Missouri Tax Policy Options

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Types of Taxes.
Advertisements

FAIR REVENUES FOR VIRGINIA’S FUTURE MEG WIEHE STATE TAX POLICY DIRECTOR INSTITUTE ON TAXATION AND ECONOMIC POLICY (ITEP) Inform + Engage Policy Summit.
PRINCIPLES OF SOUND TAX POLICY Economic efficiency Equal treatment of equals Simplicity.
Taxes. The Average Tax Rate and the Marginal Tax Rate Income Marginal Total Average Level Tax Rate Tax Taxes Tax Rate 7-12 This is a hypothetical illustration.
Module 10 The Role of Government The Canadian Welfare Society and Taxation.
GOVERNMENT IN THIS SECTION, LOOK AT HOW GOVERNMENT GETS ITS MONEY (TAXES), AND WHAT GOVERNMENT DOES WITH THE MONEY (GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS)
Types of Taxes personal income tax (all types of income) payroll tax (15.3 % of wage and salary income) corporate income tax (corporate profits) excise.
Chapter 16 Public Finance: Expenditures and Taxes 1 Graphs and Tables Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 18: Introduction to Taxation This lecture discusses a few institutional and theoretical issues for understanding tax policy. Overview of the types.
Who Pays Understanding the impact of taxes on the poor in Pennsylvania Sharon Ward Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center July 28, 2006.
Chapter Twelve: Taxes and Tax Policy. Economic Theory and Taxes.
KFTC’s Tax Justice Campaign KFTC’s Principles of Tax Reform KFTC leaders developed these principles to create and evaluate tax policy: Fair Adequate.
Types of Taxes Chapter 11.
U.S. Tax System Effects of tax depend upon how it interacts with other taxes U.S. has federal tax system 3 major categories of U.S. tax system: Federal.
Public Finance (2)1 2 Economic effects of direct taxes The net income of workers will ________. Some workers will prefer _______ to work. Labour supply.
Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved. Contemporary Economics: An Applications Approach By Robert J. Carbaugh.
Y = C + I + G The Government levies taxes on many goods & services to raise revenue to pay for national defense, public schools, etc. The Government.
1 Tax Restructuring Proposal FY 2008 Budget Robert J. Kleine State Treasurer February 8, 2007.
A Fair and Simple Tax System for Our Future: A Progressive Approach to Tax Reform January 2005.
Tax Options for Alaska: Distributional Implications of Major Alternatives October 5, 2002 Matt Gardner Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy 1311 L.
Who Pays Taxes in Wisconsin? A Study of Tax Burden, Tax Year 2001 Wisconsin Department of Revenue January 19, 2005.
Government Revenue Economics 120. There is a saying that only two things in life are certain: death and taxes.
THINKING ABOUT THE “MARRIAGE PENALTY” President’s Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform March 23, 2005 James Alm Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Georgia.
Chapter 6 Understanding Taxes Philosophies of Taxation –Benefits received Citizens who receive benefits of expenditure should help pay the cost Example:
Fiscal Policy How the government collects and spends money to meet broad economic goals.
Location Matters and Federal Tax Developments Keynote presentation for The 94 th Annual Meeting of the Montana Taxpayers Association December 2 nd, 2015.
Chapter 14SectionMain Menu Taxes. Chapter 14SectionMain Menu Clear Target I will be able to describe progressive, proportional, and regressive taxation.
© Thomson/South-Western ECONOMIC EDUCATION FOR CONSUMERS Slide 1 Chapter 5 LESSON 5.3 Taxes and Government Objective: By the end of class, students will.
Texas Revenues IV April 26, The term tax incidence focuses our attention on the individuals and groups that actually bear the burden of a tax. Tax.
Taxing and Spending Chapter 14. So what are the major taxes and what do they pay for? Personal Income Tax Corporate Income Tax Social Security Sales.
“The Big Tax Swap, 2008 to 2016” Who has benefited? Who has paid? And what we can do about it. Statewide Assembly May 2 nd, 2016.
Taxes. What are Taxes? Taxes are payments that people are required to pay to a local, state, or national government.
Unit 6 - Fiscal Policy Fiscal Policy
WV Senate Select Committee on Tax Reform, 17 February 2017
4th Annual Budget Breakfast, 23 February 2017 presented by
The Design of the Tax System
Lunch & Learn, 15 February 2017 presented by
2b – Functions of Government and Government Finance
LECTURE IX: Stylized Facts of Taxation
Economics Unit Taxes.
Other Federal Taxes GOVT Module 16.
Ch. 14 Know the criteria for effective taxes
Fiscal and Monetary Policy
Criteria for Effective Taxes
$100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $300 $300 $300 $300 $300 $400 $400 $400 $400 $400 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500.
Government Expenses -Government Services -Government Employees
4th Annual Budget Breakfast, 23 February 2017 presented by
Lesson 4B: Understanding Taxes
Market Failures.
TAXES, taxes, taxes Understanding taxes.
How Taxes Work Unit 14.1.
Chapter 24 Taxes and Spending Chapter 24 Norton Media Library
Taxes.
Ap u.s. government & politics
Taxes and Fiscal Policy
2b – Functions of Government and Government Finance
Where does this money come from?
How Taxes Work Economics.
2018 Utah Tax Reform Working Proposal
US Tax Policy Proposal: A Faith Perspective
GOVERNMENTAL REVENUES Ch.9
The Economics of Taxation
Unit 6 – Fiscal Policy and Monetary Policy
Taxation in the USA.
Taxes and Fiscal Policy
GOVERNMENTAL REVENUES Ch.9
Taxes.
Taxes!!!!.
Ch 2.1 Vocab.
Unequals should be taxed unequally
Presentation transcript:

Missouri Tax Policy Options Dylan Grundman Institute on Taxation & Economic Policy February 15, 2018

Background: State/Local Tax Codes are Regressive Taxes as share of income by income group As this graph shows, that is the case in Missouri. The lowest-income 20 percent of the population pays an overall state and local tax rate of about 9.5 percent of their income, while the highest-income 1 percent pay much less, only 5.5 percent. This is called “regressive,” and Missouri’s overall state and local tax structure is a little better than middle-of-the-pack as far as regressivity. Our tax inequality index ranks Missouri 30th most unfair. Tax changes enacted in 2014 will eventually worsen this if allowed to take effect. 2

This regressive pattern results from the interaction between personal income taxes, sales and excise taxes, property taxes, and other taxes. A more detailed look at the major Missouri taxes shows a pattern that is similar to what we see in most states. The personal income tax is the one “progressive” tax in the mix, meaning the effective rate increases as incomes increase. The sales tax and other consumption taxes are sharply regressive in all states, and that drives a lot of the overall regressivity shown in the prior slide. The property tax is fairly proportional across most of the income spectrum, but is slightly regressive overall, largely due to taxes paid by businesses and landlords that are passed on to customers and renters.

Background: Federal Tax Cuts This graph shows the effects of the most extreme version of an income-to-sales-tax shift: completely eliminating the personal income tax and replacing the revenue with a sales tax rate increase. On average, the lower 80 percent of Missourians would see tax increases while the top 20 percent would receive tax cuts. And in order to do so, the state sales tax rate would have to more than double, increasing by more than 7 cents to about 11.35 percent.

Background: State-Level Effects of Federal Tax Cuts This graph shows the effects of the most extreme version of an income-to-sales-tax shift: completely eliminating the personal income tax and replacing the revenue with a sales tax rate increase. On average, the lower 80 percent of Missourians would see tax increases while the top 20 percent would receive tax cuts. And in order to do so, the state sales tax rate would have to more than double, increasing by more than 7 cents to about 11.35 percent.

Current Options Eliminates top PIT rate (5.9%) Cuts remaining PIT rates Limits Fed Income Tax Deduction 20% non-refundable EITC This graph shows the effects of the most extreme version of an income-to-sales-tax shift: completely eliminating the personal income tax and replacing the revenue with a sales tax rate increase. On average, the lower 80 percent of Missourians would see tax increases while the top 20 percent would receive tax cuts. And in order to do so, the state sales tax rate would have to more than double, increasing by more than 7 cents to about 11.35 percent.

Current Options Cuts top PIT rate to 5.3% Limits Fed Income Tax Deduction 20% non-refundable EITC This graph shows the effects of the most extreme version of an income-to-sales-tax shift: completely eliminating the personal income tax and replacing the revenue with a sales tax rate increase. On average, the lower 80 percent of Missourians would see tax increases while the top 20 percent would receive tax cuts. And in order to do so, the state sales tax rate would have to more than double, increasing by more than 7 cents to about 11.35 percent.

Current Options New Rate structure with top rate of 7.75% at $1m Eliminates Fed Tax Deduction $20k cap on other deductions $150 per-person credit This graph shows the effects of the most extreme version of an income-to-sales-tax shift: completely eliminating the personal income tax and replacing the revenue with a sales tax rate increase. On average, the lower 80 percent of Missourians would see tax increases while the top 20 percent would receive tax cuts. And in order to do so, the state sales tax rate would have to more than double, increasing by more than 7 cents to about 11.35 percent.