Topical Workshop on Injection and Injection systems (TWIIS)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Rare RI Ring Facility at RIKEN RI Beam Factory M. Wakasugi, and Rare RI Ring Collaborators RIKEN, Nishina Center, Japan ARIS2014.
Advertisements

EMMA Magnet Design Ben Shepherd Magnetics and Radiation Sources Group ASTeC STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
Proton / Muon Bunch Numbers, Repetition Rate, RF and Kicker Systems and Inductive Wall Fields for the Rings of a Neutrino Factory G H Rees, RAL.
Electron Model Components and Costing C. Johnstone Summary talk, C. Johnstone FFAG04 Oct 12-16, 2004 KEK, Tsukuba, Japan.
Accelerators 2006 Roger Barlow 1: Wakefields 2: The NS-FFAG.
EMMA Overview Ben Shepherd Magnetics and Radiation Sources Group ASTeC STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
EMMA/BASROC/CONFORM etc: FFAG developments at the Cockcroft Institute Cockcroft SAC - 26 November 2007 Roger Barlow.
EMMA 24 th February 2009 ALICE Stakeholder Meeting.
EMMA: the first NS-FFAG Roger Barlow. What is an FFAG? Like a synchrotron Strong Focussing (‘Alternating Gradient’) Dipole field increases with particle.
FFAG Workshopfermilab April 2005 f Summary: FFAG WORKSHOP nonscaling electron model muon FFAGs C. Johnstone Fermilab.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Sergey Antipov, University of Chicago Fermilab Mentor: Sergei Nagaitsev Injection to IOTA ring.
Options for a 50Hz, 10 MW, Short Pulse Spallation Neutron Source G H Rees, ASTeC, CCLRC, RAL, UK.
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
FFAG Tune-stabilized, Linear-field Nonscaling FFAG Lattice Design C. Johnstone, Fermilab S. Koscielniak, TRIUMF FFAG07 April 12-17, 2007 LPSC, Grenoble,
, WP1 Meeting, RAL J. Pasternak Status and Recent Progress in the Muon FFAG Designs for the NF J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL STFC.
Neutrino Factory,  ± Decay Rings C Johnstone, FNAL, F Meot, CEA, & G H Rees, RAL.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
The EMMA Project Rob Edgecock STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory & Huddersfield University.
The EMMA Project Rob Edgecock STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory & Huddersfield University *BNL, CERN, CI, FNAL, JAI, LPSC Grenoble, STFC, TRIUMF.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
2002/7/04 College, London Beam Dynamics Studies of FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
The ISIS strong focusing synchrotron also at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory. Note that ISIS occupies the same hall as NIMROD used to and re- uses some.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
, EUROnu Meeting, Strasbourg J. Pasternak Status and recent progress on muon IDS-FFAG J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL STFC Work.
FFAG Tune-stabilized, Linear-field FFAG C. Johnstone, Fermilab S. Koscielniak, TRIUMF FFAG06 Japan f Fermilab.
Neutrino Factory,  ± Decay Rings C Johnstone, FNAL, F Meot, CNRS, & G H Rees, RAL.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Part III Commissioning. Proof of Principle FFAG (POP) study The world first proton FFAG –Commissioned in March –From 50 keV to 500 keV in 1ms. –Proof.
Magnet Design & Construction for EMMA
First Thoughts on IDS G H Rees, RAL. Topics 1.Two-way, μ ± injection chicane for the dog-bone RLA. 2.Injection energy & efficiency for a first dog-bone.
Optics considerations for ERL test facilities Bruno Muratori ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory (M. Bowler, C. Gerth, F. Hannon, H. Owen, B. Shepherd, S. Smith,
NEUTRINO DETECTORS Cutting-Edge Accelerator Research for a Neutrino Factory and Other Applications Ajit Kurup for the FETS and UKNF Collaborations Cutting-Edge.
FFAG Studies at RAL G H Rees. FFAG Designs at RAL Hz, 4 MW, 3-10 GeV, Proton Driver (NFFAGI) Hz,1 MW, GeV, ISIS Upgrade (NFFAG) 3.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Status of KEK 150MeV FFAG M. Aiba (KEK) For KEK FFAG Gr. FFAG’05, 5 to 9 Dec., KURRI.
EMMA: Pulsed magnets Kiril Marinov MaRS group, ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory 1.
Acceleration Overview J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory January 8, 2014.
New Gantry Idea for H + /C 6+ Therapy G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL 4 th September, 2008.
FFAG Nonscaling FFAGs for Hadron Therapy C. Johnstone, Fermilab FFAG08 Sept 1-5, 2008 University of Manchester Manchester, U.K. Fermilab.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Principals of fast injection and extraction R. Apsimon.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
, UKNF Meetin, Imperial College J. Pasternak Status and Recent Progress in the Muon FFAG Designs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
, IDS Meeting, Fermilab J. Pasternak Challenges of muon FFAG: injection/extraction, beam dynamics and injection/extraction hardware design studies.
Beam dynamics and linac optics studies for medical proton accelerators
Injection/Extraction Kicker CR Aleksey Kasaev BINP-FAIR-GSI workshop
A Compact FFAG for Radioisotope Production D. Bruton R. Barlow, R. Edgecock, and C.J. Johnstone.
Particle Physics Group Meeting January 4 th – 5 th 2010 Commissioning EMMA, the Worlds First Non Scaling Fixed Field – Alternating Gradient Accelerator.
Capabilities and Programmes of STFC’s Accelerator Science & Technology Centre (ASTeC)
Baseline Injection/Extraction Configuration Aimin Xiao and Louis Emery, September 12th 2006.
UK Neutrino Factory Conceptual Design
Beam Commissioning Adam Bartnik.
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
Nonscaling FFAG design and EMMA experiment
Injector Cyclotron for a Medical FFAG
PROGRESS REPORT OF A NLNS-FFAG ADS MAGNET
Large Booster and Collider Ring
for the Neutrino Factory
Isochronous, FFAG Rings with Insertions for Rapid Muon or Electron Acceleration G H Rees, RAL.
Laser activated thyristor. Technical description.
FCC-hh injection group 7
Muon Acceleration in a Neutrino Factory
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
Presentation transcript:

Topical Workshop on Injection and Injection systems (TWIIS) EMMA Kickers Topical Workshop on Injection and Injection systems (TWIIS) 30/08/2017 Trevor Hartnett

Daresbury Laboratory ASTeC Technology at Daresbury ASTeC – Accelerator Science and Technology Centre: Accelerator Physics, Diagnostics, Lasers, Magnets and Vacuum Science Technology at Daresbury: Electrical, Mechanical, Controls, Electronics and Vacuum Engineering

EMMA £8.6M Funded by the UK under the CONFORM project (COnstruction of a Non-scaling FFAG for Oncology, Research and Medicine) £5.6M for EMMA - Electron Machine for Many Applications First Non Scaling Fixed Field Alternating Gradient Machine (NS-FFAG) A proof-of-concept machine to explore in detail the beam dynamics to gain experience in the design and construction of NS-FFAGs Areas of possible use of NS-FFAGs are: Medical - Hadron and Ion Therapy for cancer treatment Energy generation – Accelerator driven reactor Neutrino factory - muon accelerator

EMMA Parameter Value Energy Range 10 – 20 MeV Lattice F/D Doublet Circumference 16.57m No. of cells 42 Normalised transverse acceptance 3mm No. of RF cavities 19 Average beam current 13uA Repetition rate 20 Hz Bunch charge 16 – 32 pC, single bunch

Injection Septum Kicker 1 F Quad Kicker 2 D Quad Position Magnet centre Time Injected Beam Large Septum magnet bending angles required (65° injection and 70° extraction) Reducing angle passes the beam through preceding quadrupole magnets. The focusing or defocusing effects from the quadrupoles are balanced with appropriate septum and kicker magnet adjustments. Beam must be on the correct orbit after the second kicker.

Design of EMMA Septum Magnet Very large bending angle required (65° for injection and 70° for extraction) Longitudinal space available for the magnets only ∼100 mm in the straights. Also the magnets must inject and extract in the entire energy range (10–20 MeV) Solution is an eddy-current septum, capable of translation and rotation around a moving pivot point

Production of the EMMA Septum Magnet Inner Steel Yoke assembled from 0.1mm thick Silicon Steel laminations insulated with 0.2µm coatings on each side. Magnet Assembled by Tesla Storrington, UK

Septum Power Supply Specification was for a 8000A, 25us half sinusoidal pulse. A closely coupled LC circuit with L being the septum magnet load was utilised, a proven and understood design. The capacitor is chosen to match the pulse width required. The Switch was a CX1154C thyratron valve is a proven technology with switching speeds in excess of 150kA/us. MA2709A thyratron trigger system. Dissipate stored energy Charge Capacitor Septum Pulse

Kicker Magnet Design Designed at Daresbury Laboratory. Delay Line Kicker was considered, however it was decided it would be too electrically and structurally complex Lumped (inductive) Kicker type Horizontal aperture: 46mm Vertical aperture: 25mm Length: 100mm

Production of the EMMA Kicker Magnet Kicker component manufacture by Brite Precision, Newbury. Ferrite Blocks manufactured by Ceramic Magnets, New Jersey. Magnets assembled at Daresbury Laboratory.

Kicker Power Supply Specification Parameter Value Magnet length 0.1m Field at 10MeV (injection) 0.035T Field at 20MeV (extraction) 0.07T Magnet Inductance 0.25uH Lead Inductance 0.16uH Peak Current at 10/20MeV 1.3kA Peak Voltage at Magnet 14kV Rise/Fall Time 35ns Jitter pulse to pulse <2ns

Kicker Power supply design Charge main capacitor Kicker Pulse Close switch This concept was developed in collaboration with Applied Pulse Power*: L1 is optimised magnetic switch. C1 main charging capacitor. C2 charges on closure of S1. L2 saturates when C2 at voltage required. C2 then discharges through L2 and magnet. Circuit performance optimised was to improve di/dt rate and pre-pulse current. *Applied Pulse Power Inc. Freeville, New York.

Kicker Power Supply design After computer simulation and prototype testing, circuit suitable for extraction only. The desired pre-pulse and di/dt rate has been achieved. Further work is required to increase peak current from 600Amps to 1.2kAmps. Unfortunately the post pulse oscillation was not acceptable for an injection magnet. Current (Amps) Optimised Current Pulses > 30kA/us 100 200 Time (ns)

Kicker Power supply design Charge main capacitor PFN1 Discharge Kicker Pulse Close switch Again in Collaboration with APP We developed and tested this circuit. It operates as follows: The PFNs are charged on an ~ 200ns timescale through step-up transformer, using the model S33A-8 32kV solid state switch S1. When S2 saturates, the voltage across one PFN1 discharges In turn PFN2 is able to discarge through the magnet

Kicker Power Supply design It appeared possible to meet the requirements for both injection and extraction kickers with a relatively simple and inexpensive system that uses proven solid state switch technology.

Features Due to the importance of impedance matching, the pulse power supply had to sit on top of the magnet. This provided significant mechanical limitations. We provided a complete additional level of screening for our pulse current transformers to obtain a clean current trace. Delay between the control signal pulse and current pulse varied with kicker current and was different for each kicker!

Problem with the BPMs Interference from the kickers was such that the Beam could not be detected after injection. Careful grounding and shielding methods improved this. A new enclosure rectified the issue sufficiantly to allow the BPM to be correctly utilised

Performance An in-situ field probe was mounted on the kicker magnet to measure performance. This was used to verify that the system post pulse overshoot was much larger than acceptable There were 3 main parameters to vary; resistance of the energy dampener, number of varistors or saturatable choke current. However we were unable to meet specification. The only remaining choice was multiple turn injection. This was not ideal however it was achieved and EMMA was successfully operated and met it required deliverables.

Lessons Learned Benefits: Disadvantages: Technology is relatively cheap - Cost in 2009 for 4 kicker units including testing and shipping was $100k (USD). Technology is relatively straight forward to support – the topology is relatively simple. Disadvantages: It is very difficult to design a match impedance between the pulse power supply and the magnet without the magnet present. Capacitor charger requires suitable protection from short circuit and reverse currents within the pulse power supply

Thank you for listening. Questions?