Session 1.02: Understanding your System: Using Program and System-Level Performance Measures Selina Toy Lee Director of Collaborative Community Outcomes,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Retooling Transitional Housing
Advertisements

SSVF Program Launch: Establishing Services in Compliance with Goals and Regulations Practice Area 1: Outreach, Engagement and Admission.
HEARTH Act: Planning for Impact Julie Dixon The Planning Council.
A SYSTEM IN TRANSITION: Shifting our priorities and programs to end homelessness Denise Neunaber North Carolina Coalition to End Homelessness securing.
Effectively Allocating Homeless Assistance Resources to End Homelessness NAEH Conference, Washington DC July 17, 2012 Katharine Gale Consulting Berkeley,
HOMELESSNESS TASK FORCE PRESENTATION August 15, 2013.
VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WORKGROUP Reallocate $ for more community based housing Need rapid rehousing dollars Adjust current grant to allow for more.
Shelters in the HEARTH era The Lyceum, Hartford, CT April 7, 2014 Katharine Gale
Countywide Homeless System Performance Winston-Salem/Forsyth County CoC prepared for North Carolina Coalition to End Homelessness Megan Kurteff Schatz.
Chicago’s Plan to End Homelessness A Briefing for the Harris School of Public Policy Presented by: John W. Pfeiffer, MPA First Deputy Commissioner Chicago.
Strategic Action Plan to End Homelessness Presentation to Interagency Council on Homelessness March 2010.
Strategic Plan DRAFT January Homelessness is: A crisis in King County. Cost-effective to solve Transforming lives 10,000 households per year  50%
Orientation to the Continuum of Care (CoC) July 29, 2014.
REGIONAL CONFERENCE NORFOLK, VA MARCH 16, 2009 CONDUCTED BY THE CENTER FOR URBAN COMMUNITY SERVICES 1 South Hampton Roads Regional Housing Needs Assessment.
System Performance Measures WIBOSCOC Data Committee: CoC Workgroup August 2015.
The National Alliance to End Homelessness presents The HEARTH Academy Training and tools to help your community achieve the goals of the HEARTH Act.
FY 2015 Continuum of Care Application Priorities and Process Presentation to the Lake County Coalition for the Homeless April 7, 2015.
Learnings from the Maricopa County Human Services Campus, DAVID BRIDGE MANAGING DIRECTOR HUMAN SERVICES CAMPUS LODESTAR DAY RESOURCE CENTER.
2015 NOFA Committee Orientation. A Continuum of Care (CoC) is a regional or local planning body that coordinates housing and services funding for homeless.
The HEARTH Academy System Assessment and Design October 2010.
Minneapolis/Hennepin County Continuum of Care for the Homeless 2016 Request for Proposals Pre-applications for potential new projects are being solicited.
2014 HMIS Data Standards Overview HMIS Data Standards Background – Key resources – Implementation Timeline – Revision Process Overview of Key.
VIRGINIA’S RESPONSE TO HOMELESSNESS. Virginia’s Efforts to Reduce Homelessness  Executive Order 10 in May 2010 Established a housing policy framework.
Agency Technical Administrator (ATA) Team Meeting March 29 th.
New Department on Homelessness: The Development Process.
All Home Stakeholder Meeting July 20, Agenda Welcome General Updates Measuring System Performance in King County Role of System Performance and.
Orange County Consolidated Plan One-Year Action Plan and Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice August 2, 2016 BCC.
Presentation to the Joint CSAC/LCC Homelessness Task Force
The Art of Providing Supportive Services for Homeless Veterans
Norm Suchar Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs
Mountainland Continuum of Care
Michelle Covert, , County of Santa Clara Office of supportive housing Mission, role, Strategies in addressing.
Megan Kurteff Schatz February 23, 2017
National Conference on Ending Homelessness July 27, 2016
Presented by - CARES, Inc. July 28, 2017
Virginia Balance of State
What is the Continuum of Care?
Community Exchange: Ending Family Homelessness
Housing and Homeless Coalition: State of Homelessness 2015
Systems Transformation In focus: Rapid Rehousing
Detroit Continuum of Care (CoC) 2017 HIC and PIT Count
Health Care for Homeless Veterans Programs (HCHV)
Rapid Rehousing Programs
Restructure & Repurpose 2017
Austin/Travis County HUD YHDP Bidders Conference FY2016 February 23, 2018 Presentation for Interested Parties Ending Community Homelessness Coalition.
2017 State of Homelessness.
Continuum of care for the homeless
Maine CoC Coordinated Entry
Audrey Field, Deputy Director/Director of Programs
Systems Performance Measures: The Fundamentals Session 1
All Home Stakeholder Meeting
Ending Homelessness & Data
Systems Design For an Effective Crisis Response System to End Homelessness Kay Moshier McDivitt SENIOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SPECIALIST Florida Institute.
Ending Family Homelessness in Cuyahoga County
Single Adult Homelessness Advisory Group
System Performance Measure Reports
Erin J. Kelly, MA, LCMHC Child and Family Services
CITY COUNCIL HUD Continuum of Care 2018 Funding Application
System Performance Measures: Goal
System Performance Measures (SPMs) and Longitudinal System Analysis (LSA) Data Quality 2018.
Supportive Housing Update 2019
What we learned system performance az balance of state coc
Agenda Introductions What is a Unified Shelter Model?
Introduction This report provides an overview of homelessness in Monroe County for the time period: 10/1/2107 – 09/30/2018. The time period selected is.
3.02 Assessing Shelter Capacity
Keys to Housing Security
TPCH Sheltered & Unsheltered PIT 5 Year Review
CoC Competition FY19 Overview
2019 Data Standards September 4, Data Standards September 4, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Session 1.02: Understanding your System: Using Program and System-Level Performance Measures Selina Toy Lee Director of Collaborative Community Outcomes, San Mateo County Human Services Agency, California February 23, 2017

Presentation Overview Background San Mateo County Context Homeless System Changes HMIS System Performance Analysis Challenges Faced Homeless System Redesign Where Are We Now?

San Mateo County, California Santa Cruz

Fast Facts: San Mateo County, CA 758,581 Population HUD Fair Market Rent: $2,289 Average Market Rate: $2,980 2 Bedroom Rental Extremely Low 30%: $36,900 Very Low 50%: $61,500 AMI (4 person) 2 person: $86,150 4 person: $107,700 Median HH Income 4.4% Average Apartment Vacancy Rate

Collaborative Applicant Center on Homelessness HMIS Lead Strategic Plan Community Engagement CoC Coordinator Center on Homelessness (COH)

Homeless Services Continuum Prevention Rental Assistance Utility Assistance Legal Assistance Outreach and Engagement Homeless Outreach Teams Street Medicine Dignity on Wheels (mobile shower and laundry) Coordinated Entry and Assessment Shelter Diversion (begin in April 2017) Permanent Housing Rapid Re-Housing Permanent Supportive Housing Housing Locator Services Other Housing Vouchers Interim Housing Emergency Shelter Transitional Housing

Funding for Homeless Services County Funding ($9.8m) State Funding ($200,000) Federal Funding ($819,700) HUD CoC Funding ($8.2m) Total Funding in FY 16/17: $19 million

Homeless Count 2,281 2,149 1,796 1,772

Timeline of Homeless System Changes 2009 Late 2013 July 2014 Jan 2015 Nov 2015 June HEARTH Act HUD Policy Shift to System Performance Leadership Changes New Agency Director and New Branch Director County Priority Set County Manager set priority to end homelessness by 2020; local tax funding allocated; new HMIS implemented Board Study Session on Homelessness Board of Supervisors session on homelessness; requested HMIS analysis Begin Strategic Planning Process Begin Community learning and planning for homeless system redesign CoC NOFA Priority March 2016 HUD CoC Priority and Funding Shift focused on system and program performance Release New Strategic Plan Strategic Plan to Reach Functional Zero by 2020

Relationship with HMIS (circa 2013) COH Staff had limited access Providers Submit AHAR, APR Contractor Lead on Reports to HUD Limited Data QC Managed by IT Staff Compliance Based Initiated in 2005 HMIS (HOPE System)

Homeless System Performance Report Report Summary Hire Consultant Objectives Methodology Data Analysis To Learn! Who is being served in the system Funding Investments System Investments System Outcomes Program Outcomes Focus Strategies selected via RFP in Sept. 2014 Provider Communication and Data Collection Housing Inventory Count (HIC) HMIS data Program Budget Program Capacity PIT Count Base Year Performance Calculator (BYPC) Data Quality Project Costs Project Performance System and Program Level Presentation to Board of Supervisors, HOPE Interagency Council in March 2015 Individual Project Level Reports with Providers Webpage: http://hsa.smcgov.org/center-homelessness Links to Reports on the bottom

Key Findings: System Performance SYSTEM CAPACITY System Investment and Project Capacity is not proportional to the composition of homeless population. DATA QUALITY Excellent Very little missing data LENGTHS OF STAY Single Adults: 101 days Families: 107 days ENTRIES FROM HOMELESSNESS 44% entering Emergency Shelter were not literally homeless COST PER PERMANENT HOUSING EXIT FOR FAMILIES Emergency Shelter: $25,421 Transitional Housing: $18,329 Rapid Re-Housing: $4,190 RATE OF RETURN TO HOMELESSNESS Transitional Housing: Single Adults: 36% Families: 26% Rapid Re-Housing Single Adults: 9% Families: 10% RATE OF EXIT TO PERMANENT HOUSING Emergency Shelter: Single Adults: 19%, Families: 13% Transitional Housing Single Adults: 38%, Families: 68%

What We Learned Homeless System Service Providers COH Staff Current system was set up to serve clients to move through programs Data did not always line up with anecdotes highlighted by providers Some Programs Were Still Working Towards Housing First System and Program Measures Service Providers Providers had varying knowledge and understanding of their own HMIS data Providers had never analyzed cost data or provided full budgets Non-literally homeless clients were enrolled into homeless programs Providers measure success through program participation & completion COH Staff Data Quality Checks were Ad Hoc System Level coordination of all programs is needed for change Limited ownership of system or provider performance results Need to increase depth and knowledge of homeless systems

Quality Improvement Plan Training and Technical Assistance Program Reviews Data Validation HMIS Users Group Work closely with System Admin Data Integrity Checks Quality Improvement Plan

Timeline of Homeless System Changes 2009 Late 2013 July 2014 Jan 2015 Oct 2015 June HEARTH Act HUD Policy Shift to System Performance Leadership Changes New Agency Director and Division Director County Priority Set County Manager set priority to end homelessness by 2020; local tax funding allocated; new HMIS implemented Board Study Session on Homelessness Board of Supervisors session on homelessness; requested HMIS analysis Begin Strategic Planning Process Begin Community learning and planning for homeless system redesign CoC NOFA Priority March 2016 HUD CoC Priority and Funding Shift focused on system and program performance Release New Strategic Plan Strategic Plan to Reach Functional Zero by 2020

Challenges Faced A. B. C. Alignment? Using Data Promoting Change Where to Begin? Alignment? Using Data Promoting Change A. Not all at once Gaining Trust with Community and Providers Selling “Change” as Positive Proving Best Practices can and will work B. Tough Discussions Some existing Programs not aligned with HUD/best practices Decisions and Visions become “personal” Provider Autonomy Funding Priorities C. Ready for Action Data Integrity belongs to everyone Balancing data driven decisions with reality of operations

Strategic Plan to End Homelessness VISION KEY GUIDING PRINCIPLES Text Here Systems Orientation In the next five years, homelessness will be a rare, brief, and one-time occurrence. End all Homelessness by 2020. Create System to End Homelessness End Veteran Homelessness End Family Homelessness End Youth Homelessness Individuals Exiting Institutions will not Discharge to Homelessness Context Specific and Aligned with Best Practices Housing First Data Driven Client Centered

How We Will Create the System Shift to a Housing First Approach for all Funding 1 Transform existing set of programs into housing crisis resolution system 2 Develop and Implement Shelter Diversion/Housing Counseling 3 Develop and Implement a Coordinated Entry System for Homeless Svcs 4 Right Size Interim Housing 5 Expand Rapid Re-Housing Services 6 Maximize Permanent Supportive Housing 7 Use Data for Continuous Quality Improvement 8

Moving Forward: Changing Our System Public Accountability for System Outcomes New Systems Require New Thinking Hire Staff Who Are Data Curious and Flexible New RFPs include Guiding Principles and Intended Outcomes Revise Contractor Performance Measures Data Dashboard and Data Spotlights at Meetings

Data Spotlight: Households Requesting Food

Data Spotlight: HUD System Performance HUD System Performance Measures (SPM) System Performance Measure Federal FY 14-15 (10/1/14-9/30/15) FY 16-17 Q1 &Q2 Preliminary for discussion (7/1/16-12/31/16) 1a. Average Length of time homeless in ES and TH 105 days 94 days 1a. Median Length of time homeless in ES and TH 76 days 67 days 2. Persons who exit homelessness to permanent housing destinations who return to homelessness within 6-12 months (exited from ES, TH, RRH, or PSH and returned to ES or TH within 6-12 months) 3% 2.50% 4.6. For CoC Funded Programs, Percentage of adults who exited programs with increased total income (both earned and non-employment income) 21% 22% 7b.1. Percentage of exits to permanent housing destinations for persons exiting from ES, TH , & RRH 43% 53%

Thank You and Questions Selina Toy Lee Email: SToy-Lee@smcgov.org Web: http://hsa.smcgov.org/center-homelessness (Links to Reports at Bottom) Twitter: @SelinaToyLee