Super-virtual interferometry

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Signal Estimation Technology Inc. Maher S. Maklad Optimal Resolution of Noisy Seismic Data Resolve++
Advertisements

Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
(t,x) domain, pattern-based ground roll removal Morgan P. Brown* and Robert G. Clapp Stanford Exploration Project Stanford University.
Seismic Reflection Processing Illustrations The Stacking Chart and Normal Moveout Creating a seismic reflection section or profile requires merging the.
Velocity Analysis Introduction to Seismic ImagingERTH 4470/5470 Yilmaz, ch
Seismic Reflection Ground Roll Filtering Ted Bertrand SAGE 2004.
Multi-Component Seismic Data Processing
Introduction to GeoProbe
Amplitude correction Important methods:
Processing: zero-offset gathers
3D Super-virtual Refraction Interferometry Kai Lu King Abdullah University of Science and Technology.
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
Seismic Reflection: Processing and Interpretation Katie Wooddell UW Madison.
The recovery of seismic reflectivity in an attenuating medium Gary Margrave, Linping Dong, Peter Gibson, Jeff Grossman, Michael Lamoureux University of.
Seismic Reflection Processing/Velocity Analysis of SAGE 2007 Data Andrew Steen Team Members; Stan, Tim, Josh, Andrew.
First Arrival Traveltime and Waveform Inversion of Refraction Data Jianming Sheng and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah October, 2002.
Occurs when wave encounters sharp discontinuities in the medium important in defining faults generally considered as noise in seismic sections seismic.
Bedrock Delineation by a Seismic Reflection/Refraction Survey at TEAD Utah David Sheley and Jianhua Yu.
Applications of Time-Domain Multiscale Waveform Tomography to Marine and Land Data C. Boonyasiriwat 1, J. Sheng 3, P. Valasek 2, P. Routh 2, B. Macy 2,
Filters  Temporal Fourier (t f) transformation  Spatial Fourier (x k x ) transformation applications  f-k x transformation  Radon (-p x ) transformation.
Beach Energy Ltd Haselgrove 3D Seismic Data Re-processing, 2014 Quash X – Crosspread Adaptive Linear Noise Attenuation Sept 3, 2014.
Inputs to Signal Generation.vi: -Initial Distance (m) -Velocity (m/s) -Chirp Duration (s) -Sampling Info (Sampling Frequency, Window Size) -Original Signal.
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
Infrasound detector for Apatity group Asming V.E., Kola Regional Seismological Center, Apatity, Russia.
Seismic Reflection Data Processing and Interpretation A Workshop in Cairo 28 Oct. – 9 Nov Cairo University, Egypt Dr. Sherif Mohamed Hanafy Lecturer.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Authors: Sriram Ganapathy, Samuel Thomas, and Hynek Hermansky Temporal envelope compensation for robust phoneme recognition using modulation spectrum.
Technion, CS department, SIPC Spring 2014 Tutorials 12,13 discrete signals and systems 1/39.
Image Restoration Chapter 5.
Spiking Deconvolution In order to compress seismic signal in time and whiten the spectrum. Advantages: shows embedded signal in noise Disadvantages: heightens.
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Marine Seismic Survey
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Marine Seismic Survey Data Processing, 2014 Squelch Tests for Streamer Noise Attenuation Lines BST14B24 and BST14B67.
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS. EARTH MODEL NORMAL-INCIDENCE REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENTS WHERE:  1 = DENSITY OF LAYER 1 V 1 = VELOCITY OF LAYER.
Radon Transforms in Tau-P space and Multiple Removal
Data QC and filtering Bryce HutchinsonSumit Verma Objective: Consider the frequency range of different seismic features Look for low frequency and high.
Reflection seismograms
Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter Naoshi Aoki Feb. 5,
LEAST SQUARES DATUMING AND SURFACE WAVES PREDICTION WITH INTERFEROMETRY Yanwei Xue Department of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah 1.
Super-virtual Interferometric Diffractions as Guide Stars Wei Dai 1, Tong Fei 2, Yi Luo 2 and Gerard T. Schuster 1 1 KAUST 2 Saudi Aramco Feb 9, 2012.
Comparison of filters for burst detection M.-A. Bizouard on behalf of the LAL-Orsay group GWDAW 7 th IIAS-Kyoto 2002/12/19.
Migration Velocity Analysis of Multi-source Data Xin Wang January 7,
Processing Seismic Reflection Data of La Bajada Fault Ryan Lester.
Does It Matter What Kind of Vibroseis Deconvolution is Used? Larry Mewhort* Husky Energy Mike Jones Schlumberger Sandor Bezdan Geo-X Systems.
Microtremor method Saibi. Dec, 18, 2014.
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Shuqian Dong and Sherif M. Hanafy February 2009 Interpolation and Extrapolation of 2D OBS Data Using Interferometry.
Locating a Shift in the Mean of a Time Series Melvin J. Hinich Applied Research Laboratories University of Texas at Austin
GDF Suez Holland E 16-4 VSP Part 1:
Signal processing.
Primary-Only Imaging Condition And Interferometric Migration
Digital Image Processing
Brazilian “Strong-Motion” Data Stéphane Drouet, ON, Rio de Janeiro Marlon Pirchiner, IAG/USP, São Paulo Marcelo Assumpção, IAG/USP, São Paulo Luis Carlos.
Applied Geophysics Fall 2016 Umass Lowell
Processing of KAUST Golf Data
Automatic Picking of First Arrivals
- photometric aspects of image formation gray level images
Targeted Searches using Q Pipeline
New ProMAX modules for reflectivity calibration and noise attenuation
Noppadol Poomvises Geologist 6
Gary Margrave and Michael Lamoureux
Noppadol Poomvises Geologist 6
Processing of the Field Data using Predictive Deconvolution
From Raw Data to an Image
High Resolution Velocity Analysis for Resource Plays
Just when you thought you were
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS
Prestack depth migration in angle-domain using beamlet decomposition:
Presentation transcript:

Super-virtual interferometry Fuqiang Chen Ahmed Zidan

Data and acquisition parameters Goal: Detect Qadema fault and subsurface geology. Acquisition parameters: Shot number=240. Receiver number=240@Shp. Shot interval=5m. Receiver interval=5m. Line length=1200m.

Problem Problems: Data are very noisy. Can’t pick first arrival. Picking far offset is impossible. Tomogram result is not good. Courtesy(Aydar Zaripov,2015)

Theoretical Aspects of SVI Super Virtual Interferometry and its implementation. Shuqian Dong, Jianming Sheng and Jerard T. Schuster

SVI: Numerical Tests Spike test. 2 common receiver gathers (9 traces). Orange line represents original signal and blue line represents enhanced signal using SVI. Conclusion: For spike signal and refracted arrival of linear T-X curve, SVI can perfectly recover it with amplification.

SVI: Numerical Tests Original signal (upper) and noise signal (lower). The maximal amplitude of signal is 0.4. The maximal amplitude of random noise is 80. 27 sources and two common receiver gathers are used to enhance the virtual signal

SVI: Numerical Tests The 1st common receiver gather with 80 times noise (upper) and signal of S/N enhanced by SVI with lucky window. Original signal is 3 points [….. * * * …..]. Lucky window is […@@***@@...]

SVI: Numerical Tests The results of lucky window (upper) and (15 points) unlucky window (lower). 17th trace of true data(green), noise-adding data(red) and recovered data using SVI (blue).

SVI: Numerical Tests Shot 21st before SVI (upper) and after SVI (lower)

SVI: Numerical Tests Shot 57th before SVI (upper) and after SVI (lower)

proposed solutions Solutions: Process the data to enhance SNR. Try SVI technique.

Processing Flow Karhunen-Loeve Filtering Amplitude Correction(Gain) FX-Deconvolution 2D Weiner filter FK Filter 1D median filter

Karhunen-Loeve Filtering Why???????? 50 m offset(right) 50 m offset(left)

Karhunen-Loeve Filtering In Common Offset Domain. Enhance Coherency. Parameters: Operator length=20, For left hand side. Operator length=40, For right hand side. Reference: M.D Sachi, SAIG, 2008

Karhunen-Loeve Filtering 50 m offset(right) 50 m offset(left)

Karhunen-Loeve Filtering Shot # 120

Amplitude Correction Focus energy around the first arrival. Parameters: function: 𝑡 𝑎 × 𝑒 −𝑏𝑡 . Reference: M.D Sachi, SAIG, 2008

Amplitude Correction Shot # 120

FX-Deconvolution Remove the random noise. Random noise bursts along the whole frequency spectrum. “Bandpass filter is ineffective ”. Parameters: Fmax=70Hz Fmin=20Hz Reference: M.D Sachi, SAIG, 2008

FX-Deconvolution Why FX-Deconvolution ???????? Why not Bandpass filter ??????

FX-Deconvolution Shot # 120

2D Adaptive Weiner Filter Smooth the frequency spectrum. Smooth the amplitude anomalies. Parameters: 9 samples in time. 2 samples in space.

2D Adaptive Weiner Filter Shot # 120

FK Filter Removes Linear noise. But, we kept linear events and remove every other events. Parameters: Path #1 remove events (Vmin=4000, Vmax=inf). Path #2 remove events(Vmin=100, Vmax=400). Reference: G.F. Margrave, CREWES, 1991.

FK Filter Shot # 120

1D median filter Remove FK residuals. Parameters: 8th order filter.

1D median filter Shot # 120

SVI SVI- Preconditioning Done on Right and Left hand-side separately. Window around first arrival. Shot # 160

SVI- Left hand side (mid offset) Shot # 160

SVI- Left hand side (Far offset) Shot # 160

SVI- right hand side (Far offset) Shot # 160

Conclusion And Recommendation Processing enhances the coherency of the data and enhance SNR. SVI works well till mid offset (85m). Recommendation: Further data processing is required to enhance SNR for far offset. Run SVI for far offset. Perform reflection processing to estimate the NMO velocity.