European Network on teacher Education Policies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning for Learning and Teaching, Assessment and Moderation
Advertisements

Rapporteur’s Report Professor John Coolahan Conference Theme “Better Assessment and Evaluation to Improve Teaching and Learning” How use assessment most.
Head of Learning: Job description
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Learning and Teaching Using ICT Conferences Summer 2004.
Renewed Outcomes-based Curriculum 6-9. Purpose for Renewal Teacher feedback –Provide concise & coherent curriculum –Time allocations have not changed.
Moving forward with Curriculum for Excellence Phil Denning HMI.
AITSL’s mission is to promote excellence in teacher and school leader practice for the benefit of all young Australians.
SMSC and Inspection Spiritual Moral Social & Cultural.
DOES LEADERSHIP MAKE A DIFFERENCE? 1 The importance of school leadership on the quality of schools and the achievements of pupils:
Quality assurance in IVET in Romania Lucian Voinea Mihai Iacob Otilia Apostu 4 th Project Meeting Prague, 21 st -22 nd October 2010.
© Myra Young Assessment All rights reserved. Provided for the use of participants in AM circles in North Lanarkshire Council.
October ISIS – Cluster Moderation Assessment and moderation in CfE is a process, not an event! Aims of the morning: To further inform participants in the.
Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.
Important Information Have you got a username and password for the school SRF account? If your school has not registered before then you can do this if.
OECD Review on Evaluation and Assessment Frameworks for Improving School Outcomes Conference of Education International.
CERI/OECD “Improving Learning through Formative Assessment” 3 February, 2005.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
School Improvement Partnership Programme: Summary of interim findings March 2014.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments OECD Teaching and Learning International Study (TALIS) Teacher evaluation Evidence from TALIS OECD.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Education and Training Assuring quality in education 18 November 2015 – National conference on Quality Assurance ssurance-Slovenia Isabelle De Coster Policies.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
© Crown copyright 2008 Subject Leaders’ Development Meeting Spring 2009.
Intervention and Support Inclusion Questions. Early and Strategic  How does the school provide purposeful early intervention and support to lift the.
Image: dan / FreeDigitalPhotos.net Deborah Nusche Early Childhood and Schools Division Directorate for Education, OECD Education for Innovative Societies,
Review of National Policies for Education Foundations for the Future, Netherlands 2016 May 25, 2016.
Building Our Curriculum Louise Turnbull Head Teacher Livingston Village Primary School All for the children, for all of the children!
SACE Leadership and Quality Learning Forums Australian Professional Standards for Teachers: building professional capacities in educational assessment.
Looking at Our School 2016 A Quality Framework for Post-Primary Schools A tool to support reflection, self-review and evaluation ETBI PRINCIPALS AND DEPUTY.
OUR PATH TO THE FUTURE STRATEGIC PLAN 2016 TO 2021.
Raising standards, improving lives
JMFIP Financial Management Conference
School – Based Assessment – Framework
Board on science education
Approaches to Partnership
The International Classroom; safe and open?
Country Director, Czechia
Team Teaching Action Research
Alexander Graham Bell Elementary School
Partnership for Practice
Self-Evaluation Cycle for Governing Bodies
WORK PROGRAMME to support the implementation of the Recommendation
Arancha Oviedo EQAVET Secretariat
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Education Council Work Programme
School Improvement School to Circuit to District.
ICT PSP 2011, 5th call, Pilot Type B, Objective: 2.4 eLearning
Ivor Beazley, World Bank
SICI working group SICI-SOE SOCIAL OUTCOMES in EDUCATION
Inspection and self-evaluation
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
ww.oecd.org/edu/evaluationpolicy
“CareerGuide for Schools”
TEACHING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FRAMEWORK
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
European TRAINING FOUNDATION
Building the future Workshop 3 24 November 2017
Training and Development Agency for Schools (TDA)
EDU827 : EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Professional development
Implementing Race to the Top
Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development July 2016
PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE RENEWAL PROCESS
February 21-22, 2018.
THE INSPECTION SYSTEM AND THE SCHOOL EXTERNAL EVALUATION
School Development Planning
The MODERATION cycle.
Reading Paper discussion – Week 4
Presentation transcript:

European Network on teacher Education Policies entep INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Lisboa, 20 de outubro de 2017 Challenges of a coherent and integrated evaluation approach for improving schools and teaching How the Trilogy School External Evaluation / School Self-Evaluation / Teacher development is reflected in the school organization Carlos Barreira FPCEUC

Policy options grounded OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Synergies for Better Learning (2013) Read the book online for free: oe.cd/betterlearning Analytical phase 11 literature reviews 26 country background reports 29 Country questionnaire responses Country review phase 14 country review reports based on country visits 28 external experts 2800 interview partners Synthesis phase Final report blends analytical and review evidence Policy options grounded in analysis

Topics for communication Three related aspects: General trends in evaluation and main features of the Evaluation and Assessment (E&A) framework Key components of E&A framework: trends and challenges key questions for a coherent E&A framework

General trends in evaluation and main features of the Assessment and Evaluation (E&A) framework

GENERAL TRENDS IN EVALUATION Expansion of the evaluation culture in education systems Greater variety of evaluation and assessment activities Greater reliance on educational standards and technological sophistication Larger and more varied uses of evaluation and assessment results The growing prominence of accountability as a purpose of evaluation Internationalisation of assessment

2. Key components of the E&A framework   Trends and Challenges

Key components of E&A framework Student assessment Summative / Formative (Diagnostic) Internal / External / Mixed Teacher / School principal appraisal Completion of probation / Performance management (Registration, regular appraisal, promotion) / Reward schemes School evaluation Internal / External / School performance measures System evaluation Information for the public and to inform policy / Indicators / Tools to monitor pupil outcomes / qualitative reviews & research

Student Assessment: Trends Research evidence on the benefits of using assessment results to inform teaching and learning has increased policy attention to formative assessment. Summative assessment and reporting remain important at key stages of schooling in all countries. Concerns about variations in the quality of learning across schools have led to a renewed focus on central standards and large-scale assessments.   Standardised central assessments with no stakes for students are becoming increasingly common to provide formative feedback to schools.

Student Assessment: challenges Assessment tend to remain more traditional than curriculum goals   Resolving tensions between summative and formative assessments Limited focus on students self assessment competencies Teacher and school leaders education Using results to give feedback and engage parents

Teacher Appraisal: Trends   Practices range from highly prescriptive national systems to informal approaches left to the school level In many countries, there has been renewed focus on teacher appraisal in recent years, thus can contribute to improved teaching quality Many systems have developed central standards for the teaching profession that can guide teacher appraisal processes Most systems have policy frameworks for teacher appraisal in place.

Teacher Appraisal: Challenges TA with high stakes may lead to a climate of stress and anxiety   Lack of a professional profile to guide appraisal in some countries Overreliance on some sources of information; simplistic use of student assessment results Insufficient guidance for classroom observation Absence of career opportunities for teachers

School Evaluation: Trends Focus in national policy to stimulate school self-evaluation for improvement purposes   – Requirements vary greatly in nature, e.g. conduct self evaluation; produce specific report on school development. External school evaluation is established in the vast majority of OECD countries – Mainly conceived by central or state authorities and conducted by education authorities or specific bodies (e.g. School Inspectorate)

School Evaluation: Challenges Lack of nationally agreed criteria for school quality to guide evaluation in some countries Building capacity and promoting the engagement of staff and students in school self-evaluation Adapting external evaluation to reflect the maturity of the school evaluation culture Ensuring systematic follow up

Challenges Evaluation and Assessment Framework Needs to be more integrated and coherent Use of information from different components to guide policy decisions Some articulations in the E&A are not sufficiently developed: In each specific component (Ex; teacher appraisal and teacher professional development) Between components (Ex; Articulation between teacher appraisal, school evaluation and school development)

3. Key questions in designing a coherent E&A framework

E&A Framework: Key questions Scope and Instruments What and how do we evaluate? Purpose and use of results What do we want to achieve? Governance and capacity Who is involved?

Purpose and use of results What do we want to achieve? Accountability, public reporting, certification, promotion Development, professional learning, school development, policy improvement

Scope and instruments what and how do we evaluate? Ensure that every important aspects of teaching and learning are given some attention. Use multiple instruments and evaluators, both internal and external to the school.   Explore the potential of innovative evaluation and assessment methods Learn from practice-based expertise

Governance and capacity who is involved? Develop a shared vision for evaluation and assessment   Involve professional organizations and build consensus; Strengthen teacher professionalism; Focus on role of the learner and ensure students participate entirely. Building capacity through of a strategic approach to professional learning

Articulation between school evaluation, teacher development and school effectiveness

Articulation between school evaluation, teacher development and school effectiveness It’s possible, in this figure, to report some important aspects such as:   making the focus of school evaluation on systematic school effectiveness validating school-based teacher development through school evaluation processes; exploring links between school effectiveness processes and capacity for improvement teaching practices.

Thank you for your attention