$$ Money $$ (for research) Bob McMurray

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intra-University Collaborations or How to Win Friends, Influence People and Get Resources? Hal Stern Department of Statistics University of California,
Advertisements

Presented by: Jerry Legge Associate Provost for Academic Planning (Interim), and Professor of Public Administration and Policy (SPIA) Provost Advisory.
Mapping out a Research Agenda Matt Dwyer University of Nebraska - Lincoln Thanks to Barb Ryder.
Leadership Development Institute Innovation Presentation Tom Finnegan November 16, 2012.
What’s in a Move? Normal Disruption and a Design Challenge Reza Zadeh Carnegie Mellon University, Language Technology Institute Aruna D. Balakrishnan Carnegie.
The IGERT Program Preliminary Proposals June 2008 Carol Van Hartesveldt IGERT Program Director IGERT Program Director.
Bieber et al., NJIT © Slide 1 Getting Known & Making Opportunities for Interaction Michael Bieber Information Systems Department College of Computing.
Thoughts on preparing an NSF CAREER proposal 2007 NSF CAREER Proposal Writing Workshop Maria C. Yang Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering University.
Institutional Perspective on Credit Systems for Research Data MacKenzie Smith Research Director, MIT Libraries.
The Council on Undergraduate Research ProVisions September 17, 2013.
Learning Technology Research Cluster Session lead: Matt Bower School of Education Macquarie University Twitter: mattgbower.
A Roadmap to Success Writing an Effective Research Grant Proposal Bob Miller, PhD Regents Professor Oklahoma State University 2011 Bob Miller, PhD Regents.
NSF for CASIC Researchers Jacqueline Meszaros, Ph.D. Decision, Risk and Management Sciences Innovation and Organizational Sciences
The Federal Agency Perspective on Research Belinda Batten, Director, NNMREC.
Tenure in the College of Arts & Sciences Thoughts and Tips for Women in the Sciences.
Organizing for General Education Assessment Linda Suskie, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 3624 Market Street, Philadelphia.
Managing Opportunities Lori A. Clarke Department of Computer Science University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
How to develop an independent research plan – review literature with an eye for problem, approach, solution, new ideas – review objectives of funding programs.
NIH Submission Cycle. Choosing a Study Section Ask Program Officer for advice Review rosters: – sp
Introducing CILT Roy Pea SRI International Nora Sabelli National Science Foundation.
OUR STRATEGIC INTENT: Promote a culture that demands and rewards excellence. OUR VISION: To be a world-class medical school, advancing health at the forefront.
Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J HOW RESEARCHERS FIND INFORMATION IN THE NEW DIGITAL AGE Gaynor Austen Director, Library Services.
Insider Guide to Peer Review for Applicants Dr. Valerie Durrant Acting Director CSR Division of Neuroscience, Development and Aging.
R01? R03? R21? How to choose the right funding mechanism Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Mark W. Horner, Ph.D. Department of Geography 2016 First Year Assistant Professor Grants Workshop.
Forging Links: a collaborative approach to funding for business archives in Wales Stacy Capner Business Archives Development Officer for Wales Archives.
Transforming Good Ideas into Funded Research:
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY TODAY
Community Engaged Scholarship -Connecting Teaching, Research and Service Henry R. Cunningham, PhD Director of Community Engagement, UofL Office of the.
Job Titles Examples Used for HISD Nonexempt Jobs
MedStar Health Research Institute
Coalition for National Science Funding (CNSF) 
Anglicare Australia conference 2017
Promotion & Tenure Workshop
Grants. Grants Who Am I? I’ve published about 200 papers in journals such as Science Psychological Review Psychological Science Trends in Cognitive.
Grant Writing: Seeing the Big Picture
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats and Next Steps
Vision for a Research Presence
Foresight Science & Technology, Inc.
Paul Glendinning University of Manchester Scientific Director, ICMS
Proposal Development Services
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
What are sponsors looking for in research fellows?
Education and Creativity
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Strategies for Successful Proposal Development
Collaborative Inquiry and Professional Learning Communities
Exclusive Tips To Remember While Attending Real Estate Events In Houston.
The NSF Grant Review Process: Some Practical Tips
Scott Mandernack Marquette University
Stellenbosch University
Transforming Good Ideas into Funded Research:
Rick McGee, PhD and Bill Lowe, MD Faculty Affairs and NUCATS
Information Session January 18, :00-1:45 pm
Navigating The University: Research Strategy
Engaging Institutional Leadership
Heather Brod, Executive Director of Faculty Affairs and FAME
The Curry School of Education October 3, 2018
Finding Funding for Arts, Humanities, & Social Sciences
Sharing and showcasing our educational output
Competing for Scientific Leadership Positions
Starting New Research Projects and Building Collaborations
Junior Math Study Group
Strategies for Interdisciplinary Working
Plan your journey.
Minnesota State University, Mankato
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
NEUROLOGY FACULTY DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP SERIES:
After your First Award: Next Steps in Your Journey with NIH
Tenure and CUNY Matt Brim and Shelly Eversley FFPP Academic Directors.
Presentation transcript:

$$ Money $$ (for research) Bob McMurray Dept. of Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept. of Linguistics Dept. of Communication Sciences & Disorders Dept. of Otolaryngology

Neuroscience Psychology Computer Science Linguistics Philosophy

I do ba’s and pa’s

12 years later….

How do you build a diverse research program? $$$$$

Funding environment is diverse. What’s the best strategy?

Be interdisciplinary Do things in new ways. Tell a story Talk to Program Officers Consider the application of your work Think small (at first) Collaborate Seek [lots of] Advice Be strategic Persistence pays off Build your scholarly profile.

Be interdisciplinary Do things in new ways. Tell a story Talk to Program Officers Consider the application of your work Think small (at first) Collaborate Seek [lots of] Advice Be strategic Persistence pays off Build your whole scholarly profile.

Solutions to big problems require multiple fields. Psychology Linguistics Philosophy Computer Science Neuroscience Be interdisciplinary Solutions to big problems require multiple fields. Collaborators and co-investigators Innovation is a key review criterion: applying solutions from one field to a problem in another is innovative

But… 2) Do things in new ways. Innovation is key at NIH and NSF. New cutting edge methods matter. But…

3) Tell a story Cool methods are NOT enough. Grants live or die on the how compelling the questions are. Develop your narrative.

4) Talk to Program Officers Tell your story  enthusiasm They know the review panels. Find out about institutional priorities Programs / processes for new investigators. Other funding opportunities. Generate goodwill.

4) Talk to Program Officers POs make the funding decisions. Reviews are advisory. Review Panels and Council makes funding decisions… .. But POs do have influence.

4) Talk to Program Officers What kind of influence? Communicate institutional priorities to reviewers. Route you to other institutes / programs. Create opportunity for grants on bubble.

5) Consider application of your work NIH now takes translation seriously. NSF under political pressure to show real-world relevance. A little can go a long way… Collaboration with medical research. Public engagement. Collaboration with industry.

6) Think small (at first). Grants are a risky investment. Panelists and POs evaluate your track record to complete the worl. Often more willing to take a risk for a small investment (while you build your record). Small grants can lead to big. R03s, R21s, small NSF grants etc.

7) Collaborate Use collaborations to extend your reach. Collaborators can shore up weaknesses Technical Expertise - Administrative Interdisciplinary - Application You might shore up someone else’s weaknesses! Collaborate genuinely. But: Independence?

8) Seek [lots of] advice Politics, strategies, funding programs. Content of your grant. Reviewers likely do not come from your area of expertise. Good writing is good writing. Negative reviews Don’t be afraid to ask senior colleagues: they want you to succeed.

Waiting can be beneficial 9) Be strategic. Grant writing takes a ton of time. Writing papers. Collecting pilot data. Building an infrastructure. Thinking and developing ideas! Waiting can be beneficial

10) Persistence pays off. Paylines are low (<15%)! Diversify funding sources. Take negative reviews seriously. - But not personally!

11) Build your whole scholarly profile. Grants are evaluated on applicant quality. New applicants: independent, functioning research program.

11) Build your whole scholarly profile. Grants are evaluated on applicant quality. New applicants: independent, functioning research program. Junior faculty: evaluated on research, teaching and service. - For promotion, your reputation, publications and discoveries may be as (or more) important as funding.

Be interdisciplinary Do things in new ways. Tell a story Talk to Program Officers Consider the application of your work Think small (at first) Collaborate Seek [lots of] Advice Be strategic Persistence pays off Build your whole scholarly profile.

Scholarship is interesting. Curiosity and discovery are the reward. Remember: This is fun! Scholarship is interesting. Curiosity and discovery are the reward. Do it because you love it.