Chapter Sixteen Rules of Evidence  .

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRIAL EVIDENCE.
Advertisements

LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS OF FORENSIC SCIENCE CHAPTER 2.
“ Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Criminal Evidence Chapter Three: Forms of Evidence This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright.
AKA: The Last Words AAKA: Parting Gift Closing Arguments.
CJ227 Criminal Procedure Welcome to our Seminar!!! (We will begin shortly) Tonight – Unit 4 (Chapter 9 – Pretrial Motions, Hearings and Pleas) (Chapter.
Evidence and Argument Evidence – The asserted facts that the arbitrator will consider in making a decision – Information – What is presented at the hearing.
TRIAL INFORMATION Steps, vocabulary.
Forensic Science and the Law
Stages of an Arbitration Arbitration Week in Palestine Session #4 December 9,
The Nature of Evidence A Guide to Legal Evidence & the Courts.
Unit 3 Seminar! K. Austin Zimmer Any question from Unit 2! Please make sure you have completed your Unit 1 & 2 Papers!
Basic Evidence and Trial Procedure. Opening Statement  Preview the evidence “The evidence will show”  Introduce theme  Briefly describe the issues,
The Trial Process and the Investigator as a Witness.
Evidence in Court Holy Trinity Law Audrius Stonkus.
The Criminal Trial Process Section 11 (d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that each person charged with an offence is to be ‘presumed innocent.
1 PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE Learning Domain PURPOSE FOR THE RULES OF EVIDENCE Protect the jury from seeing or hearing evidence that is: (w/b p. 1-3)
 You must consider – is it worth doing?  Many times it is not worth it to impeach on collateral matters  Must be structured and simple  Why you impeach.
“ Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Criminal Evidence Chapter Eight: Witnesses This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law.
Chapter 1: Introduction to the Study of Evidence The primary purpose of the rules of evidence is to help ensure a fair trial. Copyright © 2015 Carolina.
Evidence and Expert Testimony. Expert Testimony  Two Types of Witnesses: Fact and Expert  Fact -- have personal knowledge of facts of case  Cannot.
Professor Guy Wellborn
Court Systems and Practices. 2 Copyright and Terms of Service Copyright © Texas Education Agency, These materials are copyrighted © and trademarked.
EVIDENCE ACT Law of evidence lay rules for the production of evidence in the court of law.
Admissibility. The Frye Standard  1923 – became the standard guideline for determining the judicial admissibility of scientific examinations. To meet.
CHAPTER 7: Emond Montgomery Publications 1 Direct Examination of Witnesses.
PROCEDURES IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, 8 th ed. Roberson, Wallace, and Stuckey PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ
CJ305 Criminal Evidence Welcome to our Seminar!!! (We will begin shortly) Tonight – Unit 3 (Chapter 5 – Witnesses -- Lay & Expert) (Chapter 6 – Credibility.
Mock Trial Rules of Evidence Arkansas Bar Association Mock Trial Committee Anthony L. McMullen, J.D., Vice Chair ( )
OBJECTIONS! 13 Most Commonly Used Mock Trial Objections
Forensic Science NAS Report
Justice of the Peace Association Annual Conference September 2, 2015
Outline of the U.S. and Arizona Criminal Justice Systems
DEMYSTIFYING VICTIM COUNTERINTUITIVE BEHAVIOR IN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie-deliberate, contrived.
Direct Examination Direct is when you tell your side of the story
Experts and Lay Witness
Forensic and Investigative Accounting
OPINION RULE.
Arizona High School Mock Trial
WHAT IS EVIDENCE TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES DOCUMENTS
Law of Evidence OPINION EVIDENCE 2/12/2014 Chapter 8.
The basics of every objection allowed in a Mock Trial.
Hearsay Hector Brolo Evidence, Law 16 Spring 2017.
The basics of every objection allowed in the Mock Trial universe.
J. Max Wawrik Nancy Rosado Colon Law 16 Spring 2017
Faculty of Law Law of Evidence.
AGENDA Brief Lecture on Chapters courtroom evidence and jury selections and juries Film, 12 angry men Written exercise
State of Oregon v. Willy Freeman
EVIDENCE—BASES OF OPINION TESTIMONY BY EXPERTS
Rules of Evidence Miss Orr.
What to Expect at a Medicaid Fair Hearing
Functions and basic concepts
ПОСИЛЕННЯ ПОТЕНЦІАЛУ ІНСТИТУЦІЇ УКРАЇНСЬКОГО ОМБУДСМЕНА:
HEARSAY DEFINITIONS [RULE 801, PARED DOWN].
EVIDENCE Evidence must be relevant to the facts and issues of the case
Forms of Evidence circumstantial evidence direct evidence
TRIAL: BURDEN OF PROOF AND EVIDENCE
The Sixth Amendment: … the accused shall enjoy (1.)the right to a speedy …public trial, (2.)by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the.
OBJECTIONS.
Principles of Evidence
Witnesses’ Roles in a Case
Objections Criminal law – unit #3.
EVIDENCE—BASES OF OPINION TESTIMONY BY EXPERTS
What is Mock Trial? Steps in what we do…...
It’s a murder trial. Get ready.
Civil Pretrial Practice
WHO’S WHO IN THE COURT ROOM?
The Investigator and The Legal System
Welcome to Forensic Science!
Business Law Final Exam
Business Law Final Exam
Presentation transcript:

Chapter Sixteen Rules of Evidence  

Rules of Evidence Rules of evidence encourage fairness Help to avoid judicial delay Assist in ascertaining the truth

The Four Types of Evidence testimony of a witness exhibits facts which the attorneys have stipulated judicial notice

Testimony of a Witness Lay witness gives testimony about a subject of which the witness has personal knowledge Expert witness testifies about conclusions that may be drawn based on his or her expertise

Types of Exhibits Actual Evidence Documentary Evidence Demonstrative Evidence

Circumstantial Evidence Types of Evidence Direct Evidence Circumstantial Evidence

What is Relevancy? Relevancy is the standard by which testimony or physical evidence is evaluated; relates directly to the fact in question and proves, or has a tendency to prove, a particular legal theory

What is Impeachment? Impeachment is a tool used to attack the credibility of a witness

What is Hearsay? Hearsay evidence is an out-of-court statement offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted