Digital Evidence – Is it Admissible or Good Enough in Court?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRIAL EVIDENCE.
Advertisements

Presenter’s Name June 17, 2003 WMD HAZMAT Evidence Collection Course CBRNE/HAZMAT Evidence Collection Steps 5-8.
Use of Prior Statements, Depositions and Corollary Proceedings: Searing Impeachment and Effective Rehabilitation FITZPATRICK,
Chapter 8 Trial Procedures. The Players Judge Appointed by government Full control of courtroom Decides question of guilt (when there is no jury) and.
Briana Denney, Esq. of Newman & Denney P.C Briana Denney, Esq. of Newman & Denney P.C. E VIDENTIARY I SSUES R ELATING TO F ORENSIC R EPORTS.
EVIDENCE Trial Procedures. What is the point of Evidence? Evidence is the way in which the Crown and the defence try to reconstruct the chain of events.
Evidence Collection & Admissibility Computer Forensics BACS 371.
The Roles of Judge and Jury Court controls legal rulings in the trial Court controls legal rulings in the trial Jury decides factual issues Jury decides.
Alaska Mock Trial Glossary of Terms. Laws Rules created by society to govern the behavior of people in society. Among other things, the laws are one formal.
Evidence and Argument Evidence – The asserted facts that the arbitrator will consider in making a decision – Information – What is presented at the hearing.
AJ 104 Chapter 5 Witnesses. 5 Issues Related to a Trial Witness 1. Who is competent to testify 2. How the credibility of a witness is attacked 3. What.
Digital Forensics Dr. Randy M. Kaplan Drexel University.
Objections CRIMINAL LAW – UNIT #3. OBJECTIONS An objection:  is a formal protest raised in court during a trial to disallow a witness's testimony or.
The Rat Pack Dino Tsibouris (614)
+ Rules & Types of Evidence. + Rules of Evidence During a trial, either the Crown or the defence may object to questions asked by the opposing attorney.
Evidence.
The Adversary System.  To provide a procedure for disputing parties to present and resolve their cases in as fair a manner as possible  Controlled by.
Types of Evidence From Arraignment to Verdict. Self-Incrimination The Canada Evidence Act - regulates rules of evidence (1893). Applies to federal jurisdictions.
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 3 RULES AND TYPES OF EVIDENCE LAW 12 MUNDY
Objections Criminal law – unit #3.
Forensic Science: Fundamentals & Investigations, Chapter 1 1 x Fall Semester Period 6/7 Period 6/7.
Evidence Handling If the evidence is there the case is yours to lose.
The Criminal Trial Process Section 11 (d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that each person charged with an offence is to be ‘presumed innocent.
1 PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE Learning Domain PURPOSE FOR THE RULES OF EVIDENCE Protect the jury from seeing or hearing evidence that is: (w/b p. 1-3)
Forensic Science: Fundamentals & Investigations, Chapter 1 1 x All rights Reserved South-Western / Cengage Learning © 2012, 2009.
1 Chapter 1 Observation Skills PP for students to utilize… By the end of this chapter you will be able to: define observation and describe what changes.
The Power of Observation
Bias and Reliability When Examining Historical Evidence.
Documentation The key to due diligence. What is due diligence? “The diligence reasonably expected from, and ordinarily exercised by, a person who seeks.
Forensic Science: Fundamentals & Investigations, Chapter 1 1 x All rights Reserved South-Western / Cengage Learning © 2012, 2009.
Forensic Science: Fundamentals & Investigations, Chapter 1 1 x All rights Reserved South-Western / Cengage Learning © 2009.
EVIDENCE ACT Law of evidence lay rules for the production of evidence in the court of law.
Forensic Lab Director By: Caitlin Kotze. Qualifications Education Education –Minimum of a Bachelors degree in a natural science or a Criminalistics program.
September 10, 2012 Warm-up: Use pg. 13 in your text book to answer the following question: 1.What was the most significant modern advance in forensic science?
Admissibility. The Frye Standard  1923 – became the standard guideline for determining the judicial admissibility of scientific examinations. To meet.
PROCEDURES IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, 8 th ed. Roberson, Wallace, and Stuckey PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ
Chapter One: Observation Skills
Forensic Science: Fundamentals & Investigations, 2e Chapter 1 1 All rights Reserved Cengage/NGL/South-Western © 2016.
1 Chapter 1 Observation Skills By the end of this chapter you will be able to: o Define observation and describe what changes occur in the brain o Describe.
All rights Reserved Cengage/NGL/South-Western © 2016.
x All rights Reserved South-Western / Cengage Learning © 2012, 2009
Chapter One: Observation Skills
Outline of the U.S. and Arizona Criminal Justice Systems
Define observation and describe what changes occur in the brain
x All rights Reserved South-Western / Cengage Learning © 2009
x All rights Reserved South-Western / Cengage Learning © 2012, 2009
x All rights Reserved South-Western / Cengage Learning © 2009
Chapter One: Observation Skills
Start Figure 7.10 Trial by Jury, p. 183 End.
Laying the Foundation: Expert Witnesses
All rights Reserved Cengage/NGL/South-Western © 2016.
Faculty of Law Law of Evidence.
Mark Pollitt Associate Professor
Law of Evidence DOCUMENTRY EVIDENCE 30/11/2014.
The Adversary System.
x All rights Reserved South-Western / Cengage Learning © 2012, 2009
x All rights Reserved South-Western / Cengage Learning © 2012, 2009
Opinion Testimony, In General
x All rights Reserved South-Western / Cengage Learning © 2012, 2009
Start Figure 7.10 Trial by Jury, p. 183 End.
Chapter 5: The Court System
x All rights Reserved South-Western / Cengage Learning © 2009
x All rights Reserved South-Western / Cengage Learning © 2009
Get Started Immediately!
x All rights Reserved South-Western / Cengage Learning © 2009
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 3
Analysis Paragraph Review (CCQC)
x All rights Reserved South-Western / Cengage Learning © 2012, 2009
Chapter 5: The Court System
x All rights Reserved South-Western / Cengage Learning © 2012, 2009
Presentation transcript:

Digital Evidence – Is it Admissible or Good Enough in Court? IBLS Strategic Global Summit For E-Commerce, March 16th and 17th, 2006

Digital Evidence – Is it Admissible or Good Enough in Court? Background Summary: - The need to have an accurate, authentic, complete, durable and reproducible memory of facts. - The need to be able to believe the story that is being told to us. - If we know all the facts for sure, we will know how to judge the situation fairly in front of the law.

Digital Evidence – Is it Admissible or Good Enough in Court? Background Summary (cont´): - Thus, the need to have reliable evidence, capable of providing objective conviction about the facts. - The absence of appropriate evidence opens the door to: - uncertainty about what the true story is; - misconception of the reality; - injustice.

Digital Evidence – Is it Admissible or Good Enough in Court? Background Summary (cont´): - What kind of evidence do we usually use? - Witnesses (testimony and confession); - Documentary (photographs, writings, objects, etc.) - Opinion of experts, site inspections and technology (forensic activity). - The means we use to record the memory of our activity.

Digital Evidence – Is it Admissible or Good Enough in Court? What makes evidence credible: It must be complete; It must be accurate; It must be authentic; It must be enough; It must be obtained and submitted validly;

Digital Evidence – Is it Admissible or Good Enough in Court? Most countries admit it as evidence; Its strength as evidence depends very much on the reliability of the technology; How to prove reliability of technology; Is it durable evidence? (evolution of technology);

Digital Evidence – Is it Admissible or Good Enough in Court? Recommendations: Understand how your IT works and what it can actually do and not do; How reliable is it to safely store, transmit, receive and reproduce information, without third party intervention; Identify the procedure available to prove the reliability of your IT;