Control methods for invasive species on Mima mounds at Turnbull National Wildlife Refuge, WA Brandy K. Reynecke and Rebecca L. Brown Significance Invasive.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module #6 Forage Selection Pine Silvopasture in the Southeast.
Advertisements

Prairie Restoration: Increasing Warm-Season Native Grasses with Fire, Herbicide, and Nitrogen Application Shauna Waughtel, S.A. Clay, A. Smart, D.E. Clay,
Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Accumulation of Rhizoma Perennial Peanut and Bahiagrass Grown under Elevated CO 2 and Temperature Leon H. Allen, ARS-FL.
Management of cheatgrass fuel loading in the shrub-steppe Steven O. Link, PhD (Botany) Native Plant Landscaping and Restoration LLC 4604 E. Robin Ct. West.
INTRODUCTION Figure 1: Seedling germination success by planting technique plus rainfall amount and date at the Poolesville location during fall BC.
Native Habitat Restoration In The Lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas Anthony D. Falk *Masters candidate, Texas A&M University Kingsville, Caesar Kleberg Wildlife.
Impacts of Climate Change on Western Forests Dr. Mark Johnston Saskatchewan Research Council and Prairie Adaptation Research Collaborative.
Walker River Basin Project Water PlantSoil Interactions Interactions.
Ground Beetles and Butterflies of Corn and Old Field Areas Along a NE Iowa Trout Stream Before Riparian Habitat Reconstruction Kirk J. Larsen Department.
The Effect of Mushroom Soil on the Use of Glyphosate to Control the Growth of Reed Canary Grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) in a Mitigated Wetland Introduction.
FIELD METHODS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources Division Forest and Rangeland.
Thesis  Erin Harrington  Advisors  Bobbi Low  Phil Myers.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Fish and Wildlife Department.
LandSection 3 Rural Land Management The main categories of rural land – farmland –rangeland –forest land –national and state parks, and wilderness Condition.
Climate change II: impacts Bio 415/615. Questions 1. What are 2 ways plants and animals have been influenced by climate change over the last 50 years?
Approach: Samples were obtained from 4 different plots of land, each with a different land-use. The land uses that were examined were a grassland (hayed),
Walker River Basin Project Agriculture, Restoration, and Plant/Soil/Water Interactions Tasks 4 & 5 Summary2008.
Sharon Stanton & FIA National Indicator Leads RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENHANCED FOREST INDICATORS.
Saginaw Bay Phragmites Control and Restoration Demonstration Project Julie Sims MDEQ, Water Bureau SBCI Regional Update Meeting Bay City, MI June 5, 2009.
٥ RESTORATION OF NATIVE PLANTS THROUGH CHEMICAL CONTROL OF ALLIGATORWEED AT EUFAULA NATIONAL WILDIFE REFUGE Shannon L. Allen School of Forestry and Wildlife.
How Does Motor Vehicle Pollution in the York College Creek Crossing Impact Fish? Victoria Tsang Department of Biological Science, York College of Pennsylvania.
Response of Luzula arctica and Luzula confusa to warming in Barrow and Atqasuk, Alaska Kelseyann Kremers and Dr. Robert D. Hollister Grand Valley State.
The Coefficient of Germination Velocity (CGV) is a measure of the number of seeds germinating in a period of time. Generally, the CGV increases as more.
Global Change and Southern California Ecosystems Rebecca Aicher UCI GK-12 March 7, 2009.
Results I) Regional Survey Rarefaction curves leveled off across sites, suggesting that the sample effort was sufficient to capture differences between.
Germination of native grasses The fall burn consumed all the litter and left bare soil in which seeded grass germinated. Cool wet weather followed the.
Kellogg Biological Station’s GK-12 Bioenergy Sustainability Project Your resident scientist Alycia Lackey Harper Creek coordinators Sandy Erwin and Steve.
Introduced from Eurasia
Comparison of Soils and Plants at Prairie Ridge: % C and % N Lori Skidmore.
Effect of Fallow Period Weed Control on Wireworm Populations in Sugarcane C. Rainbolt and R. Cherry Everglades REC University of Florida/IFAS.
Seed Germination Requirements of Four Fire-Recruiter Chaparral Shrubs Kati McClain, Vivian Fung, and Rebecca E. Drenovsky Biology Department, John Carroll.
Effects of Stream Restoration: A Comparative Study of Pine Run in Felton, Pennsylvania Luke Mummert, Department of Biological Sciences, York College of.
Biological structure of Fisheries Resources In Space And Time.
 Farmland  Rangeland  Forest land  National and state parks  Wilderness  The condition of rural land is important because of the ecological services.
Wood ash, the residue remaining from the combustion of bark, sawdust and yard waste for energy generation for forestry product operations, is an effective.
Section 3: Land Management and Conservation
Chapter 11 Analysis of Variance
Phragmites (Phragmites australis subsp. australis)
Establishment of Milkweed Seeds under Different Conditions
PLANT RESPONSE TO INCREASED TEMPERATURE AND HERBIVORY Dejeanne Doublet // Terrestrial Ecology // John Parker Lab.
Forage Crop Research Dine College Land Grant Office
Claudia Tan Li Ying, Zeng Yiwen, Darren Yeo Chong Jinn
Management of cheatgrass fuel loading in the shrub-steppe
Wildlife Terms and Concepts
planipennis) Management Plan for the Gordon Natural Area
Abiotic Factors Noadswood Science, 2016.
Carbon Cycling in Perennial Biofuel Management Systems
An Agriculture Perspective
An Introduction to VegDRI
School of Forest Resources and Conservation
Dhurba Neupane1, Juan Solomon2 and Jay Davison3
Results and discussion
Section 3: Land Management and Conservation
Prairie Restorations, Inc.
Maintain a great biodiversity
Robert Lafreniere1,2, Alyson Eberhardt2,3
Grazing Management and Fire
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Section 3: Land Management and Conservation
History and Management Practices
Species Diversity Comparison North and South Slopes
A Comparison of Riparian Vegetation Structures
Lodging immediately after July 4, 2007 storm.
Land Use Chapter 14 Part 4.
Forage Selection Pine Silvopasture in the Southeast 4/5/
Effects of Soil Nutrients and Fire
Robert Lafreniere1,2, Alyson Eberhardt2,3
Grazing & Recovery after Fire
Grazing for Conservation
Presentation transcript:

Control methods for invasive species on Mima mounds at Turnbull National Wildlife Refuge, WA Brandy K. Reynecke and Rebecca L. Brown Significance Invasive plant species negatively impact the ecology of rangeland and prairie ecosystems by forming monocultures, outcompeting native plant species for resources and reducing the abundance of plants suitable for forage. The Channeled Scablands of eastern Washington has patchy distributions of rangeland and prairie which are dotted with geologic anomalies called Mima mounds. These mounds are aggregations of topsoil on basalt bedrock or glacial alluvium and provide habitat for plants during the summer when the shallow soiled inter-mound areas cannot. The mounds have been invaded by a multitude of winter annual grasses and invasive forbs resulting in a reduction of quality forage for cattle and wild life . Broad scale control of invasives, that also maintains natives, is difficult on the mounds and may require a combination approach. This study combines common techniques such as herbicide and native seed addition with experimental techniques . The experimental techniques we used for the control of invasive winter annual grasses are soil amendment with carbon as sucrose and a phytotoxic rhizobacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens D7 that specifically targets invasive annual grasses ; for the control of Linaria dalmatica we used a stem boring weevil Mecinus janthinus. It is necessary to restore the native vegetation on the mounds to ensure the continued availability of forage as well as preserve native plant species and communities. Objective Our goal is to test a combination of invasive species control and native restoration techniques on Mima mounds at Turnbull National Wildlife Refuge. Experiment 1 Hypotheses: (make more specific)There will be a significant reduction in percent cover and stem count of invasive grasses due to treatments. Methods: Surveyed 186 1 m2 vegetation plots summer 2009 (recorded species percent cover and stem counts of invasive grasses in a 400 cm2 subplot in a corner of each plot) Applied fully factorial combinations of techniques across two substrates (alluvium and basalt) in the summer and fall 2009 (16 treatments; 4-11 replicates) and include: -50 g sucrose/plot applied three times in ~three week intervals during rain events beginning the second week of June (McLendon and Redente 1992; Paschke et al. 2000) -140 ml Plateau herbicide/m2 applied mid November (0.75% conc., spot treatment rate) -3 g seed/plot (Newman and Redente 2001); seed mix was Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis) and Blue bunch wheat grass (Pseudoroegnia spicata) Study Site Basalt Alluvium Treatment effects on invasive annual grasses were analyzed using GLM in SAS. Treatment effects on native and exotic percent cover and species richness were compared using ANOVA with Tukey pair wise comparisons. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for non-normal data. (Only significant results are shown.) Did the treatments significantly reduce the abundance of invasive grasses? Was there an interaction between effects of substrate type and treatment on invasive grasses? Did substrate significantly affect species richness? Herbicide decreased cover of Bromus tectorum, B. commutatus, Ventenata dubia (P = 0.001) and all grasses cumulatively (P = 0.04). It also decreased over all grass stem counts (P = 0.02). There was a greater reduction in both exotic and native species richness on basalt as compared to alluvium (p < 0.001). Herbicide reduced the abundance of Ventenata dubia (P = 0.01) and Bromus tectorum (P < 0.001) more on the alluvial substrate than on basalt. Experiment 2 Hypothesis: Doubling M. janthinus population will decrease L. dalmatica abundance. Experiment 3 Hypothesis: Pseudomonas fluorescens D7 will decrease invasive annual grass abundance. Discussion Experiment 1: Herbicide was the only technique that reduced abundance of invasive annual grasses and it is more effective on mounds underlain by alluvium than basalt, however it also killed most native species. Carbon soil amendments had little effect possibly because the amount of sucrose used was insufficient or because applications were not applied at the right time. Native seed addition has had no effect to date, however it typically requires >1 year for natives to establish. Total species richness decreased overall (perhaps due to climatic differences from 2009-2010) and was significantly more pronounced on basalt, possibly due to recruitment limitation. Experiment 2: Mecinus janthinus did not reduce the abundance of Linaria dalmatica possibly because the pre-existing population is having the maximum effect or because one growing season is an insufficient amount of time to see a significant reduction. Experiment 3: Pseudomonas fluorescens D7 did not significantly reduce the abundance of invasive annual grasses possibly because ambient air temperatures were too low at time of application or because one growing season is insufficient to see a significant result. Future implications When developing restoration plans on Mima mounds substrate must be taken in to account. The long term effects of these treatments will be tested in future studies. Methods: Surveyed 35 1 m2 vegetation plots summer 2009 ( recorded species percent cover and stem counts of mature L. dalmatica plants.) Caged plots to contain insects Applied 20 adult insects per plot in July; !doubling the existing population. Herbicide, sucrose, and native seeds added in same concentrations and at the same time as in experiment 1 ( not fully factorial) Treatment effects on stem count and percent cover of L. dalmatica were analyzed using ANOVA with Tukey pairwise comparisons and Kruskal –Wallis tests (Only significant results are shown.) Methods: Surveyed 14 1 m2 vegetation plots in the summer of 2009 ( recorded species percent cover and stem counts of invasive grasses.) Plots fenced 108 cells P.f. D7/ m2 (10 gal/ acre) in aqueous solution as per WSDA EUP(experimental use permit) 9025 applied in December. Treatment effects on stem count and percent cover of invasive grasses were analyzed using paired t-tests0 M. janthinus did not significantly decrease L. dalmatica P. fluorescens D7 did not decrease invasive annual grasses. Acknowledgements: We thank the U.S. Department of Fish and Wildlife and the EWU biology department mini grant for funding this project. We also thank Mike Rule, TNWR employees and all of the AmeriCorps volunteers who lent intellectual and manual support. Thanks to Dr. Anne Kennedy of WSU and Chris Wend of Northwest Agricultural Products for providing and applying the P.f.D7, Jessica Bryant for help with the design and execution of these experiments., and field assistants Trenton Reynecke, Cara Hulce, Jen Grimes, Brittany Davidson and Holly O’Conner for all of the hot sweaty hours spent out on the prairie.