Fuzzy logic Introduction 3 Fuzzy Inference Aleksandar Rakić

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Negnevitsky, Pearson Education, Lecture 5 Fuzzy expert systems: Fuzzy inference Mamdani fuzzy inference Mamdani fuzzy inference Sugeno fuzzy inference.
Advertisements

Fuzzy expert systems Fuzzy inference Mamdani fuzzy inference
Fuzzy Logic Control Lect 5 Fuzzy Logic Control Basil Hamed
1 Chap 4: Fuzzy Expert Systems Part 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. Sukanya Pongsuparb Dr. Srisupa Palakvangsa Na Ayudhya Dr. Benjarath Pupacdi SCCS451 Artificial Intelligence.
Graphical Technique of Inference
Fuzzy Inference Systems
 Negnevitsky, Pearson Education, Lecture 5 Fuzzy expert systems: Fuzzy inference n Mamdani fuzzy inference n Sugeno fuzzy inference n Case study.
Fuzzy Expert System  An expert might say, “ Though the power transformer is slightly overloaded, I can keep this load for a while”.  Another expert.
AI – CS364 Fuzzy Logic Fuzzy Logic 3 03 rd October 2006 Dr Bogdan L. Vrusias
Fuzzy Logic and its Application to Web Caching
Contoh Soal Fuzzy.
Fuzzy Inference and Defuzzification
Fuzzy logic Fuzzy Expert Systems Yeni Herdiyeni Departemen Ilmu Komputer.
1 What is a fuzzy rule? A fuzzy rule can be defined as a conditional statement in the form: IF x is A THEN y is B where x and y are linguistic variables;
Fuzzy Expert System. Basic Notions 1.Fuzzy Sets 2.Fuzzy representation in computer 3.Linguistic variables and hedges 4.Operations of fuzzy sets 5.Fuzzy.
Fuzzy Expert Systems. Lecture Outline What is fuzzy thinking? What is fuzzy thinking? Fuzzy sets Fuzzy sets Linguistic variables and hedges Linguistic.
Fuzzy Logic E. Fuzzy Inference Engine. “antecedent” “consequent”
Lecture 07 Fuzzy Reasoning
Fuzzy Logic Control Lect 5 Fuzzy Logic Control Basil Hamed
6/9/2015Intelligent Systems and Soft Computing1 Lecture 5 Fuzzy expert systems: Fuzzy inference Mamdani fuzzy inference Mamdani fuzzy inference Sugeno.
Fuzzy Expert System.
Fuzzy Logic E. Fuzzy Inference Engine. “antecedent” “consequent”
Fuzzy Logic and Fuzzy Cognitive Map MATH 800 – 4 Fall 2011 Vijay Mago, Postdoctoral Fellow, The Modelling of Complex Social Systems (MoCSSy) Program, The.
Chapter 18 Fuzzy Reasoning.
1 Chapter 18 Fuzzy Reasoning. 2 Chapter 18 Contents (1) l Bivalent and Multivalent Logics l Linguistic Variables l Fuzzy Sets l Membership Functions l.
The Equivalence between fuzzy logic controllers and PD controllers for single input systems Professor: Chi-Jo Wang Student: Nguyen Thi Hoai Nam Student.
Fuzzy Rule-based Models *Neuro-fuzzy and Soft Computing - J.Jang, C. Sun, and, E. Mizutani, Prentice Hall 1997.
Fuzzy Logic. Sumber (download juga): 0logic%20toolbox.pdf
Rule-Based Fuzzy Model. In rule-based fuzzy systems, the relationships between variables are represented by means of fuzzy if–then rules of the following.
What are Neuro-Fuzzy Systems A neuro-fuzzy system is a fuzzy system that uses a learning algorithm derived from or inspired by neural network theory to.
Fuzzy Expert Systems. 2 Fuzzy Logic Four types of fuzzy logics Classic logic Crisp setence: Height(John, 180) → Weight(John, 60) Crisp data: Height(John,
Fuzzy Rules 1965 paper: “Fuzzy Sets” (Lotfi Zadeh) Apply natural language terms to a formal system of mathematical logic
Lecture 5 Fuzzy expert systems: Fuzzy inference Mamdani fuzzy inference Mamdani fuzzy inference Sugeno fuzzy inference Sugeno fuzzy inference Case study.
 Negnevitsky, Pearson Education, Lecture 5 Fuzzy expert systems: Fuzzy inference n Mamdani fuzzy inference n Sugeno fuzzy inference n Case study.
Fuzzy expert systems Chapter #9.
Fuzzy Inference (Expert) System
Fuzzy Systems Michael J. Watts
Lógica difusa  Bayesian updating and certainty theory are techniques for handling the uncertainty that arises, or is assumed to arise, from statistical.
Fuzzy Sets and Control. Fuzzy Logic The definition of Fuzzy logic is a form of multi-valued logic derived frommulti-valued logic fuzzy setfuzzy set theory.
Fuzzy Inference Systems. Fuzzy inference (reasoning) is the actual process of mapping from a given input to an output using fuzzy logic. The process involves.
“Principles of Soft Computing, 2 nd Edition” by S.N. Sivanandam & SN Deepa Copyright  2011 Wiley India Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 12 FUZZY.
Fuzzy Inference Systems
Fuzzy Expert System Fuzzy Inference دكترمحسن كاهاني
Fuzzy Inference and Reasoning
Chapter 4: Fuzzy Inference Systems Introduction (4.1) Mamdani Fuzzy models (4.2) Sugeno Fuzzy Models (4.3) Tsukamoto Fuzzy models (4.4) Other Considerations.
1 Lecture 4 The Fuzzy Controller design. 2 By a fuzzy logic controller (FLC) we mean a control law that is described by a knowledge-based system consisting.
Introduction of Fuzzy Inference Systems By Kuentai Chen.
© Negnevitsky, Pearson Education, Lecture 5 Fuzzy expert systems: Fuzzy inference Mamdani fuzzy inference Mamdani fuzzy inference Sugeno fuzzy inference.
Chapter 13 (Continued) Fuzzy Expert Systems 1. Fuzzy Rule-based Expert System 2.
Introduction to Fuzzy Logic and Fuzzy Systems
What is a fuzzy rule? IF x is A THEN y is B
Artificial Intelligence CIS 342
Fuzzy Systems Michael J. Watts
Fuzzy expert systems Fuzzy inference Mamdani fuzzy inference
Fuzzy Logic Control Lect 5 Fuzzy Logic Control Basil Hamed Electrical Engineering Islamic University of Gaza.
Artificial Intelligence
Homework 8 Min Max “Temperature is low” AND “Temperature is middle”
Introduction to Fuzzy Logic
Artificial Intelligence and Adaptive Systems
منطق فازی.
Dr. Unnikrishnan P.C. Professor, EEE
Dr. Unnikrishnan P.C. Professor, EEE
FUZZIFICATION AND DEFUZZIFICATION
Homework 9 Min Max “Temperature is low” AND “Temperature is middle”
Lecture 5 Fuzzy expert systems: Fuzzy inference
Fuzzy Logic Colter McClure.
Dr. Unnikrishnan P.C. Professor, EEE
Hybrid intelligent systems:
Fuzzy Inference Systems
Fuzzy Logic KH Wong Fuzzy Logic v.9a.
Presentation transcript:

Fuzzy logic Introduction 3 Fuzzy Inference Aleksandar Rakić rakic@etf.rs

Contents Mamdani Fuzzy Inference Sugeno Fuzzy Inference Fuzzification of the input variables Rule evaluation Aggregation of the rule outputs Defuzzification Sugeno Fuzzy Inference Mamdani or Sugeno?

Mamdani Fuzzy Inference The most commonly used fuzzy inference technique is the so-called Mamdani method. In 1975, Professor Ebrahim Mamdani of London University built one of the first fuzzy systems to control a steam engine and boiler combination. He applied a set of fuzzy rules supplied by experienced human operators. The Mamdani-style fuzzy inference process is performed in four steps: Fuzzification of the input variables Rule evaluation (inference) Aggregation of the rule outputs (composition) Defuzzification.

Mamdani Fuzzy Inference We examine a simple two-input one-output problem that includes three rules: Rule: 1 IF x is A3 OR y is B1 THEN z is C1 Rule: 2 IF x is A2 AND y is B2 THEN z is C2 Rule: 3 IF x is A1 THEN z is C3 Real-life example for these kinds of rules: Rule: 1 IF project_funding is adequate OR project_staffing is small THEN risk is low Rule: 2 IF project_funding is marginal AND project_staffing is large THEN risk is normal Rule: 3 IF project_funding is inadequate THEN risk is high

Step 1: Fuzzification The first step is to take the crisp inputs, x1 and y1 (project funding and project staffing), and determine the degree to which these inputs belong to each of the appropriate fuzzy sets.

Step 2: Rule Evaluation The second step is to take the fuzzified inputs, (x=A1) = 0.5, (x=A2) = 0.2, (y=B1) = 0.1 and (y=B2) = 0.7, and apply them to the antecedents of the fuzzy rules. If a given fuzzy rule has multiple antecedents, the fuzzy operator (AND or OR) is used to obtain a single number that represents the result of the antecedent evaluation. RECALL: To evaluate the disjunction of the rule antecedents, we use the OR fuzzy operation. Typically, fuzzy expert systems make use of the classical fuzzy operation union: AB(x) = max [A(x), B(x)] Similarly, in order to evaluate the conjunction of the rule antecedents, we apply the AND fuzzy operation intersection: AB(x) = min [A(x), B(x)]

Step 2: Rule Evaluation

Step 2: Rule Evaluation clipping scaling Now the result of the antecedent evaluation can be applied to the membership function of the consequent. The most common method is to cut the consequent membership function at the level of the antecedent truth. This method is called clipping (alpha-cut). Since the top of the membership function is sliced, the clipped fuzzy set loses some information. However, clipping is still often preferred because it involves less complex and faster mathematics, and generates an aggregated output surface that is easier to defuzzify. While clipping is a frequently used method, scaling offers a better approach for preserving the original shape of the fuzzy set. The original membership function of the rule consequent is adjusted by multiplying all its membership degrees by the truth value of the rule antecedent. This method, which generally loses less information, can be very useful in fuzzy expert systems. clipping Degree of Membership 1.0 0.0 0.2 Z C 2 scaling Degree of Membership Z 1.0 0.0 0.2 C 2

Step 3: Aggregation of the Rule Outputs Aggregation is the process of unification of the outputs of all rules. We take the membership functions of all rule consequents previously clipped or scaled and combine them into a single fuzzy set. The input of the aggregation process is the list of clipped or scaled consequent membership functions, and the output is one fuzzy set for each output variable.

Step 4: Defuzzification The last step in the fuzzy inference process is defuzzification. Fuzziness helps us to evaluate the rules, but the final output of a fuzzy system has to be a crisp number. The input for the defuzzification process is the aggregate output fuzzy set and the output is a single number. There are several defuzzification methods, but probably the most popular one is the centroid technique. It finds the point where a vertical line would slice the aggregate set into two equal masses. Mathematically this centre of gravity (COG) can be expressed as:

Step 4: Defuzzification Centroid defuzzification method finds a point representing the centre of gravity of the aggregated fuzzy set A, on the interval [a, b ]. A reasonable estimate can be obtained by calculating it over a sample of points.

Sugeno Fuzzy Inference Mamdani-style inference, as we have just seen, requires us to find the centroid of a two-dimensional shape by integrating across a continuously varying function. In general, this process is not computationally efficient. Michio Sugeno suggested to use a single spike, a singleton, as the membership function of the rule consequent. A singleton, or more precisely a fuzzy singleton, is a fuzzy set with a membership function that is unity at a single particular point on the universe of discourse and zero everywhere else.

Sugeno Fuzzy Inference Sugeno-style fuzzy inference is very similar to the Mamdani method. Sugeno changed only a rule consequent: instead of a fuzzy set, he used a mathematical function of the input variable. The format of the Sugeno-style fuzzy rule is IF x is A AND y is B THEN z is f(x, y) where: x, y and z are linguistic variables; A and B are fuzzy sets on universe of discourses X and Y, respectively; f (x, y) is a mathematical function. The most commonly used zero-order Sugeno fuzzy model applies fuzzy rules in the following form: IF x is A AND y is B THEN z is k where k is a constant. In this case, the output of each fuzzy rule is constant and all consequent membership functions are represented by singleton spikes.

Sugeno Rule Evaluation 3 1 X y Y 0.0 x 0.1 Z 0.2 2 IF is 1 (0.5) z k 3 (0.5) Rule 3: THEN B 0.7 0.5 OR ( max ) AND min 1 (0.1) 1: 2 (0.2) 2 (0.7) 2: 3 (0.0) A3 y1 x1 A2 A1 B2 B1 (max) (min) THEN z is k1 (0.1) Rule 1: IF x is A3 (0.0) OR y is B1 (0.1) k1 k2 k3 Rule 2: IF x is A2 (0.2) AND y is B2 (0.7) THEN z is k2 (0.2) Rule 3: IF x is A1 (0.5) THEN z is k3 (0.5)

Sugeno Aggregation and Defuzzification COG becomes Weighted Average (WA)

Mamdani or Sugeno? Mamdani method is widely accepted for capturing expert knowledge. It allows us to describe the expertise in more intuitive, more human-like manner. However, Mamdani-type fuzzy inference entails a substantial computational burden. On the other hand, Sugeno method is computationally effective and works well with optimization and adaptive techniques, which makes it very attractive in control problems, particularly for dynamic nonlinear systems.