mRS & NIHSS Training and Certification Procedure

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Governance of a Stroke Thrombolysis Service
Advertisements

Wisconsin Knowledge & Concepts Examination (WKCE) Test Security Training for Proctors Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Office of Educational.
E. Bradshaw Bunney, MD Speaking the Same Language: The Role of Stroke Scales in the Emergency Department Evaluation of Stroke Patients.
Andrew Asimos, MD, FACEP Stroke Patient and Stroke Therapies Assessment: ED NIHSS & Stroke Scales Use for ED Stroke Therapies.
Efficiency of stroke clinical trials with ordinal outcomes: a simulation study UPC, Julio 2010 BASEL, October 2011 Juan Vicente Torres Supervisors: Dr.
TELPAS, STAAR-ALT & Other Online Testing Presented by: Nancy Webster, Galena Park ISD & Tracy McDaniel, Spring ISD.
Using stroke scales to assess the patient – Rankin and NIHSS
Welcome to PARCC Field Test Training! Presented by the PARCC Field Test Team.
I Inclusion Perception Survey for Administrators Use your handheld control to indicate your feelings about each statement.
Automated Statement of Accounts Project and Operational Guideline March 2011.
NIH Stroke Scale Hannah Dowling University of South Florida.
Measuring the Power of Learning.™ California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Accessibility and Accommodations December 16, 2015.
MontCAS CRT-Alternate (CRT-Alt) Spring 2011 Test Administrator Training Grades 3-8 and 10 in Reading and Math Grades 4, 8, and 10 in Science Presentation.
Long-Term Outcomes after Acute Stroke Treatment Larry B. Goldstein, M.D. Professor of Medicine (Neurology) Center for Cerebrovascular Disease Center for.
Sanaz Sakiani, MD Endocrinology Fellow Journal Club
Texas Assessment Management System STAAR Alternate Manage Teacher Assignments.
UNDERSTANDING THE FIM Functional Independent Measure Part 4.
AlphaFIM® Instrument Guided Self Study updated July 2013
COPA Rollover How to successfully complete the COPA School Year End Rollover from to
What is Dual Credit Exactly?
SchoolSuccess for Coordinators
Performance Evaluations
Post-Secondary Transition
Oral Administration Training
HOW TO SCREEN PATIENTS AND BOOK THE BASELINE VISIT APPOINTMENT?
Notetaker Recruitment Program
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
Keystone Heart Reflect Neurology
KS1 SATS Guidance for Parents
KS2 SATS Guidance for Parents
NIH Stroke Scale NIH Stroke Scale/Score (NIHSS)
2017 Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
Investigator of Record – Definition
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction
Accessibility Features and Accommodations
Neurological Events After TAVR FDA Perspective
HOW TO CONSENT A PATIENT?
Notetaker Recruitment Program
The Graduate School Admissions Updates 2017
Operations Event Report Enhancement
last modified 3/1/12LL->printed November 2012
STB / Local District ELPAC Summative Assessment Coordinator Support
CMS HIPAA Transaction Implementation Status Checklist
For a new user you must click on the “Registration for Generator” link
Chatham Health Alliance & Exercise is Medicine
STAAR Alternate 2 Training
Register training Using the college register system
2017 PAWS Test Administrator Training
Symptomatic vs. Asymptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy
Apprenticeship Support and Knowledge for Schools
KS1 SATS Guidance for Parents
Investigator of Record – Definition
Investigator of Record – Definition
CONDUCTING THE TRIAL AT
Interim Assessment Training NEISD Testing Services
Applying for a TA Position in CSE
Early Scandinavian Stroke Scale Scores as a Predictive Tool for Rehabilitation and Discharge Planning Brett Jones1, Ronak Patel2,3, Christian Lueck1,3.
This presentation document has been prepared by Vault Intelligence Limited (“Vault") and is intended for off line demonstration, presentation and educational.
Notetaker Recruitment Program
Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
MDE Assessment Office Updates
WIDA ACCESS for ELLS SBD Training
ePerformance: A Process Crosswalk May 2010
Colorado PSAT/SAT SBD Training
Santa Ana Unified School District Dept. of Research and Evaluation
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information
Improving Stroke Patient and Family Education by using F.A.S.T.
opm.gov/ShowSomeLoveCFC Click “DONATE” on your local zone website
Role of the Internal Verifier
This presentation document has been prepared by Vault Intelligence Limited (“Vault") and is intended for off line demonstration, presentation and educational.
Presentation transcript:

mRS & NIHSS Training and Certification Procedure

Training in Assessment Tools Why? wide variation in perception of deficits and in application of scales mRS – functional/disability (outcome) inconsistency confounds outcome assessment NIHSS - neurological (severity) consistent approach gives better measure of severity for comparative purposes & interpretation of outcomes such as SAE consistent approach will better identify deterioration

Inter-rater variability for mRS In multi-center setting: overall agreement between pairs of raters: 43% Adequate … but room for improvement Wilson et al., 2005, Stroke; 36;777-81

Impact of misclassification reduced effect from 7.5% to 6% 20% misclassification: reduced effect from 7.5% to 4% Certification as means to reduce variability Quinn et al., 2007, Stroke; 38:2257-61 Choi et al., 2002, J Neurotrauma; 2002;19:17–22

Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0 No symptoms at all 1 No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities 2 Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities but able to look after own affairs without assistance 3 Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance 4 Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance, and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance Severe disability: bedridden, incontinent, and requiring constant nursing care and attention Dead

mRS - Rating conventions When in doubt, stick to the key discriminators of the scale, thus if: remaining symptoms  1, not 0 inability to do all previous activities  2, not 1 dependence on others in ADL  3, not 2 inability to walk without assistance  4, not 3 bedridden, requiring constant nursing care 5, not 4 If still in doubt between two alternatives, choose the worse grade

NIHSS Level of Consciousness Eye movements Vision Facial movements Motor power in limbs (strength) Coordination of movement Sensation Language (understanding, speech, naming) Articulation (clarity of speech versus slurring) Inattention (diminution of usual awareness)

NIHSS: Level of consciousness (1)

NIHSS: Facial Palsy / Motor Arm

NIHSS: Motor Leg / Limb Ataxia Ataxia (from Greek α- [used as a negative prefix] + -τάξις [order], meaning "lack of order") is a neurological sign and symptom consisting of gross lack of coordination of muscle movements.

NIHSS - Rating conventions Score actual response, not what you think patient can do Language may still be testable in anarthria, by Q&A When assessing limb power, remember that some initial movement after releasing the limb is normal: record drift only if it persists Ataxia is assessable only if reasonable power is present, otherwise score normal: 0 Ataxia scores 1 if one limb is affected and 2 if two or more limbs are affected: do not add sub-items to the total An unassessable item (e.g.dysarthria due to intubation),scores a 9, but do not include this in the total

NIHSS/mRS lessons learned When item 1a scored 3 further items like 5 and 6 scoring motor function will always be 4 UNK =9 can only be scored in case e.g. a limb is amputated Exactly following mRS scoring definitions is crucial: difference between 2 and 3 mRS score of 3 or 4 should not be based on being sick and therefore in bed. There should always be a motor deficit or ataxia

NIHSS – Version in DIAS 4 NIHSS booklets English or local language version: to be decided before site initiation Word lists in local language Use the booklets for examining the patients and rate the NIHSS Booklets considered source data Signed and dated Transcribe the scores into the NIHSS scoring sheet on the eCRF

mRS & NIHSS - Online Training and Certification A single website for both scales! http://desmo.trainingcampus.net

mRS & NIHSS - Online Training and Certification Invitation to register on TrainingCampus sent by email to each rater Certification for each scale completed or updated prior to enrolling the first patient Certification for each scale to be updated annually Printed copy of certificates filed in the site Trial Master File http://desmo.trainingcampus.net

mRS – Certification scoring system Certification based on several thousand raters Correct answer consistent with scoring instructions; and > 50% of raters Acceptable answer > 10% of raters (+ consistent with instructions) Unacceptable answer < 10% of raters Certificate awarded if all ‘correct’ or ‘acceptable’

NIHSS - Online Certification Composed of 6 sections 1 single patient interview per section All 6 patient interviews must be scored At least 84 of 90 items must be scored correctly (you can try as often as needed to successfully pass!) One-year validity form the first certification and two-year validity ever after

Protocol Section 5.3.2.2. The NIHSS will be provided in the form of user-friendly booklets. Sites will be requested to use these booklets as primary source-data. After rating a subject, the scores must be transferred into the eCRF scoring sheet.

”FAQ” What if I have a valid certificate? No need to certify When do I need to certify? – This will be indicated on the invitation email (taking into account expected FPFV) Can you accept my local society’s certificate for NIHSS? Yes, if accepted ASA

Questions ?