Extenuating Circumstances 29 Nov 2017 by Justine Bigland, SAAS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Changes to the Assessment Procedures Manual for Quality and Standards Office.
Advertisements

Regulation and Credit Framework for the Conferment of Awards Quality and Standards Office.
Extenuating Circumstances 2013/14 Definition of ECs ‘Extenuating Circumstances are circumstances, normally exceptional and outside the control of the.
Extenuating Circumstances Briefing for Chairs of Extenuating Circumstances Groups and Professional Support Staff.
© University of South Wales Regulations Briefings Overview of University of Wales, Newport regulations – still in place for ex-Newport students completing.
Procedures and regulations  Contents  How courses are assessed  Examinations  Coursework  Qualifying for the second year  B.Eng/M.Eng  Mitigations.
BSc (Honours) Computing and Information Systems Part-time Course Code: 2172 Don McFall – Course Director Room 16J08.
Slide No: 1 Extenuating Circumstances and Plagiarism Dr Mike Spann.
Extenuating Circumstances and Fit to Sit Dr Ed Day Year 4 Welfare Tutor MBChB Year
The new name for extenuating circumstances SERIOUS ADVERSE CIRCUMSTANCES.
Arbitration in Poland Practical issues Monika Hartung Legal Adviser, Partner Warsaw 16 June 2011.
Mitigation and Extenuating Circumstances
Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners February 2013
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY BOARD OF EXAMINERS: STAFF DEVELOPMENT SESSIONS Faculty / Quality Assurance Services.
...from here all possible details can be explained. University regulations state that extenuating circumstances may be granted for each of the following.
THE INTRANET. Accessing the CMS Intranet Connect to internet and connect to the CMS home page. Click Current Student button to.
University of Brighton Regulations workshop for partner colleges Tanya Izzard, Partnership Manager
MITIGATION Dr June Jones Year Tutor. What is mitigation? An explanation of a unforeseen event or series of events that accounts for why a period of learning.
Quality &Validation Department (Q &V) BUE 1 By: Nehal Osman.
Mitigations Dr Lisa Jones & Dr Lesley Roberts, Year 2 Tutors / Mrs Margaret Tucker, Student Affairs Co-ordinator.
© University of South Wales University of South Wales ‘Regulations for Taught Courses’ Hayley Burns Head of Quality Unit.
Our Academic and Quality Frameworks Phil Brimson Quality Manager (Validation and Review)
Summary of the Undergraduate and Postgraduate Standard Assessment Regulations Academic Year 2012/13.
Academic Regulations for Taught Programmes 2014/15 Stewart Smith-Langridge Annette Cooke Governance Services 5 November
Extenuating Circumstances and Fit to Sit Dr Lesley Roberts and Mr Andrew Shanks MBChB Year 1 Tutors Claire Maitland Student Development & Support Co-ordinator.
OCNLR arrangements for final external moderation and the AVA awards board Summer 2010.
Mitigating Circumstances 2015/2016 Leicester Medical School.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
WELCOME External Examiners’ Induction October 2015 Checking Eligibility to Work in the UK To comply with UK Border Agency legal obligations for employment.
Extenuating Circumstances 13 May Extenuating Circumstances Serious and exceptional circumstances outside the student’s control, normally unforeseeable.
External Examiner Induction Academic Regulations for Taught Programmes 2015/16 Annette Cooke/Alison Jones Quality and Enhancement Office 4 November 2015.
Mitigating Circumstances 2014 Leicester Medical School.
International Partnerships Conference 21 November 2013 CREATE THE DIFFERENCE1 Dr Noel Morrison Academic Registrar and Director of the Student Experience.
OPERATION OF ASSESSMENT BOARDS Academic year 2012/2013.
Access Grading Briefing Assessment requirements. Why these requirements? To ensure that: grades, credits and Access to HE Diplomas are awarded on an equivalent.
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
External Examiners’ Seminar 2011/12 Academic Regulations Lynn Jones Regulations, Assessment and Awards Manager Academic Registry.
Undergraduate Examination Board Briefing Prof Chris LANGLEY Chair – RSC Dominic STONE Secretary – RSC 25 th April 2016 Slide 1.
BOARDS OF EXAMINERS’ REVIEW Prof Chris LANGLEY Chair – RSC Dominic STONE Secretary – RSC 16 th November 2015 Slide 1.
Examination Board Briefing 21 March , Francis Bancroft 1.15.
Forum for New External Examiners. Enid Ashdown, Principal Administrator, Academic Quality Alan Gregg, Academic Coordinator, Academic Quality Vashti Hutton,
EXTERNAL EXAMINERS’ INDUCTION February - March 2017
An Introduction to External Examining Procedures at Bangor University
ACADEMIC REGULATIONS INCLUDING UPDATES
Field and Award Board Workshop
PSYCHOLOGY 2nd Year Welcome Back.
External Examiner Workshop Subject / School Boards
Mitigating Circumstances 2016/2017
Postgraduate Examination Board Briefing
School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities
ISS Board of Examiners: Info meeting for MA students
Approval of Assessments
Academic Regulations Dr Sandra Mienczakowski Head of Academic Processes Student Services - Development.
External Examiners day
Duties of External Examiner
Taught Award Regulations
Psychology at UWS BA (Hons) Psychology BSc (Hons) Psychology
Year Leader – Joanne Ingram
Welfare Tutors Dr. Biman Chakraborty Dr. Olga Maleva
Academic Regulations Dr Sandra Mienczakowski Head of Academic Processes Student Services - Development.
SIMAD UNIVERSITY Keyd abdirahman salaad.
Award Boards.
Approval of Assessments
Academic Advising Assessment Session
Appeal Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
Welcome and Induction Event for new External Examiners 2016
UWE Bristol External Examiners day 27th January 2016
Student Information System Pre-Progression Processing
Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners March 2014
Presentation transcript:

Extenuating Circumstances 29 Nov 2017 by Justine Bigland, SAAS

Extenuating Circumstances Serious and exceptional circumstances outside the student’s control, normally unforeseeable and unpreventable, which the student feels have significantly, adversely affected his/her ability to study and/or performance in assessment.

General Principles The onus for reporting and providing corroborating evidence of the extenuating circumstances lies with the student. All claims must be supported by documentary evidence. Assessment Boards take all valid submissions into account when determining progression and awards to ensure as far as possible that all students are assessed upon equal terms. All claims are treated confidentially. The scheme does not apply to the day-to-day level of requests for extensions or other matters which can (and should) be dealt with at the time by course/module tutors.

Extenuating Circumstances Process Claims and evidence are considered by a Panel prior to the Module Assessment Board to determine whether the claim is valid. The Panel is chaired by an academic at Principal Lecturer grade or above and serviced by a representative from the Student Academic & Administration Service (SAAS). The Panel is drawn from a pool of members of academic staff, 3 of whom will be at Principal Lecturer scale or above) and approved by Academic Board on an annual basis. The Panel shall comprise the Chair and two members taken from the pool. The Panel will not have the student marks available at the meeting. A claim judged as valid, is approved and accepted as having an effect on performance. The module(s)/parts of the module(s) affected will be specified.

Valid Extenuating Circumstances Claims Examples of ECs which would be considered valid: A serious illness or accident. Death or serious illness of a close relative or friend. Serious disruption to personal life – such as divorce, burglary, major fire or major court proceedings.

Invalid EC Claims Examples of ECs which would not be considered valid: Minor medical conditions such as: colds, headaches, minor accidents or injuries, sleeping problems and minor anxiety and stress. Social obligations such as holidays, weddings, parties and sporting fixtures. Avoidable study related factors such as computer crashes, corrupted or memory sticks, printer malfunction, deadline congestion or lost notes.

Possible Outcomes The Module Assessment Board takes the claims into account when considering the student’s performance in the module, progression or award, and can use its discretion as follows: To void the assessment and offer the student a first attempt (first sit), so replacing the previous attempt. To construct an Assessment Contract where the circumstances affect more than 40 credits worth of assessed work. Where there are extenuating circumstances affecting groups of students (eg disruption in an examination), then this should be reported to the Module Assessment Board which will consider the circumstances make any adjustment to marks accordingly. The action should be reported to the University Assessment Board.

Thank you – any questions? And finally … Thank you – any questions?