MKQXF FEA Model Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mechanical Analysis of Dipole with Partial Keystone Cable for the SIS300 A finite element analysis has been performed to optimize the stresses in the dipole.
Advertisements

Mechanical Design & Analysis Igor Novitski. Outlines Electromagnetic Forces in the Magnet Goals of Finite Element Analysis Mechanical Concept Description.
COIL & ASSEMBLY READINESS REVIEW, SEPT 2013 D. Smekens.
Cable inventory, relative measurements and 1 st mechanical computations STUDY OF THE QUADRUPOLE COLLAR STRUCTURE P. Fessia, F. Regis Magnets, Cryostats.
S. Caspi, LBNL HQS Progress Report High Field Nb 3 Sn Quadrupole Magnet Shlomo Caspi LBNL Collaboration Meeting – CM11 FNAL October 27-28, 2008.
Preliminary Design of Nb 3 Sn Quadrupoles for FCC-hh M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC.
 2005 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd TUTORIAL-1 : UNIAXIAL LOAD 1 PROBLEM-1 1 m P A composite A-36 steel bar shown in the figure has 2 segments,
LARP QXF 150mm Structure Mike Anerella / John Cozzolino / Jesse Schmalzle November 15, nd Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting.
H. Felice - P. Ferracin – D. Cheng 09/11/2013 Update on structure CAD model.
SC magnet developments at CEA/Saclay Maria Durante Hélène Felice CEA Saclay DSM/DAPNIA/SACM/LEAS.
NED Project P. MANIL – CEA/IRFU/SIS – Short Model Coils meeting #18 – 25/01/2008 – slide 1/18 SHORT MODEL COILS PROGRAM SMC meeting #18 Pierre MANIL CEA/IRFU/SIS.
11 T Dipole Experience M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC On behalf of CERN-FNAL project teams The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded.
MQXF support structure An extension of LARP experience Helene Felice MQXF Design Review December 10 th to 12 th, 2014 CERN.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 1 Paolo Ferracin ( ) European Organization for Nuclear Research.
Subscale quadrupole (SQ) series Paolo Ferracin LARP DoE Review FNAL June 12-14, 2006.
Hybrid Structure with Cooling John Cozzolino LARP Collaboration Meeting Port Jefferson, NY November 4-6, 2009.
Magnet design, final parameters Paolo Ferracin and Attilio Milanese EuCARD ESAC review for the FRESCA2 dipole CERN March, 2012.
New options for the new D1 magnet Qingjin Xu
11 T Dipole Project Goals and Deliverables M. Karppinen on behalf of CERN-FNAL collaboration “Demonstrate the feasibility of Nb3Sn technology for the DS.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 3 Paolo Ferracin ( ) European Organization for Nuclear Research.
S. Lassiter, P. Brindza, M. Fowler, E. Sun - Jefferson Lab G. Markham - NovaTech, B. Wands - Fermi Lab Abstract—Jefferson Laboratory is developing a set.
11 T Dipole Project CERN Status M. Karppinen 11 T Management meeting 1 July 2013.
11 T Dipole Status May 2012 M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC On behalf of CERN-FNAL collaboration.
CERN MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team.
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF D2 MECHANICAL STRUCTURE (DOUBLE COLLARING OPTION) S. Farinon, P. Fabbricatore (INFN-Sezione di Genova) Sept. 24 th 2015.
3 rd ESAC Review, 27 th February to 1 st March 2013, CEA Saclay Fresca2 Dipole Structure Assembly J.C Perez on behalf of Fresca2 collaboration team.
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF D2 MECHANICAL STRUCTURE S. Farinon, P. Fabbricatore (INFN-Sezione di Genova) Sept. 17 th 2014.
1 Long QXF Mirror Fabrication (MQXFPM1) Rodger Bossert HiLumi-LARP Collaboration Meeting May 18-20, 2016 SLAC R. Bossert - HiLumi Collaboration Meeting.
1 MQXFS Mirror Fabrication R. Bossert, G. Chlachidze, S. Stoynev HiLumi-LARP Collaboration Meeting May 11-13, 2015 FNAL.
Page 1 TQC Mechanical Model Igor Novitski / Rodger Bossert May 24, 2006 Results of MM#4 and MM#5.
16 T dipole in common coil configuration: mechanical design
Design ideas for a cos(2q) magnet
Mechanical behavior of the EuroCirCol 16 T Block-type dipole magnet during a quench Junjie Zhao, Tiina Salmi, Antti stenvall, Clement Lorin 1.
MQXC Nb-Ti 120mm 120T/m 2m models
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
WORK IN PROGRESS F C C Main Quadrupoles FCC week 2017
TQS Overview and recent progress
TQ Program and Review Charge
11 T Dipole Integration & Plans M. Karppinen
HQ Mirror Assembly R. Bossert
TQS Structure Design and Modeling
Mechanical tolerance analysis for the MQXF prototype structures
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
SQXF Mirror QXFSM1 Strain Gauges
16 T Cosq DIPOLE Mechanical Analysis
LARP Technology Quadrupole Review
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils (DRAFT)
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
Plans for the PSI Canted-Dipole Program
Mechanical Modelling of the PSI CD1 Dipole
FRESCA2 Update on the dipole design and new calculations
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils
16 T dipole in common coil configuration: mechanical design
Helene Felice 02/15/2013 HiLumi Meeting HQ Program
Bore quench field vs. critical current density
Glyn Kirby Magnet AssemblyTechniques.
Block design status EuroCirCol
Large aperture Q4 M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet
MQXF coil cross-section status
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 2 Paolo Ferracin European Organization for Nuclear Research.
P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon
Large aperture Q4 M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet
Cooling aspects for Nb3Sn Inner Triplet quadrupoles and D1
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
FRESCA2 - Coils 1+2 scenario
Q4 development M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet, E. Todesco
Helene Felice 02/15/2013 HiLumi Meeting HQ Program
Cross-section of the 150 mm aperture case
Presentation transcript:

MKQXF FEA Model Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

Key Features Shell (15mm) Loading plate Collaring Shoe Collaring Key Ground Insulation Trace Filler wedge Aluminum Bars Tapered mid-plane 150 mm apperture 12° taper Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

Shimming Positions Pole shim Pole adjustment shim Mid-plane shim Collar-Yoke radial shim Coil-Collar radial Shim Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

Magnetic Analysis Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

Magnetic Analysis @ 17.3 kA 11.82 T, 140 T/m Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

@ 19.25 kA 13.083 T, 155 T/m Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

Structural Analysis Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

Material Properties St. Steel (5) - Collars St. Steel (10) - Shell E(293K) = 195 Gpa E(4.2K) = 215 Gpa Prxy(293K) = 0.3 Prxy(4.2K) = 0.3 α= 9.215e-6 St. Steel (10) - Shell E(293K) = 195 Gpa E(4.2K) = 215 Gpa Prxy(293K) = 0.3 Prxy(4.2K) = 0.3 α= 9.897e-06 Aluminum (55) - Bars E(293K) = 70 Gpa E(4.2K) = 79 Gpa Prxy(293K) = 0.34 Prxy(4.2K) = 0.34 αx= 1.45e-5 St. Steel (52) - LoadingPlates E(293K) = 193 Gpa E(4.2K) = 210 Gpa Prxy(293K) = 0.28 Prxy(4.2K) = 0.28 α= 9.83e-06 St. Steel (11) - Pins E(293K) = 195 Gpa E(4.2K) = 215 Gpa Prxy(293K) = 0.3 Prxy(4.2K) = 0.3 α= 9.897e-06 Aluminum Bronze (53) - Wedges E(293K) = 110 Gpa E(4.2K) = 120 Gpa Prxy(293K) = 0.3 Prxy(4.2K) = 0.3 αx= 1.08e-5 Titanium (57) - PoleWedge E(293K) = 130 Gpa E(4.2K) = 130 Gpa Prxy(293K) = 0.3 Prxy(4.2K) = 0.3 α= 6.03e-06 St. Steel (52) – Collaring Shoe E(293K) = 215 Gpa E(4.2K) = 195 Gpa Prxy(293K) = 0.3 Prxy(4.2K) = 0.3 α= 9.215e-06 St. Steel (6) - Keys E(293K) = 190 Gpa E(4.2K) = 210 Gpa Prxy(293K) = 0.3 Prxy(4.2K) = 0.3 α= 9.01e-06 Magnetic Steel (7) - Yoke E(293K) = 210 Gpa E(4.2K) = 225 Gpa Prxy(293K) = 0.3 Prxy(4.2K) = 0.3 α= 6.894e-06 Coil (51) Ex(293K) = 52 Gpa Ex(4.2K) = 52 GPa Ey(293K) = 44 Gpa Ey(4.2K) = 44 Gpa Gxy(293K) = 21 Gpa Gxy(4.2K) = 21 Gpa Prxy(293K) = 0.3 Prxy(4.2K) = 0.3 αy= 1.16e-5 αx= 1.07e-5 G10 (56) - Insulation E(293K) = 30 Gpa E(4.2K) = 30 Gpa Prxy(293K) = 0.3 Prxy(4.2K) = 0.3 αx= 2,44e-5 Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

Lorentz Forces Magnetic Mesh Structural Mesh Mapped Forces Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

Parameters’ values used for the results presented below: Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

Azimuthal Stress Coil Under Press, @ 293 K After Collaring, @ 293 K It’s very interesting that the collared is not really affected by friction. Maybe this is due to the small displacement (0.05mm) applied during collaring (compared to the 11T, 0.1mm). But the coil stress is also not really affected by friction in the 11T. So this is consistent. After Shell Welding, @ 293 K @ 4.2 K @ 4.2 K, 140 T/m @ 4.2 K, 155 T/m Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

Azimuthal Stresses Coil Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

Radial Deformation Coil Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

Von-Mises Stress Collars After Shell Welding, @ 293 K @ 4.2 K, 155 T/m @ 4.2 K @ 4.2 K, 140 T/m The areas with stress over 300 Mpa are indicated in grey colour and these are the areas around the keys that typically plastify during the assembly process. Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

Deformation Collars Under Press, @ 293 K After Collaring, @ 293 K After Shell Welding, @ 293 K @ 4.2 K @ 4.2 K, 140 T/m @ 4.2 K, 155 T/m Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

Von-Mises Stress Yoke After Shell Welding, @ 293 K @ 4.2 K @ 4.2 K, 140 T/m @ 4.2 K, 155 T/m Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

Reaction Forces Collar-Yoke After Shell Welding, @ 293 K @ 4.2 K @ 4.2 K, 140 T/m @ 4.2 K, 155 T/m Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

Contact Pressure Half Yokes Tapered After Shell Welding, @ 293 K @ 4.2 K, 140 T/m @ 4.2 K, 155 T/m Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

Contact Pressure Gap Controllers After Shell Welding, @ 293 K @ 4.2 K @ 4.2 K, 140 T/m @ 4.2 K, 155 T/m Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

Azimuthal Stress Shell Detailed View: Mean Azimuthal Stress 155 MPa After Shell Welding, @ 293 K @ 4.2 K @ 4.2 K, 140 T/m @ 4.2 K, 155 T/m Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

Sensitivity Analysis Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

Tolerances Yoke ± 3,8 μm Collar ± 6,3 μm Angle of loading plate ± 0,2° Coil (outside diameter) ± 75 μm The sensitivity analysis is conducted by utilizing the DOE method (Design of Experiments) which determines sampling points on a response surface About 8 input parameters have to be checked. About 100 variations of the model have to be run Up to now, we have solved for 6 input parameters, ,corresponding to 45 variations Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

Tolerances Response Surface Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

Tolerances Sensitivity Chart Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

Conclusions Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

Conclusions New mechanical design concept for a Nb3Sn quadrupole, suitable for industrial production The FEA shows that the assembly is well controlled, with all parts staying generally within the accepted stress levels Coil pre-stress is applied in a well-controlled manner and is easily tuneable with shims The pole-loading concept allows to position the coil’s peak stress at the poles, and the min stress at the mid-plane Assembly is possible with a dipole-type press, due to the tapered-shape mid-plane poles and the dipole-type collars The Al-bars act like gap controllers at RT, while at cold the tapered - horizontally split iron yoke with a closed gap provides a rigid structure The coil is symmetric at operating temperature Robust parametric, FE multi-physics analysis Next steps: 1) Sensitivity analysis 2) Alignment features at the collar – yoke interface 3) Report for phase II Reference: M. Karppinen, “New Mechanical Concept for Nb3Sn Quadrupole”, CERN-ACC-2014-0244. Haris Kokkinos www.feacomp.com

www.feacomp.com