Recommended Guide for Next Generation of Transportation Design-Build Procurement and Contracting in the State of Georgia Russell McMurry, P.E. Chief Engineer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation at NRCan: Information for Program Managers Strategic Evaluation Division Science & Policy Integration July 2012.
Advertisements

Successful strategies for improving outcomes through quality assessment and evaluation of programs Leadership Conference Winston Salem, NC June
ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Pat Picariello, Director, Developmental Operations 1 Strategic Planning & New Activity Development.
September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop Strategic Planning & New Activity Development September 2013.
TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 EVALUATION PROCESS AND AWARD CRITERIA Anna Livieratou-Toll TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Policy & Programme Coordinator.
Procurement Update Webinar January 6, TopicTime Introductions and Review Agenda1:00–1:10 Overview of SBACs Procurement Process1:10–1:30 Advice.
Session Objectives Begin to understand the goals, purpose and rationale for Program Reviews Learn about the components of implementing Program Reviews.
CM/CG Contracting Tom Ravn, Mn/DOT Director, Office of Construction and Innovative Contracting.
1 Income Eligible Re-Procurement Board of Early Education and Care January 14, 2009.
2007 – 2008 Academic/Business Plan …a strategic initiative School District of Palm Beach County New Horizons for Student Success.
Infrastructure Study and Assessment (INSA) and State Portal Upgrade N.C. Office of Information Technology Services Infrastructure Study and Assessment.
Civil Service Reform in Georgia CONFERENCE ON CIVIL SERVICE REFORM Tbilisi, Georgia 13 June, 2012.
WORLD BANK Overview of Procurement Opportunities Peter R. Easley, Esq.
1 Department of State Program Evaluation Policy Overview Spring 2013.
The HR Paradigm Shift Discover Stakeholder Value for the Human Resources Function.
SHELLY POTTS, PH.D. UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF EVALUATION AND EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY Quality Assurance Mechanisms.
1 A risk-based approach to auditing procurement in English councils Mark Wardman Senior Manager Audit Commission 19 May 2014.
Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
Charting a Sustainable Future: Marshall University Vision 20/20 Campus Conversation October 6, 2014 Service Portfolio Review.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Program Improvement Year 3 Corrective Action.
Guidebook for Risk Analysis Tools and Management Practices to Control Transportation Project Costs Keith R. Molenaar, PhD Stuart D. Anderson, PhD, PE Transportation.
Professional Certificate in Leadership and Management - Certificate in Electoral Processes 9 th – 13 th July 2012 Guide to Planning for Electoral Management.
Broader Needs Assessment (BNA) Tool Project Phase 2 Broader Rollout Local Government Gretchen Strauss & Peter Cracknell.
Procurement and Tendering Presentation to [NAME OF CLIENT] [YOUR NAME] [DATE]
HTA from an Industry Perspective Janey Shin, Director of Medical Affairs Johnson & Johnson Medical Companies CADTH, 2015.
Capital Planning Update 1 Senate Fiscal Committee/COPE Presentation January 3, 2012.
OAG Office of the Auditor-General Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector Using Audit to Oversee Public Procurement Edward Ouko Auditor-General Kenya.
KFUPM, Department of Construction Engineering and Management Summary of AN IMPLEMENTATION MODEL FOR DESIGN-BUILD (D-B) PROJECT DELIVERY SYSTEM BY : MOHAMMAD.
Financial and Programmatic Monitoring ESEA/Act 807 ACSIP Arkansas Department of Education Division of Academic Accountability.
Measuring the effectiveness of government IT systems Current ANAO initiatives to enhance IT Audit integration and support in delivering Audit outcomes.
Sultanate of Oman Oman Drinking Water Safety Plan.
Pre-Project Planning Lessons from the Construction Industry Institute Construction Industry Institute Michael Davis, P. Eng, PMP Ontario Power Generation.
Diploma of Project Management Course Outline NSW Course Number Qualification Code BSB51407.
Minia Univresity Council for Education Affairs Meeting - July Higher Education Enhancement Project Fund (HEEPF) Improving Transportation Engineering.
EDUCATIONAL COUNSULTANCY SERVICES
Teri Barker-Morgan Program Manager Blue Print for Livable Communities The Transportation & Housing Alliance Toolkit May 9, 2014.
Audit of Public Procurement
Diploma of Project Management Course Outline NSW Course Number Qualification Code BSB51407.
November, 2000 Slide 1 Project Services Division RISK MANAGEMENT Project Services Division Presentation By: Adam Malkhassian November, 2000.
Clockwork Operations: Student Achievement Within A Collaborative Environment Charles A. Burbridge, Chief Financial Officer and Nader Sohrab, Comptroller.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
State of Maine NASACT Presentation “Using the Business Case to Guide a Transformation Procurement” 1 Using the Business Case to Guide a Transformation.
ON TRACK WITH STRATEGIC PROCUREMENT PRESENTED BY Joan Graham, CPPO, CPPB.
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Regulation and Sustainability A set of tasks and responses – varying by structure and stage Dennis Volk Programme Officer.
Subcommittee on Design New Strategies for Cost Estimating Research on Cost Estimating and Management NCHRP Project 8-49 Annual Meeting Orlando, Florida.
2010 AHCA/NCAL National Quality Award Program - Silver Overview - Session One Lance Reynolds Kevin Warren Tim Case.
Fermilab Presentation Greg Bock, Pepin Carolan, Mike Lindgren, Elaine McCluskey 2014 SC PM Workshop July 2014.
County Office of Education LCAP Update Peter Birdsall – CISI W ORKSHOP S ACRAMENTO C OUNTY O FFICE OF E DUCATION.
SHRP2 Reliability Implementation | February 2013 When Research Meets the Road Reliability Focus Area February 7, 2013.
Inputs Processes Outputs Information Systems Planning Process
12-CRS-0106 REVISED 8 FEB 2013 APO (Align, Plan and Organise)
Virginia Office of Public-Private Partnerships (VAP3) Adopted Public-Private Transportation Act (PPTA) enabling legislation in 1995 Public-Private Education.
National ITS Architecture Deployment Support October 27, 2009 T3 Webinars are brought to you by the ITS Professional Capacity Building Program (ITS PCB)
Presentation of the KZN Provincial eProcurement System Presented by KZN Provincial Treasury 09 February 2016.
Large Facilities Manual New Guidance on Cost Estimating and Analysis 2016 NSF Large Facilities Workshop Kevin Porter Large Facilities Advisor, LFO, NSF.
E-Procurement : Towards Transparency and Efficiency in Public Service Delivery.
NIGP: The Institute for Public Procurement Public Procurement’s Go-To Resource.
Work shop on Procurement Key-performance indicators with selected implementing entities Public procurement and property administration agency August 2016.
Sourcing Evaluation Life Cycle Go/No Go decision points Competition Alignment Discovery Con tract Modification Project Initiation Vendor Capabilities Contract.
CONTRACT AWARD TO ALTA PLANNING AND DESIGN FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES TO CONDUCT SAFETY OUTREACH AND UPDATE THE SUGGESTED ROUTES TO SCHOOL MAPS FOR THE SAFER.
Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator
Project No EPP EL-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP ( ) UES TEAM
N.J.A.C. 6A:30, Evaluation of the Performance of School Districts: New Jersey Quality Single Accountability Continuum (NJQSAC) Adoption Level Robert.
IT Governance Planning Overview
Virginia’s P3 Program Morteza Farajian, PhD.
Enablers and Blockers: Public Procurement
Georgia Department of Transportation
Evaluation by Best Value for Money Methodology
Role of State Audit Bureau of Kuwait in promoting and audit of IT Security  
Presentation transcript:

Recommended Guide for Next Generation of Transportation Design-Build Procurement and Contracting in the State of Georgia Russell McMurry, P.E. Chief Engineer Georgia Department of Transportation

Research Objective Research objective: develop a systematic approach to help evaluate appropriateness of DB for a project

Research Performed Comprehensive review of academic and professional literature Scanning process on state DOT websites re: DB state of practice Structured interviews with state DOT representatives

Main Factors that Motivate State DOT’s to Select DB (Source: 29 State DOT’s DB Guidelines and Manuals) Key Finding of State DOT Scanning Process

Major Deliverables of Research Project DB guidebook to improve efficiency of DB selection and implementation A DB selection tool was developed that helps GDOT to: 1.Determine suitability of DB for projects 2.Assess whether project risks can be managed if DB selected 3.Evaluate procurement methods and select most appropriate 4.Implement DB transparently and consistently

Implementation  Post-research workshop held to share and facilitate adoption of DB tool  GDOT Office of Innovative Program Delivery is currently using DB selection tool

Value of Research Information provided from research made possible the following Georgia legislative changes: – July 1, 2012: DB cap raised by 50% ($), based on total awards in previous fiscal year – July 1, 2013: DB code revised to allow for Best Value DB contracting

8 Systematic Approach Conduct SWOT Analysis Project Delivery Schedule Project Delivery Schedule Innovation Level of Design Project Delivery Cost Staff Experience Marketplace Competition &DB Team Experience SWOT Score over 60? SWOT Score over 60? Design Build is not a proper Project Delivery System NO YES Set Project Goals Set Project Goals Assess Deal- Breaker Issues Assess Deal- Breaker Issues Are there deal breakers? Are there deal breakers? Define Project Characteristics Define Project Characteristics YES NO Identify the Department’s Strategic Goals and Assess the Institutional Alignment of Design Build Project Delivery System with these Strategic Goals Identify the Department’s Strategic Goals and Assess the Institutional Alignment of Design Build Project Delivery System with these Strategic Goals Project Quality

9 Systematic Approach Perform initial risk identification and allocation Perform initial risk identification and allocation High DB Risk? High DB Risk? Design Build is a proper Project Delivery System Design Build is not a proper Project Delivery System Yes YES NO Analyze Benefits and Challenges Analyze Benefits and Challenges Assess Benefits and Challenges of Selection Based on Price Consideration Only Vs. Selection Based on Price and Technical Considerations Assess Benefits and Challenges of Selection Based on Price Consideration Only Vs. Selection Based on Price and Technical Considerations Assess Benefits and Challenges of Single- Phase Selection Process Vs. Two- Phase Selection Process Assess Benefits and Challenges of Single- Phase Selection Process Vs. Two- Phase Selection Process Select the appropriate Selection Method Select the appropriate Selection Method

10 Selection Tool

11 Risk Allocation

Thank You