N. ILINA, V. GAVRILOV (ITEP, Moscow)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regina Demina, University of Rochester 02/08/2012 Forward-backward asymmetry in top-antitop production in proton-antiproton collisions.
Advertisements

Charged Particle Jet measurements with the ALICE Experiment in pp collisions at the LHC Sidharth Kumar Prasad Wayne State University, USA for the ALICE.
Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb -1 Chris Hays 1, Ashutosh Kotwal 2, Ye Li 3, Oliver Stelzer-Chilton 1 1 Oxford University.
Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
Julia Velkovska Selected CMS Results from pp collisions 27th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics Winter Park, Colorado Feb 6-13, 2011.
Michele Gallinaro, "QCD Results at CDF" - XXXVIII Rencontres de Moriond, March 22-29, QCD Results at CDF Inclusive Jet Cross Section Dijet Mass.
STAR Strangeness production in jets from p+p 200 GeV collisions Anthony Timmins for the STAR Collaboration  Motivation  Analysis  Results  Summary.
Sourav Tarafdar Banaras Hindu University For the PHENIX Collaboration Hard Probes 2012 Measurement of electrons from Heavy Quarks at PHENIX.
Measurement of Inclusive Jet cross section Miroslav Kop á l University of Oklahoma on behalf of the D Ø collaboration DIS 2004, Štrbské pleso, Slovakia.
CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 1 PYTHIA Tune A versus Run 2 Data  Compare PYTHIA Tune A with Run 2 data on the “underlying event”.
PIC 2001 Michael Strauss The University of Oklahoma Recent Results on Jet Physics and  s XXI Physics in Collision Conference Seoul, Korea June 28, 2001.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Status of Neutral Dijet Analysis on Data from 200GeV Proton Proton Collisions Using the STAR Detector at RHIC B. S. Page for the Collaboration STAR.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Jet Studies at CMS and ATLAS 1 Konstantinos Kousouris Fermilab Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions Wednesday, 18 March 2009 (on behalf of the CMS.
Working Group C: Hadronic Final States David Milstead The University of Liverpool Review of Experiments 27 experiment and 11 theory contributions.
Study of the to Dilepton Channel with the Total Transverse Energy Kinematic Variable Athens, April 17 th 2003 Victoria Giakoumopoulou University of Athens,
16/04/2004 DIS2004 WGD1 Jet cross sections in D * photoproduction at ZEUS Takanori Kohno (University of Oxford) on behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration XII.
Optimization of parameters for jet finding algorithm for p+p collisions at E cm =200 GeV T. G. Dedovich & M.V. Tokarev JINR, Dubna  Motivations.
Fermilab MC Workshop April 30, 2003 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF  Study the “underlying event” as defined by.
Update ON the Study of Subjet Multiplicity at CMS 7TeV Manuk Zubin Mehta, Manjit Kaur Panjab University, Chandigarh 11/27/
Hadronic Event Shapes at 7 TeV with CMS Detector S,Banerjee, G. Majumdar, MG + ETH, Zurich CMS PAS QCD M. Guchait DAE-BRNS XIX High Energy Physics.
Study of the Subjet Multiplicity at CMS Manuk Zubin Mehta Prof. Manjit Kaur Panjab University Chandigarh 12/21/2015Inida CMS-Meeting.
Emily Nurse W production and properties at CDF0. Emily Nurse W production and properties at CDF1 The electron and muon channels are used to measure W.
QCD Multijet Study at CMS Outline  Motivation  Definition of various multi-jet variables  Tevatron results  Detector effects  Energy and Position.
High P T Inclusive Jets Study High P T Inclusive Jets Study Manuk Zubin Mehta, Prof. Manjit kaur Panjab University, Chandigarh India CMS Meeting March,
The Underlying Event in Jet Physics at TeV Colliders Arthur M. Moraes University of Glasgow PPE – ATLAS IOP HEPP Conference - Dublin, 21 st – 23 rd March.
7/20/07Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester)1 d  /dy Distribution of Drell-Yan Dielectron Pairs at CDF in Run II Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester) For.
Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector Seminar talk by Eduardo Garcia-Valdecasas Tenreiro.
24/08/2009 LOMONOSOV09, MSU, Moscow 1 Study of jet transverse structure with CMS experiment at 10 TeV Natalia Ilina (ITEP, Moscow) for the CMS collaboration.
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for hadrons and jets Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration.
Don LincolnExperimental QCD and W/Z+Jet Results 1 Recent Dijet Measurements at DØ Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory for the DØ Collaboration.
Charged Particle Multiplicity, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinQCD Meeting May 13, M. Rosin, D. Kçira, and A. Savin University of Wisconsin L. Shcheglova.
Recent jet measurements at the Tevatron Sofia Vallecorsa University of Geneva.
April 7, 2008 DIS UCL1 Tevatron results Heidi Schellman for the D0 and CDF Collaborations.
Andrey Korytov, University of Florida EPS 2003 July 17-23, 2003, Aachen Soft QCD Phenomena in High-E T Jet Events at CDF Abstracts covered in this talk.
Penny Kasper Fermilab Heavy Quarkonium Workshop 21 June Upsilon production DØ Penny Kasper Fermilab (DØ collaboration) 29 June 2006 Heavy Quarkonium.
1 CMS Sensitivity to Quark Contact Interactions with Dijets Selda Esen (Brown) Robert M. Harris (Fermilab) DPF Meeting Nov 1, 2006.
Kinematics of Top Decays in the Dilepton and the Lepton + Jets channels: Probing the Top Mass University of Athens - Physics Department Section of Nuclear.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
Run 2 Jets at the Tevatron Iain Bertram Lancaster University/DØ Experiment PIC2003  Inclusive Cross Section  Dijet Mass  Structure.
Gluon polarization and jet production at STAR Pibero Djawotho for the STAR Collaboration Texas A&M 4 June 2013.
F Don Lincoln f La Thuile 2002 Don Lincoln Fermilab Tevatron Run I QCD Results Don Lincoln f.
Moriond 2001Jets at the TeVatron1 QCD: Approaching True Precision or, Latest Jet Results from the TeVatron Experimental Details SubJets and Event Quantities.
Upsilon production and μ-tagged jets in DØ Horst D. Wahl Florida State University (DØ collaboration) 29 April 2005 DIS April to 1 May 2005 Madison.
KIT High Pt Jet Studies with CMS On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Andreas Oehler University of Karlsruhe (KIT) DIS 2009 XVII International Workshop on.
Inclusive jet photoproduction at HERA B.Andrieu (LPNHE, Paris) On behalf of the collaboration Outline: Introduction & motivation QCD calculations and Monte.
Jet Energy Scale and Calibration Framework
Studies of prompt photon identification and 0 isolation in first p-p collisions at √s=10 TeV May 20, 2009 Meeting Frascati Raphaëlle Ichou.
Establishing Standard LHC
Jet shape & jet cross section: from hadrons to nuclei
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Edgar Dominguez Rosas Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares
Inclusive Jet Cross Section Measurement at CDF
Recent Results on Jet Physics and as
Event Shape Analysis in minimum bias pp collisions in ALICE.
Di-jet production in gg collisions in OPAL
Katarzyna Kowalik (LBNL) For the STAR Collaboration
Lee Pondrom, U. of Wisconsin, for the CDF Collaboration
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb-1
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes
Inclusive Jet Production at the Tevatron
APS/JPS Second Joint Meeting Sep. 19, 2005
Experimental and theoretical Group Torino + Moscow
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
Presentation transcript:

N. ILINA, V. GAVRILOV (ITEP, Moscow) Study of jet transverse structure using the second moment of ET radial distribution N. ILINA, V. GAVRILOV (ITEP, Moscow) O. KODOLOVA (SINP MSU) RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

Outline Introduction Samples Variables Study of systematic shifts and uncertainties Predictions of different generators (PYTHIA vs. HERWIG++) Possibility to measure quark jets fraction Summary RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

Introduction The study is important for CMS commissioning Validation of CMSSW: detector modelling Validation of generators The jet shape study could provide the tool for quark-gluon jets separation The internal structure of a jet is expected to depend on the type of parton creating the jet (light-quark or gluon) and ET of the jet the study of jet shapes can help to test the models of underlying events and parton cascades S.D.Ellis, Z.Kunszt and D.E. Soper, Phys.Rev.Lett. 69, 3615 (1992); J.Pumplin, Phys.Rev. D 44, 7(1991) RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

pp collisions at TeV , 10 pb-1 Samples. pp collisions at TeV , 10 pb-1 IC5 Algorithm L2L3 jet energy corrections JetPlusTrack method HERWIG++ Summer08 samples: (CMSSW2.2.1 for analysis): PYTHIA generator level (CSA08): (CMSSW2.0.10 for analysis) All distributions in AN at calorimeter level to measure detector based systematics to compare predictions on generator level from PYTHIA and HERWIG to compare predictions from PYTHIA and HERWIG on generator level RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

Variables at CMS: dR2, dj2, dh2 The integrated jet shapes (CDF definition) – the average fraction of the jet transverse momentum that lies inside a cone of radius r concentric to the jet cone (was used in CMS Note 2008/024). We suggest CMS to use variables - second moment of ET radial distribution - which doesn’t depend on any inner radius: Variables sensitive to internal jets structure and detector effects RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

dR2 vs PT for matched jets at |h| < 1 Particle level Calorimetric level gen corr All jets become narrower when their transverse momentum increases Particle level jets and calorimetric jets have a similar behavior RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

dR2 vs PT for different h-regions Quark jets Gluon jets RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

Detector related systematic shifts and uncertainties RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

The sources of detector based systematic shifts for dR2 Sources of systematics: strong magnetic field non linear calorimeter response to hadrons hadron shower and calorimeter tower transversal sizes jet angular resolution jet energy scale and jet energy resolution RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

Systematic shift due to magnetic field Particle level Calorimetric level Jets do not have large difference in size in η and j directions on particle level On calorimetric level jets become oblong in j direction due to influence of magnetic field RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

Jet shapes with tracks Particle level Calorimetric level Magnetic field doesn’t affect dR2tracks Tracker jet shapes: RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

Systematic shift due to jet energy scale (MC L2L3 jet energy corrections) The systematic shift due to jet energy scale can be calculated from the difference of tracker jet shapes δR2tracks(PTcal) and δR2tracks(PTgen) RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

Systematic shift due to jet energy scale (JetPlusTrack jet energy scale) JetPlusTrack Algorithm There is no dependence on jet type (quark ar gluon) for JetPlusTrack algorithm RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

Predictions from different generators PYTHIA vs. HERWIG++ RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

dR2(PT) : HERWIG++ vs. PYTHIA6 Particle level All matched jets Quark jets Gluon jets The main difference between PYTHIA and HERWIG++ samples is in gluon jet shape RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

dR2(PT) : Theoretical and detector systematics gen Very preliminary! RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

dR2(PT) for different h-regions. Herwig++ predictions gen Jet shapes for all jets(black lines) depend on h while jet shapes for gluon/quark jets are invariant. There are different quark/gluon jets fraction in the rapidity regions RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

Measurement of quark-jets fraction from jet shapes RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

Measurement of quark-jets fraction Fraction of quark jets was calculated in 2 ways: I. From ET spectrum: II. From jet shapes: The calculation of quark jets fraction from jet shapes can be applied for data RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

q-jets fraction from PT spectrum and from jet shapes Particle level gen Fraction of quark jets determined from jets spectrum is in good agreement with q-jets fraction determined from δR2 distributions Fraction of quark jets rises with increasing transverse momentum RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

q-jets fraction for different h-regions PYTHIA vs. HERWIG++ gen HERWIG++ and PYTHIA predict the similar quark jets fraction RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

Summary The details of the jet shapes study is in https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/StudyOfJetShapes RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

Summary Pre-approval of the study is scheduled on April, 14 12/03/2009 RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

Back-up RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

PT spectra for matched jets at |h| < 1 Calorimetric level Particle level For 1 sample: JetEt150/s156 RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

Fraction of q-jets for different h-regions Particle level Calorimetric level In central rapidity region the fraction of quark jets is smaller It rises in endcap and forward regions (in endcap jets becomes narrower) RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009

Statistical advantage of new CMS variable Integrated jet shape 1-y(0.2) (CDF variable) dR2 (CMS variable) Sensibility = D/sstat, where D = ; sstat = For 500 GeV < Pt < 550 GeV: D/sstat(1-y(0.2) = D/sstat (dR2) = So dR2 gives ~2 times better accuracy than y(0.2) with the same number of events RDMS Physics and DPG workshop 12/03/2009