Steve Swanton CAST Symposium, Lyon, 17 January 2018

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Paul Humphreys. Gas generation is a fundamental issue in radioactive waste disposal Direct impact on: – Waste processing and packaging – Facility design.
Advertisements

Characterisation of reactor graphite to inform strategies for disposal of reactor decommissioning waste Andrew Hetherington University of Birmingham UNTF,
Nuclear Graphite Research Group University of Manchester, UK
Why Geologic Storage Can Not Possibly Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem by Dr. Gordon Edwards, President, CCNR, Canadian Coalition for Nuclear.
Landfill Processes. Objectives  Describe the physical, chemical, and biological processes occurring in a landfill  Describe leachate quality (Table.
Recycling Nuclear Waste: Potentials and Global Perspectives Mikael Nilsson Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science University of California,
Safety Assessment Methodologies and Implementation of Monitoring and Control Programmes Dr. Japie van Blerk AquiSim Consulting (Pty) Ltd Wednesday, 24.
Lecture #26 What’s on the Final?
SITE STATUS UPDATE TOP STOP PETROLEUM RELEASE SITE GUNNISION, UTAH Morgan Atkinson – Division of Environmental Response and Remediation, Project Manager.
ILW disposal in the UK Presentation at IAEA TM-45865, September 2013 Cherry Tweed – Chief Scientific Advisor.
Nicolas Solente Workshop on Regulatory Requirements to Ensure Safe Disposal of Disused Sealed Sources for Operators and Regulators Amman, JORDAN 7-11 April.
By Dr. Estee Yong Siek Ting
David G Bennett December 2014
PSB dump: proposal of a new design EN – STI technical meeting on Booster dumps Friday 11 May 2012 BE Auditorium Prevessin Alba SARRIÓ MARTÍNEZ.
% Composition, Empirical Formulas, & Molecular Formulas.
Characterisation of reactor graphite to inform strategies for the disposal of reactor decommissioning waste Andrew Hetherington (presented by Dr Paul Norman)
An agency of the Health & Safety Executive Enabling a better working world An agency of the Health & Safety Executive Enabling a better working world Nick.
Safety-related Issues for the Disposal of Intermediate Level Waste (ILW) Dr. Jürgen Wollrath Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS) Department Safety.
Waste and site related issues Fredrik Vahlund SKB.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Presenter Name School of Drafting Regulations for Borehole Disposal of DSRS 2016 Vienna, Austria Containment and.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Presenter Name School of Drafting Regulations for Borehole Disposal of DSRS 2016 Vienna, Austria Borehole Sealing.
HTS Tl-based coatings for FCC beam screens - Radiation Protection Aspects - Markus WIDORSKI, DGS-RP Information on ActiWiz: Courtesy of Chris Theis, DGS-RP.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency TM Technical Meeting to Discuss Human Intrusion and Future Human Actions in relation to Disposal of Radioactive.
Feasibility of a Landfill Gas to Energy System For Sumter County, Georgia University of Georgia Environmental Engineering Students ENVE 2920, April 2012.
Solutions Solution: homogeneous mixture
STEAM REFORMING OF COAL TAR BY USING CHEMICAL-LOOPING CARRIERS
Exposure Modelling Day 1.
Chemical Calculations
Chemical Formula Stoichiometry Review
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XIX Waste management Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared by the IAEA and.
Solutions Solution: homogeneous mixture
© SSER Ltd..
Pre-Lab #5 Cell Respiration
QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE ELEMENTAL ANAYSIS
Beam Dump outline work plan (UK perspective)
CAST Expert Review Group Findings
EC CAST Final Symposium: Analytical techniques and their application
CArbon-14 Source Term CAST
CArbon-14 Source Term CAST
Repository scale two-phase flow migration of 14C in the preliminary design phase of French Cigéo project Eloi Treille, Jacques Wendling Andra, 1/7 rue.
Control of Sulfur Oxides Dr. Wesam Al Madhoun
CArbon-14 Source Term CAST
CArbon-14 Source Term CAST
14C Content and Specification of SIERs from BWR
Chapter 7 – Weathering and Erosion
Name: André Rübel Organisation: GRS Date:
For more information, please visit the CAST website at:
CArbon-14 Source Term CEA/EDF contribution to WP4 Ion-Exchange Resins CAST final symposium Lyon 16th - 18th January 2018 Name: J. Comte(1), S. Legand(1),
TEAP XXV/8 Task Force Report
CArbon-14 Source Term CAST
“Malaysia’s Presentation on Experiences Using the POPs Toolkit” by Goh Choo Ta Final Regional Workshop Da Nang, Vietnam 2009 Draft Project Implementation.
For more information, please visit the CAST website at:
Petr Večerník ÚJV Řež, a. s. 16th – 18th January 2018 CAST Symposium
CArbon-14 Source Term CAST
CArbon-14 Source Term CAST
CArbon-14 Source Term CAST
Sea water Reverse Osmosis
Combustion Analysis The composition of a substance is often determined by using a specified reaction to break down the substance into known measurable.
2.9.U2 Visible light has a range of wavelengths with violet the shortest wavelength and red the longest.
Chapter 7 Reaction Rates and Chemical Equilibrium
Sellafield Major Permit Review
Introduction: IAEA activities / Documents on human intrusion
Chapter 2 Chemistry of Life
Presentation to the Environmental Health Sub-committee – November 2015
ANALYSIS OF COMPUNDS B.Sc. Sneha S. Mule Assistant Professor
2.9 Photosynthesis The background is an microscope image of leaf cells. You can clearly see the cells are packed with chloroplasts. These specialised organelles.
Public outreach for the EC Carbon-14 Source Term project
Unit 7: Solutions, Kinetics, and Equilibrium
Contributions to total changes in emissions of ozone precursors
Low-cost methods for gas/particle distribution of nitrogen species
Presentation transcript:

Steve Swanton CAST Symposium, Lyon, 17 January 2018 Carbon-14 release from Oldbury graphite. Use of experimental results to inform the safety case Steve Swanton CAST Symposium, Lyon, 17 January 2018

Outline Inventory of C-14 in UK graphite 2012 assessment of gas phase C-14 release Leaching of Oldbury graphite samples experimental details results up to one year Enhanced model for C-14 release (2015) Further leaching results up to 30 months comparison with model Conclusions

Carbon-14 in graphite in UK Waste Inventory Irradiated graphite provides the largest inventory of carbon-14 associated with irradiated material in UK ILW Core graphite makes up large fraction of graphite wastes by mass and contains most of carbon-14 Other graphite contains much less carbon-14 Graphite to be disposed to cement-based geological facility

Previous assessment model for C-14 (2006) First order release from graphite (i.e. rate proportional to activity remaining in graphite), independent of geometry, conditions, etc. Rate constant 5×10-4 yr-1 All of carbon-14 inventory can be released All carbon-14 released as 14CO2 or 14CH4 into surrounding grout Speciation 99% CO2, 1% CH4 (based on very limited data) CO2 captured as carbonate, so only carbon-14 in CH4 released as gas

2012 Gas assessment results Indicate carbon-14 release from core graphite provides substantial contribution to total carbon-14 release Peak release rate 0.03 TBq/year Operational dose is 0.5 µSv/year This is below design target (10 µSv/year) and small compared to release from other wastes Post-closure annual risk is 5×10-5 using simple potentially very cautious approach (no geosphere, minimum release area) This is significantly above the target (10-6) Substantial uncertainties in data Release from graphite represented using very simple model

Aims of RWM programme on graphite Improve understanding of the release of carbon-14 from graphite by Generating new experimental data and analysing existing data to identify relevant factors in the release (e.g. conditions, speciation, fraction releasable, time evolution of release) Updating modelling to represent relevant factors So that Uncertainties in calculations can be reduced Either calculated release rate is reduced below targets Or investment in determining alternative solution to issue is better justified

Oldbury (Magnox) graphite samples Cylindrical spacer piece from an installed set 90mm long, 70mm diameter, 300g mass Removed from Oldbury Reactor 2 in 2005 after 38 years service

Graphite sample inventory Sub-samples from outer surface (2) and cut faces (2) analysed for radionuclide content Reference date: 19 December 2011

Leaching experiments (Phase 1) 6 gas-phase release experiments Analysis for 14CO2, 14CO (volatile oxygenated organics) and 14C-hydrocarbons in gas phase Additional solution leaching experiment

Leaching experiments 30g intact samples leached in NaOH solution pH 13 For anoxic tests, de-aerated water equilibrated with iron foil was used Handling in N2 atmosphere Gas phase purging system

Gas phase carbon-14 analysis Samplers are evolutions of dry-bed absorber systems developed for 3H, 14C and 35S speciation studies of discharges from nuclear establishments Series of soda lime and silica gel columns to collect CO2 and H2O Unit 1 - collects gas phase 14CO2 and 3H2O Unit 2 - oxidation of H2 and CO to H2O and CO2 by CuO catalyst, 350°C Unit 3 - oxidation of organic compounds to H2O and CO2 by Pd catalyst, 425°C

Carbon-14 analysis Purge reactor headspace with nitrogen near-quantitative collection of all gas phase species collection columns returned to RCD for analysis CO2 is extracted from columns converted to benzene for 14C analysis by LSC LoD 0.01 to 0.03 Bq 14C per sample Solution phase samples were analysed by pyrolyser and LSC for total 14C organic 14C, samples were acidified to remove carbonate fractions before pyrolysis/LSC

Speciation of gas phase carbon-14 Ratio organics to CO 1:1 in oxic conditions 2.5:1 in anoxic conditions Negligible 14CO2 in gas phase

Carbon-14 release to solution – anoxic pH 13

Carbon-14 release, anaerobic, pH 13

Conclusions from experiments (to 1 year) Fast initial release of carbon-14 on immersion in water The rates of 14C release decreased with time Most of the 14C released remained in the aqueous phase ~1% of the carbon-14 released was as volatile gaseous species Gas phase speciation depends in part on redox conditions 1:1 hydrocarbons: CO under oxic conditions 2.5:1 hydrocarbons: CO under anoxic conditions

Enhanced assessment model Based on improved understanding from Oldbury graphite and other experimental studies (e.g. Carbowaste), enhanced empirical model developed Large proportion of carbon-14 remains unreactive and is not released Small proportion of carbon-14 released rapidly before repository closure Remaining proportion released at a slower rate that continues into repository post-closure period Release mainly into solution, with a small proportion released as gas Gas phase speciation (between 14C-hydrocarbons and 14C-O species) depends on conditions Parameters estimated from latest experimental data

Effect of uncertainty Uncertainty (and variability) considered in parameterising model Key values are: Both best estimate and variant calculations performed

Updated assessment model Enhanced model substantially reduces calculated gaseous 14C release from graphite in long term Enhanced model may still be cautious

Leaching experiments (Phase 2) Resampling after further 18 months Runs 2, 3 - baseline, intact, anoxic, high pH Run 3b – baseline (solution only) Run 5 – powdered sample, anoxic, high pH Measured Gas phase C-14 (Runs 2, 3 and 5) Solution phase total C-14 Solution organic C-14 (after acidification to remove inorganic C-14)

Longer-term 14C release – gas phase

Longer-term 14C release - solution

Organic fraction of 14C in solution Majority of release is as 14CO2 Up to 30% 14C in organic fraction (intact samples)

Comparison with enhanced model

The baseline experiments are continuing… Conclusions Fast initial release of carbon-14 occurs from Oldbury graphite on immersion in water Rate of release decreases with time and is barely measurable beyond one year Release predominantly as 14CO2, which is absorbed in alkaline solution; at high pH up to 30% as soluble organic species Less than 1% of release occurs as volatile species to gas phase Gas phase speciation depends in part on redox conditions 1:1 hydrocarbons: CO under oxic conditions 2.5:1 hydrocarbons: CO under anoxic conditions Current assessment model may be cautious concerning carbon-14 release to gas phase Future assessments will need to consider migration of organic C-14 species via the groundwater pathway The baseline experiments are continuing…

References Carbon-14 Release from Oldbury Graphite, Amec Report AMEC/5352/002 Issue 3, 2014 Carbon-14 Project Phase 2: Irradiated Graphite Wastes, AMEC/200047/004 Issue 2, 2016 Available from https://rwm.nda.gov.uk/publications/ Further studies of Carbon-14 Release from Oldbury Graphite, due to be published in 2018.

Acknowledgements Graham Baston, for managing the experimental work Steve Preston for graphite sample preparation Mark Kirkham, Bijan Farahani and James Schofield for experimental maintenance and sampling Ben Swift for modelling of 14C gas generation Adrian Clacher for solution phase 14C analysis Bob Otlett and Jill Walker (RadioCarbon Dating Ltd) for gas phase 14C analysis This work was funded by Radioactive Waste Management Limited

Thank you for listening Any questions?

Additional slides

Comparison of enhanced model with experimental results

Comparison of enhanced model with previous model

Updated performance assessment results for shielded ILW vaults