Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement – IV

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achievement Tests Designed to measure the skills and abilities acquired through direct instruction or intervention. Can measure both lower order and high.
Advertisements

Woodcock Reading Mastery Test-Revised
Individualized Education Program Present Level of Performance Training (General Education Curriculum) Division of Special Education Compliance Support.
Wide Range Achievement Test WRAT4 Authors: Gary S. Wilkinson, PhD Gary J. Robertson, PhD.
STAR Basics.
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
W OODCOCK -J OHNSON III T ESTS OF A CHIEVEMENT. I NTRODUCTION TO WJ-III A CH The 2001 Woodcock-Johnson III consists of 2 instruments: Tests of Cognitive.
Using Disability Documentation to Aid Students …and Why you Can Use It!
Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement Kara McGoey, Ph.D. & Erich Merkle, M.Ed., M.A. Psychoeducational Assessment, Spring 2003.
Educational Assessment of Children
Formative and Summative Assessment
Understanding and Interpreting Standardized Assessment Measures Joe Hannah, Hilary Wilson, and Chris Sowder.
Austin Elementary School August 20 and 27, 2015
EC CHAIRPERSON/PSYCHOLOGIST MEETING Helpful Tips re: Interventions.
SLD Academy 2.0 Houston Independent School District.
Fourth Grade Reading Night Teaching the Five Components of Reading.
Woodcock Johnson Results Before the WJIII test results are discussed, a brief explanation of scores is offered. In order to find out what scores are high,
Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-II Overview.
Diagnostics Mathematics Assessments: Main Ideas  Now typically assess the knowledge and skill on the subsets of the 10 standards specified by the National.
LAS LINKS DATA ANALYSIS. Objectives 1.Analyze the 4 sub-tests in order to understand which academic skills are being tested. 2.Use sample tests to practice.
Reevaluation Using PSM/RTI Processes, PLAFP, and Exit Criteria How do I do all this stuff?
STANDARDIZED AND STATE ASSESSMENTS 3W Talk. REASONS TO TEST  To recognize areas of strength and weakness  To look for discrepancies between subjects.
Chapter 2 ~~~~~ Standardized Assessment: Types, Scores, Reporting.
Assessing Learners with Special Needs: An Applied Approach, 6e © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5: Introduction to Norm- Referenced.
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
Test of Early Reading Ability-3 (TERA-3) By: Jenna Ferrara.
The Normal Distribution and Norm-Referenced Testing Norm-referenced tests compare students with their age or grade peers. Scores on these tests are compared.
 The introduction of the new assessment framework in line with the new curriculum now that levels have gone.  Help parents understand how their children.
Assessment Assessment is the collection, recording and analysis of data about students as they work over a period of time. This should include, teacher,
Understanding ERB Scores
Interpreting Test Results using the Normal Distribution Dr. Amanda Hilsmier.
Test of Silent Word Reading Fluency Presented by Chinwe Okenyi EDSP 5311 Dr. Fontenot Houston Baptist University, Spring 2016.
Assessment of Students with Special Education Needs.
 have a working knowledge of all available data reports;  have a working knowledge of how to interpret data available from the PMRN; and  be able to.
WIDE RANGE ACHIEVEMENT TEST 4 (WRAT4) and Standardized Administration of the Woodcock-Johnson III Claudette Ward-Konovalov.
Preparation for End of Key Stage 1 Testing 2017
Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-II
KS1 SATS Guidance for Parents
KS2 SATS Guidance for Parents
Dr. Denise P. Gibbs, Director
What is a CAT? What is a CAT?.
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Data Usage Response to Intervention
Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement - III
Milwee Middle School Math Night
MEETING FOR YEAR 2 PARENTS/CARERS: SATs Information
Performance Task Overview
Ace it!SM Tutoring Teacher Training
Key Stage 1 Assessments March 2018
Information for Parents on Key Stage 2 SATs
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Iowa Assessment Program
KS1 SATS Guidance for Parents
Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT)
Preparation for End of Key Stage 1 Testing and Assessment. 2018
Weschler Individual Achievement Test
Key Stage One National Testing Arrangements
St. James & St. John CE Primary School
Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing-Second Edition CTOPP-2
ADCOS February.
Variability in the skills measured by tests of “reading comprehension across tests and across grade levels Dr. Joseph Torgesen Florida State University.
BURNSIDE ACADEMY INSPIRES KS2 SATS Guidance for Parents
KS1 SATS Guidance for Parents
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Welcome Reporting: Individual Student Report (ISR), Student Roster Report, and District Summary of Schools Report Welcome to the Reporting: Individual.
Relationship between Standardized and Classroom-based Assessment
KS1 SATS 2019 at Olton Primary KS1 SATS Guidance for Parents
Sats Information Session
KS1 SATS Guidance for Parents
What Do All These Numbers Mean? Interpreting Gifted Test Scores
Presentation transcript:

Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement – IV Fall 2015 WSSD School Psychologists

Maintaining Standardization and Optimal Testing Conditions Administer an entire subtest in one sitting (avoid breaks in the middle of a subtest) One on one administration If timed, the time has to be exact Minimize distractions in the room Maintain contact with the student as they complete the subtests Cannot assist or give pointers Keep to language of the manual for administration Be familiar with directions for subtest administration, (including basals and ceilings)

Administrator Requirements Bachelor’s degree in educational field (e.g. education, psychology, speech therapy, occupational therapy, counseling, etc). Specific undergraduate level course in one or more of the following to include ethical administration, scoring, and interpretation…(see next slide)

Administration Requirements Intelligence/cognitive assessment Basic tests and measurement Speech, hearing, and language assessment Educational diagnostics or equivalent testing course Or, Certification by or full active professional membership in a professional organization (ASHA, AOTA, APA, AERA, ACA, AMA, NASP) that requires training and experience in a relevant area of assessment.

Specific Learning Disability Areas IDEA Basic Reading Skills Reading Fluency Skills Reading Comprehension Mathematics Problem-Solving Mathematics Calculation Written Expression Listening Comprehension Oral Expression

Subtests to Administer If SLD in…. any area of reading, administer all reading subtests, (subtests 1, 4, 7, 8, 9 & 12) any area of math, administer all math subtests, (subtests 2, 5, 10 & 13) written expression, administer writing subtests, (subtests 6 & 11) Administer all subtests (listed above) for all other disability categories, (emotional disturbance, intellectual disability, autism if testable, etc.)

Subtests to Administer Feel free to administer any other subtests within that student’s identified area of disability that you feel would provide you with important information, (i.e. editing, math facts fluency). If data supports deficits in other subject areas besides the identified area of disability, administer subtests within that subject. If data does not support deficits in other subject areas, DO NOT administer other subtests.

Subtests to Administer – Reading Curricular Area Standard Battery Subtest SLD Classification Basic Reading Skills 1: Letter-Word Identification 7: Word Attack Reading Fluency 8: Oral Reading 9: Sentence Reading Fluency Reading Fluency skills Reading Comprehension 4: Passage Comprehension 12: Reading Recall Reading Comprehension Skills

Subtests to Administer – Math Curricular Area Standard Battery Subtest SLD Classification Math Calculation Skills 5: Calculation 10: Math Facts Fluency Mathematics Problem-Solving 2: Applied Problems 13: Number Matrices Mathematics Problem-Solving

Subtests to Administer – Writing Curricular Area Standard Battery Subtest SLD Classification Written Expression 6: Writing Samples 11: Sentence Writing Fluency Written Expression Skills

Description of Subtests – Basic Reading Skills Basic Reading Skills (Tests 1 and 7) Test 1: Letter- Word Identification measures the skill in identification of words and pronouncing words correctly. It includes the ability to identify sight vocabulary and to apply phonic and structural analysis skills. Test 7: Word Attack measures skills in applying phonic and structural analysis skills to the pronunciation of unfamiliar printed words; (also referred to as pseudoword decoding on other assessments).

Description of Subtests – Reading Fluency Reading Fluency (Tests 8 & 9) Test 8: Oral Reading measures story reading accuracy. The task involves reading aloud sentences that gradually increase in difficulty and is scored for both accuracy and fluency of expression. Test 9: Sentence Reading Fluency measures reading rate, requiring both reading-writing and cognitive processing speed abilities. The task involves reading simple sentences silently and quickly and respond to the statement in a true or false (yes or no) manner.

Sentence Reading Fluency *Note: Problem with sentence reading fluency subtest – this subtest has a comprehension component that may impact on fluency scores *Note: Use AIMSWeb/progress monitoring data with the reading fluency subtest to support progress/need for programming, etc.

Description of Subtests – Reading Comprehension Reading Comprehension (Tests 4 and 12) Test 4: Passage Comprehension includes comprehension of single-word stimuli and short passages. Identifies the ability to identify a missing word in text. Test 12: Reading Recall measures skill in reading comprehension and meaningful memory. The individual reads a short story silently and then retells as much of the story as they can recall.

Description of Subtests – Mathematics Calculation Mathematics Calculation (Tests 5 and 10) Test 5: Calculation measures the ability to perform mathematical computations. The initial items require writing single numbers. The remaining items require the performance of addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, and combinations of these basic operations, as well as some geometric, trigonometric, logarithmic, and calculus operations. Test 10: Math Facts Fluency measures the ability to solve simple addition, subtraction, and multiplication facts quickly.

Description of Subtests – Math Problem Solving Math Problem Solving (Tests 2 and 13) Test 2: Applied Problems provides a measure of mathematical knowledge and reasoning. It includes the ability to analyze and solve practical mathematics problems. Test 13: Number Matrices measures quantitative reasoning and fluid reasoning abilities. The individual must identify the missing number in a matrix. Note general timeline for test items.

Description of Subtests – Written Expression Written Expression (Tests 6 and 11) Test 6: Writing Samples measures skills in writing meaningful responses to a variety of demands. Written sentences are produced and evaluated with respect to the quality of expression. Item difficulty increases by increasing passage length, level of vocabulary, and the sophistication of content. The individual is not penalized for errors in spelling or punctuation. Note: USE THE MANUAL FOR SCORING Test 11: Sentence Writing Fluency measures skills in formulating and writing simple sentences quickly. Each sentence must relate to a give stimulus picture paired with a set of 3 words. The words gradually require the formulation of more complex sentence structure.

Tips: Writing Samples Subtest - 6 ALWAYS USE THE MANUAL TO SCORE. Page 129 – Appendix B in Examiner’s Manual. The Raw Score for Writing Samples is based on one of 5 blocks of items, even if more items are administered. The examiner must ensure that the block of items used is the best estimate of the individual’s skill.

Interpretation of Scores – Age or Grade Norms? Use AGE LEVEL norms Grade level norms should be used if a student has failed/been retained in a grade If grade level norms have been used, include a statement in the report such as: “Because student was retained in/failed grade _, he/she is older than a typical student of that grade and has not received instruction commensurate with same age peers. Therefore, grade based norms were used in the calculation of standard scores and percentile ranks.”

Interpretation of Scores – Bell Curve Standard Score Range Percentile Rank Range WJ –IV Classification 131 and Above 98 to 99.9 Very Superior 121 to 130 92 to 97 Superior 111 to 120 76 to 91 High Average 90 to 110 25 to 75 Average 80 to 89 9 to 24 Low Average 70 to 79 3 to 8 Low 69 and Below 0.1 to 2 Very Low

Interpretation of Scores – Standard Scores Standard scores are based on a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Standard scores sometimes present a disadvantage to inexperienced users and others, such as parents and the student, because the scores lack objective meaning. Consequently, the interpretation of a standard score is often explained using its equivalent percentile rank.

Interpretation of Scores – Percentile Ranks A percentile rank describes performance on a scale from 1 to 99 relative to the performance of some segment of the norming sample that is at a specific age or grade level. The subject’s percentile rank indicates the percentage of subjects in the selected segment of the norming sample who had scores the same or lower than the subject’s score. Percentile ranks are particularly useful for describing a person’s relative standing in the population.

Question What if a student maintains the same standard score or percentile rank for many years? What does this say about the student’s progress? Is your building aide qualified to administer this assessment?

Age and Grade Equivalents – We Do NOT Report These Scores These scores compare students at various ages/grades based on the number of items answered correctly, not based on the skills answers correctly. For example, a grade-equivalent of 4:1 indicates that the student answered the same number of items correctly as a typical student in the first month of 4th grade. It does NOT provide an instructional level.

Age and Grade Equivalents – We do NOT Report These Scores Within an age/grade-equivalent distribution of scores, the scores may not represent equal units. The difference between 2nd and 3rd grade-equivalent scores may not be the same as the difference between 11th and 12th grade-equivalent scores Many grade-equivalents are obtained by means of interpolation and extrapolation. Consequently, the scores may not actually have been obtained by children.

Age and Grade Equivalents – We Do NOT Report These Scores Grade-equivalents encourage comparison with inappropriate groups. For example, a second grader who obtains a grade equivalent of 4.1 in math should not be said to be functioning like a 4th grader at the beginning of the school year; this is the wrong comparison group Grade-equivalents exaggerate small differences in performance – a score slightly below the median may result in grade level equivalent one or two years below grade level.

Reevaluation Reports Final RR drafts should be submitted to your school psychologist prior to RR meetings (the goal is 3 days prior which allows for time to make corrections) Any change in disability category MUST be approved by the school psychologist before presenting the RR to the parents

WJ-IV Scoring Once Trained: You will receive and e-mail from RPC_Customer_Service@hmhco.com. Your username is first initial, last name. You will need to set your own password. Accessible for free with a paper record form purchase, the WJ Online Scoring and Reporting System (WJ OSRS) combines the best features of WJ Compuscore® with all the advantages of a web-based platform, including:

Scoring the WJ-IV Secure, 24/7 access from any computer with an Internet connection Accurate and reliable results delivered in real time through robust reports 90 days to edit committed test records 14 days to access a produced report after committed Deletion and restoration of test records Scoring is not unlimited – you may score 1 student for every 1 test record Contact Cathy Baum for Test Records (forms) Do not photocopy test records (this is illegal)

Minimum System Requirements for On-Line Scoring Operating System Web Browser Other Required Software Additional Requirements Windows® 8 Internet Explorer® 10 or higher Firefox® 21 or higher Google Chrome™ 27 or higher Adobe® Reader 10 or higher *Processor: 1 GHz Pentium® dual core or higher *Memory: 1 GB RAM or higher *1024x768 screen resolution For optimal performance: *Processor: 2 GHz Pentium dual core or higher *Memory: 2 GB RAM or higher *1366x768 screen resolution Windows 7 Internet Explorer® 9 or higher Firefox® 21 or higher Google Chrome™ 27 or higher Apple™ OS X 10.7 Safari™ 5.0 or higher Firefox® 21 or higher Apple™ OS X 10.8 Safari™ 6.0 or higher Firefox® 21

Module 1 - Video Logging in and Getting Started – 7 minutes Access through Resources on wjscore.com Password Setup Password Retrieval Basic Dashboard Functions Creating an Examinee Organizing Caseload File

Module 2 - Video On-Line Scoring and Reporting – 8 minutes Access through Resources on wjscore.com Entering Scores Creating a Report