Demand Response in the NW: Overcoming Barriers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Advertisements

1 Working Together to Lessen the Impact of Rising Energy Prices on Our Customers June 17, 2008 Delaware Public Service Commission Gary Stockbridge, President.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
SMUD Sustainable Energy Supply Progress in Carbon Reduction POU 101: CMUA Briefing of Legislative Staff February 26 th, 2015 Obadiah Bartholomy Powering.
Critical Peak Pricing Gulf Power’s Experience Dan Merilatt, V.P. Marketing Services GoodCents Solutions, Inc. Stone Mountain, GA September 9, 2002.
NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative Meeting NARUC Fall Meeting Anaheim, CA T. Graham Edwards President & CEO November 11, 2007.
PUC of Texas EEIP Meeting Residential A/C Load Control Program ©2012 Comverge – Confidential and Proprietary
Comverge Comments on NPRR555 ©2012 Comverge – Confidential and Proprietary Colin Meehan
Automated Demand Response "PG&E" refers to Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a subsidiary of PG&E Corporation. ©2013 Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
1 EERMC Public Meeting on Combined Heat and Power September 17, 2013.
The Efficiency of Energy Efficiency Program Tom Van Paris Vice President-Member Services & Communications October 18, 2012.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
1 Demand Response Update April, Strategic Perspective Demand Response  Aligns with PGE’s Strategic Direction; helping to provide exceptional.
1 Enhancing the Role of Renewable Energy in California Robert A. Laurie Commissioner California Energy Commission Geothermal Resources Council Annual Meeting.
John Dumas Director of Wholesale Market Operations ERCOT Operating Reserve Demand Curve.
Floyd Trefny Director of Product Development Future of Demand Response In ERCOT A Presentation to the Workshop – September 15, 2006 Project Number
Over 3,300 Megawatts and Counting Growing and Transforming One of Nation’s Largest DSM Portfolios.
Battling Load Growth in NYC Chris Smith NYSERDA NARUC 2007 Summer Meeting.
Realigning Utility Incentives Commissioner Wayne E. Gardner Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Keystone Energy Efficiency Alliance Sept. 20, 2011.
Retail Competition: Managing a Difficult Transition David L. O’Connor Commissioner Massachusetts Division of Energy Resources (DOER) Presentation to National.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
Energy Analysis Department Cost-Effectiveness Valuation Framework for Demand Response Resources: Guidelines and Suggestions Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley.
California Energy Commission - Public Interest Energy Research Program Demand Response Research Center Research Overview Load Management Informational.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
Demand Response At Idaho Power Pete Pengilly Customer Research & Analysis Leader.
ERCOT ELTF – Overview and Brief Proposal Dr. Eric Woychik – Strategy Integration LLC representing Comverge, Inc. 8 November 2006.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
PJM © 2006 The Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Illinois State University Conference May 12, 2006 Jeff Bladen PJM Interconnection.
©2005 PJM 1 APEx The Mature PJM Market Kenneth W. Laughlin PJM October 31, 2005 Orlando, FL.
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
NARUC/FERC COLLABORATIVE: DEMAND RESPONSE Paul Suskie, Chairman, Arkansas Public Service Commission July 15, 2007.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
© EnerNOC Inc. The Role of Aggregators in the Reliable Recruitment and Delivery of Demand Response Or “why do I need an aggregator anyway? 9 June, 2011.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
ERCOT Public 1 Project Panel 1 Dan Woodfin Director, System Operations August 15, 2014.
New Incentives for Pursuing Demand Response Scott Strauss and Sean Flynn Spiegel & McDiarmid APPA Legal Seminar San Francisco – November 2004.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 8 th Should all capacity resources be paid the same? -Demand Response operational deployment.
Utility Benefits of Demand Response Trevor Lauer DTE Energy Marketing Executive Conference Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.
SFPUC IRP Presentation to CEC April 18, INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLANNING SAN FRANCISCO PUC JAMES HENDRY SAN FRANCISCO PUC.
UM 1751 Energy Storage Workshop #3 May 9, UM 1751 Workshop #3 Topics Most viable and beneficial applications (HB 2193 time frame: ) Emerging.
Demand Response 2010 and Beyond April 28, 2011 Pete Pengilly.
1 City of Palo Alto Utilities Large Commercial Customer Pilot Demand Response Program Customer Meeting March 8, 2012.
Energy: Challenges with Becoming More Sustainable © 2011San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. Robb Anderson Director.
Renewable Energy Challenges: System Stability
2018 LTSA Workshop August 2017 RPG Meeting Welcome to.
Commercial Customer Demand Response Program Pilot
SMECO Demand Response filing
Integrated Resource Plan 2016
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
Potomac Edison Preliminary Energy Efficiency and Conservation Programs
NW Demand Response Symposium
Alternative Approach for Loads in SCED v.2
National Grid Rhode Island: Piloting Wireless Alternatives
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
The New Texas Wholesale/Retail Market
Restructuring Roundtable March 24, 2017 Boston, MA
2017 Integrated Resource Plan
Idaho Power 2017 Integrated Resource Plan
Demand Response Barriers and Opportunities at PSE

Demand Response in the Sixth Power Plan
30 Minute Reserves EPFSTF January 4,
Which path to Choose? Zero Carbon Glendale Project
Forging Sustainable Solar (and Storage) Incentives for New England
Solar Energy Commercialization
New Orleans Demand Response Potential Study: DRAFT RESULTS
Presentation transcript:

Demand Response in the NW: Overcoming Barriers Stacey Donohue Idaho Public Utilities Commission stacey.donohue@puc.idaho.gov 208-334-0378

Idaho Public Utilities Commission Keep rates low! Approximately 50 employees, plus 5 Attorneys General Regulate Idaho Power, Avista, Rocky Mountain Power and … Atlanta Power Intermountain Gas, Suez Water, many small water companies, and telecom service regulation (adding a second area code to Idaho is a big deal right now) Respond to utility applications

Demand Response at Idaho Power Started in 2004 with ½ MW of residential air conditioning cycling Approximately 370 MW today 30 MW residential, 35 MW commercial, 305 MW irrigation Summer peaking $11 million in base rates, variations tracked in the PCA Works very well for dispatch center Residential demand response is hub of energy efficiency programs

Barriers in mature demand response programs: Welcome to the Future… Barriers in mature demand response programs: How much is too much? How should it be valued? Idaho Power Demand Response Settlement Case No IPC-E-13-14

Guiding Concepts Use existing demand response resources when possible Include demand response offerings for all 3 customer classes Keep costs as low as possible & re-evaluate as IRP changes Consistently in dispatch requirements for all three programs Investigate load following, operating reserves, emergency reliability and flexibility Take a long term outlook: In order to have viable long term DR, programs must continue in the short term Entire portfolio = 20 year revenue requirement for one SCCT ($16.7 million)

Nuts and Bolts Valuation – 370 MW DR portfolio equals 170 MW SCCT Participation caps – essentially capped growth Incentive amounts – how much to pay to retain participation Notification periods – shorter is better (for dispatch) Minimum dispatch – 3 times a year Ancillary services – load following

What’s next… Upcoming IRP will inform ongoing need and implementation Managing residential program churn Recruiting and maintaining C&I participants Technology is always changing – thermostats thermostats Markets

Questions Stacey Donohue Idaho Public Utilities Commission stacey.donohue@puc.idaho.gov (208) 334-0378