.serum Property RelMCnc System Ser+CSF Time aspect Pt Scale Qn QUALITY OF TOWARDS RELATIVE TO RELATIVE TO PART OF Csf Ig G Plasma NPU19660 Csf— Immunoglobulin G; rel.mass c.(Csf/P) = ? × 10-3

Example |Observable entity|: |Property type| = |Substance concentration|, |Inheres in| = |Plasma|, |Towards| = |Sodium electrolyte|, |Unit| = |mmol/L|, |Direct site| = |Serum sample|

Observables in SNOMED CT Approx. 7 000 Observable entities Approx. 17 000 Observation procedures (Laboratory, Evaluation)

Kinds of observable Body substance/structure observables: lab Physiological observables (e.g. vital signs) Function/Process Scores and indexes Procedure observables: device settings, targets (?) ”non-body” observables Information entity observables: identification code, interpretation Temporal observable Social/personal observable

Non-laboratory use of the model Domains suggested Vital signs – physiology Scores, indexes, assessments Function and activity (ICF related)

Physiological observables Vital signs Previous examples NIBP, Cardiac Output, … Aggregation (min, max, average, …) Reference to process stages/events

Function/Process Functions or processes or ? Are functions needed? E.g. biological transport, body growth, QRS interval, Are functions needed? Processes, ability to realize function, and realization of functions sufficient? Possibly upcoming WHO collaboration on ICF

Scores and indexes Score = a specific SCALE? E.g. VAS pain, where VAS is a specialization of Ordinal Scale Relation to Staging and Scales? Index = a specific TECHNIQUE involving calculation/aggregation of two or more distinct observables? E.g. Glasgow Coma Scale, Disease Activity Score

ICF-related work Aim: to represent the ICF model inside the Observables model What to represent/map? The observable? The finding/observation result? Significant overlap between conditions and observation results ICF classification principles vs. subsumption hierarchy

ICF-related results, so far ICF observables are on a more aggregated level than typical lab observables Not specifically a problem ICF qualifiers correspond to/represent property types (kinds of quality), e.g. Extent of impairment Performance Capacity ICF components are defining characteristics of the qualities

ICF-related results, so far ICF represent values/result on specific ordinal scales

ICF example (b144.x) obs:observable and ((obs:IS_ABOUT some (obs:quality and (obs:INHERES_IN some (organism and (BEARER_OF some memoryFunction))) and (obs:PROPERTY_TYPE some extentOfImpairment))) and (obs:SCALE some obs:ordinal))

ICF example (s750.x_) obs:observable and ((obs:IS_ABOUT some (obs:quality and (obs:INHERES_IN some lowerExtremity) and (obs:PROPERTY_TYPE some extentOfImpairment))) and (obs:SCALE some obs:ordinal))

ICF example (s750.x_) obs:observable and ((obs:IS_ABOUT some (obs:quality and (obs:INHERES_IN some lowerExtremity) and (obs:PROPERTY_TYPE some extentOfImpairment))) and (obs:SCALE some obs:ordinal))

ICF example (d540.x_) obs:observable and ((obs:IS_ABOUT some (obs:quality and (obs:INHERES_IN some (obs:organism and (BEARER_OF some dressingOrUndressingFunction))) * and (obs:PRECONDITION some withoutAssistance) and (obs:PROPERTY_TYPE some capacity))) and (obs:SCALE some obs:ordinal)) * or (AGENT_IN some dressingOrUnderssingProcess)

ICF example (d540._x) obs:observable and ((obs:IS_ABOUT some (obs:quality and (obs:INHERES_IN some (obs:organism and (BEARER_OF some dressingOrUndressingFunction))) and (obs:PRECONDITION some withoutAssistance) and (obs:PROPERTY_TYPE some performance))) and (obs:SCALE some obs:ordinal))