Keith M. Groves2 Christopher T. Bridgwood1

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SVN-49 Signal Anomaly Presented by Tom Stansell GPSW POC: Lt. Col. James Lake, Ph.D.
Advertisements

For HF Beginners Gary Wescom – N0GW
URSIGA, New Delhi, Oct 2005 Coordinated Observations of Ionospheric Scintillations, Density Profiles and Total Electron Content on a Common Magnetic.
The Implementation of the Cornell Ionospheric Scintillation Model into the Spirent GNSS Simulator Marcio Aquino, Zeynep Elmas,
Impacts of the December 2006 Solar Radio Bursts on the Performance of GPS NOAA/SWPC Space Weather Workshop Boulder, CO April 27-30, 2010 Charles S. Carrano.
29 April 2011Viereck: Space Weather Workshop 2011 The Recent Solar Minimum: How Low Was It? What Were The Consequences? Rodney Viereck NOAA Space Weather.
Space Weather Workshop, Boulder, CO, April 2013 No. 1 Ionospheric plasma irregularities at high latitudes as observed by CHAMP Hermann Lühr and.
E3 Engineering Division Brown Bag Series Lunch with Academia February 15 th, 2008 Coordinated by 4.1.M.1, the Electromagnetic Environmental Effects Engineering.
Abstract Since the ionosphere is the interface between the Earth and space environments and impacts radio, television and satellite communication, it is.
Space Weather influence on satellite based navigation and precise positioning R. Warnant, S. Lejeune, M. Bavier Royal Observatory of Belgium Avenue Circulaire,
TEC and its Uncertainty Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University GEM Mini-Workshop San Francisco December 2014.
Electromagnetic Wave Theory
Technician License Course Chapter 2 Radio and Electronics Fundamentals
How Global Positioning Devices (GPS) work
1 UNCLASSIFIED – FOUO – Not for Public Release Operational Space Environment Network Display (OpSEND) & the Scintillation Network Decision Aid Dr. Keith.
Effects of ionospheric small- scale structures on GNSS G. WAUTELET Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium Ionospheric Radio Systems & Techniques (IRST)
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room A
GPS: Global Positioning System  The Geographer’s best friend!  You can say with confidence… “I’m not lost!, I’m never lost!”* *Of course, where everybody.
Lecturer: Jinglin Wang Student name: Hao Li Student ID:
Doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission April 2008 Joel Johnson, IEEE GRSSSlide 1 Coexistence Issues for Passive Earth Sensing from GHz Notice: This.
Girish Kumar Beeharry Mauritius Radio Telescope An African Low Frequency E-vlbi.
Scott M. Bailey, LWS Workshop March 24, 2004 The Observed Response of the Lower Thermosphere to Solar Energetic Inputs Scott M. Bailey, Erica M. Rodgers,
GPS: Everything you wanted to know, but were afraid to ask Andria Bilich National Geodetic Survey.
Global Positioning System Overview
West Hills College Farm of the Future. West Hills College Farm of the Future Precision Agriculture – Lesson 2 What is GPS? Global Positioning System Operated.
Chapter 2 GPS Crop Science 6 Fall 2004 October 22, 2004.
Deep Occultations With GRAS C. Marquardt, A.von Engeln and Y. Andres.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
Improved Radio Occultation Observations for a COSMIC Follow-on Mission C. Rocken, S. Sokolovskiy, B. Schreiner UCAR / COSMIC D. Ector NOAA.
Assimilating Data Into Ionospheric Models: The Real-Time Revolution Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing.
Chelmsford Amateur Radio Society Advanced Licence Course Christopher Chapman G0IPU Slide Set 15: v1.2, 22-Dec-2012 (6) Propagation – Part-1 1 Chelmsford.
Transient response of the ionosphere to X-ray solar flares Jaroslav Chum (1), Jaroslav Urbář (1), Jann-Yenq Liu (2) (1) Institute of Atmospheric Physics,
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 09 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 08 Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
Simulations of the effects of extreme solar flares on technological systems at Mars Paul Withers, Boston University Monday
1 AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY Dr. Keith Groves Space Weather Center of Excellence AFRL/VSBXI 29 Randolph Rd Hanscom AFB, MA voice
Practice Questions 2015 General License Course. How is a directional antenna pointed when making a “long-path” contact with another station? A. Toward.
IMPACTS OF THE DECEMBER 2006 SOLAR RADIO BURSTS ON GPS OPERATIONS AMS Fifth Symposium on Space Weather New Orleans, LA January 20-21, 2008 Dr. Charles.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SPACE RESEARCH – INPE/MCT SOUTHERN REGIONAL SPACE RESEARCH CENTER – CRS/CCR/INPE – MCT FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA MARIA - UFSM.
Solar Radio Bursts and Effects on GPS*
AXK/JPL SBAS Training at Stanford University, October 27-30, 2003 Satellite Based Augmentation Systems Brazilian Ionosphere Group Training at Stanford.
By Saneeju m salu. Radio waves are one form of electromagnetic radiation RADIO WAVES.
ESSEM Earth System Science and Environmental Management 17/11/ ESWW6-2 M. Messerotti, A. Marassi M. MESSEROTTI 1,2,3, A. MARASSI 1 1 INAF-Astronomical.
Fundamentals of Communications. Communication System Transmitter: originates the signal Receiver: receives transmitted signal after it travels over the.
Satellite Systems Presented By Sorath Asnani Mehran University of Engineering & Technology, Jamshoro.
Global and Regional Total Electron Content Anthony Mannucci, Xing Meng, Panagiotis Vergados, Attila Komjathy JPL/Caltech Collaborators: Sarah E. McDonald,
pre-reversal enhancement of the evening vertical plasma drifts
Space weather phenomena in the ionosphere and their effect on GNSS
Global Positioning System
GPS: Global Positioning System
Satellite Communications
Space Science Data: Acquisition, Sharing and Retrieval Systems
M.J. Rivas [1,2], C. Cid [1] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE INTENSITY OF X-RAY FLARES AND THEIR EFFECTS IN THE HORIZONTAL COMPONENT OF THE.
Status of GNSS ionospheric Study in Korea
Ionospheric Complexity
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Department of communication systems engineering Effects of build-up terrain on radio signal fading in land-satellite.
Ionospheric Science and Space Weather
DIRECT EFFECTS OF SOLAR RADIO WEATHER
The HF Bands For HF Beginners Gary Wescom – N0GW.
Global Positioning System Supplemental from JD Text
How Things Work: Global Positioning System
Paul Withers, Boston University
Surveying Instruments
Series of high-frequency slowly drifting structure mapping the magnetic field reconnection M. Karlicky, A&A, 2004, 417,325.
SA13A-1873 Numerical Simulations of the Ionosphere of Mars During a Solar Flare Lollo2, P. Withers1, 2 M. Mendillo1, 2, K. Fallows1,
Challenges of Radio Occultation Data Processing
Altai State University, RUSSIA
The Vertical Structure of the Martian Ionosphere
Technician License Course.
General Licensing Class
Presentation transcript:

Keith M. Groves2 Christopher T. Bridgwood1 Impacts of the December 2006 Solar Radio Bursts on the Performance of GPS Charles S. Carrano1 Keith M. Groves2 Christopher T. Bridgwood1 Boston College, Institute for Scientific Research Air Force Research Laboratory NOAA/SWPC Space Weather Workshop Boulder, CO • April 27-30, 2010

Extreme Solar Activity from Active Region 10930 X9.0 Dec 5 10:18 10:35 10:45 Strength Date Start Peak Stop X6.5 Dec 6 18:29 18:47 19:00 X3.4 Dec 13 02:14 02:40 02:52 X1.5 Dec 14 21:07 22:15 22:26 The solar flare on Dec 5 was the most intense in terms of X-ray flux, but produced the least power at L band where GPS operates. The solar radio burst on Dec 6 generated unprecedented levels of wideband noise at L band which substantially degraded GPS tracking and positioning accuracy for entire sunlit hemisphere. Reference: Gary (2008) Solar Flare L-band Peak Flux (sfu) Dec 5 3,900 Dec 6 ~1,000,000 Dec 13 440,000 (1 GHz) Dec 14 120,000 Slide 2

Global Extent of the Impact from the Dec 6 SRB Wide Area Augmentation System x Figures from Cerruti et al. (2008) Most of the IGS/CORS/WAAS receivers record data at ~30 second cadence. In this talk we examine the impacts on high-rate GPS measurements provided by the AFRL-SCINDA network. Slide 3

AFRL-SCINDA Ground Stations (as of Dec 2006) Specialized GPS receivers of the SCINDA network record C/No, pseudorange, and phase on L1 and L2 between 10-50 Hz (dual frequency systems shown in yellow) Region where the December 6 SRB degraded GPS performance is outlined in purple

X6.5 Flare and Solar Radio Burst December 6, 2006 X6.5 Flare and Solar Radio Burst Slide 5

OVSA Solar Radio Burst RHCP Power SRB RHCP Power exceeded 106 SFU at L band Sub-solar point at 19:34 UT was (22.5S, 115.7W) Figures from Cerruti et al. (2008) Slide 6

GPS Carrier-to-Noise at Ancon on Dec 6 GPS receiver model: Ashtech Z-12 34° solar incidence angle at 19:15 UT L1 C/No dB-Hz 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 20:00 UT PRN 02 PRN 04 PRN 08 PRN 27 PRN 28 L2 C/No dB-Hz 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 20:00 UT PRN 02 PRN 04 PRN 08 PRN 27 PRN 28 L1 L2 L1 tracking loss L2 tracking loss Deepest L1 fade: 25 dB Longest L1 fade: 4 min Identical fades on all links (weak dependence on satellite elevation because SIA is the same) Deepest L2 fade: 30 dB Longest L2 fade: 9 min

GPS Pseudorange and Phase at Ancon on Dec 6 GPS receiver model: Ashtech Z-12 34° solar incidence angle at 19:15 UT 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 20:00 UT Meters PRN 02 PRN 04 PRN 08 PRN 27 PRN 28 Differential Pseudorange Differential Carrier Phase 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 20:00 UT TECU PRN 02 PRN 04 PRN 08 PRN 27 PRN 28 SITEC (enhanced ionization from flare) of 5 TECU in 3 min, starting just before peak of flare (18:47) Ranging errors (not ionospheric delay) Cycle slip (TEC becomes difficult to measure) Ranging errors (on L1, L2 or both) exceed 100 m. These will contribute to net GPS positioning error

GPS Position Solution at Ancon on Dec 6 GPS receiver model: Ashtech Z-12 34° solar incidence angle at 19:15 UT Satellites Tracked / GDOP No. Satellites Degraded tracking Max 43.4 Position Outages (5 min total) GDOP 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 20:00 Position Error Horizontal (m) Position Errors: 20 m horizontal 60 m vertical Vertical (m) 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 20:00 UT

Comparing Observations from Different Locations: Accounting for the Local Solar Incidence Angle and GPS Antenna Gain Slide 10

SRB Power and the Solar Incidence Angle C/No without SRB: Ashtech Choke Ring Antenna Gain, g() broadcast power system noise C/No with SRB: SRB power (satellite elevation cancels): Vertical equivalent (zenith) C/No with SRB (system noise cancels): Atmospheric attenuation neglected (<1 dB at L band)

C/No Reductions at L1 from Different Stations C/No reductions are very similar for any sunlit location once solar incidence angle correction applied 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 20:00 UT dB-Hz L1 C/No PRN 08 PRN 29 Ancon Antofagasta Sao Luis Kwajalein 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 20:00 UT dB-Hz Vertical Equivalent L1 C/No PRN 08 PRN 29 Ancon Antofagasta Sao Luis Kwajalein Solar incidence angles at 19:15 UT Ancon: 34° Antofagasta: 37° Sao Luis: 68° Kwajalein: 86° Signal blocked by ground obstruction Maximum vertical equivalent L1 fade: 27 dB

C/No Reductions at L2 from Different Stations C/No reductions are very similar for any sunlit location once solar incidence angle correction applied 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 20:00 UT L2 C/No PRN 08 PRN 29 dB-Hz Ancon Antofagasta Sao Luis Kwajalein 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 20:00 UT Vertical Equivalent L2 C/No PRN 08 PRN 29 dB-Hz Ancon Antofagasta Sao Luis Kwajalein Solar incidence angles at 19:15 UT Ancon: 34° Antofagasta: 37° Sao Luis: 68° Kwajalein: 86° Maximum vertical equivalent L2 fade: 30 dB

Why Were these Events Different and will they Recur? These extreme solar radio flux densities were caused by an unusually high density of spike bursts due to the Electron-Cyclotron Maser (ECM) mechanism. The December 6 solar radio burst reached a flux density of at least 106 sfu at 1.4 GHz, momentarily reaching flux densities as high as 2.5x106 sfu during individual spikes. Bursts of 106 sfu, if they follow the general size distribution of solar bursts, should occur every 15 years at solar maximum rates, or every 100 years at solar minimum rates. The events of 2006 December 6 are therefore extremely rare occurrences. In the historical record the largest bursts are missing, however, probably due to instrument saturation effects. This leaves open the question of how often such large events will occur. Sources: Gary, D. E. (2008), Cause and Extent of the Extreme Radio Flux Density Reached by the Solar Flare of 2006 December 06, Proceedings of the 2008 Ionospheric Effects Symposium. Kintner, P. M. Jr., O'Hanlon, B., Gary , D. E., & Kintner, P. M. S. (2009), Global Positioning System and Solar Radio Burst Forensics, Radio Science, 44, RS0A08. Slide 14

Conclusions The solar radio bursts in December 2006 resulted in unprecedented levels of wideband RHCP power at the GPS L1 and L2 frequencies. The solar radio burst on December 6 significantly degraded overall GPS performance on a global basis. All the AFRL-SCINDA GPS receivers on the sunlit hemisphere observed nearly identical patterns of intermittent C/No fading during each burst, lasting up to an hour. The GPS C/No reductions, some as deep as 25 dB, were modulated by the local solar incidence angle and antenna gain. The maximum vertical equivalent reduction at L1 was ~27 dB. SITEC events were observed in conjunction with all four associated solar flares, at rates between 0.4-1.2 TECU/min. These rates appeared to vary according to the solar incidence angle. Under these conditions, the SCINDA GPS receivers experienced difficulty tracking and also incurred ranging errors associated with loss of code lock. These factors led to elevated GPS positioning errors of up to 20/60 meters in the horizontal/vertical directions. These solar radio bursts came as a surprise during solar minimum, and suggest that loss of GPS operations during solar maximum could be more common than previously anticipated.

References Carrano, C. S., C. T. Bridgwood, and K. M. Groves (2009), Impacts of the December 2006 solar radio bursts on the performance of GPS, Radio Sci., 44, RS0A25, doi:10.1029/2008RS004071. Cerruti, A. P., P. M. Kintner, D. E. Gary, L. J. Lanzerotti, E. R. de Paula, and H. B. Vo (2006), Observed solar radio burst effects on GPS/Wide Area Augmentation System carrier-to-noise ratio, Space Weather, 4, S10006, doi:10.1029/2006SW000254. Cerruti, A. P., P. M. Kintner, D. E. Gary, A. J. Mannucci, R. F. Meyer, P. Doherty, and A. J. Coster (2008), Space Weather, 6, 10, doi:10.1029/2007SW000375. Gary, D. E. (2008), Cause and Extent of the Extreme Radio Flux Density Reached by the Solar Flare of 2006 December 06, Proceedings of the 2008 Ionospheric Effects Symposium. Kintner, P. M. Jr., O'Hanlon, B., Gary , D. E., & Kintner, P. M. S. (2009), Global Positioning System and Solar Radio Burst Forensics, Radio Science, 44, RS0A08. Slide 16

Thank You for Listening Chloë Trester Carrano was born on April 11, 2010 in Cambridge, MA. She weighed 7 pounds 9.5 ounces and was 21 inches tall. Slide 17