MCBM@SIS18.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

High Level Trigger (HLT) for ALICE Bergen Frankfurt Heidelberg Oslo.
Kondo GNANVO Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne FL.
CHEP04 - Interlaken - Sep. 27th - Oct. 1st 2004T. M. Steinbeck for the Alice Collaboration1/20 New Experiences with the ALICE High Level Trigger Data Transport.
1 Analysis code for KEK Test-Beam M. Ellis Daresbury Tracker Meeting 30 th August 2005.
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
WP2: Detector development Summary G. Pugliese INFN - Politecnico of Bari.
Vector meson study for the CBM experiment at FAIR/GSI Anna Kiseleva GSI Germany, PNPI Russia   Motivation   The muon detection system of CBM   Vector.
Di-electron pair reconstruction CBM Collaboration Meeting, 28 February 2008, GSI-Darmstadt Di-electron pair reconstruction Tetyana Galatyuk GSI-Darmstadt.
CBM Collaboration Meeting 1 Simulation Status V. Friese.
Simulation issue Y. Akiba. Main goals stated in LOI Measurement of charm and beauty using DCA in barrel –c  e + X –D  K , K , etc –b  e + X –B 
Radiation levels in CBM Radiation effects iFluka (Fluka C++ interface to CbmRoot) Fluka Geometry Models Results Conclusion.
Status and plans for online installation LHCb Installation Review April, 12 th 2005 Niko Neufeld for the LHCb Online team.
Real data reconstruction A. De Caro (University and INFN of Salerno) CERN Building 29, December 9th, 2009ALICE TOF General meeting.
Ooo Performance simulation studies of a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon Tracking for CBM Reconstructed URQMD event: central.
 Production at forward Rapidity in d+Au Collisions at 200 GeV The STAR Forward TPCs Lambda Reconstruction Lambda Spectra & Yields Centrality Dependence.
CBM Software Workshop for Future Challenges in Tracking and Trigger Concepts, GSI, 9 June 2010 Volker Friese.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
Feasibility studies of open charm reconstruction with pile up 1. General simulations with pile up 2. Open charm reconstruction Christina Dritsa Outline:
Status of straw-tube tracker V.Peshekhonov, D.Peshekhonov, A.Zinchenko JINR, Dubna V.Tikhomirov P.N.Lebedev Physics Institute, Moscow Presented on the.
Experience With CBM Muon Simulation Partha Pratim Bhaduri.
Online Reconstruction used in the Antares-Tarot alert system J ü rgen Brunner The online reconstruction concept Performance Neutrino doublets and high.
Data Acquisition Backbone Core J. Adamczewski-Musch, N. Kurz, S. Linev GSI, Experiment Electronics, Data processing group.
Status of Reconstruction in CBM
A Silicon vertex tracker prototype for CBM Material for the FP6 Design application.
Simulations for CBM CBM-India Meeting, Jammu, 12 February 2008 V. Friese
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
Standalone FLES Package for Event Reconstruction and Selection in CBM DPG Mainz, 21 March 2012 I. Kisel 1,2, I. Kulakov 1, M. Zyzak 1 (for the CBM.
News on GEM Readout with the SRS, DATE & AMORE
Simulations and Software CBM Collaboration Meeting, GSI, 17 October 2008 Volker Friese Simulations Software Computing.
18/03/2010 DPG Bonn – March Session: HK 48 A demonstrator for the CBM Time of Flight wall electronic readout chain Pierre-Alain Loizeau PI – Uni.
Measurement of J/  -> e + e - and  C -> J/  +   in dAu collisions at PHENIX/RHIC A. Lebedev, ISU 1 Fall 2003 DNP Meeting Alexandre Lebedev, Iowa State.
Calorimeter in front of MUCh Mikhail Prokudin. Overview ► Geometry and acceptance ► Reconstruction procedure  Cluster finder algorithms  Preliminary.
Performance simulations with a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon tracking for CBM Number of integration components Ladders106.
STS simulations: Layout, digitizers, performance Radoslaw Karabowicz GSI.
STS Radiation Environment 11 th CBM Collaboration Meeting GSI, February 2008 Radoslaw Karabowicz GSI.
Track reconstruction in TRD and MUCH Andrey Lebedev Andrey Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna.
Jonathan BouchetBerkeley School on Collective Dynamics 1 Performance of the Silicon Strip Detector of the STAR Experiment Jonathan Bouchet Subatech STAR.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
20/12/2011Christina Anna Dritsa1 The model: Input Charge generation The charge of the cluster is taken by random sampling of the experimental distribution.
CBM-Meet, VECC July 21, Premomoy Ghosh CBM – MUCH Simulation for Low-mass Vector Meson Work done at GSI during June 2006.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
Compact RICH detector Claudia Höhne, GSI Darmstadt.
CBM-TOF-FEE Jochen Frühauf, GSI Picosecond-TDC-Meeting.
Study of Charged Hadrons in Au-Au Collisions at with the PHENIX Time Expansion Chamber Dmitri Kotchetkov for the PHENIX Collaboration Department of Physics,
1/20 LHCb upgrade, Jeroen van Tilburg Nikhef Jamboree, 14 Dec 2015 Preparing for the LHCb upgrade.
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
LIT participation LIT participation Ivanov V.V. Laboratory of Information Technologies Meeting on proposal of the setup preparation for external beams.
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
Multi-Strange Hyperons Triggering at SIS 100
Susanna Costanza - Pavia Group PANDA C.M., Stockholm – June 14, 2010
for the HADES Collaboration
Summary of TRD pad plane, front-end boards and readout chain
eTOF - status and plan CBM-STAR joint Workshop Outline Introduction
– a CBM full system test-setup at GSI
Study of Hypernuclei with Heavy Ion Beams (HypHI) at GSI Shizu Minami GSI, Germany on behalf of HypHI collaboration Introduction Phase 0 experiment R.
Strangeness Prospects with the CBM Experiment
A heavy-ion experiment at the future facility at GSI
Beam Gas Vertex – Beam monitor
ALICE – First paper.
Luminosity Monitor Status
Status of the OPERA experiment
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
STAR-CBM Joint Workshop Heidelberg, Physikalisches Institut
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
Pierre-Alain Loizeau and David Emschermann for the CBM collaboration
Jerzy Pietraszko, HADES at SIS100 - status GSI Darmstadt, Germany
Status of MUCH Electronics
Presentation transcript:

mCBM@SIS18

Motivation and Concept Full system test with focus on the free streaming data transport to a mFLES compute cluster online monitoring online reconstruction offline data analysis Controls Experimental setup will consist of detector prototypes at θlab ≈ 15° - 25° no magnetic field => straight tracks high resolution TOF (t0 – TOF stop wall)

Benchmark Observable Verify the performance of the CBM data taking concept Use mCBM setup to reconstruct physics observable Choose a particle with a low production probability to get a CBM-like challenge Reconstruct online the decay of Λ → pπ- Compare the results with published data Feasibility study was done using CbmRoot for simulation, reconstruction and analysis Study shows that the reconstruction of Λ at beam energies below 2 AGeV is possible with mCBM

Location

Location

Location

Location

Location

Location

Location

Location

Location

Location

Location

Location Counting Room ?? DAQ container mCBM cave

mCBM Cave – before rebuild

First simulations

Now the problems starts No possibility to get a stronger magnet Limited to low beam energies Change beam line from 15° to 8° Maximum beam energy from SIS18 can be used for mCBM Need to rework the vacuum chamber of the existing magnet

Simulations mCBM setup at an 25° angle with respect to the beam line (8° beam line) Not all sub detector systems present in first simulation Needed for mCBM proposal

Reconstruction of Λ→pπ- Create track candidates Create straight track candidates between primary vertex at (0,0,0) and TOF hits Find matching hit in second STS which is within a cut window (Δd1) from the extrapolated track Create straight tracks using STS hit from 1.2. and primary vertex at (0,0,0) Accept as track candidate if a STS hit in the first STS station is within a cut window (Δd2) from the extrapolated track Hits accepted in a track candidate are not used for other tracks Find secondary protons Create straight tracks from STS hits from track candidates found in 1. Accept as secondary proton if impact parameter of track is larger then a cut value Find secondary pion Use TOF-STS hit pairs which were rejected in 1.2. Create straight tracks from this pairs Search for a STS hit in the second station which was not used and is within a cut window (Δdpion) from the extrapolated line Form proton/pion candidate pairs if they fulfill several conditions (opening angle, closest distance, decay length) and calculate invariant mass of the pair Subtract mixed event background

Results 108 mbias Urqmd events Ni+Ni, 1.93 AGeV 108 mbias Urqmd events 108 events correspond to roughly 10s data taking

Expected hit rates Input: UrQMD, Au+Au 1.24 AGeV, mbias The rates are normalized to 107 collisions per second

Radiation level simulations at top SIS18 energies and CBM collision rates Fluka simulations by A. Senger

mCBM Cave reconstruction W. Niebur C. Ehmer

mCBM Cave reconstruction August 2017 W. Niebur November 3rd 2017

mCBM Cave reconstruction December 20th December 14th Pictures

mCBM Cave reconstruction 8th February 2018

Status of mCBM simulation

Status mCBM simulations Redid the mCBM simulations recently Use up-to-date detector setup Include all detector subsystems in the simulation Redo Λ reconstruction mSTS, 1st station max. (design) rate: 1.5 MHz/cm2 mTOF max. (design) rate: 20 kHz/cm2 Preliminary

Status mSTS 4 C-frames (“Units”) holding the ladders with modules holding the read-out and powering electronics 
(FEB, C-ROB, POB) on cooling plates

Status mTRD and mTOF mTRD setup mTOF setup 4 layers TRD modules from DESY/CERN tests 2017 mTOF setup 25 MRPC(3a) counters (= 5x STAR modules) 150 x 120 cm2 active area 1600 readout channels

Status of mMuch

What will provided by DAQ in 2018 The DAQ will provide the backbone for the mCBM readout: Optical fiber connections from HTD to the DAQ container μTCA crates in the DAQ container, some AFCK boards Optical fiber connections from DAQ container to the GC mFLES Input Nodes in the GC and HTG-K700 boards Infiniband network for time-slice building mFLES Compute Nodes in the GC only 4 months are left until DAQ commissioning !! Information taken from D. Emschermann

What the detector teams have to provide The mCBM subsystems must provide the following: a detector including FEE terminated in a GBTx-ROB (the GBTx-ROB is part of your detector system) the optical patch chord plugged into the ROB-SFP is the interface to the mCBM DAQ system a GBTx compatible firmware to operate your AFCK software for online monitoring of your subsystem Information taken from D. Emschermann

Status of mFLES Boot environment for compute nodes is available Roughly 50 nodes reused from old computing cluster 42 nodes cabled 38 nodes are booting More serious test of these nodes needed Ethernet network Working since last week Infiniband network Will be installed once stable nodes are identified

Status of Computing Large problem Missing manpower Change of framework (FairRoot → FairMQ) Move to FairMQ Independent processes which communicate sending the data as messages Process Graph can be adjusted to the problem Move to FairMQ needs time for development and testing Not clear if it will be ready for the mCBM beam time this year Backup solution Write files and analyze them afterwards using CbmRoot (not online but “near line”) Use CbmRoot to connect to a Fles-Node and analyze the data online If more then one Fles-Node is needed for timeslice building one can’t access the full data Code has to be fast to not block the DAQ Start several CbmRoot sessions for different detector sub systems Scheme was used for several beam times

धन्यवाद् Conclusion We already made a lot of progress But still a lot of work is ahead of us and time becomes short Think about what you can do to make mCBM a success Thank you धन्यवाद्