ePhyto The 3rd IPPC Global Symposium on ePhyto

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) Training
Advertisements

Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) Training
WG 2 (data exchange) During the transitional period and till the Single Authorisation electronic information and communication system is implemented,
Electronic certification
The International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) IPPC Secretariat July 2011 Kuala Lumpur, Malyasia.
The International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) IPPC Secretariat 25 June 2013 Libreville, Gabon.
30 June -2 July 2010 Presented By Louisa Makumbe Plant Quarantine Services Rainbow Towers - Harare.
3 rd Executive Forum on Trade Facilitation Paperless Trade in International Supply Chains: Enhancing Efficiency and Security Technology as Enabler of Innovation.
WCO Economic Competitiveness Package “Symposium on WTO Trade Facilitation for African Countries” Nairobi, Kenya November 2012.
WCO Economic Competitiveness Package
UN CEFACT Single Window Recommendation Simplifying International Trade Gordon Cragge Chair – International Trade Procedures Working Group (TBG 15 of UN.
General overview of South Africa’s commitment to global market access & maintenance based on requirements for phytosanitary measures by PATRICK TSHIKHUDO.
Produce Industry Perspectives on Cross-Border Issues Canada-United States Transportation Border Working Group Fall Plenary Bev Appleby, CPMA October 28,2010.
The Revised Kyoto Convention Seminar on the Harmonization Convention Moscow October 2006.
UNITED NATIONS Conference on Trade and Development Contents 1.The ASYCUDA Programme 2.Risk Management 3.Risk Management in Customs 4.The ASYCUDA tool.
APHIS READINESS UPDATE Automated Commercial Environment US Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
© 2007 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (Canadian Food Inspection Agency), all rights reserved. Use without permission is prohibited. Summary of.
United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Plant Protection and Quarantine Electronic Exchange and the Cloud IPPC.
1 Overview of the Hub Concept & Prototype for Secure Method of Information Exchange (SMIE) April 2013 Prepared by NZ & USA.
The International Plant Protection Convention IPPC Secretariat, November 2015 Electronic Phytosanitary Certification, ePhyto.
INFORMATION SESSION ON PHYTOSANITARY REGULATIONS IN GRAIN IMPORTS.
Documents and Procedure Steps to Access EU Markets Grant Wilkinson Defra.
IPPC developments in ePhyto Update by the IPPC ePhyto Steering Group.
EU-KOREA FREE TRADE AGREEMENT Customs Requirements
Wood Packaging - Imports Canada adopted ISPM 15 in January 2004 Canada adopted ISPM 15 in January 2004 All w.p. imported to must be H.T. or M.Br. Fumigated.
Systems Approach Concept and Application 24º Technical Consultation among ORPF, August 2012 Maria Inés Ares President of Directive Committee.
“ABC – Accelerated Border Clearance” An Innovative Idea by Global Express Association (GEA) 1 Advisory Committee on Supply Chain Competitiveness (ACSCC)
Electronic Phytosanitary Certification A Presentation by the International Plant Protection Convention Secretariat.
National Food Control Systems
Electronic certification - status of IPPC ePhyto developments
UNECE International Forum on Trade Facilitation
ACE Presentation for Industry
The International Plant Protection Convention
Overview of the WTO SPS Agreement and the role of
Seminar on Arab and International Road Transport Agreements
An Integrated Industrial Policy for the Globalisation Era
UNECE Integrated Approach to Trade Facilitation Tom Butterly Deputy Chief Global Trade Solutions Branch UNECE Capacity-Building Workshop on the WTO.
The ePhyto Solution A Guide to implement the ePhyto System
KENYA COUNTRY PRESENTATION 3rd IPPC Global Symposium on ePhyto
ePhyto – IPPC Solutions
Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority (NVWA)
Japan's perspective of ePhyto
The 3rd IPPC Global Symposium on ePhyto
Report from Plernary on ePhyto Business Process
Developing a strategy for the implementation of ePhyto
GHANA’S EXPERIENCE IN PREPARING FOR THE ePHYTO SYSTEM
Understanding what is the Phytosanitary Capacity Evaluation (PCE)
Facilitating Safe Trade Improving health protection
ePhyto – objectives of a global initiative through IPPC
The TFA and Implementing ePhyto
Regional Perspectives on Paperless Trade:
The TIR Convention and transit issues
Role of Industry Self-regulation in Phytosanitary Compliance
Operationalizing Export Certification and Regionalization Programmes
Standard Method for Product Description
TRACES CONCLUSIONS CASCAIS OUTUBRO 2007.
EMBRACE THE 4TH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION
JOSIAH SYANDA Name of Session: Session 5: Technologies and Innovation in Phytosanitary Systems IMPLEMENTATION OF ELECTRONIC CERTIFICATION.
Presentation Overview
Module 5 Liaison and Managing Relationships with Stakeholders
GHANA’S EXPERIENCE IN PREPARING FOR THE ePHYTO SYSTEM
The International Plant Protection Convention
ePhyto DRAFT APPENDIX 1 TO ISPM 12:2011
Walk-through of end-to-end, Roll On Roll Off process for goods
The International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC)
Imports from 3rd countries*
Facilitating SME participation in international trade
The WTO-Agreement on Trade Facilitation
Draft revision of ISPM 6: National surveillance systems ( )
The IPPC ePhyto Solution International Plant Protection Convention Secretariat IPPC Regional Workshops 2019.
Presentation transcript:

ePhyto The 3rd IPPC Global Symposium on ePhyto “ePhyto and Trade Facilitation” Gerard Meijerink, Industry Advisory Group ePhyto

IAG members International Cotton Advisory Committee

Preventing the movement of pests

Phytosanitary certificates Means by which national plant protection organizations communicate that a consignment meets import requirements Model phytosanitary certificate (PC) and PC for re-export established in the IPPC Convention ISPM 7 and 12 provide guidance on issuance of PCs and PCs for re-export ISPM 7 Phytosanitary certification system describes the components of a national system for the issuance of PCs Topic added in 1994, standard adopted in 1997, revised in 2011 ISPM 12 Phytosanitary certificates describes the content of PCs Topic added in 1996, standard first adopted in 2001, revised in 2014

Volumes of certificates In early 2016, the ePhyto Steering Group completed a survey of IPPC members to identify preparedness for ePhyto 67 countries reported 5 million certificates issued for export consignments 7.5 million certificates received for imported consignments Important to recognize variation in countries Developed vs. developing Import vs. export Balances of trade

PC’s: examples of industry specific issues Grain shiploads, high logistic costs Seeds re-exports and long storage Fruits perishable goods Wood variation in origins en purposes, re-export Potato import restrictions Flowers perishable goods, limited use period Cotton change of destination during shipment

CURRENT PHYTOSANITARY CERTIFICATION SYSTEMS: Non-compliant documents trigger a higher number of import rejections than actual plant health issues (harmful organisms)

Challenges and opportunities for global fruit trade Opportunities with e-Phyto: Safe transimission via e-Phyto hub Better integration of LDC trading partners Faster customs operations and release of consignments No incomplete documentation Overall reduction of cost for the issuance of pc's Better organisation of customs operation through earlier notification Better usage of official control resources Reduction of losses through interceptions Challenges in global fruit trade: Fragmentation of the market Uncountable product/origin combination Persihability of the product A sector vulnerable to fraud Most interceptions on documents rather than on real phytosanitary matters Challenging trading environment with mixed consigments Compatibility of existing systems in place (Usage of harmonized terminology e.g. EPPO database) 71 200

PHYTOSANITARY CERTIFICATION: Heavy pressure on phytosanitary control systems at a few key exit and entry points for large volumes & number of shipments / in particular during peak seasons CUT FLOWERS ARE MAJOR USERS OF PHYTOSANITARY CERTIFICATION SYSTEMS WORLDWIDE 5 countries (NL, COLOMBIA, ECUADOR, KENYA, ETHIOPIA) = 85% of all exports worldwide 5 countries (DE, UK, USA, NL, RUSSIA)= 60% of all imports worldwide RESPECTING PHYTOSANITARY RULES IS CRUCIAL FOR ALL OPERATORS IN THE FLOWER BUSINESS Increasingly global, intertwined and cross-border supply chains Appropriate rules and levels of checks & controls must be enforced, in particular at import into destination markets, to ensure a safe & sustainable trade and adequate protection against pest outbreaks No trade-offs on plant health BUT fast and efficient procedures are necessary due to the high perishability of floricultural products

Survey on phytosanitary certification Map timelines, costs and issues of current ‘paper’ certification process 44 seed companies participated, exporting from 39 countries Vegetable crops, sugar beet, maize, herbs, sunflower, wheat, oats, alfalfa, crimson, soybean, canola, sorghum, cotton, oilseed rape, flower crops, rape, clover, tree seeds Commercial seeds, parent line seeds, breeding material

Where/how do you find requirements of importing countries? Import permits Country regulation provided by importer Government website IPPC portal E-mail to NPPO of importing country Databases: exp@don (FR), e-Cert(NL), PExD (USA) Internal company database

How do you provide this information to the NPPO? Paper form and electronic data (5) Email with attachment (11) Electronically (13) Paper form (10)

What are the costs charged by the NPPO per PC? 0,4 Euro 2,20 Euro Between 10 and 30 Euro 60-65 Euro 200 – 1200 CNY (26-156 Euro) 20 USD 17 USD 6,80 Euro per certificate + time based cost of inspector (av. 31,30 Euro) Payment per year: between 450 and 550 Euro

How much time between application and issuing of PC? Few minutes 4-5 hours 24-72 hours 3 days 1 day to 1 month (depending on ADs and need for testing) 1 day – 1 week 1-2 weeks

How do you forward PC to your customer? With the goods (12) Via courier / mail (8) Via courier/mail or with the goods, depending on country (6) Certified copy by email, original with the goods (12)

What % of shipments are not approved because of error in PC? < 0,1 Few, but if it happens consequences are serious Max. 1% 2-5% More and more cases 5-10% 50% (??)

What are the main reasons for not approving a PC? Lab test not accepted if field inspection is missing Wording of AD not exactly as required Seeds tested upon import and not found ‘free of’ Mistake in AD or missing AD Validity date of PC expired (too long delay between PC issue and goods received) Mistake in data, e.g. truck number, unit of measure Country of origin/distribution not approved Change of regulation between issuing PC and arrival of seeds Original certificate lost

What percentage of PCs is lost/misplaced during transport? Less than 1 %, up to 50 % (??) Most report between 1 and 2 % Some report that mail services are becoming less reliable

What are time lines and costs for a certified copy for re-export? From less than a day to 9 days Mainly 1-2 days Some countries report that only original certificate is accepted Costs: from no charge, up to 60 Euro In some countries included in annual flat rate

Anticipated benefits of ePhyto for the international cut flower trade: Overall reduction of costs for the business (losses, time, processes) Reduction of lead times and error rates Safer system for the exchange of data / lesser risk of forged & fraudulent documents More efficient logistics & faster procedures Arrival and clearance of flowers could be better planned by phytosanitary authorities and business, in particular during peak seasons Official controls could be better targeted on actual phytosanitary risks (harmful organisms) rather than paperwork Impact on cold-chain management, quality and vase-life: lesser deterioration of products – and entailed losses - along the supply-chain LONGER-TERM objective : digital signature and digitalization of ALL documents accompanying shipments (origin certificate, CITES, Commercial invoice, Airway bill, Packing list etc)

In summary: Users issues with PCs Different and sometimes lengthy procedures/country Certificates get lost Certificates have errors Inconsistencies in terminology, e.g. botanical names Misspellings of Additional Declarations Missing or wrong Additional Declarations Resulting in delays; critical for perishable products Resulting in returns; critical for bulky products Resulting in high costs

ePhyto ‘promises’ to Users Simplified and harmonized administrative procedures Harmonized terminology Strong reduction of administrative errors Quick and predictable timelines No loss of certificates anymore: improved security Possibility to anticipate and correct errors in time Increased over-all efficiency: cost reduction Facilitation of risk-based import clearance procedures Possibility to integrate in single window systems

Incentives for global use of ePhyto’s Participation of main trading countries of plants and plant related products Acceptance of global ePhyto rules and principles, reducing the need for bilateral agreements between countries Harmonized ways of working and procedures Demonstrated improvements in reliability, predictability and efficiencies

IAG perspective on rolling out of ePhyto Seamless shift from paper to electronic system No hickups and disturbances of trade Prefer delay over disturbance Collaborate with industry in making ePhyto happen A global accepted method of officializing ePhyto’s Should also work in all situations of re-export A 100% change to electronic certificates in case two countries have agreed to accept ePhyto’s When testing/piloting is succesful: shift 100% Do not leave option to continue paper certificates to Users

Industry perspective on ePhyto support Operational helpdesk is needed Available 7 days/week, 24 hours For NPPOs: at global level For companies: at global, but also at national level (NPPO)

Cost-benefit analysis Better insights needed in total costs of current system: for IPPC, for NPPOs and for Industry Better insights needed in added value and benefits for NPPOs and for Industry Insights to be based on real data collected during pilot implementations Insights to be used in promoting ePhyto for global use Insights to be used to define fee structure and level

Industry perspective on ePhyto funding Global trust fund for initial years When sufficient number of countries representing significant trade en plants/plant-related products have joined and ePhyto is working satisfactorily: Global single flat fee (transaction based) per ePhyto, covering operational costs and maintenance Trust fund for training, capacity building, implementation support Project fund for enhancements

Commitments of Industry on ePhyto Active participation in system development Participation in pilots and testing Participation in IPPC support for implementation Collaboration with NPPOs to develop efficient processes and best practices Collaborate with IPPC on system enhancements

Conclusions IAG ePhyto offers many opportunities for companies involved in import/export of plants and plant products, which are instrumental for global food security. ePhyto has full support of concerned industries represented in the Industry Advisory Group. The IAG therefor urges all countries for full collaboration in the implementation of ePhyto Industry will continue to work with IPPC on facilitating trade processes, information exchange and data management

Questions ? ePhyto