www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TOASTMASTER OF THE DAY TOASTMASTER OF THE DAY To act as host and conduct the entire program, including introducing the participants. Always lead the applause.
Advertisements

Second Judges Training ( ) Introduction to Contest Rules & Briefing for Judges Division H, K & G District February 2011 Division H, K & G.
General Understanding of Debating.  Organized public argument on a specific topic. With one side arguing in favor and the other team opposing the issue.
Cross Examination Judges’ Briefing Guide. So, you want to be a Cross Examination Debate Judge?
1. 2 Thank you!! We can’t do this without you You are performing a teaching role in the lives of our students YOU make it possible for young people to.
DIEFENBAKER XXXI A briefing for debaters and judges Directors: Garrett Richards and Angela Jansen.
ADJUDICATORS’ FUNCTIONS Decide which team has won. Decide the best speaker. State the reasons for the decision (oral adjudication). Provide constructive.
We couldn’t do it without you! This Brief Presentation Will Cover Five Talking Points That Will Train You To Be Great Judges Style of Debate Role Of.
An Overview By: Christina Weber
Model Parliamen t Social Studies 11 What is Model Parliament  Model Parliament is designed to give visual and experiential support to Social Studies.
Www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program Air Cadet League of Canada Ontario Provincial Committee Air Cadet Debating Program.
What is Debate? Debate centers on the discussion of two sides of a RESOLUTION. The resolution will usually be introduced in one of two ways: Be It Resolved.
DISCUSS ACADEMIC achievement WITH YOUR PROFESSOR! Exercise your responsibility to discuss your academic performance with all your instructors Designed.
Public Forum Debate Partner debate.
Team Policy Debate Orientation
Bio99 Term Paper. Topics The topics for discussion in the term paper must be relevant to the topics that we have discussed or are about to discuss in.
Personally Proactive: Samuel Bruce Ltd 2005 JCI NOM/LOM NAME DATE DEBATING Scott Johnston JCI Glasgow Senator JCI Scotland National President 2004 JCI.
ORGANIZING YOUR FFA MEETINGS Objective: Understanding parliamentary procedure and public speaking skills.
FORMAT (RULES AND PROCEDURES) OMS INSIGHTS Parliamentary Debate.
A Speech and Debate survival guide for everyone
2 Thank you!! We can’t do this without you You are making an investment You are performing a teaching role in the lives of our students YOU make it possible.
Quebec Student DebatingAssociation Judge’s Briefing.
Chapter Study Guide GROUP COMMUNICATION. Chapter What are the 4 steps in the problem solving process? Describe and understand the problem.
 What Have I Got Myself Into ?  Where Do I Find the Information!!!  What Are my Timelines  What Supplies Do I Need ?  Who Can Help!!!  Where To.
Parliamentary Procedure Debate Vote My Way! Debate Enables You To: Inform. Persuade. Inspire. Public speaking skills enable you to effectively “sell”
Understand parliamentary procedure abilities and public speaking skills. Objective 1.02.
Debate 101. What is Debate? A debate is the practice of comparing & contrasting ideas that centers on the discussion of a RESOLUTION. The RESOLUTION IS....?
Prepared by Jason Hong, David Miko and the University of Calgary Debate Society.
Welcome to Debating  Introduction  2008 changes  Speaker roles  Types of debates  Coaching tips  Draw announcement for the Senior Competition.
Wellesley Speech & Debate Workshops Parli Basics Forming a Case Guide to Speeches and Responsibilities Leader of Opposition Prime Minister Members of.
Debates 2016! Team 8T How to Prepare and Present a debate.
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Debate Orientation.
Parliamentary Debate:
Mock Congress Rules & Parliamentary Procedure
LD Debate Study Information
Public Forum Debate A quick guide.
Debate Chapter 13 Pages
MSPDP Rules Ms. Chacon.
Briefing for Judges.
Academic debate.
World schools debate championships 3 vs 3 format
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Debate Orientation.

Debating Skills
Quebec Student Debating Association Judge’s Briefing.
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Roles In Debating Week 2.
www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program
Quebec Student Debating Association Judge’s Briefing.
Organizing your FFA Meetings
The Debate.
JUDGING CONTESTS DISTRICT 39 (Session 2) Brought to you by
BEING A CONTESTANT DISTRICT 39
Public Forum Debate.
Debate Skills.
ENG143A: English Speaking Workshops
Debate April 12/13.
Public Speaking Contest
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Team Policy Debate Orientation
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Debate Orientation.
Presentation transcript:

www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program Air Cadet League of Canada Ontario Provincial Committee Air Cadet Debating Program www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

Introduction to Debating To familiarize attendees with the following OPC Debating Program Background Roles & Basic Rules Organizing a squadron team www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

Program Background Information Successful Optional Training activity introduced in 2003 Parliamentary Style debating based on the Ontario Student Debating Union model Focus is on developing life skills for the cadet in the areas of listening, reasoning, and public speaking Steadily grown in popularity – at capacity for a single (provincial) competition and cadet workshop. Program is established in Toronto, Hamilton and Niagara areas. New areas looking to onboard www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program Debating Roles www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program Cadet Teams Each competition team consists of 3 cadets Two cadets are the team debaters who will alternate arguing a case as the Government then the Opposition side The third cadet on each team acts as a Speaker / Timekeeper who alternates between the 2 positions from debate to debate www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program Cadet Debating Roles 1) Government Team – seated right of Speaker Affirmative side that supports the resolution. The burden of proof lies with the Government unless a counter proposal is tabled by the Opposition Prime Minister (PM) Member of the Crown (MC) 2) Opposition Team – seated left of Speaker Contests the validity of the Government’s motion Leader of the Opposition (LO) Member of the Opposition (MO) www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program Cadet Debating Roles Speaker / Timekeeper positions a) Speaker of the House Acts as moderator/master of ceremonies b) Timekeeper Uses time cards to caution speakers of time remaining and tracks time faults for teller www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program Speaker of the House Primary purpose of the speaker is to maintain order during the debate. A script is available for assistance. Speaker Explains the Process & Introduces the Teams Speaker Declares Debate Open & introduces speakers Rule on Points of Order or Personal Privilege – escalate (seek advice of the Head Judge) where required A Speakers ruling is final and not contestable A speaker may call a member to order Declares the debate closed www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program Order of Speaking 1. Prime Minister’s Introduction (PM) - 5 Minutes (3 for impromptu) 2. First member of the Opposition (MO) - 5 Minutes (3 for impromptu) 3. Minister of the Crown (MC) 4. Leader of the Opposition (LO) - 7 Minutes (4 for impromptu) 5. Prime Minister’s Rebuttal (PM) - 2 Minutes (1 for impromptu) www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

When a debater holds the floor… 1) BUILD or REBUILD their side’s case ** PM should define terms in the Resolution Explain points or arguments in detail (with supporting evidence) 2) REFUTE any points made by their opponents 3) CONCLUDE – Each member summarizes their arguments as to why the Resolution should either Stand or Fail www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program Debating Rules www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program Debating Rules - DO’s All remarks addressed to the Speaker Only one person holds the floor at one time (must be recognized by the Speaker) Use proper titles when referring to a member of the house Government should define the Resolution Verbal “heckling” must be pertinent, brief and infrequent www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

Debating Rules - DO NOTs No Profanity (proper language only) No Props or Electronic aids during debate (dictionary/thesaurus only) No new Arguments in the Final Rebuttal Speeches should not be read (notes OK) No ``squirreling`` of the resolution (defining the resolution in obscure terms) No coaching during the debate www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program Raising Points www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program Points of Order Draws Attention to Breach of Rules Possible Misconduct (e.g. Profanity) Immediately After Rule Contravened Speaker May call a Member to Order to maintain proper control of the debate www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

Points of Personal Privilege Include Misquoting or Misrepresenting an Opponent Referring to a Member Incorrectly Slandering a Member Cannot Raise a Point of Personal Privilege on Behalf of Another Member www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

Points of Information (Rule Change in 2016) Points of Information are a request to your opponent to interject during their speech with a question or comment. These are not used in Air Cadet debating. Make your comments or observations in your rebuttal arguments www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program Raising a Point: To Raise – Stand and Say “Mr. (Madam) Speaker I Rise on a Point of… (Order / Personal Privilege)” Debater Interrupted Shall Immediately Surrender the Floor (sits down). The Timekeeper suspends time. Speaker Will hear the Objection Request Speaker will RULE on the Point (confer with judges if uncertain). Announce “Point Well Taken” or “Not Well Taken”. This ruling is final. Return control to the interrupted Debater. Time keeping resumes. www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

Maintaining Control of the Debate It is the job of the speaker to maintain control of the debate and rule on any points raised in the debate. A speaker’s ruling should normally not be challenged. The speaker may consult with the judges if uncertain on a ruling or to assist brining a member to order. A Judge may also interject to gain control of a debate where a team is in clear violation of the rules, or is failing to take direction from the Speaker. The team can be cautioned that continued action could result in a disqualification. Prior to a disqualification, the Timekeeper will be directed to summon the Chief Judge for consultation on the incident, and impact to the team score (potential zero score). Speaker can defer to Head judge on a ruling. Point ruling cannot be challenged. Call member to order.... www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program Coaches Corner www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

Considering a debating team? Appoint a Coach early on (January timeframe) – can be an Officer, CV, SSC member, parent or community volunteer. Have the right supervision. CATO 23-07 for volunteers. Two or more 3 person teams per squadron are ideal for practice sessions. Neighbouring squadron teams? Prepared debate topics are released 2 to 3 weeks in advance of competition dates If required, Regional competitions are to take place in the mid-March to mid-April timeframe. Top 2 teams advance. Provincial finals same weekend and place as ES (end of April – currently Hamilton area ) Squadrons are responsible for competition travel costs www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

Before you start debating… Visit the OPC Debating Home Page Download and review current rules in detail Talk about the team roles with participants Show team members how to time keep www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program Prepare to debate You need to be able to argue both sides effectively ! Research or List Facts that support the resolution * Make sure you note the source of any research Research or List Facts that “refute” the resolution List Counterpoints or arguments for each fact you listed Bring writing material and a team dictionary or thesaurus No laptops or devices – but point form notes are permissible www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program Make 2 Point Form Lists {Affirmative and Opposition views} include your sources Supported point A counter argument Supported point B counter argument Supported point C counter argument Supported point D counter argument www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program The Arguments Fact based points – be able to quote your source. Judges can penalize fabricated evidence in the prepared round. Imaginative arguments are permitted in impromptu round Purely emotional appeals are not credited The team supporting the affirmative argument (normally the government) has the onus of persuasion unless a counter proposal be introduced. This is where the onus of persuasion can be shared or switch www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program Effective Listening! Teams need to HEAR, note and address all of their opponents arguments in order to effectively debate. Use of a pen and paper to make point form notes of the arguments will help. Be careful not to misquote your opponent. www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

Practice - Practice - Practice Practice both Prepared and Impromptu debating with your teams Impromptu topic examples can be found on the internet Consider training with neighbouring squadrons (if practical) Make it FUN – this is optional training www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program Judges Clinic www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

Judges Key Responsibilities Score the debates consistently and fairly based on: What you see and hear in the room The three categories defined in the rules: Arguments & Evidence, Organization and Delivery Guidelines for Judges made available in advance   Back-up the Speaker of the House Provide advice on the rules if they ask for it Reinforce their authority if they ask you to Step in tactfully and briefly if order has deteriorated too far www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program Judging Logistics Judging is key to fairness of the competition Ideally: At least two judges per room No debater appears before the same judges more than once before the final round Judges are not affiliated with any of the teams Judges come from many places, for example: Local university/college faculty and debating union Toastmasters Friends and colleagues Judges must be comfortable and feel supported by: Clear guidelines and judging forms A Chief Judge whose job it is to address issues/complaints and act as a resource for interpretation of the rules www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program Scoring Overview A. Argument & Evidence (40 marks) Points 10 – Presented Logical Arguments – both points and counter points 10 – Arguments Were Evidence Based 10 – Arguments Directly Supported or Rebutted the Case 10 – Rebuilt the Case After Attack Refer to Distributed Marking Sheets www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program Scoring Overview B. Organization (40 marks) Points 10 – Coherency of the Presentation 10 – Logic of Order in Which Arguments Presented 10 – Brought Together into Tight Conclusion 10 – Correct Grammar, Phrasing, Sentence Structure www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program Scoring Overview C. Delivery & Style (20 marks) Points 5 – Spoke With Enthusiasm & Confidence 5 – Cadence and Rhythm of the Presentation 5 – Proper Stance, Audible, Pronunciation Enunciation 5 – Use of Tonal Variations, Hand Gestures, Humour www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

Assessing the House Speaker The key role of the Speaker is to maintain order and respect so that the debaters can do their best The three categories for judging debaters can help frame your score for the Speaker: Evidence: Do they know the rules? Were their rulings correct? (Note: if they are not called upon to make rulings, this category may not come to bear) Organization: Did they maintain order? Was the debate run efficiently from the time the Speaker entered the room (e.g., gathering the names, getting people seated and ready)? Delivery: Were they poised and polished? Did they command respect? www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

Scoring the House Speaker The Speaker is assigned a score between 60 and 95 A speaker who is well organized and does everything they are supposed to do would receive a score of 70-79 (good). A score of 80-89 would be awarded to a speaker who does all that is normally required then goes beyond by either Correctly ruling on points without assistance OR Proactively calling members to order to maintain control 90-95is reserved for a speaker who demonstrates excellence in all scoring areas and has overcome serious challenges to the order of the house - unassisted and with remarkable poise 60-69 is reserved for a speaker who loses control of the House and requires the intervention of the Judge www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

You Be the Judge! 2015 Provincial Gold Medal Debate VIDEO 3.38 Start video at 3:38 – Stop 25:55 www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program Scoring (5 min) Who won ? Discussion Q&A www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

Resources Found under OPC website links OPC Debating Committee Fred Hopkinson, Program Chair Joanne Plaxton, Chief Judge Mark Thususka, Chief Instructor www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program

www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program Today’s Youth Tomorrow’s Leaders! www. aircadetleague.on.ca OPC Air Cadet Debating Program