ATF2 Instrumentation Stewart T. Boogert

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATF2: Status Update Glenn Christian (on behalf of FONT group) 10 th ATF Project Meeting.
Advertisements

ATF2 Interaction Point Beam Size Monitor (Shintake Monitor) Status T. Yamanaka, M. Oroku, Y. Yamaguchi, S. Komamiya ( Univ. of Tokyo ), T. Suehara, Y.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
Progress towards nanometre-level beam stabilisation at ATF2 N. Blaskovic, D. R. Bett, P. N. Burrows, G. B. Christian, C. Perry John Adams Institute, University.
ATF2 Status and Plan K. Kubo ATF2, Final Focus Test for LC Achievement of 37 nm beam size (Goal 1) – Demonstration of a compact final focus.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry.
High Resolution Cavity BPM for ILC final focal system (IP-BPM) ILC2007/LCWS 2007 BDS, 2007/6/1 The University of Tokyo, KEK, Tohoku Gakuin University,
Discussion on Milestone and schedule Toshiyuki Okugi ATF2 commissioning meeting 1 / 7 / 2009.
Personal strategy for ATF2 beam operation in 2009 Toshiyuki OKUGI 2009 / 7 /22 ATF2 weekly meeting.
Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales (FONT) - Review of Feedback Prototype Tests at ATF(KEK) Glenn Christian John Adams Institute, Oxford for FONT collaboration.
1 FONT Results 2010 Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Glenn Christian Michael Davis, Colin Perry, Javier Resta Lopez John Adams Institute Oxford.
1 Experience at ATF To get a low emittance beam Junji Urakawa KEK Circumference: m Arc Cell Type: FOBO Number of Arc Cells: 36 Energy: GeV.
UK/EU Plans for ATF2 G.A. Blair ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-0ff meeting, Annecy, 8 th October 2006 Overview EUROTeV UK.
Philip Burrows ECFA LC Workshop, Warsaw, 10 June Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University G. Christian, C. Clarke, B. Constance, H.
FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF21 FONT digitisation studies of IP BPMs D. Bett, N. Blaskovic, P. Burrows, G. Christian, M. Davis, Y. I. Kim, C. Perry John.
ATF1/2 laser-wires Stewart T. Boogert on behalf of UK Extraction line laserwire collaboration A. Aryshev, G. Blair, S. Boogert, A. Bosco, L. Corner, L.
Energy Spectrometer for the ILC Alexey Lyapin University College London.
ATF2 beam commissioning status and beam time request Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 11 / 12 ATF2 Commissioning Meeting.
Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Robert Apsimon, Philip Burrows, Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Davide Gamba,
3/25/2006 KEK LCPAC Marc Ross - SLAC 1 Results of Beam Instrumentation Studies at ATF 1.Nanometer resolution Beam Position Monitors 2.High resolution readout.
Development of a Low-latency, High-precision, Intra-train Beam Feedback System Based on Cavity Beam Position Monitors N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, D. R. Bett,
Wakefield Calculations for the ATF2 Beamline A. Lyapin, Wakefield Calculations for the ATF2 Beamline 1 S. Boogert, J. Snuverink (JAI/RHUL, UK)
Mark Woodley, SLACATF2 Project March 20-21, Summary of Tuning, Corrections, and Commissioning.
27 MAY 2008NANOBEAM A laser-wire scanner for the ATF extraction line Alexander Aryshev, Stewart Boogert, Grahame Blair, Gary Boorman a Lawrence.
ATF2 Kiyoshi KUBO Accelerator Test Facility (ATF) at KEK ATF – Designed as a prototype of damping ring and injector of LC – Achieved low vertical.
1 FONT R&D status Philip Burrows Douglas Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
ATF2 Commissioning Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 7 /9 ATF2 beam commissioning meeting, KEK.
Production and Installation Policy of IP-BPM ATF2 Project Meeting, 2006/12/18 Y. Honda, Y. Inoue, T. Hino, T. Nakamura.
1 H. Hayano for the ATF collaboration Low Emittance Beam Generation in ATF H. Hayano for the ATF collaboration BPM electronics improvement emittance tuning.
Status of ATF Collaboration The unique test facility for ILC with a low emittance beam. Junji Urakawa, KEK LCPAC at KEK
1 H. Hayano ATF Status June/2004 H. Hayano ATF: emittance status beam study status plan nm-project collaboration & plan ATF review 6/17/2004.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John.
IP instrumentation configuration for Autumn 2010 ATF2 runs Toshiyuki OKUGI, KEK 2010 / 7/ 1 10 th ATF2 project meeting.
ATF2 Tuning Summary Nov & Dec 2010 Glen White, SLAC 11 th ATF2 Project Meeting, SLAC Jan
ATF2 Report ALCW Kiyoshi KUBO, for ATF2 Collaboration.
SLAC ESA T-474 ILC BPM energy spectrometer prototype Bino Maiheu University College London on behalf of T-474 Vancouver Linear Collider.
Task Lists of ATF2 commissioning Toshiyuki Okugi ATF2 Project Meeting 12 / 17 / 2008.
ATF2: Summary of Scheduling Strategy Session Grahame Blair Feedback and Feedforward systems Fast Kicker for ILC bunch train structure Laser-wire Shintake.
ATF2 beam operation status Toshiyuki OKUGI, KEK The 9 th TB&SGC meeting KEK, 3-gokan Seminar Hall 2009/ 12/ 16.
Summary of Tuning, Corrections, and Commissioning ( Short summary of ATF2 meeting at SLAC in March 2007 ) and Hardware Issues for beam Tuning Toshiyuki.
Philip Burrows ATF2 project meeting 1/07/101 Plans for ATF2 IP Feedback Philip Burrows, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
Cavity BPM: Multi-bunch analysis N Joshi, S Boogert, A Lyapin, F. Cullinan, et al. Royal Holloway University of London,
FONT GROUP MEETING ATF JUNE SUMMARY Neven & Talitha Talitha Bromwich - Friday, 26 June 2015.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John.
Low-Q IP BPM Y. I. Kim *, A. Heo, E-S. Kim (KNU) S. T. Boogert (JAI) D. M. McCormick, J. May, J. Nelson, T. Smith, G. R. White (SLAC) Y. Honda, N. Terunuma,
Development of a High Resolution Cavity BPM for the CLIC Main Beam
1 IP FB tests at ATF2 Philip Burrows Douglas Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford.
IoP HEPP/APP annual meeting 2010 Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales: maintaining luminosity at future linear colliders Ben Constance John Adams Institute,
Instrumentation at ATF / TTF Accelerator Test Facility (KEK) Tesla Test Facility – FLASH (DESY) ESA / LCLS (SLAC) Marc Ross, SLAC.
1 1 H. Hayano and ATF group ATF Status August/2004 H. Hayano and ATF group Multibunch emittance Instrumentation developments Plans for run Multibunch.
LCLS Digital BPM Processor for ATF2 Extraction Line BPMs Steve Smith 26 August 2009.
ISG – Damping Ring Physics and Design Group ATF – 2003// focus on the TRC challenge Marc Ross – 1.Instability about which little is known: Fast ion,
2nd ATF2 Project Meeting (May 30, 2006)M. Woodley [SLAC]1 ATF2 Layout/Optics (v3.3) nBPM (SLAC) nBPM (KEK) FONT Compton / laserwire ODR Existing ATF Extraction.
1 FONT IP FB Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
ATF2 Status N.Terunuma, KEK
Special ATF Session - ATF/ATF2 day on 28th September -
ILC BDS Alignment, Tuning and Feedback Studies
Expected hardware status and Priority of the commissioning task
Glen White, SLAC Jan th ATF2 Project Meeting, KEK
13th ATF2 Project Meeting Summary
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
Auxiliary Positron Source
SuperB Injection, RF stations, Vibration and Operations
ATF nanoBPM system - nanoGrid ATF2 Movers TTF HOM – dipole / monopole
Progress towards nanometre beam stabilisation at ATF2
Progress towards nanometre level beam stabilisation
Diagnostics RF and Feedback
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
Presentation transcript:

ATF2 Instrumentation Stewart T. Boogert John Adams Institute at Royal Holloway (also on behalf of the ATF2 international collaboration) EuCARD 2nd Annual meeting, WP9 Highlight talk Friday 10-13th May 2011 CNRS, Paris, France 1

Talk introduction ATF/ATF2 facility Diagnostic instrumentation Extension to the ATF damping ring Main test facility for ILC/CLIC like beam delivery system Goal 1 : Vertical beam size of 35 nm Goal 2 : Stabilise beam vertically to few nm Diagnostic instrumentation ATF2 is extremely dense with novel/performant diagnostics systems WP9.4 funding activities : Feedback on nanosecond timescales (9.3.?), laser-wire transverse emittance monitoring (9.4.3), cavity beam position monitors (9.4.2) 2

Instrumentation at ATF2 (WP9) Cavity Beam position monitor systems (KEK/SLAC/JAI) ~40, 50 nm BPMs Interaction point beam size monitor (KEK/Tokyo) Aim to measure 35 nm beam size Optical transition radiation monitor (KEK/SLAC/IFIC) Micron scale optical transition radiation (KEK/JAI @ RHUL) Laser wire system (JAI@RHUL/Oxford) Aim 1um beam size measurement Feedback on nanosecond time scales Digital feedback on 300 nm timescale Background monitoring (LLR) Interaction point BPMs, High Q (KEK/KNU) Low Q (KEK/KNU) Tilt monitor (Tohoku university) Rotated monopole cavity Straightness, alignment monitoring (Notre Dame/JAI@RHUL/KEK) 3

Accelerator Test Facility (ATF) Photo-injector gun S-band 1.28 GeV linac ~400 m length radiation ramping storage ring (X-ray and laser-wire emittance) Low emittance extraction and transport to ATF2 4

ATF2 Overview (instrumentation) IP region (4 BPMs, IPBSM) BPM test area (high-Q, low-Q, tilt) S-band BPMs (movers) C-band BPMs (movers) LW Strip line/Cavity BPMs (rigid) WS/OTR Very dense with instrumentation 2 independent emittance diagnostic systems (3 axis wires scanners : projected emittance, OTR : full emittance) 2 independent interaction point systems (BPMs, IPBSM) 41 Cavity beam position monitors (almost every quadrupole) Test areas for development 5

Cavity position monitor system IP region (4 BPMs) BPM test area (high-Q, low-Q, tilt) S-band BPMs (movers) C-band BPMs (movers) Strip line/Cavity BPMs (rigid) 6

Cavity BPMs in one slide Dipole cavity, signal proportional to q*p Dipole mode selective waveguide couplers Simple single sideband down-converter IF~25 MHz, 100 MHz digitisation Calibration, move BPM (quad mover) or bump beam Digitised signal Decaying exponential Digitally mix to baseband Calibration signal 7

BPM Resolution (2011-02-02) ATF beam jitter 20% of beam size ~ 10s micron Use PCA/MIA/SVD to determine position correlation between BPMs, based on 500 pulses x y 8

BPM Resolution (2011-02-02) Lines indicate cut, at which BPM is labelled bad x SFs, Large BBA offset y IP1 200 nm IP1 No attenuators in this region 40 nm 9

were where the circles are BPM Resolution (2011-02-04) Pattern similar days later but some degradation of high resolution BPMs x y High resolution BPMs were where the circles are 10

Online resolution Cavity BPMs in test accelerator is complex Saturation, alignment (resolution beam position dependent) Online analysis complete Resolution, beam jitter, calibration Cavity BPMs are non-constant resolution devices 11

Beam optics verification Routinely use cavity BPM system of optics verification, beam based alignment, jitter studies. Use single upstream corrector and compare model prediction (Lucretia) vs BPM response Complex lattice reproduced faithfully (including coupling) 12

Interaction point beam size (IPBPM) U. of Tokyo Laser interference system 5 different laser beam angular separations Observe modulation of Compton rate Problems... Backgrounds in detector Mode switching Laser power/timing ... (ok always an issue) 13

IPBSM : 2-8 degree mode Compton signal modulation clearly observed U. of Tokyo Compton signal modulation clearly observed Multi-knob scans conducted Optimise vertical beam size down to ~300-400 nm 14

Optics scans with IPBSM KEK Sextupole strength scans, to check the chromaticity correction SD4FF, SF1FF, SD0FF Minimum measured ~300 nm 15

FONT P1,2,3 Strip line BPMs K1,2 Strip line kickers 3 bunches, with Oxford JAI 3 bunches, with 150 ns separation P1,2,3 Strip line BPMs K1,2 Strip line kickers P3 P2 P1 QD10X QF11X QD12X QD14X QF13X QF15X K1 K2 P2 P3 P1 To dump FB board DAQ P2  K1 (‘position’) P3  K2 (‘angle’) P3  K1 P2  K2 QF15X QD14X QF13X QD12X K2 QF11X QD10X K1 FONT5 16

FONT summary Improvements to FONT5 board Latency 44 ns (irreducible) Oxford JAI Improvements to FONT5 board Latency 44 ns (irreducible) Electronics 87 ns BPM mover calibration Investigation of bunch to bunch correlations Bunch 1 Bunch 2 2.1 um  0.4 um 17

John Adams (RHUL/Oxford) Laser-wire John Adams (RHUL/Oxford) Aim to reach 1 um beam size measurement 4 um already published EuCARD plan Integrate with optics modelling and BPMs Need to extract Compton photon signal over 20 m at 1.56 Hz Small exit window in special flange 532 nm, 0.7 J in 300 ps Cherenkov detector beam dir, ~1x1010 e ~20 m 18

John Adams (RHUL/Oxford) Laser-wire John Adams (RHUL/Oxford) Difficult commissioning due to ~25m Compton transport Fixed using alignment laser and 2 wire scanners in drift around LWIP Best results thus far ~8 micron Synchronised with cavity BPM system 19

Summary Cavity BPM system performing well resolution 200 (20 dB) and 50 (no attenuators) nm Typical numbers reproducible over weeks Best resolution recorded 27 nm (high charge and well aligned) Re-commissioned laser-wire system, aim to reach 1 micrometer will use BPM data to constrain laser-electron collision IPBSM used by tuning operators but problems using 30 degree mode to tune beam down to goal Other diagnostics development proceeding well (not discussed in this talk) Difficult times for ATF/ATF2 firstly because of a modulator fire and more importantly the recent earthquake. Try to restart some beam operation this month. 20

Back up slides High resolution IPBPMs More information of IPBSM Emittance measurement IPBPM Performance Tuning 21

IP region BPM installation T. Smith/YI Kim/Y Honda Honda-san installed 2 BPM, IPBPM block T. Smith installed Mixdown electronics 5.7 GHz source for x New SLAC 16 bit, 120 MHz digiziters Excellent linearity Low noise 22

IPBPM waveform processing Boogert/Lyapin/Kim/Cullinan Filter width of 0.03, so 33 samples IPBPM decay time ~10 samples Increase filter to 0.1 and recalibrate More important with saturation (see IP2 y) IP1 y IP2 y Grey box : filter width Red line : Last un-staturated Green line : sample point Cyan line : Amplitude (DDC) Saturation example (IP2 y). Nominal sample point (green) disturbed by saturation so sample at new point 1/BW later (red-dashed) extrapolate back (green) Reference 23

Emittance measurement SLAC/IFIC Wire scanners From old ATF extraction line Relatively slow and projected measurement (coupling etc) Installed new multi OTR system (SLAC/IFIC) Fast measurement Can extract full emittance and coupling in few minutes 24

Installed on beam-line OTR station SLAC/IFIC Mechanical design Installed on beam-line New targets 25

Beam measurement SLAC/IFIC Emittance panel 26 Current OTR info Start/stop emittance procedure Number of OTR to be used Data analysis and plots Calculation data 26

Emittance measurement stability G. White 27

30 degree mode Signal not observed in 30 degree mode U of Tokyo Signal not observed in 30 degree mode Backgrounds, other drifts Collision geometry Beam size itself 28