CEO – CHRISTINE OBEK COO – CHLOE NEOH CFO – JASON TIONG ASST. COO – FARAH AMELIA PR OFFICER – DANIEL PHUAN.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Yasunari Matsuno, Ichiro Daigo, Masaru Yamashita
Advertisements

From Waste to Algae Viability of carbon dioxide and wastewater utilization for algae biofuel production.
Direct Reduction Iron Plant Group Golf Selimos, Blake A. Arrington, Deisy C. Sink, Brandon Ciarlette, Dominic F. (Scribe) Advisor: Orest Romaniuk 1.
Landfill Gas to Liquid Fuels Ryan Kent Kirk Jaunich Tyler Stewart Zachary Kerbo University of South Florida Chemical & Biomedical Engineering Department.
What is Biomass Gasification ? Conversion of organic materials into combustible gas mixture called SYN Gas or Producer Gas. Involves partial combustion.
Sustainable bio-energy Regional Innovations in Bio-energy, Food and Feed Production Onno van Dijk project manager life sciences.
BIOMASS GASIFICATION : CHALLENGES AND THEIR SOLUTIONS BY - J. MUKHERJEE.
BEST Slow Pyrolysis Technology C4H4 Demonstration Plant Presented by Cordner Peacocke for Adriana Downie.
The most efficient Waste to Energy Technology Henry A. Melendez, Ph.D.
Renewal Fuel from Biomass Waste UC Discovery/West Biofuels Research Project: “An Investigation of a Thermochemical Process for the Conversion of Biomass.
Decentralized Power Production in Rural Communities Andrea French Nicole Munguia November 21, 2006.
Combustion AND Emissions Performance of syngas fuels derived from palm shell and POLYETHYLENE (PE) WASTE VIA CATALYTIC STEAM GASIFICATION Chaouki Ghenai.
COAL GASIFICATION GASIFICATION ONLY REASONABLE WHEN PLANT IS INTEGRATED SOME PROCESSES ARE COMMERCIAL H 2 S REMOVAL BY THE CLAUS PROCESS H 2 S + O 2 =
Proprietary work product, not for reproduction 1 BIOMASS GASIFIER 20 MW POWERPLANT Energy & Environmental Integrators Note! This system can be scaled from.
Biomass Gasification: Emerging Technologies for Converting Biomass to Pipeline-Quality SNG presented to Wisconsin Public Utility Institute Natural Gas.
SynGas Gasifier ALTERNATIVE ENERGY Technology Presentation.
Energy year 2013 District Heat Wilhelms District heat in Finland year 2013  Heat sales (incl. taxes) 2,31 mrd €  Sold heat energy31,7 TWh.
Chemical Engineering Plant Design
Production of Syngas and Ethanol Group II. Definition of Syngas Syngas is the abbreviated name for synthesis gas. It is a gas mixture that comprises of.
Alternative Renewables. Biofuels Plant or animal material 3 types – Biomass Wood, yard waste Methane from landfills, feedlots Burned and used to create.
WASTE TO FUEL Evaluation and Thermochemical Modeling of High Temperature Steam Gasification of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) University of Florida Boiling.
Ansaldo Ricerche S.p.A. Carbon Dioxide capture Berlin, March 2008.
Production of Ammonia Plant Feedstock From Natural Gas Team Charlie Michael Gardiner - Scribe Rami Qafisheh Alexandria Rinella – Team Leader Advisor: Orest.
Possible cooperation with YKA, Bahrain in oil recovery of AGAS´s oil pit.
Direct Reduction Iron Plant Group Golf Selimos, Blake A. Arrington, Deisy C. Sink, Brandon Ciarlette, Dominic F. (Scribe) Advisor: Orest Romaniuk 1.
1 Waste Conversion Technologies Life Cycle Assessment California Integrated Waste Management Board Board Meeting May 22, 2004 Keith Weitz, RTI International.
Profitability Analysis-II Chapter 8 & 9 ChEN 5253 Terry A. Ring.
Biomass Energy By Jonathan Sharer, Brandon Deere,Eric Carpenter.
Using Heat to Generate Electricity In many areas, thermoelectric generating plants use a fuel such as coal or biomass to heat water to create high- pressure.
Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: The Efficiencies of Internal Reforming Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Fueled by Natural.
Comparison of Energy Resources
Making use of Energy lesson 8
PLASMA GASIFICATION OF SOLID WASTE
S3 Physics - Energy
Seerdrum Processing of Municipal Solid Waste
Team Echo Leader: Matt Levy
Turbomachinery in Biofuel Production
Renewable vs. Nonrenewable Energy
Date of download: 10/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
PRIMARY ENERGY SOURCES
NONRENEWABLE AND RENEWABLE RESOURCES
Nonrenewable Resources
Process simulation of switch grass gasification using Aspen Plus
Ultra Clean Thermal and Plasma Technologies For the Future
Energy Sources Power & Energy 9.
Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis
Tawsif Rahman University of Science and Technology 23 May,2016
Chapter 6: Resources.
Making Hydrogen with Nuclear Energy for Liquid Fuels
Profitability Analysis-II
What are Resources, and how do we use them?
Energy Resources.
OPEX and Profitability Analysis-II
Biomass-fired combined heat and power for district heating
Anaerobic Sequencing Batch Reactor
Energy: Powering Our Nation
A Case Study on a Rice Husk Cogeneration Power Plant
DO NOW Pick up notes and Review #30. Turn in any missing work.
Energy Resources Chapter 5, Section 4 Mrs. Boguslaw.
Brianna Rankins Nyri White Andre Elam
District heating in Finland 2017
Introduction to Biomass Gasification and Overview of it through Paper Review Special Topics in Fuel Cell Hong-Min Cho Prof. Yong-Tae Kim.
Carbon Footprint.
Closing the Biomass Power Cost-Price Gap
Renewable and Non-renewable
Chapter Energy Resources.
OPEX and Profitability Analysis-II
Producing Electricity from Fossil Fuels and Renewable Sources
Solar nova scotia case study: Solar Thermal Halifax
Bioenergy : Biomasses for energy production by gasification By : Bambang Dwi Argo Head of Bioprocess Technology Study Programe Department of Agricultural.
Presentation transcript:

CEO – CHRISTINE OBEK COO – CHLOE NEOH CFO – JASON TIONG ASST. COO – FARAH AMELIA PR OFFICER – DANIEL PHUAN

Summary of Feedstocks to be co-gasified PALM OIL BIOMASS HDPE WASTE Amounts to 85.5% of total biomass production in Malaysia Amounts to 60.1% of total plastic waste produced in Malaysia High potential for producing renewable energy (98.7%) Capable of producing high concentrations of hydrogen gas Over palm oil 400 mills in Malaysia

PASIR GUDANG, JOHOR BAHRU Comparison of available choices for Plant location FACTORS SAMALAJU, BINTULU PASIR GUDANG, JOHOR BAHRU LAHAD DATU, SABAH Land Cost (USD 000’) 10.4 253.5 284.3 Electricity Cost (USD/kWh) 0.06 0.10 0.08 Special Features Water treatment plant located in Samalaju. Nil

MEMBRANE SEPARATOR FIXED BED FLUIDIZED BED GASIFIER GASIFIER SCRUBBER WATER STEAM FEED (BIOMASS + PLASTIC) ASH FLUIDIZED BED PRODUCT GAS FIXED BED PRODUCT GAS TAR + WATER TAR SCRUBBED GAS ENRICHED SYNGAS ENRICHED HYDROGEN CARBON DIOXIDE GAS MEMBRANE SEPARATOR FIXED BED GASIFIER FLUIDIZED BED GASIFIER SCRUBBER ADIABATIC REACTOR LEGEND: R – 101 A = FLUIDIZED BED GASIFIER R – 102 A = FIXED BED GASIFIER V – 101 A = SCRUBBER R – 103 A = ADIABATIC REACTOR R – 105 A = MEMBRANE SEPARATOR R – 104 A = SETTLING TANK B – 101 = SCREW CONVEYER BELT T – 101 = WATER TANK E – 101 A = STEAM GENERATOR E – 102 A = COOLER E – 103 A = COOLER M – 101 A = MIXER K – 101 = COLLECTOR P – 101 A = PUMP P – 102 A = PUMP VLV – 101 A = THREE WAY VALVE VLV – 102 A = VALVE VLV – 103 A = VALVE VLV – 104 A = VALVE VLV – 105 A = VALVE

LEGEND: R – 101 A = FLUIDIZED BED GASIFIER R – 102 A = FIXED BED GASIFIER V – 101 A = SCRUBBER R – 103 A = ADIABATIC REACTOR R – 105 A = MEMBRANE SEPARATOR R – 104 A = SETTLING TANK B – 101 = SCREW CONVEYER BELT T – 101 = WATER TANK E – 101 A = STEAM GENERATOR E – 102 A = COOLER E – 103 A = COOLER M – 101 A = MIXER K – 101 = COLLECTOR P – 101 A = PUMP P – 102 A = PUMP VLV – 101 A = THREE WAY VALVE VLV – 102 A = VALVE VLV – 103 A = VALVE VLV – 104 A = VALVE VLV – 105 A = VALVE

Price of Feedstock and Hydrogen in 3 different scenarios BEST BASE WORST FEEDSTOCK ($ millions/KG) 0.04 0.64 1.12 HYDROGEN 823 764 707 BEST BASE WORST FEEDSTOCK ($/KG) 0.04 0.06 0.11 HYDROGEN ($/KG) 8.23 7.64 7.07 FEED SUPPLY OF 1,000,000 KG/YEAR PRODUCTION RATE OF 100,000,000 KG/YEAR

OPERATIONAL LIFE :20 YEARS Operating Cost + Fixed Charges Total Hydrogen Production price – sales - TPC BEST BASE WORST SALES TAX ($millions) 4.12 3.82 3.54 TOTAL PRODUCT COST ($millions) 56.2 56.8 57.3 REVENUE ($millions) 22.0 15.8 9.91 NET PROFIT BEFORE TAXES ($millions) 23.4 16.8 10.7 OPERATIONAL LIFE :20 YEARS 20% 25% BEST BASE WORST TOTAL TAX PAID ($millions) 110 67.2 53.4 NET PROFIT AFTER TAX ($millions) 357 268 160

Returns of Investment (ROI) Payback Period BEST 4.56 YEARS BASE 4.81 YEARS WORST 6.92 YEARS PAYBACK PERIOD Returns of Investment (ROI) Best Base Worst BEST BASE WORST PRE-TAX (%) 28.4 20.46 11.6 AFTER-TAX (%) 21.7 16.4 5.7