OFDM Signal Parameters Definition in 11ay

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Feedback Reliability Calculation for an Iterative Block Decision Feedback Equalizer (IB-DFE) Gillian Huang, Andrew Nix and Simon Armour Centre for Communications.
Advertisements

Institute of Communications Engineering, NCTU 1 Unit 2 Synchronization.
Doc.: IEEE /0630r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Verification of IEEE ad Channel Model for Enterprise Cubical Environment.
Doc.: IEEE /0644r0 Submission May 2015 Ganesh Venkatesan (Intel Corporation)Slide 1 Preliminary Simulation Results on AoA Accuracy in 2.4 GHz.
Doc.: IEEE /0358r3 Submission March 2015 Daewon Lee, NEWRACOM Numerology for 11ax Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.:IEEE /0206r0 Submission January 2015 Shiwen He, Haiming Wang Pilot Design for OFDM PHY for aj(45 GHz) Authors/contributors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0489r1 Submission May 2010 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models Date:
Phase Tracking During VHT-LTF
Doc.: IEEE /1399r0 Submission November 2014 Multi-Carrier Training Field for OFDM Transmission in aj (45GHz) Authors/contributors: Date:
Wireless Communication Technologies 1 Outline Introduction OFDM Basics Performance sensitivity for imperfect circuit Timing and.
Doc.: IEEE /383 Submission November1998November 1998 Jamshid Khun-Jush, ETSI-BRANSlide 1 BRAN#11 PHY Decisions & Issues to Resolved with
Submission doc.: IEEE /0824r0 July 2015 Slide 1 Pilot Design for 11ax Downlink Transmissions Date: Authors: Yujin Noh, Newracom.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1088r0 September 2015 Daewon Lee, NewracomSlide 1 LTF Design for Uplink MU-MIMO Date: Authors:
PHY Rate for NG60 Date: Authors: November 2014
Doc.: IEEE /0205r0 Submission Jan 2015 Shiwen He, Haiming Wang Slide 1 Time Domain Multiplexed Pilots Design for IEEE802.11aj(45 GHz) SC PHY Authors/contributors:
Performance Analysis of Open Loop SU-MIMO Receivers for IEEE ay
Doc.: IEEE /0632r1 Submission May 2016 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Performance Analysis of Robust Transmission Modes for MIMO in 11ay Date:
SC PHY EDMG-CEF Design for Channel Bonding x3
Space Time Block Coding for SC PHY in 11ay
PHY Design Considerations for af
Non-Uniform HOM Constellations for 11ay Single Carrier
OFDM Pilots Definition in 11ay
Length 1344 LDPC codes for 11ay
GI Overhead/Performance Impact on Open-Loop SU-MIMO
MIMO Coding for SC PHY in 11ay
EDMG Header-B Encoding and Modulation for SC PHY in 11ay
Channel Estimation Field for EDMG OFDM PHY in 11ay
SC 64-QAM in clause 21 PHY Date: Authors: November 2015
Rate 7/8 LDPC Code for 11ay Date: Authors:
Rate 7/8 (1344,1176) LDPC code Date: Authors:
Symbol Blocking and Guard Interval Definition for SC MIMO in 11ay
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Mar 2017
Signal Bandwidth and Sequence for OOK Signal Generation
6-10GHz Rate-Range and Link Budget
Field Measurements of 2x2 MIMO Communications
OOK Waveform Generation Follow-up
WUR Dual SYNC Design Follow-up: SYNC bit Duration
Pilot Sequence for VHT-DATA
May 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: OFDM PHY Proposal Date Submitted: 7 May 07.
Simulation of NGV Channel Models
Simulation of NGV Channel Models
MIMO Coding for SC PHY in 11ay
Simulation of NGV Channel Models
Signal Bandwidth and Sequence for OOK Signal Generation
Synchronization Requirements
Preamble for 120MHz Date: Authors: Nov, 2010 Month Year
Simulation of NGV Channel Models
PHY designs for NGV Date: Authors:
May 2016 doc.: IEEE /XXXXr0 May 2016
Simulation of Potential PHY Technology
Optimal Combining of STBC and Spatial Multiplexing for MIMO-OFDM
PHY designs for NGV Date: Authors:
STBC for OFDM PHY in 11ay Date: Authors: May 2017 May 2017
160 MHz Transmissions Date: Authors: July 2010 Month Year
D1.0 PHY Comments Discussion
Simulation of Potential PHY Technology
D1.0 PHY Comments Discussion
PHY Numerology Discussions
HNS Proposal for n Physical Layer
Numerology for 11ax Date: Authors: March 2015 Month Year
PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models
PHY designs for NGV Date: Authors:
20 MHz transmission in NGV
EDMG STF and CEF Design for SC PHY in 11ay
Signal Bandwidth and Sequence for OOK Signal Generation
Compressed Midamble in NGV
20 MHz transmission in NGV
Additional SC MCSs in clause 20 (DMG PHY)
Presentation transcript:

OFDM Signal Parameters Definition in 11ay April 2017 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/XXXXr0 April 2017 OFDM Signal Parameters Definition in 11ay Date: 2017-04-17 Authors: Intel Corporation Intel Corporation

April 2017 Introduction This presentation proposes OFDM signal parameters definition in 11ay. Intel Corporation

Common Frequency Grid Channel and subcarrier spacing: Problem: April 2017 Common Frequency Grid Channel and subcarrier spacing: Channel spacing: ∆F = 2160 MHz; Subcarriers spacing: ∆F = 5.1563 MHz; Problem: ∆F / ∆F ~= 418.9091; There is no common subcarriers grid over the channels; Solution: The closest integer number which provides minimal error is 419; FDC – DC frequency for OFDM signal spectrum; Fc – carrier frequency or center channel frequency; FDC(4) = Fc(4), FDC(i) ≠ Fc(i), for channels i = 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8; Fshift = FDC – Fc, | Fshift | < ∆F/2; Intel Corporation

Common Frequency Grid (Cont’d) April 2017 Common Frequency Grid (Cont’d) Table 1 below provides a summary of DC (FDC) and carrier (Fc) frequencies for frequency channels #1 - #8. The relative shift (Fshift) does not exceed ∆F/2 ~= 2.5781 MHz. Table 1: DC and carrier frequencies for frequency channels #1 - #8. Channel # #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 Fc, GHz 58.32 60.48 62.64 64.8 66.96 69.12 71.28 73.44 FDC, GHz 64.8 - ∆F*3*419 64.8 - ∆F*2*419 64.8 - ∆F*419 64.8 + ∆F*419 64.8 + ∆F*2*419 64.8 + ∆F*3*419 64.8 + ∆F*4*419 Fshift, MHz -1.4063 -0.9375 -0.4688 0.4688 0.9375 1.4063 1.8750 Intel Corporation

Pilots Grid for Single Channel April 2017 Pilots Grid for Single Channel 11ad pilots grid: Pilot indexes: p_idx = [-150:20:150]; Issue: large zones at the spectrum edges without pilots; Proposed solution for 11ay grid: Pilot indexes: p_idx = [-165:22:165]; Legacy 11ad pilots grid Proposed pilots grid for 11ay Intel Corporation

Common Pilots Grid Common pilots grid: Proposed solution: April 2017 Different channels and channel bonding should have a common pilots grid with equidistant step equal to 22; Issue: channel spacing by 419 subcarriers complicates the alignment of pilots grid over the channels; Proposed solution: Different channels have different pilot indexes: CH#1: p_idx = [-165:22:165] + 3; CH#2: p_idx = [-165:22:165] + 2; CH#3: p_idx = [-165:22:165] + 1; CH#4: p_idx = [-165:22:165]; CH#5: p_idx = [-165:22:165] - 1; CH#6: p_idx = [-165:22:165] - 2; CH#7: p_idx = [-165:22:165] - 3; CH#8: p_idx = [-165:22:165] - 4; Intel Corporation

Common Pilots Grid (Cont’d) April 2017 Common Pilots Grid (Cont’d) Extra pilots: In case of channel bonding, additionally to 16 pilots per channel, extra pilots filling the gaps between the channels are inserted; Issue with middle pilot for NCB = 2 and 4: For NCB = 2 and 4, the middle pilot can fall into the DC bin, which is undesired; Proposed solution: Instead of single middle pilot, it is proposed to introduce two pilots with indexes [-5, +5] relative to the middle pilot tone index; Based on channel estimation from these pilots one can interpolate the channel for the middle point; This allows to keep the total number of pilots equal to even number; Intel Corporation

Number of Pilots Number of pilots for different NCB: April 2017 Number of Pilots Number of pilots for different NCB: NCB = 1: NSP = 16, like in the legacy case; NCB = 2: NSP = 2*16 + 4 = 36; NCB = 3: NSP = 3*16 + 4*2 = 56; NCB = 4: NSP = 4*16 + 4*3 = 76; General formula: NSP = NCB*16 + (NCB-1)*4 = NCB*20 – 4; Linear dependence on NCB factor; Intel Corporation

Data & DC Subcarriers Data subcarriers indexes for different NCB: April 2017 Data & DC Subcarriers Data subcarriers indexes for different NCB: NCB = 1: d_idx = [-177:-2, 2:177], excluding p_idx; NCB = 2: d_idx = [-386:-2, 2:386], excluding p_idx; NCB = 3: d_idx = [-596:-2, 2:596], excluding p_idx; NCB = 4: d_idx = [-805:-2, 2:805], excluding p_idx; DC subcarrier indexes for different NCB: NCB = 1: dc_idx = [-1, 0, 1]; NCB = 2: dc_idx = [-1, 0, 1]; NCB = 3: dc_idx = [-1, 0, 1]; NCB = 4: dc_idx = [-1, 0, 1]; Keeping the number of DC subcarriers the same for different NCB simplifies implementation; Intel Corporation

Summary of OFDM Parameters April 2017 Summary of OFDM Parameters Table 2 below provides a summary of main OFDM signal spectrum parameters. Table 2: Summary of main OFDM signal spectrum parameters.   NCB = 1 NCB = 2 NCB = 3 NCB = 4 NSD 336 734 1134 1532 NSP 16 36 56 76 NST 355 773 1193 1611 NDC 3 ∆F, MHz 5.1563 Intel Corporation

Pilots Overhead Pilots overhead example for 11ac: April 2017 Pilots Overhead Pilots overhead example for 11ac: NCB = 1: NSP = 4, Ntotal = 56, overhead = 4*100/56 ~= 7.1 %; NCB = 2: NSP = 6, Ntotal = 114, overhead ~= 5.3 %; NCB = 4: NSP = 8, Ntotal = 242, overhead ~= 3.3 %; Pilots overhead in the current proposal for 11ay: NCB = 1: NSP = 16, Ntotal = 352, overhead ~= 4.5 %; NCB = 2: NSP = 36, Ntotal = 770, overhead ~= 4.7 %; NCB = 3: NSP = 56, Ntotal = 1190, overhead ~= 4.7 %; NCB = 4: NSP = 76, Ntotal = 1608, overhead ~= 4.7 %; Proposal keeps constant overhead over different NCB > 1; NCB = 1, 2: 11ac has ~0.6 - 2.6 % higher overhead; NCB = 4: 11ay has ~1.4 % higher overhead; Intel Corporation

Pilot Estimations Pilots estimations: April 2017 Pilot Estimations Pilots estimations: Common Phase Error (CPE) estimation; Phase Noise (PN) realization estimation; Channel estimation and tracking: Channel estimation for pilot subcarriers; Channel interpolation; NOTE #1: equidistant pilots distribution allows to simplify interpolation; NOTE #2: reduction of number of pilots leads to significant errors between actual channel and its interpolated counterpart; Intel Corporation

CPE Estimation Maximum likelihood estimator: April 2017 CPE Estimation Maximum likelihood estimator: ML estimation is given by: Sqk is a known pilot, Hqk is a channel estimation, Yqk is a received signal, qk is a pilot subcarrier index; ML estimator achieves Cramer-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB); Blue and green points represent the simulated performance of ML estimator for SNRs corresponding to PER = 10-2 for different MCSs of 16QAM and 64QAM modulations; Intel Corporation

CPE Estimation (Cont’d) April 2017 CPE Estimation (Cont’d) Table below summarizes the SNR degradation due to CPE estimation for fixed level of BLER = 10-4. ML phase estimator uses NSP = 16 and 32 pilot subcarriers. CFO + PN model from 11ad evaluation methodology. Table 3: SNR degradation due to residual phase error for BLER = 10-4. NSP = 16 NSP = 32 16QAM 1/2 0.6 dB 0.2 dB 16QAM 5/8 0.5 dB 16QAM 3/4 0.1 dB 16QAM 13/16 0.3 dB Intel Corporation

Cyclic Prefix (GI) Length April 2017 Cyclic Prefix (GI) Length OFDM cyclic prefix proposal @ 2.64 GHz: Short GI: 48 samples, TGI short = 18.18 ns; Normal GI: 96 samples, TGI normal = 36.36 ns; Long GI: 192 samples, TGI long = 72.72 ns; CP duration for OFDM is equal to SC PHY GI duration; Intel Corporation

April 2017 SP/M Do you agree: To define OFDM signal parameters as defined in (11-17-0597-01-00ay 30 6 1 OFDM Signal Parameters)? Intel Corporation

April 2017 References P802.11ay_D0.3 Intel Corporation