OVERVIEW: POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL (ptc)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Positive Train Control Benefits
Advertisements

John Barton, P.E. Assistant Executive Director for Engineering Operations Texas Department of Transportation Mid-States Highway-Rail Safety Conference.
SCORT/TRB Rail Capacity Workshop - Jacksonville Florida1 1  A Primer on Capacity Principles  New Technologies  Public Sector Needs 22 September
1 Federal Railroad Administration Railroad Safety Advisory Committee On-Track Safety Adjacent Tracks Safety Advisory No April 27, 2004.
1 Union Pacific Railroad David Wickersham Chief Engineer, Western Region February 24, 2014.
Positive Train Control Allison I. Fultz Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP Washington, DC 2010 LEGAL AFFAIRS SEMINAR February 23, 2010.
INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL NORTHEAST UPDATE AASHTO – FEBRUARY 29,
1.  NCHRP Report 657 is the general guidebook for implementing passenger service on shared corridors  This guidebook “drills down” on the issue of service.
1 Business Model TRAIN OPERATIONS NEC INFRASTRUCTURE GOVERNMENT PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION AND OVERSIGHT.
Locomotive Horn Rule Regulations
Way Side Warning System Toth Industries, LLC Arlington Heights, IL T rackside.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Rail Capacity Unit 3: Measuring & Maximizing Capacity.
Airmux-500 HPMP – 2011 Slide 1 Solution Note: Railway Crossing Accident Prevention Customer Type: Intercity train Strategic Sales Development.
Amtrak Advanced Civil Speed Enforcement PTC System Status Report
©David F. Thurston, 2012, All rights reserved Capacity Implications of PTC now and in the Future David Thurston, Ph.D., P.E., FIRSE Vice President – Rail.
Conductor Decertification Discipline
An Action Plan for the Restructuring and Rationalization of the National Intercity Rail Passenger System Briefing by the Amtrak Reform Council February.
Karen Hedlund Director, Public-Private Partnerships 2015 Federal Rail Legislation.
Guidelines for Traffic Control at Surface Mines
The Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008 Issues For Rail Industry Contractors Kevin M. Sheys Partner K&L Gates LLP January 9, 2009.
CE 515 Railroad Engineering
Electronic Train Management System and Safety Larry Milhon March 9, 2007.
2015 Traffic Signals 101 Topic 11 Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) and Railroad (RR) Preemption.
Standing Committee on Rail Transportation Oklahoma City September 22, 2009 High-Speed Passenger Rail Safety Strategy Grady Cothen Deputy Associate Administrator.
Office of Railroad, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Collision of Metrolink Passenger Train 111 and Union Pacific Freight Train LOF65-12 Signal.
ARRC Collision Avoidance System
Northern Lights Express High Speed Rail: MN APA Conference September 2011.
Office of Railroad, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Collision of Metrolink Train 111 with Union Pacific Train LOF Opening Statement Chatsworth,
Intercity Rail Background/ Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Update Met Council TAC Meeting November 5, 2008.
Positive Train Control Labor Briefing Washington, DC December 10, 2008.
 Classes of trains  Fundamental principles of track authority  Impact of power/ton ratios  Drivers of dispatch priority 22 September 2010 SCORT/TRB.
North Carolina Rail Division Staff of about 50 Mission to: Improve & expand passenger rail service Improve safety at crossings Provide industrial access.
Operations Railroad Communica- tions Hazmat & Safety Personnel.
The Railroad Industry Local Operations And Future Challenges.
C B T M Communications Based Train Management
Michigan Accelerated Rail Service Passenger & Freight Director Kirk T. Steudle, P.E. Michigan Department of Transportation Faster, Better, Cheaper, Safer,
1 PTC 101 A primer for PTC PTC 101 A primer for PTC.
POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL What it is, and what it does SCORT – September 2015.
1 PTC Update ACACSO May 2011 PTC Update ACACSO May 2011.
p-REES 2: Module 2-B Advanced Train Operations PTC and CBTC
© American Public Transportation Association Advanced Train Operation PTC and CBTC.
Office of Railroad, Pipeline & Hazardous Materials Investigations DCA-08-MR-003 Collision of Amtrak Train 371 and Norfolk Southern Railway Company Freight.
Positive Train Control The impact of legislative changes SCORT Chris Heald September 22, 2009.
1 BLUE SIGNAL PROTECTION Blue Signal Protection of Workmen This rule outlines the requirements for protecting railroad workmen who are inspecting,
49 CFR PART 240 Qualification and Certification of Locomotive Engineers.
A new fail-safe principle for railway signaling
UNIT IV TRACK CONSTRUCTION. POINTS AND CROSSINGS Point and Crossings are peculiar arrangement used in permanent way to guide the vehicle for directional.
Freight Railway Integration Strategy For Inter-American Development Bank Transport Week 2009 by Transportation Technology Center, Inc. (TTCI) Subsidiary.
March 31, 2016 Area Transportation Partnership Fergus Falls, MN.
Positive Train Control Implementation of the Rail Safety Improvement Act Mandate: Elements of an Agreement?
Intercity Passenger Rail: Legislative Policy Recommendations Astrid Glynn Chair ASC Intercity Passenger Rail Legislative Team AASHTO Standing Committee.
Reno Area / Rail-Transit Options March 24, 2016 Reno Area Rail-Transit Options by Lawrence Meeker HNTB Corporation Reno Area Rail-Transit Options by Lawrence.
APTA Webinar with Congressional Rail Staff– Overview of the FAST Act
MBTA/MassDOT RAILROAD QUIET ZONES
Positive Train Control
Los Angeles – San Diego – San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Update
NCHRp Report 773 Capacity Modeling Guidebook FOR SHARED-USE PASSENGER AND FREIGHT RAIL OPERATIONS A project to develop guidebook for DOT’s, Public Agencies.
Guide for the application of CSM design targets (CSM DT)
ODOT Railroad Access & Safety
Accident investigations: developments and roles
Communications in Railway Centralized Traffic Control Systems
HSR Crossing Safety Update Elliot A
University of Colorado A Line and B Line Grade Crossing Update
Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) and Railroad (RR) Preemption
APTA Webinar with Congressional Rail Staff– Overview of the FAST Act
Designed-in Logic to Ensure Safety of Integration and Field Engineering of Large Scale CBTC Systems Author: Fenggang Shi.
Status Update Jeff Gordon FRA
Presentation to City of Palo Alto Rail Committee on Quiet Zones
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
March 31, 2016 Area Transportation Partnership Fergus Falls, MN
Presentation transcript:

OVERVIEW: POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL (ptc) December 2017

Positive Train Control WHAT IS PTC? PTC is a technology capable of automatically controlling train speeds and movements, should a train operator fail to take appropriate action in the prevailing conditions.    HOW IT WORKS For example, PTC can force a train to stop before it passes a signal displaying a stop indication, or before running through an improperly lined switch, averting a potential collision.

Positive Train Control WHAT DOES PTC DO? PTC systems that meet the standards set by FRA regulations are required to reliably and functionally prevent:  Train-to-train collisions; Over speed derailments; Incursion into an established work zone; and Movement through a main line switch in the improper position. Other functions are applicable within the requirements as specific conditions warrant. An Amtrak train director monitors the Chicago Union Station control center.

Positive Train Control WHAT IS THIS HISTORY OF PTC? How did we get here… 1990s – 2000s While some railroads make progress on PTC installation, others do not – costs and technical challenges are cited as reasons. OCT 2015 Congress extends PTC implementation deadline to December 31, 2018: All Class 1 railroads, intercity passenger railroads, and commuter railroads required to implement PTC (where called for by FRA regulation). Possibility of two additional years if certain requirements are met. FRA starts collecting progress implementation data from railroads shared that data with the public. 1920s-1940s Primitive automatic train stop systems enter service in some places. 1990s – 2000s Amtrak undertakes pioneering U.S. installations of PTC on portions of the Northeast Corridor and Amtrak’s Michigan Line. Interest in PTC continues to grow as passenger and transit ridership rise. HOW DID WE GET HERE? 1920s - 1940s 1960s - 1970s 1990s - 2000s 2008 2008 - 2015 MAY 2015 OCT 2015 DEC 2015 DEC 2017 Amtrak Tacoma incident. 1990s – 2000s Interest in PTC grows. 1990s – 2000s Chatsworth collision; Congress passes bill requiring PTC by December 2015. MAY 2015 Frankfurt Junction derailment in Philadelphia – deemed “PTC preventable.”

Positive Train Control AMTRAK AND PTC For Amtrak’s purposes, there are 2 types of PTC PTC technologies that we own/operate and have installed on our infrastructure PTC technologies that have been chosen by other carriers for their infrastructure that Amtrak’s locomotives and cab cars must operate and communicate with Amtrak’s PTC = ACSES, ITCS Approved by FRA, provide all elements of PTC In use on the NEC (ACSES) and Michigan Line (ITCS) Freight carriers’ and some other commuter RRs’ PTC = IETMS Class I freight carriers and many commuter trains use the Interoperable Electronic Train Management System (I-ETMS). I-ETMS provides all the elements required for PTC An Amtrak technician resetting a PTC transponder in Delaware along the Northeast Corridor.

Positive Train Control WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PTC INSTALLATION? Component Responsible Party PTC Infrastructure Rail infrastructure owner, FRA Infrastructure system back office server Rail infrastructure owner Testing Rail infrastructure owner, FRA Locomotive and onboard systems Equipment owner Back office servers Shared; host railroads require back office server, Amtrak and other operators also needs one to communicate with multiple host servers Component Responsible Party PTC Infrastructure Rail infrastructure owner Infrastructure system back office server Testing Rail infrastructure owner, FRA Locomotive and onboard systems Equipment owner Back office servers Shared; host railroads require a back office server, Amtrak also needs one to communicate with multiple host servers

Positive Train Control CONCLUSION Responsibility for PTC is shared among parties, sometimes complicating implementation, but all parties are working towards the same goal. Installing PTC is one component of Amtrak’s overarching commitment to the safety of our customers and employees and the communities we serve. Continued Congressional support is needed to ensure that Amtrak and commuter railroad PTC costs are funded.

APPENDIX: Technical Systems

Positive Train Control TRACKSIDE SIGNAL SYSTEM ABS, CTC and Interlockings Intermediate (ABS) signals operate automatically: Detect presence of a train using “track circuits” Activates two signals behind the train to protect it: Approach signal Stop signal Interlockings are controlled remotely by dispatchers: This system of remote control is called “Centralized Traffic Control,” (CTC for short) Complex of signals and switches electronically “interlocked” Impossible to “line” an unsafe route Clear signals permit engineers to operate the train at maximum authorized speeds.

Positive Train Control I-ETMS ARCHITECTURE Interoperable Electronic Train Management System (I-ETMS): I-ETMS is designed to: Prevent train-to-train collisions Enforcing stop signals Enforcing “authority limits” (i.e., track a train has permission to occupy) Prevent trains from derailing through excessive speed Prevent trains from entering work zones without proper authorization Prevent movement through an improperly set switch in the main track Provide warning and enforcement at a derail or switch providing access to a main track Provide warning and enforcement in the event of a highway-rail grade crossing warning device malfunction Provide warning and enforcement for a mandatory directive associated “After Arrival Of” train movements SOURCE: FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION I-ETMS adds an overlay system to enforce the existing signal indications and civil speed restrictions

Positive Train Control PREDICTIVE SPEED ENFORCEMENT If a train comes within Warning Distance of a speed restriction, and I-ETMS predicts train speed will exceed speed limit by 5mph or more when the train enters the restriction, a “Speed Reduction To XX mph” message will display along with the time remaining to enforcement braking. If the engineer takes no action, computer will apply the brakes at the appropriate time, bringing the train to a stop. Engineer will not be able to recover from a “penalty application” until the train has stopped.

Positive Train Control REACTIVE SPEED ENFORCEMENT If a train exceeds maximum speed allowed for the track by 3 mph, I-ETMS will display a warning to indicate the train is over speed and a “Maximum Speed Is xx MPH” message. If the train exceeds the maximum speed allowed for the speed of the current location by at least 5 mph, I-ETMS will apply the brakes and display the “Maximum Speed Is xx MPH” message. If a penalty brake application occurs, the train MUST be stopped before recovery is permitted.

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION VISIT: media.amtrak.com