Prof: Ming Wu GSI: Kevin Han Discussion 1/17/18

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study of propagative and radiative behavior of printed dielectric structures using the finite difference time domain method (FDTD) Università “La Sapienza”,
Advertisements

Maxwell’s equations(sec. 32.1) Plane EM waves & speed of light(sec. 32.2) The EM spectrum(sec. 32.6) Electromagnetic Waves Ch. 32 C 2012 J. F. Becker.
Modelling techniques and applications Qing Tan EPFL-STI-IMT-OPTLab
EMLAB 1 Numerical Boundary Conditions. EMLAB 2 A Problem at the Boundary of the Grid We must implement the update equations for every point in the grid.
Inverse design for nano-photonics
Effects of reflections on TE-wave measurements of electron cloud density Kenneth Hammond Mentors: John Sikora and Kiran Sonnad.
EMLAB 1 Power Flow and PML Placement in FDTD. EMLAB 2 Lecture Outline Review Total Power by Integrating the Poynting Vector Total Power by Plane Wave.
Finite Difference Time Domain Method (FDTD)
May 25, 2007Bilkent University, Physics Department1 Optical Design of Waveguides for Operation in the Visible and Infrared Mustafa Yorulmaz Bilkent University,
Implementation of 2D FDTD
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 31 Maxwell’s Equations and Electromagnetic Waves.
Chapter 9 Electromagnetic Waves. 9.2 ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES.
6. Electromagnetics Enhancements. Training Manual Aug Electromagnetics Enhancements Emag focus in ANSYS 5.7 is on high-frequency electromagnetics.
Modeling Plasmonic Effects in the Nanoscale Brendan McNamara, Andrei Nemilentsau and Slava V. Rotkin Department of Physics, Lehigh University Methodology.
1 EEE 431 Computational Methods in Electrodynamics Lecture 9 By Dr. Rasime Uyguroglu
Periodic Boundary Conditions in Comsol
The Fundamental Physics of Directive Beaming at Microwave and Optical Frequencies in Terms of Leaky Waves Saman Kabiri, Master’s Student Dept. of Electrical.
UPenn NROTC Unit, dtd Fall 2004 Naval Weapons Systems Energy Fundamentals.
The Perfectly Matched Layer (PML)
EMLAB 1 Examples of One ‐ Dimensional FDTD. EMLAB 2 Typical FDTD Grid Layout.
Tutorial for XFDTD Written by Cynthia Furse Utah State University.
Introduction to CST MWS
Tutorial for XFDTD Written by Cynthia Furse University of Utah.
So far, we have considered plane waves in an infinite homogeneous medium. A natural question would arise: what happens if a plane wave hits some object?
Electromagnetic Waves
EMLAB 1 3D Update Equations with Perfectly Matched Layers.
Lai-Ching Ma & Raj Mittra Electromagnetic Communication Laboratory
Finite Element Method for General Three-Dimensional
1 EEE 431 Computational Methods in Electrodynamics Lecture 8 By Dr. Rasime Uyguroglu
1 EEE 431 Computational Methods in Electrodynamics Lecture 7 By Dr. Rasime Uyguroglu
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 16 Sound.
Formulation of 2D‐FDTD without a PML.
Except otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Modes in infinite slab waveguides ELEC-E3240.
Light and Optics  The Electromagnetic Spectrum  Interference, Diffraction, and Polarization Wave Properties of Light.
Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. The implementation of the angular spectrum of plane waves method in the finite.
FDTD Simulation of Diffraction Grating Displacement Noise 1 Daniel Brown University of Birmingham AEI, Hanover - 14/12/2010.
Agenda for today Today we will use Lumerical FDTD to simulate the scattering of light from a ‘pit’ used to encode data on a DVD. The size of the pit will.
17. Electromagnetic waves
Agenda for today Today we will do another tutorial example together to continue introduction to Lumerical FDTD software. Task #1: Tune the resonance frequency.
Electromagnetic Waves
Electromagnetic Waves
Notes 23 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves Fall 2016
Discussion today Over the next two class periods we will be designing a ring resonator based 2-channel wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) optical link.
Agenda for today: Laser cavity design
Lens Equation ( < 0 ).
MICE RF Cavity Simulations and Multipactor
ELEC 401 MICROWAVE ELECTRONICS Lecture 3
Lecture Outline Chapter 25 Physics, 4th Edition James S. Walker
New Jersey TRIVIA QUESTION!
OPSE 301: Lab13 Data Analysis – Fitting Data to Arbitrary Functions
Agenda for today Today we will do another tutorial example to continue introduction to Lumerical FDTD software. Task #1: Tune the resonance frequency of.
Agenda for today: Laser cavity design
Light Through a Single Slit
ELEC 401 MICROWAVE ELECTRONICS Lecture 3
Discussion today Over the next two class periods we will be designing a ring resonator based 2-channel wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) optical link.
Prof: Ming Wu GSI: Kevin Han Discussion 1/17/18
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 17)
Lightwave Engineering
EM Waves, & Their Speed Derived from Maxwell’s Equations
Discussion today: Grating couplers
Electromagnetic Waves
Phys102 Lecture 20 Electromagnetic Waves * (skipped)
Microwave Engineering
Exam 2 free response retake: Today, 5 pm room next to my office
Scalar theory of diffraction
Scalar theory of diffraction
Diyu Yang Mentor: Xu Chen Advisor: José E. Schutt-Ainé Abstract
Applied Electromagnetic Waves Waveguiding Structures
Electromagnetic Waves
Atilla Ozgur Cakmak, PhD
Presentation transcript:

Prof: Ming Wu GSI: Kevin Han Discussion 1/17/18 EE232: Lightwave Devices Prof: Ming Wu GSI: Kevin Han Discussion 1/17/18

EE232 overview Lectures will mainly cover lasers and detectors Discussions will mainly cover other photonic devices – waveguides, couplers, modulators Lumerical FDTD and related applications will be used throughout discussion and for final project Unusual plasmonic laser structure Dual microring resonator CdS nanowire laser

Today: intro to FDTD General FDTD simulation and E&M concepts Example: DVD reader

General simulation concepts The finite-difference time domain (FDTD) method simulates Maxwell’s equations in the time domain: Constitutive relations: Pros: easy to implement, covers wide frequency range in single simulation, can handle most material types Cons: meshing can be tricky, large simulations difficult Can extract far field using post-processing

General simulation concepts FDTD evaluates Maxwell’s equations on a grid, eg. (Faraday’s law) … Source: Wikipedia

General simulation concepts Radiation Object Source

General simulation concepts Computational domain Radiation Object Source Truncation boundary

Boundary conditions Perfectly matched layer (PML) Computational domain Radiation Object Source

Perfectly matched layer (PML) Artificial material that absorbs radiation without reflection This is perhaps the most common way to truncate a computational domain. Disadvantages: Some reflections from PML can occur. This can be minimized by ensuring that radiation hits PML at a 90 degree angle; i.e. place PML far from any scatterer or use circular computation domain if possible Magnitude of reflections is wavelength dependent Additional computational complexity: PML needs to be meshed and the fields need to be solved in this region

Other boundary conditions Perfect electrical conductor (PEC): All radiation is reflected Perfect magnetic conductor (PMC): Less common Periodic boundary condition: Used for periodic structures. Need only simulate a unit cell. Source: Griffiths, Intro to Electrodynamics

Other boundary conditions Symmetric and anti-symmetric boundary: used when simulation has a mirror symmetry, to reduce simulation time by factor of 2, 4, or 8

Example Line current source Source: Jianming Jin, “Theory and Computation of Electromagnetic Fields”

Source: Jianming Jin, “Theory and Computation of Electromagnetic Fields”

Source: Jianming Jin, “Theory and Computation of Electromagnetic Fields”

Source: Jianming Jin, “Theory and Computation of Electromagnetic Fields”

FDTD code implementation for previous example for n=1:1:timesteps Jz(src_X,src_Y)=exp(-0.5*(((n-1)*delt)/(2*period))^2)*sin(omega*(n-1)*delt); %Size of grids %Bx,Hx M rows, N-1 columns %By,Hy M-1 rows, N columns %Dz,Ez M rows, N columns %Magnetic flux (Bx, By) Bx(1:M,1:N-1)=(1./beta_y(1:M,1:N-1)).*(alpha_y(1:M,1:N-1).*Bx_negt(1:M,1:N-1)-... (epsilon/dely)*(Ez_negt(1:M,2:N)-Ez_negt(1:M,1:N-1))); By(1:M-1,1:N)=(1./beta_z(1:M-1,1:N)).*(alpha_z(1:M-1,1:N).*By_negt(1:M-1,1:N)+... (epsilon/delx)*(Ez_negt(2:M,1:N)-Ez_negt(1:M-1,1:N))); %Magnetic field intensity (Hx, Hy) Hx(1:M,1:N-1)=(1./beta_z(1:M,1:N-1)).*(alpha_z(1:M,1:N-1).*Hx_negt(1:M,1:N-1)+... (1/mu)*beta_x(1:M,1:N-1).*Bx(1:M,1:N-1)-... (1/mu)*alpha_x(1:M,1:N-1).*Bx_negt(1:M,1:N-1)); Hy(1:M-1,1:N)=(1./beta_x(1:M-1,1:N)).*(alpha_x(1:M-1,1:N).*Hy_negt(1:M-1,1:N)+... (1/mu)*beta_y(1:M-1,1:N).*By(1:M-1,1:N)-... (1/mu)*alpha_y(1:M-1,1:N).*By_negt(1:M-1,1:N)); %Electric flux (Dz) Dz(2:M-1,2:N-1)=... (1./beta_x(2:M-1,2:N-1)).*(alpha_x(2:M-1,2:N-1).*Dz_negt(2:M-1,2:N-1)... +(epsilon/delx)*(Hy(2:M-1,2:N-1)-Hy(1:M-2,2:N-1))... -(epsilon/dely)*(Hx(2:M-1,2:N-1)-Hx(2:M-1,1:N-2))-epsilon*Jz(2:M-1,2:N-1)); %Electric field intensity (Ez) Ez(2:M-1,2:N-1)=... (1./beta_y(2:M-1,2:N-1)).*(alpha_y(2:M-1,2:N-1).*Ez_negt(2:M-1,2:N-1)... +(1/epsilon)*beta_z(2:M-1,2:N-1).*Dz(2:M-1,2:N-1)... -(1/epsilon)*alpha_z(2:M-1,2:N-1).*Dz_negt(2:M-1,2:N-1)); %Apply Etan=0 B.C Ez(1:M,25)=0; %Update field components Ez_negt=Ez; Hx_negt=Hx; Hy_negt=Hy; Dz_negt=Dz; Bx_negt=Bx; By_negt=By; < 50 lines of MATLAB code!

Propagating to far-field FDTD can generally only simulate near-field effects due to need to mesh entire region Often we are interested in the fields far away from simulation (𝑟≫𝜆) Source: Wikipedia

Propagating to far-field Can calculate far-field using equivalence principle: Pick a closed surface enclosing sources Run simulation and record fields on surface Replace fields on surface with equivalent current sources Use radiation equations to determine E1, H1 fields in far-field Vector potential A Current source J Can pick to be zero Source: Balanis, Antenna Theory

How a DVD works Basic idea: Laser is scanned over DVD. If laser beam encounters pit the light will be scattered away and will not reach the photodetector (Binary 1). Otherwise, most laser light is reflected back toward the photodetector (Binary 0). Source: http://functionalcd.weebly.com/

How a DVD works Source: Wikipedia

FDTD simulation Using Lumerical FDTD, we would like to optimize the dimension of the “pit” such that we maximize the amount of laser light scattered. Polycarbonate (n=1.55) PML We will assume focused Gaussian spot for 650nm laser. PML / PEC boundary conditions will be utilized to truncate the computational domain. We will use FDTD to calculate the far-field light radiation scattered by the pit. Laser 650nm PML PML 320nm 120nm pit land PEC Aluminum

Next time Install Lumerical FDTD Solutions Walk-through creating and running simulation of DVD pit Analyze results Investigate modifying pit height

Installing FDTD Solutions https://www.lumerical.com/register.html Use @berkeley.edu address

Installing FDTD Solutions Log in here: You will get an email with the license code Download FDTD Solutions Extract zip file Run the installer Start the program https://www.lumerical.com/portal/workshop.html?ec=CDF54A

Installing FDTD Solutions Check email for activation code Enter it here Click Activate

Lumerical FDTD program

Create ‘land’ geometry We will create a rectangle consisting of Aluminum. To create a rectangle and edit the properties: Structures  Rectangle Right click on rectangle in Objects Tree; select Edit object

Create ‘land’ geometry

Create ‘land’ geometry

Create simulation window To create a simulation window and edit the properties: Simulation  Region Right click on FDTD in Objects Tree; select Edit object

Create simulation window

Create simulation window

Create simulation window

Create simulation window

Create simulation window Hint: Click FDTD in the Objects Tree then click Zoom extents icon on the left-hand side

Create source To create a simulation window and edit the properties: Sources  Gaussian Right click on source in Objects Tree; select Edit object

Create source

Create source

Create source

Create source

Create field monitor To create a simulation window and edit the properties: Monitors  Frequency-domain field and power Right click on DFTMonitor in Objects Tree; select Edit object

Create field monitor

Create time-domain monitor To create a simulation window and edit the properties: Monitors  Frequency-domain field and power Right click on DFTMonitor in Objects Tree; select Edit object

Create time-domain monitor

Create movie monitor To create a simulation window and edit the properties: Monitors  Movie Right click on MovieMonitor in Objects Tree; select Edit object

Create movie monitor

Run simulation Click the Run icon

Analyze field-monitor Right-click reflection  visualize  E Click lambda in the Parameters window. Drag the slider until Value ~ 0.650

Far-field calculation In the Result View, right-click farfield and click Calculate Set the wavelength to 0.651841 and click Far Field settings. Set the material index to 1.55

Far-field calculation In the Result View, right-click farfield and click Visualize

Far-field calculation These results are not too interesting. All we are observing is the simple reflection of a laser beam from a metallic surface. Let’s add a DVD ‘pit’

Create ‘pit’ geometry We will create a rectangle consisting of Aluminum. To create a rectangle and edit the properties: Structures  Rectangle Right click on rectangle in Objects Tree; select Edit object

Create ‘pit’ geometry

Create ‘pit’ geometry

Far-field Lobes indicate that light is scattered away at angles

How to maximize scattering? Polycarbonate (n=1.55) Let’s loosely think of the laser beam as impinging optical rays. Some of the rays (red) will hit the pit and reflect back with a phase change of Δ 𝜙 1 =𝜋. Other rays (blue) will hit the land and reflect back with a phase change of Δ 𝜙 2 =𝜋+4𝜋𝑛𝑑/𝜆 Δ 𝜙 1 Δ 𝜙 2 d pit land Destructive interference for Δ 𝜙 2 −Δ 𝜙 1 =𝜋 What happens to the light? It’s scattered away! We can quickly calculate that we need 𝑑=𝜆/4𝑛=120𝑛𝑚 for destructive interference to occur. Aluminum

How to maximize scattering? What if Δ 𝜙 2 −Δ 𝜙 1 =2𝜋? Then we have constructive interference and we should expect that most light will be reflected straight back as if there was no ‘pit’ present. Let’s test this out... Then we need 𝑑=240𝑛𝑚 Polycarbonate (n=1.55) Δ 𝜙 1 Δ 𝜙 2 d pit land Aluminum

Far-field Most light is scattered straight back as if ‘pit’ is not present!

Far-field comparison 240nm pit 120nm pit land land