Figure 1: Distribution of stance types across corpora

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
©2002 Oxford University Press PowerPoint Overheads to accompany Phillip E. Allen Douglas R. Holberg CMOS Analog Circuit Design Chapter 8 Comparators.
Advertisements

P247. Figure 9-1 p248 Figure 9-2 p251 p251 Figure 9-3 p253.
© Oxford University Press How are the plates moving?
Figure 1. (a–c) LE has been increasing globally from 1990 to 2008
Figure 1 The spatial and temporal distribution of diarrhoea rates
Figure 2: Mean responses in the null pronoun conditions
Source:Rosnes and Vennemo 2009.
Figure 1. Structural Equation Model: Effects of Valence Framing on Perceived Truth of Statements and Source Trustworthiness. Standardized path-coefficients.
Figure 1. Programme provisions, eligibility, evaluation period and geographical coverage of programme over time From: Impact evaluation of free delivery.
From: A Phrasal Expressions List
Figure 1 A decision tree diagram for problems and its German correspondences From: Corresponding lexical domains: A new resource for onomasiological.
Figure 1. Logos appearing in the choice experiment
Chapter 2 Kenneth J. McLaughlin, Labor Economics Copyright © 2016 Oxford University Press.
Figure 1. Conceptual model of well-being related to involvement in theatre. From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From.
Figure 1 Individual Lifted from Group Photograph
Figure 1: Newspaper sales October 2000–December 2010 (daily newspapers) through Audit Bureau of Calculations. Figures derived from
Figure 2 Distribution of Annual Household Income for Jordan Overall, Camp Refugees, and Camp Poor From: A Profile of Poverty for Palestinian Refugees in.
Chapter 6 Kenneth J. McLaughlin, Labor Economics Copyright © 2016 Oxford University Press.
Chapter 3 Kenneth J. McLaughlin, Labor Economics Copyright © 2016 Oxford University Press.
Figure 1 Overall analysis approach.
Figure 1. Distribution of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels at the baseline visit in a study population of adults aged 18–59 years (n = 309), Toronto,
From: Consumer Bankruptcy, Bank Mergers, and Information *
From: Ethics and Epidemiology: The Income Debate
Figure 2 The final moderated mediation model: a differential indirect effect of personal issue importance on elaborative reasoning through pro- and counterattitudinal.
Figure 1. Impact ratings for prospective memory lapses for younger (~age 30), middle-age (~age 50), and older (~age 65) adults. From: Daily Memory Lapses.
Figure 1. The flow chart illustrates the construction process of anti-CRISPRdb, and the information that users can obtain from anti-CRISPRdb. From: Anti-CRISPRdb:
جلسة منتدى الاستثمار العربى
February 12 – 19, 2018.
Figure 1. Distribution of colonial sources in the EDD
FIGURE 1. Estimated instantaneous fault detection rate
Fig. 5 Detailed classifier results for tweets (a) J48, (b) SVM, and (c) NB From: A sentiment analysis system for social media using machine learning techniques:
דיני חברות ד"ר ויקטור ח. בוגנים
Fig. 1 Languages used for SA
Figure 1. Annual growth rates of the number of records in each Entrez database as of 1 September 2018. Identical Protein Groups is not included since this.
Figure 1. HR (95% CI) of death from dementia associated with weight or BMI in middle age and in old age. From: Adiposity in middle and old age and risk.
Figure 4. Influence of Clerk Ideology on Justice Voting.
Figure 1. Non-biochemical recurrence rate for the entire population (n = 122). From: Salvage radiation therapy for prostate cancer patients after prostatectomy.
Communicating Brand Identity

Figure 1 Data-selection process
Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.
Figure 1 Phases of the research. Author’s own work.
Figure 1. Historical dialectic framework to assess transnational advocacy network influence Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright.
Figure 1. Susceptibility of all P
Figure 1. Results of search based on the PRISMA statement.14
Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European children completing all components of B4SC in 2013 and 2015 Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European.
Figure 1. Immunohistochemistry of jejunum samples from chicken submitted to T-2 toxin challenge (contaminated) and ... Figure 1. Immunohistochemistry of.
Figure 1 MIC test strips showing reversion of daptomycin resistance of isolate 5 passaged in vitro. This figure ... Figure 1 MIC test strips showing reversion.
Chapter 11 Kenneth J. McLaughlin, Labor Economics Copyright © 2016 Oxford University Press.
Chapter 11 Michael A. Bailey, Real Econometrics Copyright © 2017 Oxford University Press.
Michael A. Bailey, Real Stats Copyright © 2016 Oxford University Press
Chapter 4 Kenneth J. McLaughlin, Labor Economics Copyright © 2016 Oxford University Press.
Chapter 2 Michael A. Bailey, Real Econometrics Copyright © 2017 Oxford University Press.
Michael A. Bailey, Real Stats Copyright © 2016 Oxford University Press
Chapter 7 Michael A. Bailey, Real Econometrics Copyright © 2017 Oxford University Press.
Figure 1. Genetic context of blaNDM-21 on pNDM21_020023
Figure 1 Grant agencies and charitable foundations supporting Plan S.
Figure 1. On-budget donor funds disbursed to the MoH annually: 1997–2008 (expressed in 2000 US$ terms). Source: ... Figure 1. On-budget donor funds disbursed.
Chapter 8 Kenneth J. McLaughlin, Labor Economics Copyright © 2016 Oxford University Press.
Figure 1 Strategies for reconciling protection and participation.
Chapter 5 Michael A. Bailey, Real Econometrics Copyright © 2017 Oxford University Press.
Chapter 5 Kenneth J. McLaughlin, Labor Economics Copyright © 2016 Oxford University Press.
Figure 1 ABCDE of primary prevention.2
Chapter 13 Real Econometrics Second Edition Michael A. Bailey
Chapter 9 Real Econometrics Second Edition Michael A. Bailey
Figure 1. Evolutionary process of a policy field.
Chapter 10 Real Econometrics Second Edition Michael A. Bailey
Chapter 14 Real Econometrics Second Edition Michael A. Bailey
Chapter 12 Real Econometrics Second Edition Michael A. Bailey
Chapter 11 Real Econometrics Second Edition Michael A. Bailey
Presentation transcript:

Figure 1: Distribution of stance types across corpora From: Building a Trustworthy Corporate Identity: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Stance in Annual and Corporate Social Responsibility Reports Appl Linguist. Published online February 13, 2017. doi:10.1093/applin/amw058 Appl Linguist | © Oxford University Press 2017

Figure 2: Distribution of attitudinal stance constructions From: Building a Trustworthy Corporate Identity: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Stance in Annual and Corporate Social Responsibility Reports Appl Linguist. Published online February 13, 2017. doi:10.1093/applin/amw058 Appl Linguist | © Oxford University Press 2017

Figure 3: Distribution of desire/intention/decision verbs From: Building a Trustworthy Corporate Identity: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Stance in Annual and Corporate Social Responsibility Reports Appl Linguist. Published online February 13, 2017. doi:10.1093/applin/amw058 Appl Linguist | © Oxford University Press 2017

Figure 4: Distribution of epistemic stance constructions From: Building a Trustworthy Corporate Identity: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Stance in Annual and Corporate Social Responsibility Reports Appl Linguist. Published online February 13, 2017. doi:10.1093/applin/amw058 Appl Linguist | © Oxford University Press 2017

Figure 5: Distribution of certainty and likelihood constructions From: Building a Trustworthy Corporate Identity: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Stance in Annual and Corporate Social Responsibility Reports Appl Linguist. Published online February 13, 2017. doi:10.1093/applin/amw058 Appl Linguist | © Oxford University Press 2017

Figure 6: Distribution of certainty verbs controlling a complement clause From: Building a Trustworthy Corporate Identity: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Stance in Annual and Corporate Social Responsibility Reports Appl Linguist. Published online February 13, 2017. doi:10.1093/applin/amw058 Appl Linguist | © Oxford University Press 2017

Figure 7: Distribution of likelihood verbs From: Building a Trustworthy Corporate Identity: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Stance in Annual and Corporate Social Responsibility Reports Appl Linguist. Published online February 13, 2017. doi:10.1093/applin/amw058 Appl Linguist | © Oxford University Press 2017

Figure 8: Distribution of modal constructions From: Building a Trustworthy Corporate Identity: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Stance in Annual and Corporate Social Responsibility Reports Appl Linguist. Published online February 13, 2017. doi:10.1093/applin/amw058 Appl Linguist | © Oxford University Press 2017

Figure 9: Distribution of permission/possibility/ability modals From: Building a Trustworthy Corporate Identity: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Stance in Annual and Corporate Social Responsibility Reports Appl Linguist. Published online February 13, 2017. doi:10.1093/applin/amw058 Appl Linguist | © Oxford University Press 2017

Figure 10: Distribution of volition/prediction modals From: Building a Trustworthy Corporate Identity: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Stance in Annual and Corporate Social Responsibility Reports Appl Linguist. Published online February 13, 2017. doi:10.1093/applin/amw058 Appl Linguist | © Oxford University Press 2017

Figure 11: Distribution of obligation/necessity modals From: Building a Trustworthy Corporate Identity: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Stance in Annual and Corporate Social Responsibility Reports Appl Linguist. Published online February 13, 2017. doi:10.1093/applin/amw058 Appl Linguist | © Oxford University Press 2017

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.