Performance Monitoring and Development of Common Data Platforms

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented to: 2012 FAA Airport Pavement Working Group Meeting By: Al Larkin, Airport Technology, R & D Date: April 25, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration.
Advertisements

Pavement Management Engineer
Wyoming County Paved Roads Management and Monitoring Khaled Ksaibati, Ph.D., P.E. STIC June, 2014.
Module 4-2 : Joint Sealing
Low Volume Road Solutions By: Jason Panter. Seal Coats What is a Seal Coat? – Thin surface treatments – Binder & Aggregates.
Pavement Preservation and Maintenance Private Roads Maintenance Workshop August 18, 2012.
Flooding & Drainage Committee March 30, 2010 Pavement Condition Assessments Mobile Data Collection Unit.
Introduction Surface Engineering & Aggregates and Pavement Management 1.
Portorož, Slovenia TIRE / PAVEMENT NOISE CHARACTERISTICS OF WEARING COURSE ASPHALT MIXTURES Douglas D. Carlson Rubber Pavements AssociationRubber Pavements.
Surface Rehabilitation Treatments
Use of Ground Penetrating Radar to Review MN Roads
PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS. Instructional Objectives n Need for condition surveys n Collection methodologies n Basic types of condition surveys n Different.
Data Collection for Determining Pavement Condition
PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS Lecture 4. Instructional Objectives n Need for condition surveys n Collection methodologies n Four basic types of condition.
HMA Pavement Recycling and Reconstruction
Research Findings from the NCAT Test Track APAI Winter Conference Indianapolis, December 14, 2010.
Chapter 3 Framework for Treatment Selection From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG)
MnDOT Road Research Update Maureen Jensen Benjamin Worel TRB January 17, 2013.
2003 Warranty Presentations Caltrans WARRANTED HMA PAVEMENTS PAVEMENTS.
Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh April 19, 2005 April 19, 2005 Pavement Preservation Sub-Group on Strategy Selection & Evaluation.
Session 4 Preventive Maintenance Treatments. Learning Objectives 1.Identify typical preventive maintenance techniques used on HMA and PCC pavements 2.Identify.
Ultra Thin Bonded Wearing Coarse Sponsored by: Minnesota LTAP Center Presented by: Michael Marti, P.E. SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Dan Wegman, P.E. SemMaterials.
Surface Treatments #2.
Optimizing the Durability and Functionality of PFC Surfaces Don Watson Test Track Sponsor Meeting May 11,
Pavement Preservation Program Emily McGraw, PE February 23 and 24, 2015 – NCDOT & CAPA Workshop.
3rd International Road Surface Friction Conference
CAPA/NCDOT NCAT Pavement Test Track. Washington Oregon California Nevada Idaho Montana Wyoming Colorado Utah New Mexico Arizona Texas Oklahoma Kansas.
Benjamin Worel Minnesota Department of Transportation.
“Analysis of Pavement Condition along Ramon Magsaysay Boulevard by Pavement Distress Approach” Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering Major in Transportation.
Data Collection Technologies for Road Management Brown Bag Lunch Presentation 4 May 2005 Christopher R. Bennett EASTR.
VDOT’S PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE TECHNIQUES & EXPECTATIONS
Alabama Asphalt Pavement Association
A Data-Driven Strategy to Improve the Quality
November 2014 AEMA Fall Meeting Baltimore, MD.
INDOT Roadway Preservation Initiative Update
Pavement Preservation Techniques Used in Virginia
NCAT Pavement Test Track
Haritha Musty and Mustaque Hossain Kansas State University MATERIALS
MnDOT / NCAT Partnership “National Research Benefits”
Content History Oversight Quality Loading Performance Findings
Research Implementation WHRP Flexible Group
ALDOT Specification Updates
Surface Preparation before laying Hot Mix
Barry Paye, PE Chief Materials & Pavement Engineer Wisconsin DOT
Implementation of pavement preservation treatments
Consequences of Delayed Maintenance of Pavement Networks
CIMMS – Network Survey Vehicle
2018 Pavement Workshop May 23-24, 2018
2018 Pavement Workshop May 23-24, 2018
2018 Pavement Workshop May 23-24, 2018
Pavement Preservation
2018 Pavement Workshop May 23-24, 2018
MnROAD/NCAT Partnership
Pavement Asset management section
CSAH-8-1 Crack Sealing w/ Transverse Mastic
Dr. Randy West, P.E. Director / Research Professor
NCAT Pavement Test Track
CIMMS – Network Survey Vehicle
Surface Treatments #2.
Materials and Tests Engineer
MnROAD/NCAT Partnership
Prime Factors for Successful Preservation Treatments
NRRA Pavement Workshop 2019
2019 Pavement Workshop May 21-23, 2019
Preventive Maintenance Team Jerry Geib Research Operations Engineer
NRRA Pavement Workshop 2019
Superpave5 Superpave Design at Five Percent Air Voids
NCAT Pavement Test Track
Pavement Preservation Pooled Fund (Preservation Group – PG1 and PG2)
NRRA Mix Rejuvenator Field Sections
Presentation transcript:

Performance Monitoring and Development of Common Data Platforms   Jason Nelson Assistant NCAT Research Engineer Chelsea Hanson MnDOT Research Engineer

Outline Data collection activities and schedule US 169/CSAH 8 Pavement preservation and MnROAD Cracking Group sections Overview of Pathways 3D data collection van and data analysis Preliminary ride data (before and after construction) NCAT data collection

Common Activities Joint Planning Meeting with Sponsors Performance Monitoring Dedicated Pathways Van Cracking Rutting Ride Texture Every 2 weeks beginning Spring/Summer 2017 Database Utilize the MnROAD common database with NCAT Common Analysis at NCAT

Data Collection Schedule Data to be Collected Frequency Analysis Cracking Bi Weekly (Van Survey) Video Manual Distress (monthly, office workstation) Manual Distress (field review – quarterly) AutoCrack (Bi Weekly, office workstation) Rutting Bi Weekly, office workstation Ride Texture FWD Quarterly Falling Weight Deflectometer GPR As Needed Ground Penetrating Radar WIM Continuously Weigh – in - Motion

Digital Inspection Vehicle Equipment Pathway Services Digital Inspection Vehicle

3D Laser System 3D Camera Linescan Lasers Macrotexture Laser Digital image of roadway 3D Linescan Camera gives us a 3D image of roadway (measures rutting)

2D Digital Image of Roadway Digital Image of Roadway: (Used to conduct surface ratings at workstation) 3D Image of Roadway: (lighter=roadway close to you, darker=further away) Gives you visual of rutting Surface rating identifies distresses on pavement surface 3D Image allows user to identify rutting in pavement section as well as cracking distresses 3D Image of Roadway 2D Digital Image of Roadway

Cell 0, US 169

2D Digital Image of Roadway 3D Image of Roadway

Digital Cameras Film Front and Right Shoulder View Profiler bar collects Ride and Roughness Data (reports IRI) Profiler

MnDOT Experience 15+ years’ experience with Pathway equipment 1997: First Pathway van, using VCR’s to record images. 2005: Two new vans purchased and began surveying counties. Started using digital cameras and scanning lasers in back of van for rutting. 2011: Two new vans with 3D technology. Special thanks to Pavement Management office Dave Janisch, Shelly Pedersen, Elaine Miron, Mark Resemius, Gary Wallner, Tom Nordstrom

Data Collection Pre-construction collection: July 22 Post-construction collection : October 14 US 169 and CSAH 8 Post-construction run on Cracking Group Cells TBD After open to traffic, beginning of November Second run on Preservation sections in November, weather permitting

Preliminary Results

Chip Sealing Northern Low Traffic Preservation CSAH-8 Single, double, triple. With fibers. With a rejuvenating emulsion. Under microsurfacing. Under Thinlay. Section 2 Single Chip Seal (FA2.5) over Crack Seal / Transverse Mastic Section 3 Single Chip Seal (FA 2.5) Section 4 Microsurfacing (Type-III) over Single Chip Seal (FA 2.5) Section 5 Double Chip Seal (FA 2 over FA 2.5) Section 6 Triple Chip Seal (FA 2 over FA 2.5 over CA-70) Section 7 Fibermat Chip Seal (FA 2.5) Section 16 Thinlay Overlay (ABR over fibermat (FA 2.5) Section 18 Thinlay Overlay (ABR over Chip Seal (FA 2.5)

Microsurfacing Northern Low Traffic Preservation CSAH-8 Section 4 Microsurfacing (Type-III) over Single Chip Seal (FA 2.5) Section 8 Microsurfacing (Type III) over Fibermat Chip Seal (FA 2.5) Section 9 Microsurfacing (Type III) over Scrub Seal (FA 2.5) Section 11 Microsurfacing (Type II) over crack seal and Transverse Mastic Section 12 Microsurfacing (Type II) Section 13 Double Microsurfacing (Type II over Type II)

Thinlay Overlays Northern Low Traffic Preservation CSAH-8 Preliminary experiment design of northern MnDOT sections Section 16 Thinlay Overlay (ABR over fibermat (FA 2.5)) Section 17 Thinlay Overlay (ABR over Scrub Seal (FA 2.5)) Section 18 Thinlay Overlay (ABR over Chip Seal (FA 2.5)) Section 23 Thinlay Overlay Virgin (4.75 mm) Section 24 Thinlay Overlay ABR(4.75 mm with RAP and RAS) Section 28 Ultra Thin Bonded Wearing Coarse Section 29 Thinlay Overlay (4.75 mm with RAP and RAS) Delta S 16

Chip Sealing Northern High Traffic Preservation US 169 Single, double, triple. With fibers. With a rejuvenating emulsion. Under microsurfacing. Under Thinlay. Section 2 Single Chip Seal (FA2.5) over Crack Seal / Transverse Mastic Section 3 Single Chip Seal (FA 2.5) Section 4 Double Chip Seal (FA 2 over FA 2.5) Section 5 Triple Chip Seal (FA 2 over FA 2.5 over CA-50/70) Section 10 Fibermat Chip Seal (FA 2.5)

Microsurfacing Northern High Traffic Preservation US 169 Section 6 Microsurfacing (Type-II) over Single Chip Seal (FA 2.5) Section 7 Microsurfacing (Type II) over Crack Seal /Transverse Mastic Section 8 Microsurfacing (Type II with fibers) Section 9 Double Microcurfacing (Type II over Type II) Section 11 Microsurfacing (Type II) over Fibermat Chip Seal (FA 2.5) Section 12 Microsurfacing (Type II) over Scrub Seal (FA 2.5)

Thinlay Overlays Northern High Traffic Preservation US 169 Preliminary experiment design of northern MnDOT sections Section 22 Thinlay Overlay (ABR with Delta S) Section 23 Thinlay Overlay (Virgin) Section 24 Ultra Thin Bonded Wearing Course Section 25 Thinlay Overlay (HiMA) Section 26 Thinlay Overlay ABR Section 27 Thinlay Overlay (ABR over Chip Seal (FA 2.5)) 19

Preliminary Ride Data Northern Cracking Group Cells 16-23 LISA (Lightweight Internal Surface Analyzer) Preliminary experiment design of northern MnDOT sections Cell 16 20% RAP, 5% Shingles Cell 17 10% RAP, 5% Shingles Cell 18 20% RAP Cell 19 20% RAP, 3% Design Air Voids Cell 20 30% RAP Cell 21 20% RAP, Typical MnDOT Mix Cell 22 20% RAP, Limestone Mix Cell 23 15% RAP, Highly Modified Binder 20

Data Sharing Currently working on setting up common data sharing practices Development of results database Continued open communication between both organizations Common analysis at NCAT Jason Nelson, Assistant Research Engineer with NCAT

Distress Data Collection Preservation Treatments Southern Sections

Pathway Van – Class 1 Profiler HD perspective camera Three single-point lasers for roughness and rutting

Pathway Van – Class 1 Profiler Linescan cameras

Pathway Database – *.sec

Data Collection Parameter Track Lee Road 159 US-280 Roughness Weekly Rutting Macrotexture Crack Mapping Monthly+ FWD Monthly Quarterly Surface Friction Permeability - Noise Road closure needed to collect all but automated on US-280/US-431. 26

IRI – Control Sections

IRI – Chip Seals

IRI – OGFSC Sections

Jason Nelson 277 Technology Parkway Auburn, AL 36830 Assistant Research Engineer 277 Technology Parkway Auburn, AL 36830 Phone: (334) 844-7339 Cell: (334) 750-6241 Email: nelsoja@auburn.edu