Communication technologies for autonomous vehicles

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date: 1 October2013 Meeting: Concertation meeting VRA Speaker and organisation: Maarten Oonk, TNO [ Roadmap Automation in Road Transport.
Advertisements

Driver Behavior Models NSF DriveSense Workshop Norfolk, VA Oct Mario Gerla UCLA, Computer Science Dept.
1 Challenge the future The Dutch Automated Vehicle Initiative: Challenges for automated driving Dr. R.(Raymond) G. Hoogendoorn Assistant Professor Delft.
G4 Apps The Impact of Connected Vehicles on Traffic Operations ISMA Traffic Expo October 1, 2014.
Comparison between TOR of IG-ITS/AD and SAE Levels*1
Definition for Levels of Automation
Maarten Oonk MSc.Joakim Svensson Sr. Market Manager TNO [ Automation in Road Transport Past, Present & Future Date: 7th of March 2013.
The future of road safety Michael Meyer Robert Bosch GmbH.
Cars - the better drivers ?
The Fully Networked Car Geneva, 4-5 March Ubiquitous connectivity to improve urban mobility Hermann Meyer ERTICO.
IntelliDriveSM Update
Vehicle Safety - (R)Evolution of Driving Assist Systems Jochen Schäfer Heiner Hunold Submitted by the experts from Informal document GRRF th GRRF,
IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2011 Design Principles for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: Keeping Drivers In-the-Loop Transmitted.
 Introduction  What is Driverless Car ?  History  Component  Action  Technology  Advantages  Disadvantages  Conclusion  Reference.
CIS 2011 rkala.99k.org 1 st September, 2011 Planning of Multiple Autonomous Vehicles using RRT Rahul Kala, Kevin Warwick Publication of paper: R. Kala,
ESafety WG “Digital Maps” Ad Bastiaansen (Tele Atlas) - Chair Yiannis Moissidis (NAVTEQ) - Co-Chair The 4 th Plenary Session of eSafety Forum Thursday,
OICA „Certification of automated Vehicles“
Informal document GRRF-84-32
Emerging Technologies in Autonomous Driving
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Activities of ARIB on WRC-19 AI 1.12
Vehicle to Vehicle Communication
On-board Technologies
ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS
7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016
Priorities of TTA Jaemoon Park President TTA Document No:
PRESENTED BY:BHABESH RANJAN MAHAKUD
V2X Frequency Harmonization for C-ITS
Augmental Robotics – An Indian Perspective
Autonomous Driving Localization, path planning, obstacle avoidance
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
V2X Frequency Harmonization for C-ITS
CYBERSECURITY FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES
How IIoT Makes Machines and Devices More Effective & Intelligent
GSC-EM TF goal, as defined initially
Plan of ITS TF Activity Takeshi Yamamoto, ARIB Document No:
The Importance of ADAS Technology
SAE DSRC Technical Committee work and outlook
Autonomous Cyber-Physical Systems: Autonomous Systems Software Stack
Multi-RAT, Multi-Link, Multi-operator V2X Communications Apostolos Kousaridas Huawei Technologies, Munich Research Center, Germany 5G V2X Communications.
Project: IEEE P Interest Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: ITS OCC system based vehicle-to-vehicle communication.
Overview of CV2X Requirements
Erik Guttman, Chairman of 3GPP TSG SA Samsung Electronics
SAE C-V2X Technical Committee
IVG Driver Training Critical Event Reporting.
Accelerating the Introduction of
Informal document GRRF-86-36
Industry Homework from AEB 02
Overview/Review of AV/Pedestrian Interactions
NGV SG Use Cases (Next Generation V2X Study Group)
Google Self Driving Car
NGV SG Use Cases (Next Generation V2X Study Group)
Augmental Robotics – An Indian Perspective
3GPP and Critical Communications Standardization
On-board Technologies
Reason for performance difference between LVW and GVW
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
ACSF – Automated Driving Systems Taxonomy and Definitions - SAE J3016 Jean-Michel Roy Transport Canada.
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
Activities of ARIB on WRC-19 AI 1.12
Plan of ITS TF Activity Takeshi Yamamoto, ARIB Document No: GSC-21_020
lesson 3.3 STARTING, STOPPING, STEERING, AND TARGETING
Communication technologies for autonomous vehicles
Plan of ITS TF Activity Takeshi Yamamoto, ARIB Document No:
Tomorrow’s Mobility…Is Here Today!
Connected Cars: C-V2X to support traffic safety and automated driving C-V2X on the way to 5G November, 2018 The automotive.
ACSF B2 SAE Level 2 and/or Level 3
Automotive Technology Principles, Diagnosis, and Service
Automated Lane Keeping Systems
Presentation transcript:

Communication technologies for autonomous vehicles Document No: GSC-21_012 (R1) Source: TTA Contact: SungDuck Chun Agenda Item: 3.02 Communication technologies for autonomous vehicles SungDuck Chun, LG Electronics 26-27 September 2017 HOSTED BY

Topics in this presentation Introduction to autonomous vehicles The role of communication in autonomous vehicles Standardization activities of C-V2X Performance of C-V2X Topics for discussion

Levels of autonomous driving There are multiple levels for autonomous vehicles Level 1 Driver Assistance Level 2 Partial Level 3 Conditional Level 4 High Level 5 Full automation Overview Driving assistance by using either steering or braking/ acceleration Driver assistance by combining multiple operation simultaneously (e.g. by steering control while accelerating) Driving control with assumption that drivers can intervene when requested Driving control even if drivers can not react immediately Not applicable to all scenarios (e.g. highway driving, parking) Driving control even if drivers can not react immediately Applicable full-time Benefit Assist drivers attention Assist driver with basic repetitive operations Assist driver by doing some operations such as lane changing. Burden on the driver can be reduced Drivers may do other tasks as long as drivers can take control when requested by driving system In certain scenario, driver can do other tasks Efficient use of time by drivers Drivers can always do other tasks than driving Reduced traffic jam Operation efficiency of vehicles maximized

Elements to the next levels There are multiple levels for autonomous vehicles Human-based driving System-based driving Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Fully covered high definition map (e.g. even parking area) Dynamic map update (e.g. event-triggered map update) Reliability enhancement in sensing/decision/control (to support even eye-off) Infra-structure assistance (e.g. old vehicles, pedestrians) Understanding of other vehicle (e.g. behavior on curved road, or future trajectory) Cloud computing, artificial intelligence Level 2 High definition positioning High definition map (exit, merge, intersection, etc.) Sensing non-visible area (e.g. during overtaking) Level 1 Advance in sensor technologies Sensor fusion Combination of multiple operations

Examples of limitation in case of sensors only 1 3 2 HV 1 Sensors don’t know when/whether other vehicles will change lanes. 2 Sensors may not detect this vehicle which is not in line-of- sight. Sensors cannot know whether lane change is happening or the vehicle is moving on curved road. 3 4 Sensors don’t know which route should be avoided 4

Then, what communication can do I will change lane X seconds later 1 I’m on the curved road I’m here 3 2 HV Communication can deliver information beyond what sensors can detect. E.g.: Status information (speed, location, heading, etc.) of each vehicle, even if it is not in line-of-sight Intention information (future planned trajectories, negotiation of future movement) Shared awareness (information exchange of detected objects, other events such as roadwork) Road work at location K 4

Or, even cloud computing can be supported While hardware installed in a vehicle may not be upgraded, artificial intelligence in the cloud will continuously evolve. As long as communication path is available between vehicle and A.I. in the cloud, new and advanced service can be provided to a old vehicle. Image processing to calculate position, to identify objects Coordination of future trajectories of vehicles Planning of future route Remote driving control of vehicle A.I. in the cloud

Roadmap of Cellular V2X 3GPP finished the first phase of C-V2X and has moved into next phases (SA1) LTE V2X (`15.02~ `16.03) Stage-1 Use case, Requirements (SA1) eV2X (`16.05~ `17.03) Stage-2 Architecture (SA2) LTE V2X (`15.10~ `16.09) (SA2) eV2X (`17.04~ `18.09) Stage-3 Protocols (RAN) LTE V2X (`15.06~ `17.03) (RAN) LTE eV2X (`17.04~ `18.06) (RAN) NR eV2X (`17.3Q~ `19.4Q) Basic V2X services Advanced V2X services Road hazard warning Intersection movement assistance Forward collision warning Autonomous driving CACC, Platooning Tele-operated driving Sensor data sharing -> Higher reliability, Higher throughput, Lower latency

Topics for discussion Standardization of V2X Applications for beyond Day 2: For some advanced V2X applications, progress of standardization is slow. For other advanced V2X applications, there is no plan at all. (e.g. video sharing, remote driving, etc.) Cloud-to-cloud connectivity between stake-holders also needs to be considered. (e.g. how one OEM cloud connects to other OEMs cloud? how operators’ cloud connects to other OEMs’ cloud or operators’ cloud?) Coexistence and evolution ITS band (e.g. 5.9 Ghz) is technology neutral, allowing access of both C-V2X and DSRC/ITS-G5. How to ensure coexistence of both technologies within same band? How to ensure the evolution of access technologies? What and to which extent interoperability should be supported? Competition and collaboration Which part of V2X service is up for competition/implementation and which part of V2X service is up for collaboration/standardization? Which part of V2X specification is up for competition or collaboration among SDOs?

Annex A: Evolution of Cellular technologies Cellular technologies are merging, what about V2X? 2G 3G 4G EDGE GSM/GPRS WCDMA/HSxPA LTE LTE-A LTE-Pro IS-95A/B CDMA2000 1x, EV-DO, Rev A/B

Common IMS (i.e. Access agnostic) Specs Annex B: Evolution of IMS Standardization IMS specification also converged, then what about V2X? Pre 3GPP Release 6 3GPP Release 6 3GPP Release 7 3GPP Release 8 3GPP Release 9 3GPP 3GPP IMS Specs Common IMS (i.e. Access agnostic) Specs Common IMS Specs Common IMS Specs Common IMS Specs 3GPP2 TISPAN MMD specs IMS Release-1 specs IMS Release-2 specs

Annex C: Co-existence example 5GAA’s approach on co-existence

For more information, please contact: Sungduck Chun Thank you For more information, please contact: Sungduck Chun sungduck.chun@lge.com Affiliation Name: www.lge.com