Acc. Collaboration board

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
Advertisements

Standardisation, regulation, worldwide strategies 1 Modules of conformity assessment.
Sustainable Energy Systems Overview of contractual obligations, procedures and practical matters KICK-OFF MEETING.
Software Project Transition Planning
DITSCAP Phase 2 - Verification Pramod Jampala Christopher Swenson.
Source: ec.europa.eu/CEmarking CE marking makes Europe’s market yours!
Safety & Safety Documentation 2 3 Safety in three Questions Why ? Providing a safe workplace is a legal and moral obligation on every undertaking, and.
ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE GENERAL European Commission Anna Solé Mena Policy Officer - European Commission DG Enterprise and Industry.
Introduction to Software Quality Assurance (SQA)
Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Presented by: Charles Kilfoil Bechtel National Waste Treatment Plant Richland WA.
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
Managing Accelerator Quality Matthew Conlon 13 April 2015.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.
Over View of CENELC Standards for Signalling Applications
Collaborating for Quality Quality Assurance (QA) & Quality Control (QC) in the Accelerator Project (ACCSYS) Matthew Conlon ACCSYS QA/QC
CDR for the ESS Linac Magnets for LWUs (pulsed quadrupoles and DC correctors) Closeout May 4, 2016 J.G. Weisend II, Chairman CDR.
Logo area MQXF Review: Safety Thomas Otto HL-LHC Project Safety Officer With contributions by -Paolo Ferrcin and Ezio Todesco, TE-MSC -Francesca Viggiano,
ACCSYS Design Reviews J. G. Weisend II Deputy Head of Accelerator Projects.
 Planning an audit of cost statements, records and other related documents is considered necessary to ensure achievement of audit objectives with available.
An exposure to COMPLIANCE AUDIT By- Vishal Chawre DAG(A/c & VLC) O/o AG(A&E), Nagpur.
Collaborating for Quality through the Project Quality Plan Matthew Conlon ESS ACCSYS QA/QC Quality Learning & Planning.
Introduction for the Implementation of Software Configuration Management I thought I knew it all !
Principles of Information Systems Eighth Edition
Minimum Set of Requirements for Suppliers
Minimum Set of Requirements for Suppliers
Software Quality Control and Quality Assurance: Introduction
OH&S Plant Obligations make
Strategy for conformity of non-standard cryogenic equipment
Fundamentals of Information Systems, Sixth Edition
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING
TechStambha PMP Certification Training
EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING
FC facilitation of Installations
Session II: System authority for ERTMS 4RP Trackside approval
Experience in Conformity Assessment of Products and Services  for Russian NPPs and Overseas Nuclear Power Plant New Builds Yury Meltsov Aug
Software Requirements
Outcome TFCS-11// February Washington DC
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Quality Management Systems – Requirements
Engineering Processes
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
Lockheed Martin Canada’s SMB Mentoring Program
Regulatory Cooperation Forum (RCF) - Plenary 2018
USNRC IRRS TRAINING Lecture18
Management System - update -
Helen Boyer OHS group leader
MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND FINANCE
Assessment of Quality in Statistics GLOBAL ASSESSMENTS, PEER REVIEWS AND SECTOR REVIEWS IN THE ENLARGEMENT AND ENP COUNTRIES Mirela Kadic, Project Manager.
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
ESS approach and support for Declaration of Conformity (CE-marking) Fredrik Håkansson 9th SRF ESS
Mattias Skafar Head of Quality Division
Engineering Processes
Workshop commissioning Installation Coordination at ESS
ESS approach and support for Declaration of Conformity (CE-marking) Fredrik Håkansson 9th SRF ESS
PSS verification and validation
ESS Management System SSM visit 24th October
Relevant Management System & Declaration of Conformity EU compliance
Internal Audits Management Review Meetings
Overview of the recommendations on software updates
ESS approach and support for Declaration of Conformity (CE-marking) Fredrik Håkansson ESS Accelerator Collaboration Board Meeting Trieste
Machine Protection PLC Based System Verification and Validation Plan
Acc. Collaboration board
CDS-EL IRR Closeout 28 March 2019 J.G. Weisend II, Chairman.
5.b3 Monitoring & Reporting 2019
ESHAC #8 Safety Readiness Review Thomas Hansson, ESH
CE compliance -LLRF- Anders Svensson, ESS
ESS-CEA ESSI Coordination Committee
ESHAC#7 General Q-progress CE marking
Presentation transcript:

Acc. Collaboration board ESS - CE marking Acc. Collaboration board www.europeanspallationsource.se Nov 17

Introduction ”declaration of confomity” ESS need for "declaration of conformity” have lead to: speculations and rumors in the project resistance lost focus and energy What is the intention and how to communicate? ESS steering documents is not released – delay in communication to our partners a CR will be issued to formalize the request “at the right time” Before a CR is issued we jointly need to understand the impact and implications ”for evaluation purposes” There is more questions then answers today, all will be answered ESS agree, this is ”partly” new requirement For the ACC project, most of the cases, will lead to “declaration of conformity”, not CE marking Due to bespoke equipment, where we heavily lean against our design and review process

Background In order to support the construction of ESS facilities, ESS Management have decided on a strategy to organize the plant information to comply with EU standards and directives for all deliveries This presentation aim to put this into context of the ongoing work, based on ESS Management System The contract agreement stipulate and give guidance, the presentation details the expectations and outline what is important

Organization and delegation of requirement to be implemented Director General John Womersley Associate Director ESH&Q Ralf Trant Quality Assurance Officer, Quality Control Officer, Document mgmt./arch. specialist, Quality Inspections Tech. Head of Quality Division Mattias Skafar Overall QA/QC responsibility and coordination . Acc. Project Project Delegated QA/QC responsibility WPM WPM

ESS Strategy for CE Marking (ESS-0103087) All deliverables to ESS must comply with applicable European Safety, Quality and other directives including CE marking. CE marking can be exempted if justified, however in any such cases the mandatory Risk Assessment, Technical File and related Operational Manual needs to be provided. Any exemption/deviation shall be agreed between the two parties in writing and approved by ESS. The provider, In-Kind or contractors has the responsibility to ensure that the applicable directives are identified and fulfilled.

ESS Strategy for CE Marking (ESS-0103087) The strategy is applicable to all equipment delivered to ESS (IK, ESS self performed or commercial agreement) The conformity declaration is pending the boundaries of the delivery; Complete machine, Part of the machine, Specific component, or a part of a component of the machine The objective, ESS shall be able to aggregate all information up to the complete machine This aggregation of parts, components and systems will be done according to and follow the start-up sequence of the Acc. Following the ACC ITC plan.

What does CE marking mean? The CE mark is a mandatory conformity marking for certain products placed on the market within the European Economic Area (EEA) since 1985. Sweden was adopting to the EU Directives in 1994. CE marking signifies that the product conforms with all EU Directives or EU regulations that apply to it. Examples of such directives: Machine, pressure, Low Voltage, ATEX, and EMC Directive. The manufacturer of CE marked goods has to verify that the product complies with all applicable EU requirements, such as safety, health and environmental protection. Or inform of any deviations and how to mange this during the life cycle

On the market… According to the EU directives, a product has to comply with the requirements and have a CE-marking from the moment it is: placed on the Community market for the first time; put into service(use) in the Community market for the first time. Placing on the market is the initial action of making a product available for the first time, either for payment or free of charge. Putting into service(use) takes place at the moment of first use within the EEA by the end user.

Technical Annex text ” TA” We didn't foresee CE verification when we wrote the contract, if so, it would have been explicitly written; The Partner shall ensure that all work and deliverables comply with applicable European and national regulations, directives and other acts, also any additionally specified standard, regulation or restriction identified in the documents of the baseline reference design specified The Partner shall identify and list the standards the Partner will comply with in executing this Sow, in the [PQP] The Partner is responsible, in accordance with applicable European and national regulations for safety and health at work, for the safe conduct of the activities to perform this SoW.

Technical Annex text ” TA” The Partner shall prepare a consistent and comprehensive Project Quality [PQP]. Planning and compliance documentation required might be principally generated from the Partner’s own quality management system when applying a system manual with defined procedures. ESS remains directly responsible to SSM for licensing and it is the responsibility of ESS to identify and describe SoW to the partner. any specific requirements for the Partner, any specific deliverables to be provided by the Partner and any specific process(es) to be followed by the Partner which enable ESS to achieve SSM licensing. ESS may at a later stage, request of the Partner additional information required by, or in support of ESS’ responsibilities for SSM licensing.

What to do ? The “Principle approach” Product Identify Relevant EC Directives e.g. 2006/42/EC 2014/35/EU 2014/30/EU Identify and apply applicable standards Compile Technical file Description, Technical reports, Test reports, Construction plans, Circuit diagrams, Part lists etc. Issue User manual in English 42 Machine 35 Low voltage 30 Electromagnetic compatibility Create a EC - Declaration of conformity (Part of a machine) Award of the EC-Conformity mark (CE)

Declaration of Conformity – DoC Contributions needs to be delivered with a DoC Verifying that applicable directives and requirements have been applied by the supplier/IKC. This will ease the integration process and secure that the Manufacturer of a deliverable have taken their responsibility for the delivery in terms of: Safety requirements Quality requirements Technical requirements Compliance to European Directives and standards Applies for commercial and In-Kind deliveries

How to do this ? ”road map” Based on components to be delivered and its boundaries; Our partners identify relevant regulations, directives standards, norms and requirements Identify applicable and relevant parts Perform necessary verifications Develop needed documentation Design and component construction Reviews e.g.. PDR, CDR, TRR, SAR Safety risk analysis (design impact, adm. control, op manual) Witnessing, Reviewing or Auditing manufacturing Inspection and Test including FAT Final Documentation

How to do this ? ”road map” Based on Design and component construction to find common relevant minimalistic approach IK partner present intention and ask questions ESS give support to outline the approach and structuring of information to ”declaration of conformity” ESS will give the IK partners needed support in the decision process to meet the final objective ESS will define the level and ambition in cooperation with the partners Based on Design and component construction Partner compile and issue ”declaration of conformity” ESS verify partner compliance

Divide in Logical packages * Declaration of Conformity for part of machine (to be incorporated) or a complete machine Declaration of Conformity ESS level To be demonstrated at different times/for part of the machine (test and commissioning plan) IKC A Declaration of Conformity IKC B Declaration of Conformity IKC C Declaration of Conformity IKC D Declaration of Conformity IKC E Declaration of Conformity*

Conclusions By work trough, define and agree the process workflow needed documentation ESS need We can evaluate the amount of work required to perform the ”declaration of conformity” We can see and agree on how to do the work We can align and agree on expectations We can minimize the risk We end up with the best and most minimalistic approach

Thank you for your attention! and now…

Example Type of delivery: In house design In-kind Contribution Declaration of Conformity* IKC Declaration of Conformity* Declaration of Conformity* Partner institute Supplier Type of delivery: In house design In-kind Contribution External provider Off the shelf, CE marked * Part of a machine or complete machine

Certificate of Compliance CE marking to be secured Bottom up approach in building ESS Certificate of Conformity Strategy for CE marking ESS-0103087 Rules for CE marking ESS-0127031 ESS CoC CE Marking ACCYS Project Quality Plan ESS-0033583 In-Kind Partner Certificate of Compliance CoC CE Marking Manufacturer Off shelf component CE marking to be secured On shelf component CE marking is given

ESS ACCYS Project Quality Plan (ESS-0033583)

ESS ACCYS Project Quality Plan (ESS-0033583) The ACCSYS Quality Goals (AQG#) for ACCSYS during Construction Phase are: AQG1 Assure and control Quality of Accelerator’s buildings and other site infrastructure Assure and control Quality of the linac and its supporting equipment systems Assure and control Quality of installation Assure and control Quality of commissioning Assure and control Quality of initial operations

ESS ACCYS Project Quality Plan (ESS-0033583) AQG2, Quality of Accelerator´s Equipment Systems describe steps of ESS Quality Assurance to be performed in collaboration with ESS In-Kind partners and / or Contractors as: Reviews of Statement of Work, Requirements, Technical Specification etc. Participate in Technical Reviews as Preliminary Design Review (PDR), Critical Design Review (CDR), Test Readiness Review (TRR), System Acceptance Review (SAR) Witnessing, Reviewing or Auditing manufacturing Inspection and Test including Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Review of Final Documentation and ensure the upload to ESS Documentation Management System. To assist Partners to fulfill requirements for CE marking or Declaration of Conformity