a)Statistically significant difference (P<0.05).

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Periapical radiography

Advertisements

For these slides: print out in hand out form(6/page)

BIOLOGY OF THE HUMAN DENTITION

The Anatomy, Physiology and Morphology of Teeth

{ Periodontology Dr. Suzan A. Banjar, BDS, MS Dr. Suzan A. Banjar, BDS, MS Medical Director, BMC Chairperson La Perle Dental Spa Consultant Periodontist,

TARRSON FAMILY ENDOWED CHAIR IN PERIODONTICS

Single Tooth in the Aesthetic Zone. Initial Presentation Upper central incisor intruding patient concerned HPC: 5years previous tooth avulsed due to trauma.

Dental Terminology Part 2

are often weakened coronally by excessive removal of tooth structure is often narrower than the bur used to make the initial access. (cervical.

25 The Use of Radiographs in the Evaluation of Periodontal Diseases.

P247. Figure 9-1 p248 Figure 9-2 p251 p251 Figure 9-3 p253.

Root Coverage Procedures in the Treatment of Gingival Recession Hend AL-Harbi, BDS, Nadir Babay, DDS,MS, DESM Introduction: Gingival recession can be defined.

CLOSURE OF A DIASTEMA IN THE ESTHETIC ZONE WITH PORCELAIN VENEERS PART II OF THE SMILBYDESIGNNY SERIES BY SMILEBYDESIGNNY.COM.

Dentistry in Practice: IMAGE LIBRARY Heidi Lobprise, DVM, DAVDC.

Greater Palatine Block

Marshitah ,Sakinah,Syafiqah, Hamzi,Azizul ,Fais , Asmat,Fatin ,Fadhila

ANTERIOR TOOTH SELECTION

Applied Anatomy Anatomical Land Marks Applied Anatomy

Management of furcation-involved teeth. Intraoperative revision of furcation involvement include – Furcation depth – Width of furcation entrance – Height.

  How many milk teeth?  20.  What are the different kinds of milk teeth?  Incisors  Canine  Molars Milk teeth.

General Anatomy & Terminology. Gingiva Root Canal Enamel Corona / Crown Radix / Root Cervix / Neck Dentin Occlusal Surface Anatomy of a Tooth Pulp.

WARM UP 4/11 1. What is mastication? 2. What are the functions of the tongue? 3. What is the thing hanging in the back of our throat called? 4. What is.

1 Chapter FIGURE 10.1 Tooth classes. From mesial to distal: incisors, canine, premolars, molars. Drawing by Lon Hunt. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier.

Introduction to Paleoanthropology

Straumann® Bone Level Implant

MANDIBULA Lower jaw.

EVALUATION AND SELECTION OF ABUTMENTS

The reading is 7.38 mm. The reading is 7.72 mm.

Figure 2. Case 1 clinical photographs

WELCOME to Dental Anatomy and Tooth Morphology RESD 701/701L

Figure 6. Changes in clinical parameters

Local Anesthesia Local infiltration Nerve block

MCQs for recording bases and occlusal rims

refers to a light area on the film

From: Development of a Rat Schematic Eye From In Vivo Biometry and the Correction of Lateral Magnification in SD-OCT Imaging Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci..

Management of Osseous Defects

Figure 2. Complication incidence in the two implant systems

PERIODONTAL PLASTIC AND ESTHETIC SURGERY

Figure 1. Comparison of salivary superoxide dismutase (SOD), activity (%) between the control group (CG) and the test groups (periodontally healthy iron.

Case Presentation – F.W..

Exodontia Extraction forceps

Figure 1. Incidence of tooth extraction according to the presence of acute PD in Koreans during 12 years of follow-up in the National Health Insurance.

Dr. Bushra Rashid Noaman

Gingival papillae after single-implant computer guided

Digestive System: Outcome: I can describe the structure of a tooth and accurately label the teeth anatomically. Drill: What is the function of the uvula?

Figure 4. Histological observations of specimens retrieved at 4 weeks after surgery (positive control group, A; negative control group, B; experimental.

Figure 6. Histological observations of specimens retrieved at 8 weeks after surgery (positive control group, A; negative control group, B; experimental.

IATROGENIC FACTORS.

Figure 5. Histological observations of specimens retrieved at 8 weeks after surgery (positive control group, A; negative control group, B; experimental.

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم dr. k. jawad.

Name that bone....

Rania A. Fahmy1 DDS, PhD, Ahmed El-Ghannam2, PhD

Treatment Planning K. Chavez

Radiographic findings in bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws.A, Normal: the alveolar crest of the jaws is the cortical bone of the alveolar.

X=(A–B)×fixture length (actual)/(A–C)

Figure 1. (A) Prevalence of 9 periodontal pathogens found in 94 periodontally healthy subjects. (B) DNA copy numbers of 9 periodontal pathogens. (C) Bacterial.

Figure 2. Associations of comorbidities with PD in elderly participants in the multivariate regression analysis. The multivariate Cox proportional-hazards.

Figure 7. Fibrovascular tissue area (FA) values in the AOIs

PDL: periodontal ligament, CEJ: cementoenamel junction.

Figure 1.(A, B) Initial clinical presentation showing the extent of the buccal marginal gingival recession and the exposure of both root and implant surfaces.

Figure 3. Paraxial views from CBCT obtained 4 months after SL (A) and DL (B) ARP procedures. CBCT: cone-beam computed tomography, SL: the socket was filled.

Figure 2. Surgical procedures of the SL and DL open membrane healing technique. The procedures of the SL and DL groups were only different in the number.

Figure 2. (A) The sections from the mesio-distal aspects throughout the mandibular first molars in CTRL (H&E, 4×), (B) The sections from the mesio-distal.

Figure 4. Histological features of defect healing 7 weeks after defect creation (Masson trichrome staining, scale bar=1 mm). Group 1 (A) showed notable.

Figure 4. Representative photomicrographs in the test (reciprocal autologous root transplantation) group. (A) Overview of the class III furcation defects.

Figure 3. Proinflammatory activity by Porphyromonas gingivalis-induced oxidized HDL. (A) Monocytes incubated with Porphyromonas gingivalis in the presence.

Figure 3. Representative photomicrographs in the control group

Figure 4. Histologic views of wound healing at day 7 with light microscopic findings (H&E stain, 100× magnification). Newly formed bone was seen from the.

Presentation transcript:

a)Statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Figure 4.Comparison between buccal bone and gingival thicknesses according to tooth types. There was a significant difference among tooth types for G0, G1, and A5. CI, central incisor; LI, lateral incisor; CA, canine; G0, gingival thickness at alveolar crest line; G1, gingival thickness at 1 mm inferior to the alveolar crest; A5, buccal bone thickness at 5 mm inferior to the alveolar crest. a)Statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Figure 4.Comparison between buccal bone and gingival thicknesses according to tooth types. There was a significant difference among tooth types for G0, G1, and A5. CI, central incisor; LI, lateral incisor; CA, canine; G0, gingival thickness at alveolar crest line; G1, gingival thickness at 1 mm . . . J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2016 Dec;46(6):372-381. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2016.46.6.372