Performance Contracting 2008 WASHTO – CMS Meeting April 8, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACT Canada TDM Summit Halifax| October, 2008 Telework Pilot : The City of Calgary.
Advertisements

F EDERAL H IGHWAY A DMINISTRATION Highways for Life Highways for LIFE: In Search of the Perfect Highway Perfect Highway.
CM/CG Contracting Tom Ravn, Mn/DOT Director, Office of Construction and Innovative Contracting.
ODOT-OES Environmental Update Meeting September 16, 2010.
Retroreflectivity: Raising the Nighttime Brightness of Traffic Signs and Markings Office of Technology Applications Peter Hatzi.
Innovative Contracting
Moving transportation into the future Strategic Highway Research Program.
ACCELERATED BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION (ABC): THE KEYS TO SUCCESS FROM AN OWNERS PERSPECTIVE Presented by James McMinimee, P.E., P.S.E. UDOT Chief Engineer, Director.
Overview What is the National ITS Architecture? User Services
Purpose of Instruction
Genesis: 2004 SCAN of Construction Management Practices in Canada and Europe Ongoing ETG Formed Became Transportation Construction Management (TCM) Steering.
Mobility and Safety Product Team (Work Zones). Integrated Product Teams “Integrated Product Teams (IPT’s) are chartered by agency leadership to address.
Technology Implementation Group (TIG) Overview AASHTO Subcommittee on Design Boston, Massachusetts June 13, 2003.
AASHTO SUBCOMMITTEE ON CONSTRUCTION AUGUST 2010 SHRP 2 Renewal Program Overview.
TURNER-FAIRBANK HIGHWAY RESEARCH CENTER FHWA Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Hamid Ghasemi, Ph.D. Program Manager Long-Term Bridge Performance Program.
System Office Performance Management
Welcome to the Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Pioneer Sites Webinar July Audio: , passcode
Construction Industry Efforts and Capabilities to Support PBES Deployment. William G. Duguay J.D. Abrams, L.P.
Presentation By: Chris Wade, P Eng. Finally … a best practice for selecting an engineering firm.
1 Purchasing and Procurement Processes Module Four Revision Date: 2/06/2015.
SHRP2 Implementation Update to the Standing Committee on Highways Pam Hutton, AASHTO May 29,
Crisis and Risk Communication Course Development Update Damon Coppola June 7, 2011.
Certification/Qualification Program. Certification Program What is it? Who is involved? What should be considered? Where can a Certification Program work.
Overview of UNDAF process and new guidance package March 2010 u nite and deliver effective support for countries.
Using Value for Money Analysis to Evaluate Highway Public-Private Partnership Projects ARTBA P3 Conference Washington, DC, July 15-17, 2015 Patrick DeCorla-Souza,
Moving Research into Practice.  Implementation is the routine use of a SHRP 2 product by users in their regular way of doing business.  Users can include.
AASHTO Subcommittee on Rail Transportation Sept. 18, 2012 Kevin Chesnik.
FHWA Update WASHTO Construction and Materials Conference Portland, Oregon April 8, 2008.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Perinatal and Infant Oral Health Quality Improvement National Learning Network Estimated Number Awards: One (1) Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement Estimated.
FHWA Reorganization Update Program Performance Management Standing Committee on Performance Management Meeting Detroit, MI October 14, 2011 Peter Stephanos.
TH 2 – Wilton Bridge Replacement Design-Build Project S.P March 5, 2009 Todd Vonasek, P.E. Mn/DOT Project Manager PROJECT INFORMATIONAL MEETING.
Concept to Implementation Leadership Team Prototype Implementation Plan First Call for Engagement, Formation of Communities of Practice Formation.
AASHTOWare Program Overview to the Safety Data Systems Task Group of the Safety Management Subcommittee Presented by Tony Bianchi, Project Manager AASHTO.
UNICEF’s work and planned activities for the production of data on children with disabilities Claudia Cappa, Data and Analytics Section, UNICEF, NY.
1 Context Sensitive Design CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Howard R. Green Company.
FHWA Update Butch Wlaschin, P.E. Director, Office of Asset Management AASHTO Highway Subcommittee on Construction 2010 Annual Meeting Burlington, Vermont.
The Global Road Safety Partnership is hosted by Work Related Road Safety Ken Shaw – Global Road Safety Partnership Department of Disaster Prevention and.
Implementation Overview SHRP 2 Oversight Committee June 18, 2012.
International Partnership Day.  An SPMT is used for transporting massive structures that are too large or heavy for normal trucks  The SPMT consists.
FHWA Update AASHTO Subcommittee on Design July 26, 2010 Columbia, South Carolina Jon Obenberger, Ph.D., P.E. Preconstruction Team Leader Infrastructure.
Best Practices in Addressing NPDES and Other Water Quality Issues in Highway System Management NCHRP 20-68A, Scan DOMESTIC SCAN PROGRAM Scan Overview.
Mr. Shawn R. Hawkins O DUSD - Acquisition Reform 27 April 99 Government/Industry Partnership Packaging Example CIVIL MILITARY INTEGRATION.
Materials, Pavements & Transportation Operations CONCEPTS FOR ENHANCING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS Stuart Anderson Gerald Ullman Making.
Working Smart for the Customer’s Benefit Pam Hutton AASHTO SHRP2 Implementation Manager June 11, 2013.
2 Breakout Session # 506 Daryl Berg, DOE Contacting Officer Julia Trautman, DOE Contract Specialist Date April 15, 2008 Time3:20 – 4:20 p.m. Energy Savings.
1 FOCUS STATE INITIATIVE Work Zone Communications and Outreach Workshop April 19-20, 2005 Regina McElroy and Roemer Alfelor Office of Transportation Operations.
GOOD PRACTICES IN TECHNICAL COOPERATION FOR STATISTICS Paris 21 Meeting Paris, France, June 2000.
1 Federal Highway Administration, USDOT The Final Rule on Work Zone Safety and Mobility Updates to 23 CFR Section 630, Subpart J Presented by Tracy Scriba,
© 2013 IBM Corporation IBM Enterprise Content Management Solutions Services and Support.
Re-Do It -- Faster, Cheaper, Greener Pavement Renewal Solutions.
Web Conference: Highways for LIFE September 27, 2005 Speaking: Byron Lord.
Highways for LIFE J. Richard Capka Deputy Administrator Federal Highway Administration.
SHRP2 Reliability Implementation | February 2013 When Research Meets the Road Reliability Focus Area February 7, 2013.
The U.S. Department of Transportation and the Next Generation Jenny Hansen – Contractor – NG9-1-1 Project Coordinator USDOT – NHTSA.
AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan Development & Implementation Status 2004 Traffic Records Forum David M. Smith Senior Transportation Specialist, Office.
SHRP2 Capacity Implementation | February 2013 When Research Meets the Road Capacity Focus Area February 4, 2013.
Chapter 10 Learning and Development in a Knowledge Setting
Office of Major Project Development (OMPD) Overview November 2015.
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
SUPPORTING PEOPLE PROVIDER FORUMS An overview of Supporting People’s new approach to Performance Monitoring and Quality Assurance.
Green Focused Programs of Study Technical Assistance Academy Academy for Educational Development MPR Associates, Inc. National Association of State Directors.
Overview of SCOH Strategic Plan AASHTO Subcommittee on Design 2010 Annual Meeting Rick Land, Vice Chair AASHTO Highway Subcommittee on Design and Chief.
2013 Nevada Transportation Conference
Accelerating the Adoption of Innovation
TSMO Program Plan Development
DITAP: Digital IT Acquisition Professionals Program
John Williams | Senior Procurement Specialist
Industry Engagement Program Medical Diagnostic Imaging (MDI) Equipment
Presentation transcript:

Performance Contracting 2008 WASHTO – CMS Meeting April 8, 2008

Overview What is Highways for LIFE? What is Performance Contracting? Why Performance Contracting for Construction? Why Performance Contracting for a Highways for LIFE Project Framework Purpose Stakeholder Involvement Framework Contents Lessons Learned Pilot Program Seeking the Best Solutions Workshops

What is Highways for LIFE (HfL)? HfL is a Federal Program driving the concept that we can build highways: Faster With less congestion With better safety and quality At lower cost, and With better user satisfaction

The Highways for LIFE Philosophy Set motorist-focused stretch goals Identify and use innovative practices and technologies to meet or exceed those goals Interact/communicate with customers

The Highways for LIFE Program Projects Technology Partnerships Technology Transfer Workshops Information Dissemination Monitoring and Evaluation Stakeholder Involvement

Oregons Highways for LIFE Project Replacing five bridges on Oregon 38 Goal is to minimize disruption to the traveling public Will use prefabricated bridge elements made with high-performance concrete Will move the prefabricated structures into place overnight with self-propelled modular transporters Anticipated total project cost is $47,554,000

What is Performance Contracting? Innovative contracting technique Contractor is responsible for achieving a defined set of goals Performance goals are specified instead of prescriptive methods

Why Performance Contracting for Construction? Allows State and local agencies to define and communicate to contractors specifically what they want to achieve Contractors will have the flexibility to determine how they do the work

Why Performance Contracting for a Highways for LIFE Project? Someone needs to be responsible for meeting the goals that are set for the project If the goals are under the influence of the contractor, why not make the contractor responsible for meeting them? Performance contracting provides a mechanism for assigning that responsibility to the contractor

Relation to the Highways for LIFE Program Performance contracting is a tool in the HfL toolbox HfL projects are not required to use performance contracting

Some Pros and Cons of Performance Contracting Pros Contractor is responsible for meeting the goals that they can influence Introduction of Innovation Defined Outcomes Contractor Flexibility Share of risk and rewards Cons New approach that requires a culture shift May not be applicable to all projects

Performance Contracting Framework - Purpose To provide State and local agencies with processes and materials that they can use to accelerate the development of a performance contract solicitation package for construction contracts Meant to be used as a reference guide Should help agencies to avoid common obstacles and pitfalls

Performance Stakeholder Involvement The project team developed the materials working with: A select group of stakeholders from State DOTs and Industry Provided guidance and review at the 30%, 60%, and 90% stages Subject matter experts from FHWA

State DOT and Industry Stakeholder Group Scott Jarvis - Caltrans Chuck Suszko - Caltrans Gene Mallette - Caltrans Peggy Chandler - Texas DOT Steve DeWitt - North Carolina DOT Kevin Dayton - Washington State DOT Dexter Newman - the Kentucky Cabinet Sid Scott - Trauner Consulting Brian Deery - AGC Bob Lanham - Williams Brothers Construction- Brian Burgett - Kokosing Construction Rich Juliano - ARTBA Note: Participation did not involve formal endorsement of the final product

Framework Contents Overall process for performance contract development Guidance on selecting appropriate projects Processes, lessons learned, and sample solicitation package materials for: Performance Goals Measurement Methodology Enhanced Low Bid Award Process Best Value Award Process SEP-14 Process

Pilot Program FHWA is currently seeking 4 to 8 agencies that are interested in piloting the Performance Contracting Framework. Pilot states will receive tailored technical assistance to help them implement this approach Pilot states can propose the use of the framework as an innovative approach when applying under the Highways for LIFE Program For more information on how an agency can become a pilot agency, talk to Mary Huie at or

Seeking the Best Solutions Workshops A one-day workshop for State DOTs Instructs participants how to use the HfL, ACTT workshop and performance contracting concepts to deliver a project better, faster and cheaper. Leads participants through the process of: identifying goals that respond to motorists, highway users and the agencys highest priorities and seeking the best ways to achieve those goals. For more information on hosting a workshop, contact Mary Huie at or

For More Information Mary Huie, FHWA Chris Schneider, FHWA Jim Sorenson, FHWA Mark Robinson, SAIC

Questions