Performance of the postwash total motile sperm count as a predictor of pregnancy at the time of intrauterine insemination: A meta-analysis  Janne-Meije van Weert, M.D., Sjoerd Repping, M.Sc., Ph.D., Bradley J. Van Voorhis, M.D., Fulco van der Veen, M.D., Ph.D., Patrick M.M. Bossuyt, M.Sc., Ph.D., Ben W.J. Mol, M.D., Ph.D.  Fertility and Sterility  Volume 82, Issue 3, Pages 612-620 (September 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.01.042 Copyright © 2004 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

FIGURE 1 Funnel plot: estimated effect in relation to sample size. Fertility and Sterility 2004 82, 612-620DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.01.042) Copyright © 2004 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

FIGURE 2 Summary ROC curve. 0.3–20.0: numbers attached to the abbreviations are the cut-off values of the particular study × 106. Be = Berg et al. (14), Br = Branigan et al. (5), Ca = Campana et al. (1), Co = Cohlen et al. (38), De = Delepine et al. (44), Ho = Horvath et al. (16), Hu = Huang et al. (17), Kh = Khalil et al. (17), Le = Lee et al. (39), Mi = Miller et al. (40), Om = Ombelet et al. (19), Pa = Pasqualotto et al. (18), Pau = Paulmyer-Lacroix et al. (20), St = Stone et al. (41), To = Tomlinson et al. (42), We = van der Westerlaken et al. (43). Fertility and Sterility 2004 82, 612-620DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.01.042) Copyright © 2004 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions