WP6 - aims, objectives Don Kirkup

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EGIDA Stakeholder Network and Advisory Board and Their Relevance for EGIDA and GEO Stefano Nativi 1 st Joint Workshop of the EGIDA Stakeholder Network.
Advertisements

EVALUATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE STRATEGY PRESENTED BY DR SHYAM PATIAR.
Chapter 14. To understand the process of project audit To recognize the value of an audit to project management To determine when to terminate a project.
WP7: Training modules Claudia Engelhardt, Timo Gnadt, Jens Ludwig Gothenburg, Final.
The Preparatory Phase Proposal a first draft to be discussed.
1 WERT: WP 5 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010 Aim To pilot and evaluate the content and context of the course material with target groups To help women.
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
Digitization of Natural History Collections (DIGIT) Larry Speers Program Officer Digitization of Natural History Collections Data TDWG Annual Meeting Oct.
EU BON Meeting, Joensuu, March 2015 WP2 Task 2.3: Data sharing tools – Action Point MS232 : Technical workshop, review of documents, test versions of data.
Company: _________________________ KP1: KP2: KA1: KA2: KR1: KR2: VP1: VP2: CR1: CR2: CS1: CS2: C1: C2: CO1: CO2: CO3: CO4: RS1: RS2: RS3: RS4: Key Partners,
Material produced under Phare 2006 financial support Phare TVET RO 2006/ Project financed under Phare EUROPEAN UNION MERI/ NCDTVET-PIU.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
SERSCIDA WP2 and WP3 Marijana Glavica SEEDS kick-off meeting, 4th May 2015.
2050AP Project WP5: “Conclusions” UPM Madrid 11 de Octubre 2013.
Coordination and Policy Development in Preparation for a European Open Biodiversity Knowledge Management System Supported by the European Commission through.
WP6 – Monitoring and Evaluation 17th November 2014 Rome.
Coordination and Policy Development in Preparation for a European Open Biodiversity Knowledge Management System Supported by the European Commission through.
University of Macedonia © University of Macedonia Co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (75%) and the Greek National Funds (25%)
UNGGIM – PRIVATE SECTOR NETWORK. AGENDA > OVERVIEW OF PRIVATE SECTOR >PURPOSE AND VISION OF PRIVATE SECTOR NETWORK > STRUCTURE AND TERMS OF REFERENCE.
© GEO Secretariat Work Plan Management Update GEO Work Plan Symposium 30 April – 2 May 2012.
ITS Observatory Business Plan Martine Harvey Transport Systems Catapult.
Logic Models How to Integrate Data Collection into your Everyday Work.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Pre-planning Planning to plan (and adapt) Implementation starts Here!
Dr Micky Kerr Leeds Institute of Medical Education Rose Dewey
Knowledge Transfer Partnership Project Nottingham Trent University and Nottinghamshire County Council Dr Adam Barnard Rachel Clark Catherine Goodall 19/4/16.
Task 6.3 – Evaluating business models currently in use by partners
HEE Nursing Associate Programme
Management Policies on Digital Collections
Overview of key findings from the MUNROS project
Designed for: Maruti Suzuki India Designed by: Jatinder Singh
Business Model Canvas XYZ Company Date Iteration #1 Key Partners
AMCH PPS PAC Executive Committee Meeting August 27, 2015
Enhancing employers’ involvement in Social Protection policy debates
Introduction WFP Logistics, We Deliver.
The ESS vision, ESSnets and SDMX
Boston’s Payment in Lieu of Tax Program:
ICT PSP 2011, 5th call, Pilot Type B, Objective: 2.4 eLearning
Introduction WFP Logistics, We Deliver.
How the MAC is driving improvements and efficiency
<Name of Product>Pilot Closeout Meeting <Customer Name>
GAC Operational Processes
Cultivating Student Leaders In Your Adult Education Program
Work Plan Management GEO Work Plan Symposium 30 April – 2 May 2012
Second pro-iBiosphere Management Meeting
Davor Kozmus, MHEST Steering Platform Meeting 29. October 2009, Zagreb
MAES Working Group Meeting Brussels
The Business Model Generator SEC Session
Policy and Best Practice … in practice
WP2 Governance Per Öster
ESSnet on Linked Open Statistics
Alexander Osterwalder
Documentation Requirements of an IT Audit including Audit Management System (Area: Audit Process) A presentation by SAIs AFROSAI-E, Bangladesh, China,
RECARE set-up Rudi Hessel on behalf of coordination team
WP7 – COMBINING BIG DATA - STATISTICAL DOMAINS
WP4 Proposed Structure of the Outcome “Tool Kit and Recommendations”
Reflecting on the week – planning for the future
Employee engagement Delivery guide
The Business Model Canvas
MEETING OF THE WORKING GROUP ON CULTURE STATISTICS 23-24/11/2016
PAL Coordinator Butterworth Campus
Unlocking Freedom through Adult Education
Session 2: Implementation experience - Art. 9
Open Access to scientific publications
Schedule (Major Deliverables and Milestones)
Roadmap City Water Fund Strategic Plan
ARTISTE PMT Meeting September , 2000
WP7 – Related activities
OPTIMA INCO-MPC Management Board Meeting, April 1/2 2005, Izmir
Presentation transcript:

WP6 - aims, objectives Don Kirkup to evaluate possible business models to support sustainable Open Science taking into account the needs of the Pro-iBiosphere community and best practices from other domains. Morning Session Introduction of the Advisory Board members and their contribution in pro-­-iBiosphere Discuss the project activities with the AB Obtain feedback

WP6 - ongoing activities Morning Session Introduction of the Advisory Board members and their contribution in pro-­-iBiosphere Discuss the project activities with the AB Obtain feedback

WP6 - ongoing activities Morning Session Introduction of the Advisory Board members and their contribution in pro-­-iBiosphere Discuss the project activities with the AB Obtain feedback

WP6 - aims, objectives Objectives Ascertain the costs of supplying services (6.1 Naturalis) Ascertain the benefits of these services to users and providers (6.2 RBGK) Project vision and Identifying business models in use within and without our community (6.3 SIGMA) Evaluate model feasibility and recommend possible model models to follow (6.4 RBGK) Contributions to project, feedback, possible synergies, etc.

Agenda – pro-iBiosphere consortium meeting Fri 15th Feb Afternoon Session Provide an overview of the project status (deliverables, milestones) Follow-­-up of the project objectives Progress of WP2-­-6 (task activities (workshops, training, pilots, etc.),budget& person month consumption) Discuss the results of the pro-­-iBiosphere meeting nr.2 (i.e.three workshops) Discuss the status of the remaining pro-­-iBiosphere meetings(i.e.logistics, preliminary agenda, objectives,expected results,list of attendees,etc.) Take actions for the next 3 months of the project

Task 2.2 information requirements ? ? ? ? ? ? workshops, agenda, participants, logistics, training, pilots, etc. Questionnaire - Best practice - Floristic and Faunistic information standards Are original observation records archived (by author/editor/other)? Are voucher specimens cross referenced (eg. seen for flora/fauna of ...)? Policy for citation of specimens? What standards employed for: Taxonomic system? Taxonomic names? Author abbreviations? Bibliography? How is the geographical area defined (inc. standard if any)? How does the area relate to standard TDWG geographical units? Are there geographical subdivisions defined (inc. Standard if any)? How to these relate to standard TDWG geographical units? Are the boundaries mapped (paper/digital raster/digital vector)? Gazetteer of collecting localities? Chorological classification? Vegetation classification? Ecological classification (inc. Biomes)? Geological classification? Life-form classification? Glossary of other morphological descriptive terms for authors? To what extent are terms standardised (author/editor) Do you employ mark-up in the editorial process (eg stylesheets)? Do you employ spreadsheets or databases in the editorial process (eg stylesheets)? ? ?

Progress of task 2.2 activities Information standards questionnaire (best practice) https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/W75FX3X Draft agenda meeting 3 (May 2013 Berlin) Provider & user questionnaire http://www.pro-ibiosphere.eu/showpage.php?storyid=3957 Draft participant list 1:1 follow-up, meetings (up to Aug 2013) workshops, agenda, participants, logistics, training, pilots, etc. Questionnaire - Best practice - Floristic and Faunistic information standards Are original observation records archived (by author/editor/other)? Are voucher specimens cross referenced (eg. seen for flora/fauna of ...)? Policy for citation of specimens? What standards employed for: Taxonomic system? Taxonomic names? Author abbreviations? Bibliography? How is the geographical area defined (inc. standard if any)? How does the area relate to standard TDWG geographical units? Are there geographical subdivisions defined (inc. Standard if any)? How to these relate to standard TDWG geographical units? Are the boundaries mapped (paper/digital raster/digital vector)? Gazetteer of collecting localities? Chorological classification? Vegetation classification? Ecological classification (inc. Biomes)? Geological classification? Life-form classification? Glossary of other morphological descriptive terms for authors? To what extent are terms standardised (author/editor) Do you employ mark-up in the editorial process (eg stylesheets)? Do you employ spreadsheets or databases in the editorial process (eg stylesheets)?

Review of WP6 (50 minutes) 6.1 Measuring and constraining costs reports on cost delivery, efficiency and cost reduction through effective practices (m 15 & 21) 6.2 Identifying and measuring the benefits of delivering services 6.3 Evaluating business models currently in use by partners (questionnaires) 6.4 Towards Sustainability for Services General progress, budget and person month consumption. Presentation of revised methodology and first results.

vp1 - What are the business drivers for our institutes?

vp2 - What value do we deliver to the customer?

vp3 - Which one of our customer’s problems are we helping to solve?

vp4 - What bundles of products and services are we offering to each customer segment?

vp5 - Which customer needs are we satisfying?

cs1- For whom are we creating value?

cs2 - Who are our most important customers?

rs1 - For what value are our customers really willing to pay?

rs2- For what do they currently pay?

rs3 - How are they currently paying?

co1 - What are the most important costs inherent in our business model?

co2 - Which key resources are most expensive?

co3 - Which key activities are most expensive?

kp5 - What are the motivations for having partnerships